Fluorescent energy transfer causing misleading signal in multicolor flow cytometry

FRET causing misleading signal from fluorescein excited by the violet laser in flow cytometry

Multiple immunolabeling introduces high risks of interferences between fluorescences. As an example, in analyzing T cell clonality, we recently reported a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) effect providing an unexpected signal on B770 (PE-Cy7) detector, on the Vβ-PE positive CD3 APC-Alexa750+ T cell subsets. Here, we report another FRET effect produced by the violet laser in Vβ-FITC positive CD3-Pacific Blue (PB) T cells providing signal on V550 (Krome Orange; KrO) detector. The study was performed on fresh whole blood, labeled with anti-CD3-PB, CD8-KrO, Vbeta FITC, Vbeta PE, CD4 AA750 then fixed, treated for erythrolysis, and washed before analysis on DxFlex cytometer from Beckman Coulter. Data were analyzed using Kaluza software. Using this panel, we repeatedly observed an added CD8dim-KrO (V550) cell population on all Vβ FITC positive T cells. The unexpected green signal excited by the violet laser was still observed after removing anti-CD8-KrO (FMO) but disappeared where either anti-CD3-PB or anti-Vβ-FITC was removed. The effect was also observed with an anti-TCR gamma delta-FITC labeling, but not with another FITC labeled antibody targeting a protein out of the CD3-TCR complex. The analysis of fluorochrome spectra confirms that PB emission and FITC excitation spectra partly overlap. This observation clearly reminds users that FRET can give misleading results in case of labeling of very close markers with complementary fluorochromes. This risk has to be considered in panel design. These observations clearly highlight the potential for FRET to give misleading results in cases where very close markers are labeled with complementary fluorochromes. This risk must be considered when designing panels. To our knowledge, this is the first description of a FRET between PB and FITC as acceptor thus excited by the violet laser.

Hematological characteristics, cytogenetic features, and post-induction measurable residual disease in thymic stromal lymphopoietin receptor (TSLPR) overexpressed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in an Indian cohort

The overexpression of cytokine receptor-like factor-2 (CRLF2) identified by anti-thymic stromal lymphopoietin receptor/TSLPR flow cytometry (FCM) has been reported as a screening tool for the identification of BCR-ABL1-like B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/B-ALL with CRLF2 re-arrangement. TSLPR expression was studied prospectively in consecutive 478 B-ALLs (≤ 12 years (n = 244); 13-25 years (n = 129); > 25 years (n = 105)) and correlated with various hematological parameters and end-of-induction measurable residual disease (day 29; MRD ≥ 0.01% by 10-color FCM). TSLPR positivity in ≥ 10% leukemic cells was detected in 14.6% (n = 70) of B-ALLs. CRLF2 re-arrangement was detected in eight cases (11.4%) including P2RY8-CRLF2 (n = 6), and IgH-CRLF2 (n = 2) with a median TSLPR positivity of 48.8% and 99% leukemic cells, respectively. Recurrent gene fusions/RGF (BCR-ABL1 (17.1%); ETV6-RUNX1 (4.2%), TCF3-PBX1 (1.4%)), other BCR-ABL1-like chimeric gene fusions/CGFs (PDGFRB-rearrangement (2.9%), IgH-EPOR (1.4%)), CRLF2 extra-copies/hyperdiploidy (17.1%), and IgH translocation without a known partner (10%) were also detected in TSLPR-positive patients. CD20 positivity (52.9% vs 38.5%; p = 0.02) as well as iAMP21 (4.3% vs 0.5%; p = 0.004) was significantly more frequent in TSLPR-positive cases. TSLPR-positive patients did not show a significantly higher MRD, compared to TSLPR-negative cases (37% vs 33%). Increasing the threshold cut-off (from ≥ 10 to > 50% or > 74%) increased the specificity to 88% and 100% respectively in identifying CRLF2 translocation. TSLPR expression is not exclusive for CRLF2 translocations and can be seen with various other RGFs, necessitating their testing before its application in diagnostic algorithms. In patients with high TSLPR positivity (> 50%), the testing may be restricted to CRLF2 aberrancies, while patients with 10-50% TSLPR positivity need to be tested for both CRLF2- and non-CRLF2 BCR-ABL1-like CGFs.