Usefulness of IGH/TCR PCR studies in lymphoproliferative disorders with inconclusive clonality by flow cytometry

Lymphoproliferation in Inborn Errors of Immunity: The Eye Does Not See What the Mind Does Not Know

Inborn errors of immunity (IEIs) are a group of heterogeneous disorders characterized by a broad clinical spectrum of recurrent infections and immune dysregulation including autoimmunity and lymphoproliferation (LP). LP in the context of IEI may be the presenting feature of underlying immune disorder or may develop during the disease course. However, the correct diagnosis of LP in IEI as benign or malignant often poses a diagnostic dilemma due to the non-specific clinical features and overlapping morphological and immunophenotypic features which make it difficult to treat. There are morphological clues to LP associated with certain IEIs. A combination of ancillary techniques including EBV-associated markers, flow cytometry, and molecular assays may prove useful in establishing a correct diagnosis in an appropriate clinical setting. The present review attempts to provide comprehensive insight into benign and malignant LP, especially the pathogenesis, histological clues, diagnostic strategies, and treatment options in patients with IEIs.

The role and contribution of clonality studies in the diagnosis of lymphoproliferative disorders

OBJECTIVES

To explore the frequency, context and diagnostic impact of B- and T-lymphocyte clonality assay use in the assessment of possible lymphoproliferative disorders at a central haematopathology diagnostics hub.

METHODS

All cases reported by haematopathologists over a sixteen-month period were identified, n = 4462, and those which had clonality studies undertaken analysed further.

RESULTS

Clonality studies were requested in 9% of cases, directly contributing to a diagnosis being made in 79%. They were most frequently used to help distinguish reactive lymphoid infiltrates from low-grade B-cell lymphomas and in cases of possible T-cell lymphoma, facilitating a diagnosis being made in over 90% of these. In contrast when clonality assays were requested as a diagnostic adjunct in cases with an atypical cutaneous lymphoid infiltrate, and in occasional cases of lymphoid proliferations with Hodgkin-like cells or EBV-driven proliferations, a definitive final diagnosis was possible in less than 60% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Clonality studies were used in 9% of cases assessed for a possible lymphoproliferative disorder and had a differing impact depending on the differential diagnoses being considered. These findings can be used to guide access to clonality assays by highlighting the likelihood of an informative result in different diagnostic settings.

Contribution of immunoglobulin lambda light chain gene rearrangement analysis in the diagnosis of B-cell neoplasms

Identification of clonal IGH, IGK and IGL gene rearrangements offers diagnostic adjunct in suspected B-cell neoplasms. However, many centres omit IGL analysis as its value is uncertain. A review of 567 cases with IGH, IGK and IGL rearrangement assessed using BIOMED-2 assays showed clonal immunoglobulin gene rearrangement in 54% of cases, of which 24% had a clonal IGL rearrangement. In two cases, the clonal rearrangement was detected exclusively by IGL analysis. This finding demonstrates the added value of IGL analysis for clonality assessment, especially in suspected B-cell neoplasms in which a clonal IGH and/or IGK rearrangement is not detected or is equivocal.

Inconclusive flow cytometric surface light chain results; can cytoplasmic light chains, Bcl-2 expression and PCR clonality analysis improve accuracy of cytological diagnoses in B-cell lymphomas?

BACKGROUND

Flow cytometric immunophenotyping (FCI), is widely used in cytology for distinguishing between B-cell lymphoma (BCL) and reactive lymphocytic proliferations (RLP), mainly by identifying monotypic B-cell populations. Since this cannot always be determined by ratios of surface immunoglobulin light chains (sIg LCs) we wanted to assess if cytoplasmic immunoglobulin (cIg) LCs, Bcl-2 and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based clonality analysis can improve accuracy of cytological diagnoses of BCL.

METHODS

Our study included 98 fine needle aspiration biopsies from lymph nodes suspicious for BCL with inconclusive sIg LCs. In all cases PCR clonality analysis was performed in order to determine immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGH) gene and T-cell receptor (TRC) gene rearrangement. In selected cases expression of Bcl-2 and cIg LC were determined by FC.

RESULTS

Thirty patients had lymphoma and 68 had reactive lymphocytic proliferations. Three patterns of sIg LCs staining were found: negative, dual positive and difficult to interpret. Percentage of lymphomas was highest in the dual positive group (75 %). Morphology coupled with cIg LCs determination and/or Bcl-2 expression was able to give a correct diagnosis in 83 % of cases. Molecular tests would have been misleading in 15 % of cases because 7/30 BCL were polyclonal and 8/68 RLP were monoclonal.

CONCLUSIONS

Determination of cIg LCs, Bcl-2 expression and PCR clonality analysis of B cells improved accuracy of cytological diagnoses in BCL with inconclusive sIg LC. However, clonality determined by PCR was misleading in some cases.

Detection of malignant B lymphocytes by PCR clonality assay using direct lysis of cerebrospinal fluid and low volume specimens

INTRODUCTION

The diagnosis of lymphoid malignancies is often challenging in paucicellular specimens. PCR may also be limited by insufficient cells for DNA isolation and incomplete coverage of gene rearrangements. This study aims to evaluate a PCR method for IgH clonality using direct cell lysates.

METHODS

PCR amplification used cell lysate from detergent-based lysis and BIOMED-2 primers. CSF specimens were tested for 20 patients with primary CNS lymphoma or systemic lymphoma suspected for CNS involvement. Cytology and flow cytometry analysis was performed in parallel with PCR.

RESULTS

Direct lysis produced a better yield than the column-based method for DNA isolation. PCR using lysate showed an efficiency of clonality detection from a minimum of 20 tumor cells. PCR clonality was found in nine of the 20 CSFs, and positive PCR was concordant with both cytology and flow cytometry in seven cases. There were two cases positive for PCR, but indeterminate for flow cytometry because of insufficient cell events. Of the eleven PCR-negative cases, two were considered as false negative, as flow cytometry showed positive for malignant cells. The PCR was also performed successfully with a specimen from the anterior chamber of the eye.

CONCLUSION

PCR clonality with direct cell lysis of CSF is feasible, and it may overcome the limitation of DNA isolation. This PCR method may be particularly useful for small volume and low cell CSF when flow cytometry is inconclusive.