Immunophenotypic Heterogeneity of Polytypic Plasma Cells and the Impact on Myeloma Minimal Residual Disease Detection by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry

"Friends and foes" of multiple myeloma measurable/minimal residual disease evaluation by next generation flow

Next Generation Flow (NGF) represents a gold standard for the evaluation of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) in Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients at any stage of treatment. Although the assessment of MRD is still not universally employed in clinical practice, numerous studies have demonstrated the strength of MRD as a reliable predictor of long-term outcome, and its potential to supersede the prognostic value of CR. The possibility to acquire millions of events, in combination with the use of standard reagents and a good expertise in the analysis of rare populations, led to high chance of success and a sensitivity of 10-6 that is superimposable to the one of Next Generation Sequencing molecular techniques. Some minor bias, correlated to the protocols applied, to the quality of samples and to the high heterogeneity of plasma cells phenotype, may be overcome using standard protocols and having at disposition personnel expertise for MRD analysis. With the use of NGF we can today enter a new phase of the quantification of residual disease, switching from the definition of "minimal" residual disease to "measurable" residual disease. This review takes account of the principle "friends and foes" of Myeloma "Measurable" Residual Disease evaluation by NGF, to give insights into the potentiality of this technique. The optimization of the quality of BM samples and the analytic expertise that permits to discriminate properly the rare pathologic clones, are the keys for obtaining results with a high clinical value that could be of great impact and relevance in the future.

Relevance of polyclonal plasma cells and post-therapy immunomodulation in measurable residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND

Immunophenotypic profile and post-therapy alteration in antigenic expression were evaluated in normal, reactive, and aberrant plasma cells (NPC, RPC, and APC) for impact on measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment in multiple myeloma (MM).

METHODS

Samples from non-MM staging marrow (n = 30), Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 30) and MM (n = 724) were prospectively evaluated for expression profiles of NPC, RPC, and APC using antigens recommended in consensus guidelines.

RESULTS

Polyclonal NPC-RPC demonstrated aberrations for all antigens evaluated with a higher frequency of aberrancies in post-therapy samples compared to treatment naïve samples (p < 0.001%). Immunomodulation in APC was observed in 79% of post-therapy samples with a change in expression of 1, 2, and ≥3 antigens in 19.9%, 15.6%, and 43.5% samples, respectively. In 13.4% of samples, APC showed no aberrancy and aberrant status was assigned based on cytoplasmic light chain restriction (cyLCR) alone. 9% samples with an admixture of NPC and APC displayed normal cytoplasmic kappa to lambda ratio (cyKLR) when the percentage of APC of total PC (neoplastic plasma cell index, NPCI), was below 25% and 50% for kappa and lambda restricted cases, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The panorama and high frequency of antigenic aberrations on polyclonal PC signify the importance of MRD assay validation on a large cohort under normal and reactive conditions. Frequent Immunophenotypic shifts in APC re-confirm the redundancy of baseline immunophenotype for MRD evaluation. Small clones of APC may be missed by assessment of cyKLR alone and therefore, surface marker aberrancy supported by cyLCR is required for definitive assignment of residual APC.

Multiple myeloma with CD138 changed from positive to negative: A case report

BACKGROUND

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a common malignant disease of the blood system, caused by the neoplastic proliferation of plasma cells that accumulate in bone marrow (BM). Here, we report a case of MM patient with CD138 marker changed from positive to negative.

METHODS

BM and peripheral blood samples from a 48-year-old patient with MM were examined and analyzed by conventional morphology, flow cytometry, and immunodetection.

RESULTS

Imaging examination and clinical manifestations fulfilled criteria for MM. On the first hospitalization, flow cytometry showed that the cells were CD138⁺ /CD38⁺ /CD19^- /CD56⁺ . However, on the fifth hospitalization, flow cytometry revealed that the cells were CD138^- /CD38⁺ /CD19^- /CD56⁺ .

CONCLUSIONS

MM is diagnosed on imaging and clinical manifestations, immunophenotype of flow cytometry is also an important method of diagnosing MM. However, the discovery of atypical immunophenotypes cannot prevent the diagnosis of MM, even provide a clue of disease progression.