Polygenic score modifies risk for Alzheimer's disease in APOE ε4 homozygotes at phenotypic extremes

Clinical application of whole genome sequencing in young onset dementia: challenges and opportunities

INTRODUCTION

Young onset dementia (YOD) by its nature is difficult to diagnose. Despite involvement of multidisciplinary neurogenetics services, patients with YOD and their families face significant diagnostic delays. Genetic testing for people with YOD currently involves a staggered, iterative approach. There is currently no optimal single genetic investigation that simultaneously identifies the different genetic variants resulting in YOD.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses the advances in clinical genomic testing for people with YOD. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) can be employed as a 'one stop shop' genomic test for YOD. In addition to single nucleotide variants, WGS can reliably detect structural variants, short tandem repeat expansions, mitochondrial genetic variants as well as capture single nucleotide polymorphisms for the calculation of polygenic risk scores.

EXPERT OPINION

WGS, when used as the initial genetic test, can enhance the likelihood of a precision diagnosis and curtail the time taken to reach this. Finding a clinical diagnosis using WGS can reduce invasive and expensive investigations and could be cost effective. These advances need to be balanced against the limitations of the technology and the genetic counseling needs for these vulnerable patients and their families.

Resistance and Resilience to Alzheimer's Disease

Dementia is a significant public health crisis; the most common underlying cause of age-related cognitive decline and dementia is Alzheimer's disease neuropathologic change (ADNC). As such, there is an urgent need to identify novel therapeutic targets for the treatment and prevention of the underlying pathologic processes that contribute to the development of AD dementia. Although age is the top risk factor for dementia in general and AD specifically, these are not inevitable consequences of advanced age. Some individuals are able to live to advanced age without accumulating significant pathology (resistance to ADNC), whereas others are able to maintain cognitive function despite the presence of significant pathology (resilience to ADNC). Understanding mechanisms of resistance and resilience will inform therapeutic strategies to promote these processes to prevent or delay AD dementia. This article will highlight what is currently known about resistance and resilience to AD, including our current understanding of possible underlying mechanisms that may lead to candidate preventive and treatment interventions for this devastating neurodegenerative disease.

An interpretable Alzheimer's disease oligogenic risk score informed by neuroimaging biomarkers improves risk prediction and stratification

Introduction

Stratification of Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients into risk subgroups using Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS) presents novel opportunities for the development of clinical trials and disease-modifying therapies. However, the heterogeneous nature of AD continues to pose significant challenges for the clinical broadscale use of PRS. PRS remains unfit in demonstrating sufficient accuracy in risk prediction, particularly for individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and in allowing feasible interpretation of specific genes or SNPs contributing to disease risk. We propose adORS, a novel oligogenic risk score for AD, to better predict risk of disease by using an optimized list of relevant genetic risk factors.

Methods

Using whole genome sequencing data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort (n  =  1,545), we selected 20 genes that exhibited the strongest correlations with FDG-PET and AV45-PET, recognized neuroimaging biomarkers that detect functional brain changes in AD. This subset of genes was incorporated into adORS to assess, in comparison to PRS, the prediction accuracy of CN vs. AD classification and MCI conversion prediction, risk stratification of the ADNI cohort, and interpretability of the genetic information included in the scores.

Results

adORS improved AUC scores over PRS in both CN vs. AD classification and MCI conversion prediction. The oligogenic model also refined risk-based stratification, even without the assistance of APOE, thus reflecting the true prevalence rate of the ADNI cohort compared to PRS. Interpretation analysis shows that genes included in adORS, such as ATF6, EFCAB11, ING5, SIK3, and CD46, have been observed in similar neurodegenerative disorders and/or are supported by AD-related literature.

Discussion

Compared to conventional PRS, adORS may prove to be a more appropriate choice of differentiating patients into high or low genetic risk of AD in clinical studies or settings. Additionally, the ability to interpret specific genetic information allows the focus to be shifted from general relative risk based on a given population to the information that adORS can provide for a single individual, thus permitting the possibility of personalized treatments for AD.

Testing a polygenic risk score for morphological microglial activation in Alzheimer's disease and aging

Neuroinflammation and the activation of microglial cells are among the earliest events in Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, direct observation of microglia in living people is not currently possible. Here, we indexed the heritable propensity for neuroinflammation with polygenic risk scores (PRS), using results from a recent genome-wide analysis of a validated post-mortem measure of morphological microglial activation. We sought to determine whether a PRS for microglial activation (PRS mic ) could augment the predictive performance of existing AD PRSs for late-life cognitive impairment. First, PRS mic were calculated and optimized in a calibration cohort (Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), n=450), with resampling. Second, predictive performance of optimal PRS mic was assessed in two independent, population-based cohorts (total n=212,237). Our PRS mic showed no significant improvement in predictive power for either AD diagnosis or cognitive performance. Finally, we explored associations of PRS mic with a comprehensive set of imaging and fluid AD biomarkers in ADNI. This revealed some nominal associations, but with inconsistent effect directions. While genetic scores capable of indexing risk for neuroinflammatory processes in aging are highly desirable, more well-powered genome-wide studies of microglial activation are required. Further, biobank-scale studies would benefit from phenotyping of proximal neuroinflammatory processes to improve the PRS development phase.