Cervical biopsy/cytology correlation data can be collected prospectively and shared clinically

Reappraisal of cytology-histology correlation in cervical cytology based on the recent American Society of Cytopathology guidelines (2017) at a cancer research centre

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of recently published American Society of Cytopathology (ASC) guidelines (2017) on the conduct of cervical cytology-histology correlation (CHC).

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted for cervical biopsies with their corresponding conventional cervical smears over a 7.5-year period (January 2011-June 2018). As per the ASC guidelines, a discrepancy assessment grid was prepared. Major cytology-histology discordance was defined as a diagnosis of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) or CIN2+ in one of the tests with negative result in the other. Smears and biopsies of all discordant cases were reviewed for reasons of overcall and undercall.

RESULTS

Of the 341 cervical biopsies with corresponding Papanicolaou smear, cytology-histology agreement was noted in 249 (73%) cases. Major discordance was observed in 22 cases (6.4%)-16 undercalls and six overcalls on cytology-while minor discrepancies were noted in 70 cases. Atypical metaplasia and repair changes were the main reasons for overcall while small HSIL cells in atrophic smear and scant HSIL cells were important causes of undercall on cytology review. Using the ASC guidelines, we could improvise upon the existing CHC methodology for categorisation of cyto-histological pairs of cases with a cytological diagnosis of atypical glandular cells.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrates, for the first time, that the recent ASC guidelines facilitate cervical CHC, especially for categorisation of cases with atypical glandular cells on cytology. Uniform application of these guidelines would standardise the conduct of cervical CHC internationally and provide scope for inter-laboratory comparison of data as well as enhance self-learning and peer learning.

Histopathologic and Cytopathologic Diagnostic Discrepancies in Head and Neck Region: Pitfalls, Causes, and Preventive Strategies

BACKGROUND: Clinicians commonly utilize fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) for the primary investigation of head and neck masses. Correlation of these results with the surgical resection diagnosis is an essential part of quality control and assurance programs in all cytology laboratories.

METHODS: Of 610 cases, 20 (3.3%) had corresponding surgical resections performed within 3 months of the FNAB, with a discrepant diagnosis identified through a search that involved all FNABs performed on the head and neck region, excluding the thyroid gland, at Wayne State University between 1999 and 2004. Sites of discrepant samples included the parotid or submandibular gland (n = 5), lymph nodes (n = 8), and paratracheal/paraesophageal neck masses (n = 7).

RESULTS: The reasons of false-negative FNABs included sampling errors (n = 3), insufficient material for an adequate interpretation (n = 5), lack of triage necessary for ancillary studies (n = 4), and interpretation errors (n = 6). There were 2 false-positive FNABs, both reported as mucoepidermoid carcinoma and showed chronic sialadenitis in one and lymphoepithelial cyst in the other.

CONCLUSIONS: FNAB is an effective tool for the diagnosis and triage of patients with head and neck masses that can be further improved with an onsite immediate adequacy evaluation and triage performed by a pathologist.

Quality improvement opportunities in gynecologic cytologic-histologic correlations: findings from the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference working group 4

CONTEXT

Cytopathology experts, interested stakeholders, and representatives from the College of American Pathologists, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the American Society of Cytopathology, the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology, the American Society for Clinical Pathology, and the American Society of Cytotechnology convened the Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference to present preliminary consensus statements developed by working groups, including the Cytologic-Histologic Correlations Working Group 4, using results from surveys and literature review. Conference participants voted on statements, suggested changes where consensus was not achieved, and voted on proposed changes.

OBJECTIVES

To document existing practices in gynecologic cytologic-histologic correlation, to develop consensus statements on appropriate practices, to explore standardization, and to suggest improvement in these practices.

DATA SOURCES

The material is based on survey results from 546 US laboratories, review of the literature from 1988 to 2011, and the College of American Pathologists Web site for consensus comments and additional survey questions.

CONCLUSIONS

Cytologic-histologic correlations can be performed retrospectively, during initial case review, or both. At minimum, all available slides should be reviewed for a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion Papanicolaou test with negative biopsies. The preferred monitor for correlations is the positive predictive value of a Papanicolaou test. Laboratories should design cytologic-histologic correlation programs to explore existing or perceived quality deficiencies.

The impact of a multidisciplinary conference in the management of cervical cytological and histological abnormalities: a university hospital experience

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates the impact of a cytology-colposcopy correlation conference (CCCC) on the management of preinvasive cervical lesions in a university hospital.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of 130 consecutive cases from the colposcopy clinic at our University Health Center that were presented in the CCCC during a period of 1 year (November 2006 to October 2007). Variables examined to assess the usefulness of CCCC included the actual number of times there was a recorded change in the diagnosis or management recommendation secondary to presentation in the conference. The algorithms from the 2001 American Society of Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology consensus guidelines for the management of cytologic and histologic abnormalities were used to identify the patients in whom the conference recommendations were a deviation from the standard society recommendations.

RESULTS

The diagnosis was changed on review of the original cytology or biopsy 24 times (13%), downgraded 13 times (7%), and upgraded 11 times (6%). The conference recommendations were a modification of the standard 2001 American Society of Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology guidelines 38 times (21%) in 34 patients. The most common triage change was the recommendation for observation of unexplained high-grade cytology with negative or lower-grade biopsy (73%), followed by observation of high-grade lesion on biopsy (27%). This recommendation, while an option in the 2006 guidelines, was not given as a choice in the 2001 guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

The CCCC at our institution provided significant input into the management of patients with preinvasive cervical lesions, anticipating some of the changes made in the 2006 guidelines.

Longitudinal clinical evaluation of a novel antibody cocktail for detection of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions on cervical cytology specimens

CONTEXT

Although cervical cancer screening by cytology is successful, the test continues to show relatively poor operating characteristics. Cell cycle markers may enhance detection of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the clinical usefulness of ProExC, an immunocytochemical assay for cell cycle components, performed on routine cervical cytology samples.

DESIGN

Cervical cytology samples were collected using the SurePath method. Residual cells remaining after preparation of the Papanicolaou-stained slide were used to make a second slide for ProExC staining using an indirect polymer-based immunoperoxidase method. Only adequately cellular slides were evaluated for the presence of nuclear staining within cytologically abnormal epithelial cells. Results were correlated with clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

Six hundred twenty-four samples were satisfactorily cellular and stained. Correlation with clinical follow-up for subsequent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2+ on biopsy/high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on cytology (CIN 2+/HSIL) showed that 434 results were true negative, 78 true positive, 18 false-negative, and 94 false-positive, resulting in a sensitivity/specificity of 81%/82%. When ProExC results were combined with any level of cytologic atypia, sensitivity for CIN 2+/HSIL was 92% and specificity was 84%.

CONCLUSIONS

ProExC shows promise as an aid in enhancing the sensitivity and specificity of cervical cytology for subsequent CIN 2+/HSIL and may be useful in identifying those cervical lesions most apt to progress.

The effect of continuous monitoring of cytologic-histologic correlation data on cervical cancer screening performance

CONTEXT

The use of Papanicolaou (Pap) test cytologic-histologic correlation in quality improvement activities is not well studied.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if continuous monitoring of correlation data improves performance.

DESIGN

Participants in the College of American Pathologists Q-Tracks program (213 laboratories) self-reported the number of Pap test-histologic biopsy correlation discrepancies every quarter for up to 8 years. A mixed linear model determined if the length of participation in the Q-Tracks program was associated with improved performance. Main outcome measures were predictive value of a positive Pap test, Pap test sensitivity, sampling sensitivity, and proportion of positive histologic diagnoses following a Pap test diagnosis of atypical squamous cells or atypical glandular cells.

RESULTS

Institutions evaluated 287,570 paired Pap test-histologic correlation specimens and found 98,424 (34.2%) true-positive Pap test correlations, 19,006 (6.6%) false-positive Pap test correlations, and 6575 (2.3%) false-negative Pap test correlations. The mean predictive value of a positive Pap test, sensitivity, screening and interpretive sensitivity, sampling sensitivity, and proportion of positive histologic diagnoses following a Pap test diagnosis of atypical squamous or glandular cells were 83.6%, 93.7%, 99.2%, 94.2%, 60.3%, and 38.8%, respectively. Longer participation was significantly associated with a higher predictive value of a positive Pap test (P = .01), higher Pap test sensitivity (P = .002), higher Pap test sampling sensitivity (P = .03), and higher proportion of positive histologic diagnoses for a Pap test diagnosis of atypical squamous cells (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term monitoring of cytologic-histologic correlation is associated with improvement in cytologic-histologic correlation performance.

Validity of sampling error as a cause of noncorrelation

BACKGROUND

Sampling error is a common explanation of noncorrelation in women whose Papanicolaou (Pap) tests show high-grade intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) but whose follow-up cervical biopsies show only cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1, koilocytosis, or reactive/inflammatory changes. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the validity of sampling error in this setting by determining the proportion of negative colposcopic cervical biopsies in women with HSIL who subsequently undergo cone/loop electrode excision procedure (LEEP) biopsies or repeat cervical biopsies that confirm the diagnosis of high-grade CIN (HGCIN).

METHODS

In all, 368 cases of HSIL were retrieved from the computerized database from January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2005. Follow-up was obtained as part of routine quality assurance/quality control activities including cytologic-histologic correlation.

RESULTS

A total of 368 HSIL Pap diagnoses were retrieved. Of the 254 cases that were followed up by cervical biopsy, 146 showed HGCIN in the biopsy. Of the remaining 108 patients whose cervical biopsies failed to demonstrate HGCIN, 47 had a subsequent procedure, either cone/LEEP, cervical biopsy, or repeat Pap test. Cone biopsy/LEEP was performed in 34 cases (72.3%) with a diagnosis of HGCIN in 19. Repeat cervical biopsy was performed in 9 cases (19.1%) with HGCIN diagnosed in 5. Repeat Pap test was performed in 4 cases (8.5%) with HSIL diagnosed in 2.

CONCLUSIONS

In the population of women with HSIL by Pap test followed up by cervical biopsy with or without subsequent cone/LEEP, there was a discordant cervical biopsy rate for HGCIN of 43%. In the subgroup of women with HSIL by Pap test followed up by cervical biopsy and subsequent cone/LEEP or repeat cervical biopsy, the proportion of women with negative colposcopic cervical biopsy and subsequent histology-proven HGCIN was 56%. These figures justify sampling error as a valid cause of noncorrelation in women with HSIL followed up by cervical biopsy alone.

Variability in Cytologic-Histologic Correlation Practices and Implications for Patient Safety

Context.—The Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 require that laboratories perform cytologic-histologic correlation, although the optimal methods and the value of performing correlation have not been determined.

Objective.—To determine the similarities and differences in how laboratories perform cytologic-histologic correlation.

Design.—One hundred sixty-two American laboratories were sent a letter requesting copies of the materials they used in the cytologic-histologic correlation process. The returned materials were classified into the categories of forms, logs, and tally sheets. A checklist (derived from the College of American Pathologists Laboratory Accreditation Cytopathology Checklist) was developed to classify the “minimum expected” (15) and “additional” data points that laboratories collected when they performed a correlation.

Participants.—American pathology laboratories.

Main Outcome Measures.—Measures were percentage of laboratories that recorded minimum expected and additional data points and the frequency with which specific minimum expected data points were recorded.

Results.—The response frequency was 32.1%, and a total of 84 cytologic-histologic correlation materials were obtained. The only minimum expected variables recorded on forms or logs by more than 50% of laboratories were cytology case number, sign-out cytology diagnosis, surgical pathology case number, and sign-out surgical pathology diagnosis. Nine (17.3%) laboratories did not record data on forms, logs, or tally sheets. The mean number of minimum expected and additional variables recorded on forms was 6.5 and 8.7, respectively.

Conclusions.—Laboratories record data from the cytologic-histologic correlation process in a number of ways, indicating the lack of standardization of the data collection process.

Errors in pathology and laboratory medicine: consequences and prevention

Reducing errors and improving quality are an integral part of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine. The rate of errors is reviewed for the pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical phases for a specimen. The quality systems in place in pathology today are identified and compared with benchmarks for quality. The types and frequency of errors and quality systems are reviewed for surgical pathology, cytopathology, clinical chemistry, hematology, microbiology, molecular biology, and transfusion medicine. Seven recommendations are made to reduce errors in future for Pathology and Laboratory Medicine.

Correspondance histologique des frottis cervico-utérins détectant un cancer ou une lésion de haut grade

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to analyze the histological-cytological correlations for Pap smears having detected cancer or high-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesion (HSIL) of the cervix.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

The study about 311 women is retrospective. The average age is 36.4 years. Group 1 (histological diagnosis of high-grade or invasive lesion) includes 244 women (77.5%). Group 2 (histological diagnosis other than high-grade or invasive lesion) includes 37 women (11.9%) with a presumed diagnosis of HSIL. Group 3 (absence of histological follow-up) includes 30 women (9.6%) with a presumed diagnosis of HSIL.

RESULTS

In group 1, the presumed cytological diagnosis is HSIL in 229 cases, squamous carcinoma in 11 cases and adenocarcinoma in two cases. In this group, the average delay between the Pap smear and the first histology is equal to two months. It is longer than 6 months in seven cases. The diagnosis of cancer or high-grade lesion is confirmed histologically on a first biopsy of the cervix in 196 cases, a second or a third biopsy in 10 cases, an endocervical curettage in six cases and a surgical specimen in 32 cases. In the group 2, the histological diagnosis is normal-benign in 14 cases (presumed cytological false positives) and condyloma-CIN 1 in 23 cases (presumed overevaluations).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Results highlight benefits of interactive exchanges between clinicians and pathologists, and the necessity of review of discordant cases by several pathologists in due time, with written comments and coding of the conclusions of the review. Histological follow-up is late or not done in some women.

Abnormal Pap smears with negative follow-up biopsies: Improving cytohistologic correlations

A review of the literature noted 11-16% discrepancy rates in cytology and histology diagnoses. We collected 358 cases with abnormal cytology and matching cervical biopsies. There were 123 (30%) discrepant pairs, of which 34 (27%) had negative biopsies following Papanicolaou (Pap) smears with squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL). These constituted our study group. All biopsies were obtained within an average of 5 wk after Pap smears (range, 0-18 wk). After confirming original diagnoses, all biopsies were evaluated for the presence of squamocolumnar junction, proper orientation, gross size of specimen, denudation of superficial mucosa, and inadequate sectioning through blocks. Each block was recut at three levels and reviewed microscopically. Five biopsies (14%) needed reorientation. Nine biopsies (26%) showed more than a 2-mm difference from gross size. Eleven (32%) new SILs were found. Adequate deep sectioning and proper orientation of tissues can significantly improve cytohistologic correlations.

Cytologic-histologic correlation of nongynecologic cytopathology cases: separation of determinate from indeterminate cytologic diagnoses for analysis and monitoring of laboratory performance

Much of the literature on the quality-assurance aspect of cytologic-histologic correlation (CHC) has focused on gynecologic cytology. For nongynecologic cytopathology, the process is complicated by the use of determinate (positive for malignant cells, negative for malignant cells) and indeterminate (atypical, suspicious, or follicular lesion) diagnostic categories. Here, we illustrate our routine methodology for analyzing CHC data on nongynecologic cytopathology cases by separating determinate from indeterminate cases. A focused list of determinate and indeterminate cytopathology cases with surgical pathology correlation is generated each week. The determinate cases are ascertained as true positive (TP), true negative (TN), false positive (FP), or false negative (TN). The discrepant cases (FP and FN) are investigated to determine the cause (sampling, interpretation, or screening). For indeterminate cases, the surgical pathology outcome (benign, malignant) and suitability of the cytopathology category utilized are reviewed. For the focused period of 4 mo, sensitivity was 70% and specificity was 100%. The most common reason for false-negative diagnoses was a sampling problem in the cytologic specimen; there were no false-positive diagnoses. Malignant outcomes for follicular lesion, atypical, and suspicious diagnoses were 29%, 40%, and 76%, respectively. Data derived from regularly performed CHC are useful in reviewing the diagnostic performance of the laboratory.