Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the retroperitoneum: a series of 111 cases not including specific organs

Benefits of 3D technique in guiding percutaneous retroperitoneal biopsies

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the usefulness and advantages of multiplanar reformations (MPR) during multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT)-guided percutaneous fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) and core biopsy of retroperitoneal lesions that are difficult to access with the guidance of ultrasound and axial CT alone owing to overlying bony structures, large vessels or abdominal organs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MDCT-guided retroperitoneal FNAB and core biopsy was performed on 14 patients with suspected retroperitoneal neoplasm. We used MPR images (sagittal and coronal) obtained with a six-detector-row MDCT scanner and 20-22 gauge Chiba needles.

RESULTS

Using MDCT with 3D MPR allowed biological samples to be obtained in all cases (ten cytological and four histological) and diagnostic samples in 11/14 cases (78.5%). Histological samples were deemed adequate for diagnostic assessment in all cases and cytological samples in 7/10 cases (70%).

CONCLUSIONS

MPR images allowed sampling of retroperitoneal lesions until now considered unreachable with the guidance of axial MDCT alone. Compared with the conventional procedure, the use of MPR images does not increase the procedure time.

Clinical value of image-guided fine needle aspiration of retroperitoneal masses and lymph nodes in gynecologic oncology

OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of fine needle aspiration of retroperitoneal masses and lymph nodes in gynecologic oncology.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 101 punctures administered to 84 patients aged 23-86 years. The method's sensitivity and specificity were evaluated by clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

A satisfactory sampling was obtained in 89.1% of punctures, and a cytological diagnosis was made in 88.1%. The size of the lymph nodes punctured was less than 14 mm in 46.5%. This test has a sensitivity of 87.5%, specificity of 88.9%, positive predictive value of 98%, negative predictive value of 53.3%, and accuracy of 87.7%. Four patients presented complications: pain (2), hematoma (1), and right ureteral perforation (1).

CONCLUSIONS

The fine needle aspiration technique has excellent positive predictive value and low morbidity. As a method of visualization, CT-scan, in combination with lymphography, allows the location of small lesions and the definition of their internal structures. The weak negative predictive value of fine needle aspiration might be correctible by laparoscopy-directed biopsy, and its potential is clearly ensured by the development of techniques for locating sentinel lymph nodes.

Chirurgie des sarcomes rétropéritonéaux

Retroperitoneal sarcomas comprise approximately 15% of all soft tissue sarcomas and 50% of all retroperitoneal tumours. Helical CT of the abdomen and pelvis, with selective use of MRI will establish the extent of the tumour, its retroperitoneal location, the degree of necrosis, and the evidence of metastasis. A CT guided core needle biopsy is the optimal pre operative tissue sampling. A complete surgical resection is the mainstay of the treatment with a rim of normal tissue that often requires removal of adjacent organs. The 5-year probability of local control is approximately 50%. The role of adjuvant therapy is evolving and at present should not be used outside the investigational setting.

Telomerase activity predicts malignancy in percutaneous image-guided needle biopsy specimens of the abdomen and pelvis

PURPOSE

To determine prospectively if assessment of telomerase activity in percutaneous needle biopsy specimens improves sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of abdominal and pelvic malignancy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was approved by the institutional review board, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. A prospective double-blinded design was used to assess telomerase activity in abdominal and pelvic biopsy specimens from 99 patients (64 men, 35 women; age range, 22-87 years). After the clinical sample was retrieved, a study specimen from an extra needle pass was divided and independently analyzed for cytologic characteristics and telomerase activity. The final diagnosis was based on chart review at a minimum 1-year follow-up. Statistical analyses included sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of cytologic examination and/or telomerase activity in predicting malignancy.

RESULTS

Data from study specimens indicated that the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of telomerase activity (n=99) in predicting malignancy were 55%, 79%, and 60%, respectively. For cytologic examination (n=86), the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in predicting malignancy were 74%, 94%, and 78%, respectively. Combining the two tests (n=86) and classifying a positive reading with either test as malignant improved sensitivity (83%) (P <.05) without altering specificity (76%). In 20 patients who had clinical sample reports that were classified as indeterminate, telomerase activity (n=20) yielded a higher sensitivity (62%) (P <.05) and similar specificity (86%) compared with cytologic examination (n=15), which yielded a sensitivity of 11% and a specificity of 83%.

CONCLUSION

In percutaneous biopsy specimens of the abdomen and pelvis, the combination of cytologic examination and telomerase activity yielded an increased sensitivity in predicting malignancy. In addition, assessing telomerase activity can help identify cancer even when cytologic results are indeterminate.

Diagnosis of Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors around the Pelvis

OBJECTIVE

To distinguish between benign and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors around the pelvis.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 30 patients with benign and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors located around the pelvis was performed. Clinical, imaging and histological features of 19 benign and 11 malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors around the pelvis were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Nearly all patients exhibited pain at presentation in cases involving both benign and malignant tumors. Although tumor size, duration of symptoms and presence of sensory disturbance possessed little value in differential diagnosis, severe motor weakness was observed exclusively in patients presenting with malignant tumors. On CT or MRI, central enhancement was apparent in 11 of the 19 benign tumors; in contrast, central enhancement was evident in one of the 11 malignant tumors. Fine needle aspiration cytology was performed in 11 tumors; correct diagnosis was achieved in four tumors. Core needle biopsy was performed in five tumors, all of which were correctly diagnosed with no neurological deficits. Immunohistochemically, all benign tumors were diffusely positive for S-100 protein, whereas malignant tumors were negative or focally positive for S-100 protein. Ki-67 index was less than 4% in all benign tumors; additionally, this index was 7-36% in malignant tumors.

CONCLUSION

Central enhancement pattern on imaging studies strongly suggests a benign tumor; in contrast, severe motor weakness suggests malignant lesions. Core needle biopsy was reliable with respect to preoperative diagnosis.

Tumeurs rétropéritonéales primitives de l’adulte

Primary retroperitoneal tumors are rare and most of the time malignant. Because of the large space in which they grow, they are often discovered lately as they are large. CT and MR are the imaging techniques of choice for the primary diagnosis and the follow up of these tumors. Multiplanar reconstructions , signal and density resolution help for the nature diagnosis. The examinations allowed to find associated signs that helps also for the right diagnosis. The purpose of this paper is to answer a serie of questions: Is the mass in the retroperitoneal space? Are they imaging signs that helps for the diagnosis of nature? Are they associated signs that helps for the diagnosis of nature? What are the most common diagnosis? Is there any place for percutaneous biopsies? What is the role of imaging in the follow up? Are there any other processes that can mimic retroperitoneal tumors?