Combined normal donor and CLL: Single tube ZAP-70 analysis

Current Landscape of Ancillary Diagnostic Testing in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common adult leukemia and is a heterogeneous disease with variable patient outcomes. A multidisciplinary technical evaluation, including flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, molecular and cytogenetic analyses, can comprehensively characterize a patient's leukemia at diagnosis, identify important prognostic biomarkers, and track measurable residual disease; all of which can impact patient management. This review highlights the key concepts, clinical significance, and main biomarkers detectable with each of these technical approaches; the contents are a helpful resource for medical practitioners involved in the workup and management of patients with CLL.

CD49d shows superior performance characteristics for flow cytometric prognostic testing in chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma

BACKGROUND

CD49d is emerging as a powerful adverse prognostic marker in chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL). However, flow cytometric testing for CD49d has not yet been widely adopted in the United States, in part due to the lack of establishment of its performance characteristics in the clinical setting, especially in comparison with the more common CLL/SLL prognostic markers CD38 and ZAP-70.

METHODS

CD49d expression levels in 124 CLL/SLL cases were assessed among peripheral blood (PB), bone marrow (BM), and lymph node (LN) specimens and correlated with available CD38 and ZAP-70 expression and cytogenetic findings. For 10 PB/BM specimens, the stability of CD49d, CD38, and ZAP-70 expression was assessed at <24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, and 96 hours.

RESULTS

39% (28 of 71) PB, 56% (18 of 32) BM, and 71% (15 of 21) LN involved by CLL/SLL were CD49d+, using a ≥30% threshold. The mean for the CD49d+ cases was 2.8 standard deviations (SD) above the cutoff for positivity, compared with 1.7 SD for CD38 and 1.1 SD for ZAP-70. CD49d demonstrated the lowest mean SD (0.91) and coefficient of variation (CV) (8.0%) compared with CD38 (SD = 2.1, CV = 10.4%) and ZAP-70 (SD = 9.8, CV = 40.5%) in stability studies over a 96-hours time period. CD49d+ CLL/SLL correlated with trisomy 12 (P = 0.025) and lack of isolated deletion (13q) (P = 0.005). CD38+ CLL/SLL correlated with deletion (11q) (P = 0.025). ZAP-70 did not correlate with any underlying cytogenetic abnormality.

CONCLUSIONS

CD49d is a robust adverse prognostic marker in CLL/SLL with superior performance characteristics. © 2016 International Clinical Cytometry Society.

T/B ratio does not reflect levels of ZAP70 expression in clonal CLL B-cells due to ZAP70 overexpression in patient T-cells

Flow cytometry is the reference technique for assessing ZAP70 expression, a marker of poor prognosis in CLL. One of the most common methods is to assess ZAP70 levels in CLL cells by calculating the ratio between ZAP70 mean fluorescence intensities (MFIs) in residual T-cells and CLL B-cells (ZAP70 T/B ratio). In this study, we developed a new method for ZAP70 labeling. Cells were labeled with a combination of anti ZAP70 phycoerythrin-conjugated SBZAP monoclonal antibody (mAb) and mAbs against CD45, CD19, and CD5. The latter three were used to specifically gate on different lymphocyte subsets. Staining was performed in absence (test) or in presence of excess unconjugated SBZAP mAb (isoclonic control). A so-called ZAP70 isoclonic ratio between SBZAP MFIs in the test and isoclonic control was calculated. A series of 32 patients with CLL and 10 normal controls were studied. Prediction of IGHV mutation status by ZAP70 isoclonic and T/B ratios was similar. By using the ZAP70 isoclonic ratio, we showed that ZAP70 expression was increased in T-cells from CLL patients. Nearly all cases with increased ZAP70 expression in CLL cells were associated with high ZAP70 expression in cognate T-cells. Therefore, the ZAP70 isoclonic ratio was more likely to closely reflect the biology of ZAP70 dysregulation rather than the T/B ratio. These results also explained why ZAP70 T/B ratios were artefactually close to normal in cells from CLL patients with high levels of ZAP70.