Methodological considerations for the high sensitivity detection of multiple myeloma measurable residual disease

The role of minimal residual disease and serum free light chain ratio in the management of multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) denotes a cancerous growth characterized by abnormal proliferation of plasma cells. Growing evidence suggests that the complexity in addressing MM lies in the presence of minimal residual disease (MRD) within the body. MRD assessment is becoming increasingly important for risk assessment in patients with MM. Similarly, the levels of serum free protein light chain and their ratio play a crucial role in assessing the disease burden and changes in MM. In this paper, we review and explore the utilization of MRD and serum free light chain ratio in the treatment of MM, delving into their respective characteristics, advantages, disadvantages, and their interrelation.

Current Status of Flow Cytometric Immunophenotyping of Hematolymphoid Neoplasms in Korea

Background

Flow cytometric immunophenotyping of hematolymphoid neoplasms (FCI-HLN) is essential for diagnosis, classification, and minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring. FCI-HLN is typically performed using in-house protocols, raising the need for standardization. Therefore, we surveyed the current status of FCI-HLN in Korea to obtain fundamental data for quality improvement and standardization.

Methods

Eight university hospitals actively conducting FCI-HLN participated in our survey. We analyzed responses to a questionnaire that included inquiries regarding test items, reagent antibodies (RAs), fluorophores, sample amounts (SAs), reagent antibody amounts (RAAs), acquisition cell number (ACN), isotype control (IC) usage, positive/negative criteria, and reporting.

Results

Most hospitals used acute HLN, chronic HLN, plasma cell neoplasm (PCN), and MRD panels. The numbers of RAs were heterogeneous, with a maximum of 32, 26, 12, 14, and 10 antibodies used for acute HLN, chronic HLN, PCN, ALL-MRD, and multiple myeloma-MRD, respectively. The number of fluorophores ranged from 4 to 10. RAs, SAs, RAAs, and ACN were diverse. Most hospitals used a positive criterion of 20%, whereas one used 10% for acute and chronic HLN panels. Five hospitals used ICs for the negative criterion. Positive/negative assignments, percentages, and general opinions were commonly reported. In MRD reporting, the limit of detection and lower limit of quantification were included.

Conclusions

This is the first comprehensive study on the current status of FCI-HLN in Korea, confirming the high heterogeneity and complexity of FCI-HLN practices. Standardization of FCI-HLN is urgently needed. The findings provide a reference for establishing standard FCI-HLN guidelines.

Flow Cytometry in Diagnosis, Prognostication, and Monitoring of Multiple Myeloma and Related Disorders

Flow cytometry plays a critical role in the diagnosis, prognostication, therapy response evaluation, and clinical management of plasma cell neoplasms. The review summarizes how flow cytometry is used in the initial evaluation to distinguish primary and secondary clonal plasma cell populations from each other and from reactive plasma cells. We further illustrate the kinds of prognostic information the assessment can provide at diagnosis and disease follow-up of primary plasma cell neoplasms. Technical requirements for MRD assays and their use in therapy efficacy assessment and clinical decision-making in multi-myeloma are discussed.

Optimization of monocyte gating to quantify monocyte subsets for the diagnosis of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia

BACKGROUND

The presence of >94% classical monocytes (MO1, CD14++/CD16-) in peripheral blood (PB) has an excellent performance for the diagnosis of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). However, the monocyte gating strategy is not well defined. The objective of the study was to compare monocyte gating strategies and propose an optimal one.

METHODS

This is a prospective, single center study assessing monocyte subsets in PB. First, we compared monocyte subsets using 13 monocyte gating strategies in 10 samples. Then we developed our own 10 color tube and tested it on 124 patients (normal white blood cell counts, reactive monocytosis, CMML and a spectrum of other myeloid malignancies). Both conventional and computational (FlowSOM) analyses were used.

RESULTS

Comparing different monocyte gating strategies, small but significant differences in %MO1 and percentually large differences in %MO3 (nonclassical monocytes) were found, suggesting that the monocyte gating strategy can impact monocyte subset quantification. Then, we designed a 10-color tube for this purpose (CD45/CD33/CD14/CD16/CD64/CD86/CD300/CD2/CD66c/CD56) and applied it to 124 patients. This tube allowed proper monocyte gating even in highly abnormal PB. Computational analysis found a higher %MO1 and lower %MO3 compared to conventional analysis. However, differences between conventional and computational analysis in both MO1 and MO3 were globally consistent and only minimal differences were observed when comparing the ranking of patients according to %MO1 or %MO3 obtained with the conventional versus the computational approach.

CONCLUSIONS

The choice of monocyte gating strategy appears relevant for the monocyte subset distribution test. Our 10-color proposal allowed satisfactory monocyte gating even in highly abnormal PB. Computational analysis seems promising to increase reproducibility in monocyte subset quantification.

Consensus for Flow Cytometry Clinical Report on Multiple Myeloma: A Multicenter Harmonization Process Merging Laboratory Experience and Clinical Needs

Flow cytometry is a highly sensitive and specific approach for discriminating between normal and clonal plasma cells in multiple myeloma. Uniform response criteria after treatment have been established by the International Myeloma Working Group and the EuroFlow Group; however, the way in which flow cytometry data are reported has suffered from no collaborative or multicentre efforts. This study, involving 8 expert laboratories and 12 clinical hematology units of the Lazio region in Italy, aims to produce a uniform and shared report among the various Centres. From the pre-analytical phase to sample processing, data acquisition, analysis, and evaluation of the potential limitations and pitfalls of the entire process, the study reaches a final conclusion shared by laboratories and clinicians according to the most updated principles and recommendations. The aim was to identify the necessary data to be included in the clinical report by using multiple-choice questionnaires at every single stage of the process. An agreement of more than 75% of the laboratories was considered mandatory for the data to be included in the report. By ensuring the operational autonomy of each laboratory, this study provides a clear report that limits subjective interpretations and highlights possible bias in the process, better supporting clinical decision-making.

Spatiotemporal assessment of immunogenomic heterogeneity in multiple myeloma

Spatial heterogeneity is a common phenomenon in metastatic solid tumors and an evolving concept in multiple myeloma (MM). The interplay between malignant plasma cells (PCs) and the microenvironment has not yet been analyzed in MM. For this purpose, we performed bone marrow aspirates and imaging-guided biopsies of corresponding lesions in newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) and relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) patients. PCs were isolated and subjected to whole-exome sequencing (WES). Non-PCs were studied with next-generation flow (NGF) and T-cell receptor sequencing (TCRseq) to analyze the connection between malignant and nonmalignant cells in the bone marrow and in lesions. Although we observed a strong overlap from WES, NGF, and TCRseq in patients with intramedullary disease, WES revealed significant spatial heterogeneity in patients with extramedullary disease. NGF showed significant immunosuppression in RRMM compared with NDMM as indicated by fewer myeloid dendritic cells, unswitched memory B cells, Th9 cells, and CD8 effector memory T cells but more natural killer and regulatory T cells. Additionally, fewer T-cell receptor (TCR) sequences were detected in RRMM compared with NDMM and healthy individuals. After induction therapy, TCR repertoire richness increased to levels of healthy individuals, and NGF showed more regulatory T cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells, regardless of depth of response. Clinical significance of imaging-guided biopsies of lesions was demonstrated by detection of monoclonal PCs in patients without measurable residual disease (MRD) in aspirates from the iliac crest as well as identification of secondary primary malignancies in MRD- patients. Furthermore, site-specific clones with different drug susceptibilities and genetically defined high-risk features were detected by our workflow.

Deciphering spatial genomic heterogeneity at a single cell resolution in multiple myeloma

Osteolytic lesions (OL) characterize symptomatic multiple myeloma. The mechanisms of how malignant plasma cells (PC) cause OL in one region while others show no signs of bone destruction despite subtotal infiltration remain unknown. We report on a single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) study of PC obtained prospectively from random bone marrow aspirates (BM) and paired imaging-guided biopsies of OL. We analyze 148,630 PC from 24 different locations in 10 patients and observe vast inter- and intra-patient heterogeneity based on scRNA-seq analyses. Beyond the limited evidence for spatial heterogeneity from whole-exome sequencing, we find an additional layer of complexity by integrated analysis of anchored scRNA-seq datasets from the BM and OL. PC from OL are characterized by differentially expressed genes compared to PC from BM, including upregulation of genes associated with myeloma bone disease like DKK1, HGF and TIMP-1 as well as recurrent downregulation of JUN/FOS, DUSP1 and HBB. Assessment of PC from longitudinally collected samples reveals transcriptional changes after induction therapy. Our study contributes to the understanding of destructive myeloma bone disease.

Contemporary Challenges in Clinical Flow Cytometry: Small Samples, Big Data, Little Time

Background

Immunophenotypic analysis of cell populations by flow cytometry has an established role in primary diagnosis and disease monitoring of many hematologic diseases. A persistent problem in evaluation of specimens is suboptimal cell counts and low cell viability, which results in an undesirable rate of analysis failure. In addition, the increased amount of data generated in flow cytometry challenges existing data analysis and reporting paradigms.

Content

We describe current and emerging technological improvements in cell analysis that allow the clinical laboratory to perform multiparameter analysis of specimens, including those with low cell counts and other quality issues. These technologies include conventional multicolor flow cytometry and new high-dimensional technologies, such as spectral flow cytometry and mass cytometry that enable detection of over 40 antigens simultaneously. The advantages and disadvantages of each approach are discussed. We also describe new innovations in flow cytometry data analysis, including artificial intelligence-aided techniques.

Summary

Improvements in analytical technology, in tandem with innovations in data analysis, data storage, and reporting mechanisms, help to optimize the quality of clinical flow cytometry. These improvements are essential because of the expanding role of flow cytometry in patient care.

Harmonization of Flow Cytometric Minimal Residual Disease Assessment in Multiple Myeloma in Centers of Polish Myeloma Consortium

Minimal residual disease (MRD) status is now considered as one of the most relevant prognostic factors in multiple myeloma (MM) while MRD negativity became an important endpoint in clinical trials. Here, we report the results of the first study evaluating the reproducibility of high-sensitivity flow cytometry MM MRD assessment in four laboratories in Poland. EuroFlow protocols for instrument setting standardization and sample preparation in MM MRD assessment were implemented in each laboratory. In the inter-laboratory reproducibility study, 12 bone marrow samples from MM patients were distributed and processed in participant laboratories. In the inter-operator concordance study, 13 raw data files from MM MRD measurements were analyzed by five independent operators. The inter-laboratory study showed high 95% overall concordance of results among laboratories. In the inter-operator study, 89% of MRD results reported were concordant, and the highest immunophenotype interpretation differences with regard to expression of CD27, CD45, CD81 were noticed. We confirmed the applicability and feasibility of the EuroFlow protocol as a highly sensitive method of MRD evaluation in MM. Results of our inter-center comparison study demonstrate that the standardization of MM MRD assessment protocols is highly desirable to improve quality and comparability of results within and between different clinical trials.

Evaluation of measurable residual disease in multiple myeloma by multiparametric flow cytometry: Current paradigm, guidelines, and future applications

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a heterogeneous group of mature B-cell diseases that are typically characterized by the presence and accumulation of abnormal plasma cells (PCs), which results in the excess production of monoclonal immunoglobulin and/or light chain found in the serum and/or urine. Multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) is an indispensable tool to supplement the diagnosis, classification and monitoring of the disease due to its high patient applicability, excellent sensitivity and encouraging results from various clinical trials. In this regard, minimal or, more appropriately, measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity by MFC has been recognized as a powerful predictor of favourable long-term outcomes. Before flow cytometry can be effectively implemented in the clinical setting for MM MRD testing, sample preparation, panel configuration, analysis and gating strategies must be optimized to ensure accurate results. This manuscript will discuss the current consensus guidelines for flow cytometric processing of samples and reporting of results for MM MRD testing. We also discuss alternative approaches to detect plasma cells in the presence of daratumumab treatment. Finally, there is a lack of information describing the subclonal distribution of myeloma cells based on their protein expression. The advent of high-dimensional analysis may assist in following the evolution of antigen expression patterns on abnormal plasma cells in patients with relapsed/refractory disease. This in turn can help identify clonal subtypes that are more aggressive for potential informed decision. An analysis using t-SNE to identify the emergence of PCs subclones by MFC, along with the analysis of their immunophenotypic profiles are presented as a future perspective.

Minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma: defining the role of next generation sequencing and flow cytometry in routine diagnostic use

For patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma (MM) there have been significant treatment advances over the past decade, reflected in an increasing proportion of patients achieving durable remissions. Clinical trials repeatedly demonstrate that achieving a deep response to therapy, with a bone marrow assessment proving negative for minimal residual disease (MRD), confers a significant survival advantage. To accurately assess for minute quantities of residual cancer requires highly sensitive methods; either multiparameter flow cytometry or next generation sequencing are currently recommended for MM response assessment. Under optimal conditions, these methods can detect one aberrant cell amongst 1,000,000 normal cells (a sensitivity of 10^-6). Here, we will review the practical use of MRD assays in MM, including challenges in implementation for the routine diagnostic laboratory, standardisation across laboratories and clinical trials, the clinical integration of MRD status assessment into MM management and future directions for ongoing research.

Validation of a modified pre-lysis sample preparation technique for flow cytometric minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and B-non Hodgkin lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment of hematopoietic neoplasia below 10^-4 requires more leukocytes than is usually attainable by post-lysis preparation. However, not all laboratories are resourced for consensus Euroflow pre-lysis methodology. Our study aim was to validate a modified pre-lysis protocol against our standard post-lysis method for MRD detection of multiple myeloma (MM), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and B-non Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL), to meet demand for deeper MRD assessment by flow cytometry.

METHOD

Clinical samples for MRD assessment of MM, CLL, and B-NHL (50, 30, and 30 cases, respectively) were prepared in parallel by pre and post-lysis methods for the initial validation. Total leukocytes, MRD, and median fluorescence intensity of antigen expression were compared as measures of sensitivity and antigen stability. Lymphocyte and granulocyte composition were compared, assessing relative sample processing stability. Sensitivity of the pre-lysis assay was monitored post validation for a further 18 months.

RESULTS

Pre-lysis achieved at least 10^-4 sensitivity in 85% MM, 81% CLL, and 90% B-NHL samples versus 24%, 48%, and 26% by post-lysis, respectively, with stable antigen expression and leukocyte composition. Post validation over 18 months with technical expertise improving, pre-lysis permitted 10^-5 MRD assessment in 69%, 86%, and 82% of the respective patient groups.

CONCLUSION

This modified pre-lysis procedure provides a sensitive, robust, time efficient, and relatively cost-effective alternative for MRD testing by MFC at 10^-5 , facilitating clinically meaningful deeper response assessment for MM, CLL, and B-NHL. This method adaptation may facilitate more widespread adoption of highly sensitive flow cytometry-based MRD assessment.

Measurable disease evaluation in patients with myeloma

Recent years saw significant breakthroughs in treatment of multiple myeloma. Durable remissions are now seen in a significant proportion of patients with the previously uniformly incurable and progressive disease. Yet because of deep suppression of the neoplastic myeloma clones by the newer therapies, older disease monitoring techniques are insufficient to distinguish between the patients at high risk of imminent relapse and those in whom durable remission is expected. This review briefly describes prognostic and therapeutic implications of measurable disease (MRD) evaluation, explains why deep MRD evaluation is needed for patients without morphologic evidence of disease, and reviews the state of the art of evaluation of myeloma MRD by flow cytometry.