Dual DNA staining enables isolation of multiple sub‐types of post‐replicative mouse male germ cells

Isolation of stage-specific spermatogenic cells by dynamic histone incorporation and removal in spermatogenesis

Due to the lack of an efficient in vitro spermatogenesis system, studies on mammalian spermatogenesis require the isolation of specific germ cell populations for further analyses. BSA gradient and elutriation have been used for several decades to purify testicular germ cells; more recently, flow cytometric cell sorting has become popular. Although each method has its advantages and disadvantages and is used depending on the purpose of the experiment, reliance on flow cytometric cell sorting is expected to be more prevalent because fewer cells can be managed. However, the currently used flow cytometric cell sorting method for testicular germ cells relies on karyotypic differences via DNA staining. Thus, it remains challenging to separate post-meiotic haploid cells (spermatids) according to their differentiation stage despite significant variations in morphology and chromatin state. In this study, we developed a method for finely separating testicular germ cells using VC mice carrying fluorescently tagged histones. This method enables the separation of spermatogonia, spermatocytes, and spermatids based on the intensity of histone fluorescence and cell size. Combined with a DNA staining dye, this method separates spermatids after elongation according to each spermiogenic stage. Although the necessity for a specific transgenic mouse line is less versatile, this method is expected to be helpful for the isolation of testicular germ cell populations because it is highly reproducible and independent of complex cell sorter settings and staining conditions.

Isolation of Mouse Germ Cells by FACS Using Hoechst 33342 and SYTO16 Double Staining

In the adult mouse testis, germ cells of various developmental cell states co-exist. FACS isolation of cells stained with the DNA dye Hoechst 33342 has been used for many years to sub-divide these cells based on their DNA content. This approach provides an efficient way to obtain broad categories of male germ cells: pre-meiotic spermatogonia, meiotic spermatocytes and post-meiotic spermatids. The addition of a red filter for Hoechst staining enables further sub-division of spermatocytes depending on sub-stages of meiotic prophase. However, separation of different stage spermatids using Hoechst staining alone is not possible. We recently reported a methodology, combining Hoechst staining with a second DNA dye (SYTO16) that enables the further separation of these cells into three sub-populations: round, early elongating, and late elongating spermatids (Gill et al., Cytometry A 101:529-536, 2022). This method makes it possible to obtain rapidly and simply pure fractions of male germ cells from multiple developental stages from the same animal.

De novo transcriptome assembly of mouse male germ cells reveals novel genes, stage-specific bidirectional promoter activity, and noncoding RNA expression

In mammals, the adult testis is the tissue with the highest diversity in gene expression. Much of that diversity is attributed to germ cells, primarily meiotic spermatocytes and postmeiotic haploid spermatids. Exploiting a newly developed cell purification method, we profiled the transcriptomes of such postmitotic germ cells of mice. We used a de novo transcriptome assembly approach and identified thousands of novel expressed transcripts characterized by features distinct from those of known genes. Novel loci tend to be short in length, monoexonic, and lowly expressed. Most novel genes have arisen recently in evolutionary time and possess low coding potential. Nonetheless, we identify several novel protein-coding genes harboring open reading frames that encode proteins containing matches to conserved protein domains. Analysis of mass-spectrometry data from adult mouse testes confirms protein production from several of these novel genes. We also examine overlap between transcripts and repetitive elements. We find that although distinct families of repeats are expressed with differing temporal dynamics during spermatogenesis, we do not observe a general mode of regulation wherein repeats drive expression of nonrepetitive sequences in a cell type-specific manner. Finally, we observe many fairly long antisense transcripts originating from canonical gene promoters, pointing to pervasive bidirectional promoter activity during spermatogenesis that is distinct and more frequent compared with somatic cells.