• Reference Citation Analysis
  • v
  • v
  • Find an Article
Find an Article PDF (4619888)   Today's Articles (1580)   Subscriber (49404)
For: Kute TE, Russell GB, Zbieranski N, Long R, Johnston S, Williams H, Stackhouse C, Wilkins L, Evans I, Berry P, Rimmer K, Tucker E. Prognostic markers in node-negative breast cancer: A prospective study. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2004;59:24-31. [PMID: 15108167 DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.20003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Number Cited by Other Article(s)
1
Identification of Immune-Related Risk Signatures for the Prognostic Prediction in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J Immunol Res 2021;2021:6203759. [PMID: 34497859 PMCID: PMC8420972 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6203759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]  Open
2
Kang J, Yu Y, Jeong S, Lee H, Heo HJ, Park JJ, Na HS, Ko DS, Kim YH. Prognostic role of high cathepsin D expression in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2020;12:1758835920927838. [PMID: 32550865 PMCID: PMC7281710 DOI: 10.1177/1758835920927838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2019] [Accepted: 04/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]  Open
3
Kim YS, Ryu DW, Lee CH. Analysis of factors related systemic recurrence after breast conserving surgery in stage I breast cancer. KOSIN MEDICAL JOURNAL 2018. [DOI: 10.7180/kmj.2018.33.3.289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]  Open
4
Pinto AE, Pereira T, Silva GL, André S. Prognostic relevance of DNA flow cytometry in breast cancer revisited: The 25-year experience of the Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Lisbon. Oncol Lett 2017;13:2027-2033. [PMID: 28454358 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.5718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2016] [Accepted: 12/16/2016] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]  Open
5
Xu J, Huang L, Li J. DNA aneuploidy and breast cancer: a meta-analysis of 141,163 cases. Oncotarget 2016;7:60218-60229. [PMID: 27528028 PMCID: PMC5312380 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.11130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2016] [Accepted: 07/19/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]  Open
6
Arodola OA, Soliman MES. Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Ligand-Induced Flap Conformational Changes in Cathepsin-D-A Comparative Study. J Cell Biochem 2016;117:2643-57. [PMID: 27038253 DOI: 10.1002/jcb.25564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2016] [Accepted: 03/31/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
7
Pinto AE, Pereira T, Silva GL, André S. Aneuploidy identifies subsets of patients with poor clinical outcome in grade 1 and grade 2 breast cancer. Breast 2015;24:449-55. [PMID: 25920680 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2014] [Accepted: 04/08/2015] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]  Open
8
Ma M, Guo X, Chang Y, Li C, Meng X, Li S, Du ZX, Wang HQ, Sun Y. Advanced glycation end products promote proliferation and suppress autophagy via reduction of Cathepsin D in rat vascular smooth muscle cells. Mol Cell Biochem 2015;403:73-83. [PMID: 25673507 DOI: 10.1007/s11010-015-2338-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2014] [Accepted: 01/30/2015] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
9
Song WJ, Kim KI, Park SH, Kwon MS, Lee TH, Park HK, An JS. The Risk Factors Influencing between the Early and Late Recurrence in Systemic Recurrent Breast Cancer. J Breast Cancer 2012;15:218-23. [PMID: 22807940 PMCID: PMC3395746 DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.2.218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2011] [Accepted: 05/14/2012] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]  Open
10
Masson O, Bach AS, Derocq D, Prébois C, Laurent-Matha V, Pattingre S, Liaudet-Coopman E. Pathophysiological functions of cathepsin D: Targeting its catalytic activity versus its protein binding activity? Biochimie 2010;92:1635-43. [DOI: 10.1016/j.biochi.2010.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2010] [Accepted: 05/14/2010] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
11
Goswami T, Shah M, Isaacs C. Novel molecular prognostic markers in breast cancer. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2009;3:523-32. [PMID: 23495982 DOI: 10.1517/17530050903032653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
12
Lee HS, Kwak BS, Son BH, Ahn SH. Prognostic Factors Influence on the Systemic Recurrence in Axillary Lymph Node Negative Breast Cancer. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SURGICAL SOCIETY 2009. [DOI: 10.4174/jkss.2009.77.4.238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
13
Gazic B, Pizem J, Bracko M, Cufer T, Borstnar S, Pohar-Marinsek Z, Us-Krasovec M. S-phase fraction determined on fine needle aspirates is an independent prognostic factor in breast cancer - a multivariate study of 770 patients. Cytopathology 2007;19:294-302. [PMID: 18070112 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2007.00528.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
14
Colozza M, Azambuja E, Cardoso F, Sotiriou C, Larsimont D, Piccart MJ. Proliferative markers as prognostic and predictive tools in early breast cancer: where are we now? Ann Oncol 2005;16:1723-39. [PMID: 15980158 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdi352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 203] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]  Open
15
Decock J, Paridaens R, Cufer T. Proteases and metastasis: clinical relevance nowadays? Curr Opin Oncol 2005;17:545-50. [PMID: 16224231 DOI: 10.1097/01.cco.0000180435.39614.63] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
PrevPage 1 of 1 1Next
© 2004-2024 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA