1
|
Du L, Langhough RE, Wilson RE, Reyes RER, Hermann BP, Jonaitis EM, Betthauser TJ, Chin NA, Christian B, Chaby L, Jeromin A, Molfetta GD, Brum WS, Arslan B, Ashton N, Blennow K, Zetterberg H, Johnson SC. Longitudinal plasma phosphorylated-tau217 and other related biomarkers in a non-demented Alzheimer's risk-enhanced sample. Alzheimers Dement 2024. [PMID: 38970274 DOI: 10.1002/alz.14100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Revised: 05/16/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/08/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Understanding longitudinal change in key plasma biomarkers will aid in detecting presymptomatic Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS Serial plasma samples from 424 Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention participants were analyzed for phosphorylated-tau217 (p-tau217; ALZpath) and other AD biomarkers, to study longitudinal trajectories in relation to disease, health factors, and cognitive decline. Of the participants, 18.6% with known amyloid status were amyloid positive (A+); 97.2% were cognitively unimpaired (CU). RESULTS In the CU, amyloid-negative (A-) subset, plasma p-tau217 levels increased modestly with age but were unaffected by body mass index and kidney function. In the whole sample, average p-tau217 change rates were higher in those who were A+ (e.g., simple slopes(se) for A+ and A- at age 60 were 0.232(0.028) and 0.038(0.013))). High baseline p-tau217 levels predicted faster preclinical cognitive decline. DISCUSSION p-tau217 stands out among markers for its strong association with disease and cognitive decline, indicating its potential for early AD detection and monitoring progression. HIGHLIGHTS Phosphorylated-tau217 (p-tau217) trajectories were significantly different in people who were known to be amyloid positive. Subtle age-related trajectories were seen for all the plasma markers in amyloid-negative cognitively unimpaired. Kidney function and body mass index were not associated with plasma p-tau217 trajectories. Higher plasma p-tau217 was associated with faster preclinical cognitive decline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lianlian Du
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Institute, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Rebecca E Langhough
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Institute, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Rachael E Wilson
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Institute, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Ramiro Eduardo Rea Reyes
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Institute, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Bruce P Hermann
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Erin M Jonaitis
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Institute, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Tobey J Betthauser
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Institute, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Nathaniel A Chin
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Bradley Christian
- Waisman Laboratory for Brain Imaging and Behavior, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | | | | | - Guglielmo Di Molfetta
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Wagner S Brum
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
- Graduate Program in Biological Sciences: Biochemistry, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - Burak Arslan
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Nicholas Ashton
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Kaj Blennow
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
- ICM Paris Brain Institute, ICM, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
- Neurodegenerative Disorder Research Center, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, and Department of Neurology, Institute on Aging and Brain Disorders, University of Science and Technology of China and First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Henrik Zetterberg
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
- UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, London, UK
- Hong Kong Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, China
| | - Sterling C Johnson
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Institute, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bollack A, Collij LE, García DV, Shekari M, Altomare D, Payoux P, Dubois B, Grau‐Rivera O, Boada M, Marquié M, Nordberg A, Walker Z, Scheltens P, Schöll M, Wolz R, Schott JM, Gismondi R, Stephens A, Buckley C, Frisoni GB, Hanseeuw B, Visser PJ, Vandenberghe R, Drzezga A, Yaqub M, Boellaard R, Gispert JD, Markiewicz P, Cash DM, Farrar G, Barkhof F. Investigating reliable amyloid accumulation in Centiloids: Results from the AMYPAD Prognostic and Natural History Study. Alzheimers Dement 2024; 20:3429-3441. [PMID: 38574374 PMCID: PMC11095430 DOI: 10.1002/alz.13761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To support clinical trial designs focused on early interventions, our study determined reliable early amyloid-β (Aβ) accumulation based on Centiloids (CL) in pre-dementia populations. METHODS A total of 1032 participants from the Amyloid Imaging to Prevent Alzheimer's Disease-Prognostic and Natural History Study (AMYPAD-PNHS) and Insight46 who underwent [18F]flutemetamol, [18F]florbetaben or [18F]florbetapir amyloid-PET were included. A normative strategy was used to define reliable accumulation by estimating the 95th percentile of longitudinal measurements in sub-populations (NPNHS = 101/750, NInsight46 = 35/382) expected to remain stable over time. The baseline CL threshold that optimally predicts future accumulation was investigated using precision-recall analyses. Accumulation rates were examined using linear mixed-effect models. RESULTS Reliable accumulation in the PNHS was estimated to occur at >3.0 CL/year. Baseline CL of 16 [12,19] best predicted future Aβ-accumulators. Rates of amyloid accumulation were tracer-independent, lower for APOE ε4 non-carriers, and for subjects with higher levels of education. DISCUSSION Our results support a 12-20 CL window for inclusion into early secondary prevention studies. Reliable accumulation definition warrants further investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariane Bollack
- Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC)Department of Medical Physics and BioengineeringUniversity College LondonLondonLondonUK
| | - Lyduine E. Collij
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Clinical Memory Research UnitDepartment of Clinical SciencesLund UniversityMalmöSweden
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain ImagingVU University AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - David Vállez García
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Mahnaz Shekari
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall FoundationBarcelonaSpain
- Universitat Pompeu FabraBarcelonaSpain
- Instituto de investigaciones médicas Hospital del Mar (IMIM)BarcelonaSpain
| | - Daniele Altomare
- Neurology UnitDepartment of Clinical and Experimental SciencesUniversity of BresciaBresciaItaly
| | - Pierre Payoux
- Department of Nuclear MedicineImaging PoleToulouse University HospitalToulouseFrance
- Toulouse NeuroImaging CenterUniversité de ToulouseInsermUPSCHU PurpanPavillon BaudotPlace du Docteur Joseph BaylacToulouseFrance
| | - Bruno Dubois
- Department of NeurologySalpêtrière HospitalAP‐HPSorbonne UniversityParisFrance
| | - Oriol Grau‐Rivera
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall FoundationBarcelonaSpain
| | - Mercè Boada
- Ace Alzheimer Center Barcelona – Universitat Internacional de CatalunyaBarcelonaSpain
- CIBERNEDNetwork Center for Biomedical Research in Neurodegenerative DiseasesNational Institute of Health Carlos IIIMadridSpain
| | - Marta Marquié
- Ace Alzheimer Center Barcelona – Universitat Internacional de CatalunyaBarcelonaSpain
- CIBERNEDNetwork Center for Biomedical Research in Neurodegenerative DiseasesNational Institute of Health Carlos IIIMadridSpain
| | - Agneta Nordberg
- Department of NeurobiologyCare Sciences and Society, Center for Alzheimer Research, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Karolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
- Theme Inflammation and Aging, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Zuzana Walker
- Division of PsychiatryUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, The LodgeWickfordUK
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center and Department of NeurologyAmsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Alzheimercentrum AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Michael Schöll
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, The University of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
- Department of Psychiatry and NeurochemistryInstitute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University HospitalGothenburgSweden
- Department of Neurodegenerative DiseaseUCL Institute of NeurologyLondonUK
| | | | - Jonathan M. Schott
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyLondonUK
| | | | | | | | - Giovanni B. Frisoni
- Neurology UnitDepartment of Clinical and Experimental SciencesUniversity of BresciaBresciaItaly
| | - Bernard Hanseeuw
- Department of NeurologyInstitute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, Cliniques Universitaires Saint‐LucBrusselsBelgium
- Gordon Center for Medical ImagingDepartment of RadiologyMassachusetts General HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
- WELBIO DepartmentWEL Research InstituteWavreBelgium
| | - Pieter Jelle Visser
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Department of NeurobiologyCare Sciences and Society, Center for Alzheimer Research, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Karolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
- Alzheimer Center Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - Rik Vandenberghe
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, LBI – KU Leuven Brain InstituteLeuvenBelgium
| | - Alexander Drzezga
- Department of Nuclear MedicineUniversity Hospital Cologne, Universitätsklinikums KölnKölnGermany
- Molecular Organization of the Brain, Institute for Neuroscience and Medicine, INM‐2), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbHJülichGermany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE)BonnGermany
| | - Maqsood Yaqub
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | - Juan Domingo Gispert
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall FoundationBarcelonaSpain
- Universitat Pompeu FabraBarcelonaSpain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina, Instituto de Salud Carlos IIIMadridSpain
| | - Pawel Markiewicz
- Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC)Department of Medical Physics and BioengineeringUniversity College LondonLondonLondonUK
- Computer Science and Informatics, School of Engineering, London South Bank UniversityLondonUK
| | - David M. Cash
- Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College LondonLondonUK
- UK Dementia Research Institute at University College LondonLondonUK
| | | | - Frederik Barkhof
- Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC)Department of Medical Physics and BioengineeringUniversity College LondonLondonLondonUK
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College LondonLondonUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Meeker KL, Luckett PH, Barthélemy NR, Hobbs DA, Chen C, Bollinger J, Ovod V, Flores S, Keefe S, Henson RL, Herries EM, McDade E, Hassenstab JJ, Xiong C, Cruchaga C, Benzinger TLS, Holtzman DM, Schindler SE, Bateman RJ, Morris JC, Gordon BA, Ances BM. Comparison of cerebrospinal fluid, plasma and neuroimaging biomarker utility in Alzheimer's disease. Brain Commun 2024; 6:fcae081. [PMID: 38505230 PMCID: PMC10950051 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease biomarkers are crucial to understanding disease pathophysiology, aiding accurate diagnosis and identifying target treatments. Although the number of biomarkers continues to grow, the relative utility and uniqueness of each is poorly understood as prior work has typically calculated serial pairwise relationships on only a handful of markers at a time. The present study assessed the cross-sectional relationships among 27 Alzheimer's disease biomarkers simultaneously and determined their ability to predict meaningful clinical outcomes using machine learning. Data were obtained from 527 community-dwelling volunteers enrolled in studies at the Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center at Washington University in St Louis. We used hierarchical clustering to group 27 imaging, CSF and plasma measures of amyloid beta, tau [phosphorylated tau (p-tau), total tau t-tau)], neuronal injury and inflammation drawn from MRI, PET, mass-spectrometry assays and immunoassays. Neuropsychological and genetic measures were also included. Random forest-based feature selection identified the strongest predictors of amyloid PET positivity across the entire cohort. Models also predicted cognitive impairment across the entire cohort and in amyloid PET-positive individuals. Four clusters emerged reflecting: core Alzheimer's disease pathology (amyloid and tau), neurodegeneration, AT8 antibody-associated phosphorylated tau sites and neuronal dysfunction. In the entire cohort, CSF p-tau181/Aβ40lumi and Aβ42/Aβ40lumi and mass spectrometry measurements for CSF pT217/T217, pT111/T111, pT231/T231 were the strongest predictors of amyloid PET status. Given their ability to denote individuals on an Alzheimer's disease pathological trajectory, these same markers (CSF pT217/T217, pT111/T111, p-tau/Aβ40lumi and t-tau/Aβ40lumi) were largely the best predictors of worse cognition in the entire cohort. When restricting analyses to amyloid-positive individuals, the strongest predictors of impaired cognition were tau PET, CSF t-tau/Aβ40lumi, p-tau181/Aβ40lumi, CSF pT217/217 and pT205/T205. Non-specific CSF measures of neuronal dysfunction and inflammation were poor predictors of amyloid PET and cognitive status. The current work utilized machine learning to understand the interrelationship structure and utility of a large number of biomarkers. The results demonstrate that, although the number of biomarkers has rapidly expanded, many are interrelated and few strongly predict clinical outcomes. Examining the entire corpus of available biomarkers simultaneously provides a meaningful framework to understand Alzheimer's disease pathobiological change as well as insight into which biomarkers may be most useful in Alzheimer's disease clinical practice and trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin L Meeker
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Patrick H Luckett
- Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Nicolas R Barthélemy
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Diana A Hobbs
- Department of Radiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Charles Chen
- Department of Radiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - James Bollinger
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Vitaliy Ovod
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Shaney Flores
- Department of Radiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Sarah Keefe
- Department of Radiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Rachel L Henson
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Elizabeth M Herries
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Eric McDade
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Jason J Hassenstab
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
- Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Chengjie Xiong
- Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
- Division of Biostatistics, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Carlos Cruchaga
- Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Tammie L S Benzinger
- Department of Radiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
- Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - David M Holtzman
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
- Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Suzanne E Schindler
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
- Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Randall J Bateman
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - John C Morris
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
- Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Brian A Gordon
- Department of Radiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
- Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Beau M Ances
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
- Department of Radiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
- Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Morgado B, Klafki HW, Bauer C, Waniek K, Esselmann H, Wirths O, Hansen N, Lachmann I, Osterloh D, Schuchhardt J, Wiltfang J. Assessment of immunoprecipitation with subsequent immunoassays for the blood-based diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2024:10.1007/s00406-023-01751-2. [PMID: 38316685 DOI: 10.1007/s00406-023-01751-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
The Aβ42/40 ratio and the concentration of phosphorylated Tau181 in blood plasma represent attractive biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease. As a means for reducing potential matrix effects, which may interfere with plasma immunoassays, we have previously developed a pre-analytical sample workup by semi-automated immunoprecipitation. Here we test the compatibility of pre-analytical immunoprecipitations with automated Aβ1-40, Aβ1-42 and phosphorylated Tau181 immunoassays on the Lumipulse platform and compare the diagnostic performance of the respective immunoprecipitation immunoassay approaches with direct plasma measurements. 71 participants were dichotomized according to their Aβ42/40 ratios in cerebrospinal fluid into the diagnostic groups amyloid-positive (n = 32) and amyloid-negative (n = 39). The plasma Aβ1-42/1-40 ratio and phosphorylated Tau181 levels were determined on the Lumipulse G600II platform (Fujirebio) by direct measurements in EDTA-plasma or after Aβ- or Tau-immunoprecipitation, respectively. Pre-analytical immunoprecipitation of Aβ turned out to be compatible with the Lumipulse Aβ assays and resulted in a numerical, yet statistically not significant increase in the area under the ROC curve for plasma Aβ1-42/1-40. Additionally, we observed a significant increase in the standardised effect size (Cohen's D). Pre-analytical immunoprecipitation of Tau resulted in increased differences between the diagnostic groups in terms of median and mean phosphorylated Tau 181 levels. Furthermore, we observed a greater Cohen's d (p < 0.001) and a larger area under the ROC curve (p = 0.038) after Tau-IP. Our preliminary findings in a small, preselected sample indicate that pre-analytical immunoprecipitation may have the potential to improve the diagnostic performance of plasma biomarker immunoassays for Aβ1-42/1-40 and phosphorylated Tau181 to predict brain amyloid deposition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Morgado
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Goettingen (UMG), Georg-August University, Von-Siebold Strasse 5, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.
| | - Hans-Wolfgang Klafki
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Goettingen (UMG), Georg-August University, Von-Siebold Strasse 5, 37075, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Chris Bauer
- MicroDiscovery GmbH, Marienburger Strasse 1, 10405, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Hermann Esselmann
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Goettingen (UMG), Georg-August University, Von-Siebold Strasse 5, 37075, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Oliver Wirths
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Goettingen (UMG), Georg-August University, Von-Siebold Strasse 5, 37075, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Niels Hansen
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Goettingen (UMG), Georg-August University, Von-Siebold Strasse 5, 37075, Goettingen, Germany
| | | | - Dirk Osterloh
- Roboscreen GmbH, Hohmannstrasse 7, 04129, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Jens Wiltfang
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Goettingen (UMG), Georg-August University, Von-Siebold Strasse 5, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), 37075, Goettingen, Germany.
- Neurosciences and Signaling Group, Institute of Biomedicine (iBiMED), Department of Medical Sciences, University of Aveiro, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Klafki HW, Wirths O, Jahn O, Morgado B, Esselmann H, Wiltfang J. Blood plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease: Aβ1-42/1-40 vs. AβX-42/X-40. Clin Chem Lab Med 2024; 62:e56-e57. [PMID: 37775501 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2023-0990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Hans-Wolfgang Klafki
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Goettingen, Georg-August-University, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Oliver Wirths
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Goettingen, Georg-August-University, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Olaf Jahn
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Goettingen, Georg-August-University, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Barbara Morgado
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Goettingen, Georg-August-University, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Hermann Esselmann
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Goettingen, Georg-August-University, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Jens Wiltfang
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Goettingen, Georg-August-University, Goettingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kurihara M, Kondo S, Ohse K, Nojima H, Kikkawa-Saito E, Iwata A. Relationship Between Cerebrospinal Fluid Alzheimer's Disease Biomarker Values Measured via Lumipulse Assays and Conventional ELISA: Single-Center Experience and Systematic Review. J Alzheimers Dis 2024; 99:1077-1092. [PMID: 38759016 PMCID: PMC11191528 DOI: 10.3233/jad-240185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024]
Abstract
Background Although Lumipulse assays and conventional ELISA are strongly correlated, the precise relationship between their measured values remains undetermined. Objective To determine the relationship between Lumipulse and ELISA measurement values. Methods Patients who underwent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarker measurements and consented to biobanking between December 2021 and June 2023 were included. The relationship between values measured via Lumipulse assays and conventional ELISA were evaluated by Passing-Bablok analyses for amyloid-β 1-42 (Aβ42), total tau (t-tau), and phospho-tau 181 (p-tau 181). Studies using both assays were systematically searched for in PubMed and summarized after quality assessment. Results Regression line slopes and intercepts were 1.41 (1.23 to 1.60) and -77.8 (-198.4 to 44.5) for Aβ42, 0.94 (0.88 to 1.01) and 98.2 (76.9 to 114.4) for t-tau, and 1.60 (1.43 to 1.75) and -21.1 (-26.9 to -15.6) for p-tau181. Spearman's correlation coefficients were 0.90, 0.95, and 0.95 for Aβ42, t-tau, and p-tau181, respectively. We identified 13 other studies that included 2,117 patients in total. Aβ42 slope varied among studies, suggesting inter-lab difference of ELISA. The slope and intercept of t-tau were approximately 1 and 0, respectively, suggesting small proportional and systematic differences. Conversely, the p-tau181 slope was significantly higher than 1, distributed between 1.5-2 in most studies, with intercepts significantly lower than 0, suggesting proportional and systematic differences. Conclusions We characterized different relationship between measurement values for each biomarker, which may be useful for understanding the differences in CSF biomarker measurement values on different platforms and for future global harmonization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masanori Kurihara
- Department of Neurology, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan
- Integrated Research Initiative for Living Well with Dementia, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Soichiro Kondo
- Department of Neurology, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kensuke Ohse
- Integrated Research Initiative for Living Well with Dementia, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | - Atsushi Iwata
- Department of Neurology, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan
- Integrated Research Initiative for Living Well with Dementia, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Martínez-Dubarbie F, Guerra-Ruiz A, López-García S, Lage C, Fernández-Matarrubia M, Infante J, Pozueta-Cantudo A, García-Martínez M, Corrales-Pardo A, Bravo M, López-Hoyos M, Irure-Ventura J, Sánchez-Juan P, García-Unzueta MT, Rodríguez-Rodríguez E. Accuracy of plasma Aβ40, Aβ42, and p-tau181 to detect CSF Alzheimer's pathological changes in cognitively unimpaired subjects using the Lumipulse automated platform. Alzheimers Res Ther 2023; 15:163. [PMID: 37784138 PMCID: PMC10544460 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-023-01319-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The arrival of new disease-modifying treatments for Alzheimer's disease (AD) requires the identification of subjects at risk in a simple, inexpensive, and non-invasive way. With tools allowing an adequate screening, it would be possible to optimize the use of these treatments. Plasma markers of AD are very promising, but it is necessary to prove that alterations in their levels are related to alterations in gold standard markers such as cerebrospinal fluid or PET imaging. With this research, we want to evaluate the performance of plasma Aβ40, Aβ42, and p-tau181 to detect the pathological changes in CSF using the automated Lumipulse platform. METHODS Both plasma and CSF Aβ40, Aβ42, and p-tau181 have been evaluated in a group of 208 cognitively unimpaired subjects with a 30.3% of ApoE4 carriers. We have correlated plasma and CSF values of each biomarker. Then, we have also assessed the differences in plasma marker values according to amyloid status (A - / +), AD status (considering AD + subjects to those A + plus Tau +), and ATN group defined by CSF. Finally, ROC curves have been performed, and the area under the curve has been measured using amyloid status and AD status as an outcome and different combinations of plasma markers as predictors. RESULTS Aβ42, amyloid ratio, p-tau181, and p-tau181/Aβ42 ratio correlated significantly between plasma and CSF. For these markers, the levels were significantly different in the A + / - , AD + / - , and ATN groups. Amyloid ratio predicts amyloid and AD pathology in CSF with an AUC of 0.89. CONCLUSIONS Plasma biomarkers of AD using the automated Lumipulse platform show good diagnostic performance in detecting Alzheimer's pathology in cognitively unimpaired subjects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Martínez-Dubarbie
- Neurology Service, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Avda. de Valdecilla 25, Santander, Cantabria, 39008, Spain.
- Institute for Research Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Cantabria, 39011, Spain.
| | - Armando Guerra-Ruiz
- Biochemistry and Clinical Analysis Department, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Cantabria, 39008, Spain
| | - Sara López-García
- Neurology Service, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Avda. de Valdecilla 25, Santander, Cantabria, 39008, Spain
- Institute for Research Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Cantabria, 39011, Spain
| | - Carmen Lage
- Neurology Service, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Avda. de Valdecilla 25, Santander, Cantabria, 39008, Spain
- Institute for Research Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Cantabria, 39011, Spain
- Atlantic Fellow for Equity in Brain Health, Global Brain Health Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - Marta Fernández-Matarrubia
- Neurology Service, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Avda. de Valdecilla 25, Santander, Cantabria, 39008, Spain
- Institute for Research Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Cantabria, 39011, Spain
| | - Jon Infante
- Neurology Service, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Avda. de Valdecilla 25, Santander, Cantabria, 39008, Spain
- Institute for Research Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Cantabria, 39011, Spain
- CIBERNED, Network Center for Biomedical Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases, National Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, 28220, Spain
- Medicine and Psychiatry Department, University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain
| | - Ana Pozueta-Cantudo
- Neurology Service, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Avda. de Valdecilla 25, Santander, Cantabria, 39008, Spain
- Institute for Research Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Cantabria, 39011, Spain
| | - María García-Martínez
- Neurology Service, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Avda. de Valdecilla 25, Santander, Cantabria, 39008, Spain
- Institute for Research Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Cantabria, 39011, Spain
| | - Andrea Corrales-Pardo
- Neurology Service, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Avda. de Valdecilla 25, Santander, Cantabria, 39008, Spain
- Institute for Research Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Cantabria, 39011, Spain
- Universidad Europea del Atlántico, Santander, Spain
| | - María Bravo
- Neurology Service, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Avda. de Valdecilla 25, Santander, Cantabria, 39008, Spain
- Institute for Research Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Cantabria, 39011, Spain
| | - Marcos López-Hoyos
- Institute for Research Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Cantabria, 39011, Spain
- Immunology Department, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain
- Molecular Biology Department, University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain
| | - Juan Irure-Ventura
- Institute for Research Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Cantabria, 39011, Spain
- Immunology Department, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain
| | - Pascual Sánchez-Juan
- CIBERNED, Network Center for Biomedical Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases, National Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, 28220, Spain
- CIEN Foundation/Queen Sofia Foundation Alzheimer Center, Madrid, 28220, Spain
| | - María Teresa García-Unzueta
- Institute for Research Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Cantabria, 39011, Spain
- Biochemistry and Clinical Analysis Department, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Cantabria, 39008, Spain
| | - Eloy Rodríguez-Rodríguez
- Neurology Service, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Avda. de Valdecilla 25, Santander, Cantabria, 39008, Spain
- Institute for Research Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Cantabria, 39011, Spain
- CIBERNED, Network Center for Biomedical Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases, National Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, 28220, Spain
- Medicine and Psychiatry Department, University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nisenbaum L, Martone R, Chen T, Rajagovindan R, Dent G, Beaver J, Rubel C, Racine A, He P, Harrison K, Dean R, Vandijck M, Haeberlein SB. CSF biomarker concordance with amyloid PET in Phase 3 studies of aducanumab. Alzheimers Dement 2023; 19:3379-3388. [PMID: 36795603 DOI: 10.1002/alz.12919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Revised: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We assessed the use of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers as an alternative to positron emission tomography (PET) for brain amyloid beta (Aβ) pathology confirmation in the EMERGE and ENGAGE clinical trials. METHODS EMERGE and ENGAGE were randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 trials of aducanumab in participants with early Alzheimer's disease. Concordance between CSF biomarkers (Aβ42, Aβ40, phosphorylated tau 181, and total tau) and amyloid PET status (visual read) at screening was examined. RESULTS Robust concordance between CSF biomarkers and amyloid PET visual status was observed (for Aβ42/Aβ40, AUC: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.83-0.97; p < 0.0001), confirming CSF biomarkers as a reliable alternative to amyloid PET in these studies. Compared with single CSF biomarkers, CSF biomarker ratios showed better agreement with amyloid PET visual reads, demonstrating high diagnostic accuracy. DISCUSSION These analyses add to the growing body of evidence supporting CSF biomarkers as reliable alternatives to amyloid PET imaging for brain Aβ pathology confirmation. HIGHLIGHTS CSF biomarkers and amyloid PET concordance were assessed in Ph3 aducanumab trials. Robust concordance between CSF biomarkers and amyloid PET was observed. CSF biomarker ratios increased diagnostic accuracy over single CSF biomarkers. CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 demonstrated high concordance with amyloid PET. Results support CSF biomarker testing as a reliable alternative to amyloid PET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ping He
- Biogen, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Robert Dean
- Robert A. Dean Consulting, LLC, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Salvadó G, Larsson V, Cody KA, Cullen NC, Jonaitis EM, Stomrud E, Kollmorgen G, Wild N, Palmqvist S, Janelidze S, Mattsson-Carlgren N, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Johnson SC, Ossenkoppele R, Hansson O. Optimal combinations of CSF biomarkers for predicting cognitive decline and clinical conversion in cognitively unimpaired participants and mild cognitive impairment patients: A multi-cohort study. Alzheimers Dement 2023; 19:2943-2955. [PMID: 36648169 PMCID: PMC10350470 DOI: 10.1002/alz.12907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2022] [Revised: 10/30/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Our objective was determining the optimal combinations of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers for predicting disease progression in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other neurodegenerative diseases. METHODS We included 1,983 participants from three different cohorts with longitudinal cognitive and clinical data, and baseline CSF levels of Aβ42, Aβ40, phosphorylated tau at threonine-181 (p-tau), neurofilament light (NfL), neurogranin, α-synuclein, soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (sTREM2), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), YKL-40, S100b, and interleukin 6 (IL-6) (Elecsys NeuroToolKit). RESULTS Change of modified Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite (mPACC) in cognitively unimpaired (CU) was best predicted by p-tau/Aβ42 alone (R2 ≥ 0.31) or together with NfL (R2 = 0.25), while p-tau/Aβ42 (R2 ≥ 0.19) was sufficient to accurately predict change of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients. P-tau/Aβ42 (AUC ≥ 0.87) and p-tau/Aβ42 together with NfL (AUC ≥ 0.75) were the best predictors of conversion to AD and all-cause dementia, respectively. DISCUSSION P-tau/Aβ42 is sufficient for predicting progression in AD, with very high accuracy. Adding NfL improves the prediction of all-cause dementia conversion and cognitive decline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma Salvadó
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Victoria Larsson
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Karly A Cody
- Wisconsin Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Nicholas C Cullen
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Erin M Jonaitis
- Wisconsin Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- Wisconsin Alzheimer’s Institute, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Erik Stomrud
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Memory Clinic, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | | | | | - Sebastian Palmqvist
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Memory Clinic, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Shorena Janelidze
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Wallenberg Center for Molecular Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Henrik Zetterberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom
- UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, London, United Kingdom
- Hong Kong Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Hong Kong, China
| | - Kaj Blennow
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Sterling C Johnson
- Wisconsin Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- Wisconsin Alzheimer’s Institute, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center at the William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Oskar Hansson
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Memory Clinic, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Is plasma amyloid-β 1–42/1–40 a better biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease than AβX–42/X–40? Fluids Barriers CNS 2022; 19:96. [DOI: 10.1186/s12987-022-00390-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
A reduced amyloid-β (Aβ)42/40 peptide ratio in blood plasma represents a peripheral biomarker of the cerebral amyloid pathology observed in Alzheimer’s disease brains. The magnitude of the measurable effect in plasma is smaller than in cerebrospinal fluid, presumably due to dilution by Aβ peptides originating from peripheral sources. We hypothesized that the observable effect in plasma can be accentuated to some extent by specifically measuring Aβ1–42 and Aβ1–40 instead of AβX–42 and AβX–40.
Methods
We assessed the plasma AβX–42/X–40 and Aβ1–42/1–40 ratios in an idealized clinical sample by semi-automated Aβ immunoprecipitation followed by closely related sandwich immunoassays. The amyloid-positive and amyloid-negative groups (dichotomized according to Aβ42/40 in cerebrospinal fluid) were compared regarding the median difference, mean difference, standardized effect size (Cohen’s d) and receiver operating characteristic curves. For statistical evaluation, we applied bootstrapping.
Results
The median Aβ1–42/1–40 ratio was 20.86% lower in amyloid-positive subjects than in the amyloid-negative group, while the median AβX–42/X–40 ratio was only 15.56% lower. The relative mean difference between amyloid-positive and amyloid-negative subjects was −18.34% for plasma Aβ1–42/1–40 compared to −15.50% for AβX–42/X–40. Cohen’s d was 1.73 for Aβ1–42/1–40 and 1.48 for plasma AβX–42/X–40. Unadjusted p-values < 0.05 were obtained after .632 bootstrapping for all three parameters. Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated very similar areas under the curves for plasma Aβ1–42/1–40 and AβX–42/X–40.
Conclusions
Our findings support the hypothesis that the relatively small difference in the plasma Aβ42/40 ratio between subjects with and without evidence of brain amyloidosis can be accentuated by specifically measuring Aβ1–42/1–40 instead of AβX–42/X–40. A simplified theoretical model explaining this observation is presented.
Collapse
|
11
|
A Novel Automated Chemiluminescence Method for Detecting Cerebrospinal Fluid Amyloid-Beta 1-42 and 1-40, Total Tau and Phosphorylated-Tau: Implications for Improving Diagnostic Performance in Alzheimer's Disease. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10102667. [PMID: 36289929 PMCID: PMC9599653 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10102667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Revised: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Recently, a fully automated instrument for the detection of the Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) (low concentration of Amyloid-beta 42 (Aβ42), high concentration of total tau (T-tau) and Phosphorylated-tau (P-tau181)), has been implemented, namely CLEIA. We conducted a comparative analysis between ELISA and CLEIA methods in order to evaluate the analytical precision and the diagnostic performance of the novel CLEIA system on 111 CSF samples. Results confirmed a robust correlation between ELISA and CLEIA methods, with an improvement of the accuracy with the new CLEIA methodology in the detection of the single biomarkers and in their ratio values. For Aβ42 regression analysis with Passing−Bablok showed a Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.867 (0.8120; 0.907% 95% CI p < 0.0001), T-tau analysis: r = 0.968 (0.954; 0.978% 95% CI p < 0.0001) and P-tau181: r = 0.946 (0.922; 0.962 5% 95% CI p < 0.0001). The overall ROC AUC comparison between ROC in ELISA and ROC in CLEIA confirmed a more accurate ROC AUC with the new automatic method: T-tau AUC ELISA = 0.94 (95% CI 0.89; 0.99 p < 0.0001) vs. AUC CLEIA = 0.95 (95% CI 0.89; 1.00 p < 0.0001), and P-tau181 AUC ELISA = 0.91 (95% CI 0.85; 0.98 p < 0.0001) vs. AUC CLEIA = 0.98 (95% CI 0.95; 1.00 p < 0.0001). The performance of the new CLEIA method in automation is comparable and, for tau and P-tau181, even better, as compared with standard ELISA. Hopefully, in the future, automation could be useful in clinical diagnosis and also in the context of clinical studies.
Collapse
|
12
|
Greenberg BD, Pettigrew C, Soldan A, Wang J, Wang MC, Darrow JA, Albert MS, Moghekar A. CSF Alzheimer Disease Biomarkers: Time-Varying Relationships With MCI Symptom Onset and Associations With Age, Sex, and ApoE4. Neurology 2022; 99:e1640-e1650. [PMID: 36216518 PMCID: PMC9559947 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000200953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES This study aimed to examine whether baseline CSF measures of Alzheimer disease (AD)-related pathology are associated with the time to onset of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and whether these associations differ by age, sex, Apolipoprotein E (ApoE4) status, and proximal (≤7 years) vs distal (>7 years) time to symptom onset. METHODS Measures of amyloid (Aβ1-42 and Aβ1-40), phospho-tau (ptau181), and total tau (t-tau) were determined from CSF samples obtained at baseline from participants in an ongoing longitudinal project, known as the Biomarkers for Older Controls at Risk for Alzheimer Disease study (BIOCARD) study. The fully automated, Lumipulse G immunoassay was used to analyze the specimens. Cox regression models were used to examine the relationship of baseline biomarker levels with time to symptom onset of MCI and interactions with age, sex, and ApoE allelic status in subjects who progressed from normal cognition to MCI. RESULTS Analyses included 273 participants from the BIOCARD cohort, who were cognitively normal and predominantly middle-aged at baseline, and have been followed for an average of 16 years (max = 23.6). During follow-up, 94 progressed to MCI (median time to symptom onset = 6.9 years). In Cox regression models, elevated ptau181 and t-tau levels were associated with time to MCI symptom onset if it occurred within 7 years of baseline (HR 1.386 and 1.329; p = 0.009 and 0.017, respectively), while a lower Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio was associated with symptom onset if it occurred >7 years from baseline (HR 0.596, p = 0.003). There were also significant 3-way CSF × age × sex interactions for ptau181 and Aβ42/Aβ40, with follow-up analyses indicating that associations between these biomarkers and progression to MCI were stronger among men than among women, but this difference between sexes diminished with increasing age. DISCUSSION The lengthy follow-up of BIOCARD participants permitted an examination of time-varying associations between CSF AD biomarkers with MCI symptom onset and the influence of sex, baseline age, and ApoE4 genotype on these associations. These factors may inform clinical trial enrollment strategies, or trial duration and outcomes, which may use these measures as surrogate markers of treatment response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barry D Greenberg
- From the Department of Neurology (B.D.G., C.P., A.S., J.A.D., M.S.A., A.M.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; and Department of Biostatistics (J.W., M.-C.W.), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
| | - Corinne Pettigrew
- From the Department of Neurology (B.D.G., C.P., A.S., J.A.D., M.S.A., A.M.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; and Department of Biostatistics (J.W., M.-C.W.), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Anja Soldan
- From the Department of Neurology (B.D.G., C.P., A.S., J.A.D., M.S.A., A.M.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; and Department of Biostatistics (J.W., M.-C.W.), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jiangxia Wang
- From the Department of Neurology (B.D.G., C.P., A.S., J.A.D., M.S.A., A.M.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; and Department of Biostatistics (J.W., M.-C.W.), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Mei-Cheng Wang
- From the Department of Neurology (B.D.G., C.P., A.S., J.A.D., M.S.A., A.M.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; and Department of Biostatistics (J.W., M.-C.W.), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jacqueline A Darrow
- From the Department of Neurology (B.D.G., C.P., A.S., J.A.D., M.S.A., A.M.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; and Department of Biostatistics (J.W., M.-C.W.), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Marilyn S Albert
- From the Department of Neurology (B.D.G., C.P., A.S., J.A.D., M.S.A., A.M.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; and Department of Biostatistics (J.W., M.-C.W.), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Abhay Moghekar
- From the Department of Neurology (B.D.G., C.P., A.S., J.A.D., M.S.A., A.M.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; and Department of Biostatistics (J.W., M.-C.W.), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Keshavan A, O'Shea F, Chapman MD, Hart MS, Lunn MP, Paterson RW, Rohrer JD, Mummery CJ, Fox NC, Zetterberg H, Schott JM. CSF biomarkers for dementia. Pract Neurol 2022; 22:285-294. [PMID: 35301255 DOI: 10.1136/practneurol-2021-003310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Although cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker testing is incorporated into some current guidelines for the diagnosis of dementia (such as England's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)), it is not widely accessible for most patients for whom biomarkers could potentially change management. Here we share our experience of running a clinical cognitive CSF service and discuss recent developments in laboratory testing including the use of the CSF amyloid-β 42/40 ratio and automated assay platforms. We highlight the importance of collaborative working between clinicians and laboratory staff, of preanalytical sample handling, and discuss the various factors influencing interpretation of the results in appropriate clinical contexts. We advocate for broadening access to CSF biomarkers by sharing clinical expertise, protocols and interpretation with colleagues working in psychiatry and elderly care, especially when access to CSF may be part of a pathway to disease-modifying treatments for Alzheimer's disease and other forms of dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashvini Keshavan
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Frankie O'Shea
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Miles D Chapman
- Neuroimmunology and CSF Laboratory, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.,Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Melanie S Hart
- Neuroimmunology and CSF Laboratory, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.,Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Michael Pt Lunn
- Neuroimmunology and CSF Laboratory, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.,MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Ross W Paterson
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Jonathan D Rohrer
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, University College London Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Catherine J Mummery
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - Nick C Fox
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Henrik Zetterberg
- Fluid Biomarkers Laboratory, UK DRI at University College London, UK Dementia Research Institute, London, UK.,Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg Sahlgrenska Academy, Goteborg, Sweden
| | - Jonathan M Schott
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|