1
|
Melchers S, Roemer M, Albrecht JD, Assaf C, von Gugelberg C, Guenova E, Klemke CD, Moritz RKC, Schlaak M, Stadler R, Wehkamp U, Wobser M, Albrecht T, Goerdt S, Schneider S, Nicolay JP. Evaluation of Sézary cell marker expression and cell death behaviour upon in vitro treatment by flow cytometry in Sézary syndrome patients. Exp Dermatol 2024; 33:e15171. [PMID: 39219147 DOI: 10.1111/exd.15171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Revised: 08/12/2024] [Accepted: 08/18/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
The diagnosis of Sézary syndrome (SS) relies on the identification of blood Sézary cells (SC) by different markers via flow cytometry. Treatment of SS is challenging since its pathogenesis is characterized by cell death resistance rather than hyperproliferation. In this study, we establish an integrated approach that considers both the expression of SC markers and sensitivity to cell death both spontaneously and upon in vitro treatment. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from 20 SS patients and analysed for the SC markers CD7 and CD26 loss as well as CD158k and PD1 gain. The cells were then treated with different established and experimental therapies in vitro and cell death was measured. Spontaneous and therapeutically induced cell death were measured and correlated to cellular marker profiles. In the marker-positive cells, spontaneous cell death sensitivity was reduced. Different treatments in vitro managed to specifically induce cell death in the putative CTCL cell populations. Interestingly, a repeated analysis after 3 months of treatment revealed the CTCL cell death sensitivity to be restored by therapy. We propose this novel integrated approach comprising the evaluation of SC marker expression and analysis of cell death sensitivity upon treatment that can also enable a better therapy stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Melchers
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim/University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
- Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Section of Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - M Roemer
- Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls-University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - J D Albrecht
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim/University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
- Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Section of Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - C Assaf
- Department of Dermatology, HELIOS Klinik Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
| | - C von Gugelberg
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - E Guenova
- Department of Dermatology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - C-D Klemke
- Department of Dermatology, Municipal Medical Center Karlsruhe, Teaching Hospital of the University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - R K C Moritz
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Halle, Halle, Germany
- Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, University Medical Centre Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - M Schlaak
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - R Stadler
- Department of Dermatology, Johannes-Wesling-Clinic Minden and University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - U Wehkamp
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - M Wobser
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Wurzburg, Wurzburg, Germany
| | - T Albrecht
- Department of Pathology, Ruprechts-Karls-University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - S Goerdt
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim/University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - S Schneider
- Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls-University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - J P Nicolay
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim/University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
- Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Section of Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vermeer MH, Moins-Teisserenc H, Bagot M, Quaglino P, Whittaker S. Flow cytometry for the assessment of blood tumour burden in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: towards a standardised approach. Br J Dermatol 2022; 187:21-28. [PMID: 35157307 PMCID: PMC9541328 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.21053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Revised: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS) are the best-studied subtypes of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, a rare non-Hodgkin lymphoma that primarily presents in the skin but can also involve blood, lymph nodes, and viscera. The role of blood involvement in the assessment and staging of MF and SS has evolved in recent years from being classed as simply 'present' or 'absent', with no impact on staging, to full analysis of abnormal peripheral-blood T cells using flow cytometry (FC) to detect and quantify aberrant T-cell phenotypes and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to characterise T-cell receptor gene rearrangements. These sensitive peripheral-blood assessments are replacing manual Sézary cell counts and have become an important part of clinical work-up in MF and SS, providing the potential for more accurate prognostication and appropriate management. However, although international recommendations now include guidelines for FC analysis of peripheral-blood markers for staging purposes, many clinics only perform these analyses in advanced-stage patients, if at all, and there is still a need for standardised use of validated markers. Standardisation of a single effective multiparameter FC panel would allow for accurate identification and quantification of blood tumour burden for diagnosis, staging, assessment of therapeutic response, and monitoring of disease progression at all stages of disease. Once defined, validation of an MF/SS biomarker FC panel will enable uptake into clinical settings along with associated standardisation of protocols and reagents. This review discusses the evolution of the role of FC in evaluating blood involvement in MF and SS, considers recently published international guidelines, and identifies evidence gaps for future research that will allow for standardisation of FC in MF and SS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten H Vermeer
- Dermatology Department, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Helene Moins-Teisserenc
- Université de Paris, Institut de Recherche Saint Louis, INSERM UMR1160, Paris, France.,Hematology Laboratory, AP-, HP, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France
| | - Martine Bagot
- Université de Paris, Institut de Recherche Saint Louis, INSERM UMRS976, Onco-Dermatology and Therapies, Paris, France.,Département de Dermatologie, AP-, HP, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France
| | - Pietro Quaglino
- Dermatologic Clinic, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin Medical School, Turin, Italy
| | - Sean Whittaker
- St. John's Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic and Medical Biosciences, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| |
Collapse
|