Epithelioid variant of gastrointestinal stromal tumor: Diagnosis by fine-needle aspiration

Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of MET-variant digestive tract tumors

The receptor tyrosine kinase encoded by the MET gene plays an important role in various cellular processes such as growth, survival, migration and angiogenesis, and its abnormal activation is closely related to the occurrence and development of various tumors. This article reviews the recent advances in diagnosis and treatment of MET-variant digestive tract tumors. In terms of diagnosis, the application of next-generation sequencing technology and liquid biopsy technology makes the detection of MET variants more accurate and efficient, providing a reliable basis for individualized treatment. In terms of treatment, MET inhibitors such as crizotinib and cabotinib have shown good efficacy in clinical trials. In addition, the combination of immunotherapy and MET inhibitors also demonstrated potential synergies, further improving the therapeutic effect. However, the complexity and heterogeneity of drug resistance mechanisms are still one of the difficulties in current research. In the future, it is necessary to further deepen the understanding of the mechanism of MET variation and explore new combination treatment strategies to improve the overall survival rate and quality of life of patients. The diagnosis and treatment of MET-variant digestive tract tumors are moving towards precision and individualization, and have broad application prospects.

Mesenchymal neoplasms of the tubular gut and adjacent structures: experience with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration cytopathology

INTRODUCTION

Unlike epithelial malignancies, mesenchymal neoplasms arising within the tubular gut are less often encountered in endoscopic ultrasound-guided (EUS) fine-needle aspiration biopsies (FNABs). Nonetheless, preoperative diagnosis of such neoplasms has important therapeutic and prognostic value. We report our experience with this category of neoplasms from the past decade.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a 10-year retrospective search at our respective institutions to identify EUS-guided FNAB cases of mesenchymal neoplasms arising from the tubular gut wall and closely adjacent structures. Cytopathologic diagnoses were compared to corresponding surgical pathology (SP) when available. Cases with either no confirmatory cell block (CB) immunohistochemical (IHC) staining, or no SP were excluded.

RESULTS

Two-hundred eighty-two cases (M:F = 1:1; age range: 25-94 years, mean age = 60 years) of EUS-guided FNAB from the tubular gut met our criteria. Onsite adequacy was performed on nearly all cases. Case numbers: 209 gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), 58 smooth muscle neoplasms, and 15 miscellaneous neoplasms. Of these, 188 (67%) had SP follow-up. We found that 258 (91%) aspirates had a correct specific diagnosis, 3 (1%) were nondiagnostic, 18 (6%) had indeterminate diagnoses, and 3 (1%) had incorrect diagnoses (2 leiomyosarcomas mistaken as leiomyoma, and 1 fibrosclerotic lesion mistaken as inflammatory pseudotumor). Of 94 cases with no SP, all had a specific cytologic diagnosis based on confirmatory IHC staining from the CB including 61 GISTs, 29 smooth muscle neoplasms, and 4 miscellaneous tumors.

CONCLUSION

This study endorses the clinical utility of EUS-guided FNAB in the diagnosis of tubular gut mesenchymal neoplasms. A definitive and accurate diagnosis is possible in over 90% of cases, chiefly when cytomorphology is coupled with optimal cellularity and IHC from a concurrent CB. EUS-guided FNAB diagnosis of mesenchymal tubular gut neoplasms may play an important role in determining neoadjuvant therapy as targeted therapy evolves.

Cytopathology of classic type epithelioid sarcoma: a series of 20 cases and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

As a rare soft tissue malignancy, epithelioid sarcoma (EpS) is infrequently subjected to cytopathologic analysis. With the exception of a few series, the cytology literature regarding EpS is largely limited to single case reports. Our purpose was to evaluate our experience with EpS, and review the literature regarding its cytopathology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search was made of our cytopathology and surgical pathology databases for cases diagnosed as EpS. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy smears and imprint smears were performed and examined using standard technique. Effusion samples were processed using liquid-based slides.

RESULTS

Twenty cases of EpS were retrieved from 10 patients (M:F 1:1; mean age = 36 years). One patient had 5, 1 patient had 3, and 3 patients had 2 separate specimens. All patients had prior or subsequent tissue confirmation of EpS; all were of the classic/distal type. Seven were new patient cases, 7 were locally recurrent, and 6 were metastases. Sites included lower extremity (8 cases), upper extremity (4), trunk (4), serous effusion (2), scalp (1), and mediastinum (1). Specific cytologic diagnosis were EpS (13 cases), sarcoma not otherwise specified (5), and malignant neoplasm (2). All cases where cell-block SMARCB-1 staining was used were specifically recognized as EpS. Cytomorphology was composed primarily of epithelioid/plasmacytoid cells having eccentrically positioned nuclei, moderate cytoplasm, and variable nuclear pleomorphism.

CONCLUSION

The cytopathology of EpS is somewhat variable, morphologically non-specific, and mimics that of other neoplasms with epithelioid features. Ancillary immunostaining is necessary for a specific diagnosis in newly encountered patients.

An unexpected diagnosis of ectopic liver diagnosed by fine needle aspiration

The differential diagnosis of perigastric masses is broad, ranging from benign to malignant entities. Among the benign entities, accessory liver lobes and ectopic liver are unusual and often incidentally discovered. Here, we report a patient with malignant melanoma who was clinically suspected to have a perigastric metastasis or a gastrointestinal stromal tumor but was ultimately diagnosed by fine needle aspiration (FNA) to have benign ectopic liver. A 47-year-old male was diagnosed with malignant melanoma of the scalp in May 2015 at a tertiary care hospital. He was found to have a 2.6 cm enhancing mass adjacent to the fundus of the stomach and below the diaphragm by computed tomography imaging. To exclude metastasis, the patient was referred to endoscopy, and an endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA was performed with rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) by a cytopathologist. A relatively new FNA needle (Shark Core) was used, which produced useful core biopsy material. Cytopathology demonstrated flat sheets, single cells, and small clusters of polygonal cells. There was abundant granular cytoplasm, often containing pigment. Cells lacked pleomorphism. The smear findings appeared consistent with hepatocytes. The cell block demonstrated small core fragments of hepatic parenchyma with portal tracts. Immunohistochemistry for arginase-1 confirmed that this was hepatic tissue. ROSE was useful for communicating with the endoscopist that the mass was both far from, and not connected to, the liver. This is the first documented account of perigastric ectopic liver diagnosed by FNA. This entity should be considered in the differential of perigastric masses.

A case of successful detection of disseminated gastrointestinal stromal tumors by ascites smear cytology using cell block preparation with DOG1 immunostaining

Cytological features of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) have been reported, especially regarding fine-needle aspiration cytology, including immunostaining for c-kit and DOG1. Meanwhile, cytological findings of GISTs on ascites cytology have rarely been reported, which may be owing to the rare appearance of GIST tumor cells in ascites. Herein, we present a 66-year-old woman who had disseminated GISTs in the abdomen. The GIST tumor cells appeared sparsely in the ascites smear cytology using ascites obtained at the time of autopsy. Even when widespread intra-abdominal dissemination takes place, GISTs may be hard to detect in ascites smear cytology, based on the experience of this case. However, immunohistochemistry of DOG1 using a cell block preparation was found to clearly visualize the GIST tumor cells, although they were sparsely present. Immunostaining of c-kit did not provide as clear an identification of the tumor cells as DOG1 did. When suspicious about GISTs, it is wise to prepare a cell block to make it possible to visualize the tumor cells immunohistochemically.

Cytopathologic features of epithelioid inflammatory myofibroblastic sarcoma with correlation of histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular cytogenetic analysis

BACKGROUND

Epithelioid inflammatory myofibroblastic sarcoma (E-IMS) is a recently established rare variant of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. It is characterized by a distinctive constellation of clinical, pathological, and molecular features, including a nearly exclusive intraabdominal location, strong male predilection, aggressive clinical course, predominance of epithelioid tumor cells, and Ran-binding protein 2 (RANBP2)-anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion in the majority of cases. To the authors' knowledge, the cytologic features of E-IMS have not been described to date.

METHODS

Cases of E-IMS that had corresponding cytology were searched. Six cytology samples (1 fine-needle aspiration sample, 2 imprint samples, and 3 effusion fluids) containing tumor cells were identified in 5 patients with E-IMS.

RESULTS

The cytomorphology included large monotonous epithelioid cells arranged in loose aggregates or singly, with admixed myxoid stroma, and an inflammatory background rich in neutrophils. The tumor cells had a large, round, eccentric nucleus with vesicular chromatin, prominent nucleoli, and moderate amounts of pale cytoplasm. Delicate thin-walled branching vessels traversing tumor aggregates was a prominent feature in a fine-needle aspiration sample. Immunohistochemically, ALK was positive in all 5 tumors, with a nuclear membranous staining pattern noted in 3 cases and a cytoplasmic pattern observed in the other 2 cases. ALK rearrangement was confirmed in all 5 tumors by molecular genetic studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The cytologic features of E-IMS recapitulate its histologic characteristics. E-IMS merits inclusion in the differential diagnosis of any intraabdominal, large epithelioid cell neoplasm. Confirmation of ALK rearrangement is advisable because patients may benefit from targeted therapies.

Utility of DOG1 Immunomarker in Fine Needle Aspirates of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal tumor of the gastrointestinal tract. DOG1 is a sensitive and specific immunohistochemical marker for the diagnosis of GIST. To date, no study has reported the utility of DOG1 immunocytochemistry on aspirate smears.

METHODS

Aspirates with a cytological diagnosis of GIST were retrieved. DOG1 immunocytochemistry was performed on aspirates with adequate material.

RESULTS

23 cases were included (11 primary, 2 recurrent, 10 metastatic). Primary tumors were most frequently located in the stomach; most metastatic tumors were in the liver. Tumor cells were arranged in cohesive clusters with high cellularity. Cells were spindled, had a low N:C ratio, and a moderate amount of cytoplasm, which was elongated and tapering. Characteristic nuclear features included elongated nuclei with blunt or tapering ends, fine chromatin, mild anisonucleosis, and longitudinal grooves. The mitotic count was low, including in metastatic tumors. DOG1 immunopositivity was noted in 57% of the cases examined. Histopathology was available in 5 cases, all diagnosed as GIST.

CONCLUSION

Cytology is a sensitive investigative modality for the preoperative diagnosis and confirmation of metastasis of GISTs. In ambiguous cases, DOG1 immunocytochemistry can serve as a valuable adjunct. Cytologic assessment, however, cannot predict malignant potential of GISTs as even metastatic tumors display bland nuclear features.

Cytomorphology of gastrointestinal stromal tumors and extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A comprehensive morphologic study

BACKGROUND

The term gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) is used to refer to those mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) which express CD117, a c-kit proto-oncogene protein.

AIMS

To study the cytological features of GIST and extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors (EGIST), to correlate them with histology and to determine cytological indicators of malignancy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cytological smears from patients diagnosed as GIST/EGIST on histology were retrieved. From Jan 2000 to July 2010, 26 GIST (13 primary, 12 metastatic, one recurrent) and seven EGIST (5 primary, one metastatic, one recurrent) cytologic samples from 27 patients were identified.

RESULTS

The patients included 20 males and 7 females with a mean age of 50.6 years. Tumor sites included stomach (5), duodenum (5), ileum (2), ileocecal (1), rectum (1), liver (9), retroperitoneum (5), mesentery (1), subcutaneous nodule (1), supra-penile lump (1), ascitic (1) and pleural fluids (1). The smears were cellular with cohesive to loosely cohesive thinly spread irregularly outlined cell clusters held together by thin calibre vessels. The tumor cells were mild to moderately pleomorphic, spindle to epithelioid with variable chromatin pattern and variable cytoplasm. Cellular dyscohesion, nuclear pleomorphism, intranuclear pseudoinclusions, prominent nucleoli, mitosis and necrosis were more prominent in malignant, metastatic and recurrent tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

GISTs show a wide spectrum of cytological features and the presence of mitosis, necrosis and nuclear pleomorphism can help in prediction of malignant behavior. Further, cytology is a very useful screening modality in patients of GIST and EGIST to detect early recurrence and metastasis at follow-up.

Fine needle aspiration biopsy of hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatocellular nodular lesions: role, controversies and approach to diagnosis

The role of fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy of the liver has evolved. Advances in imaging modalities have obviated the need for tissue confirmation in clinically classic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The risks of needle tract seeding and haematogenous dissemination have been actively debated. Nowadays, cytopathologists are confronted by smaller and smaller nodules, detected due to increased surveillance of high-risk cirrhotic patients. Tissue characterization of small well-differentiated hepatocellular nodular lesions (size less than and equal to 2 cm) is extremely challenging and has therapeutic implications. Major issues in the cytodiagnosis of HCC include: (i) distinguishing benign hepatocellular nodular lesions, namely, large regenerative nodules, dysplastic nodules, focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma from reactive hepatocytes; (ii) distinguishing well-differentiated HCC from benign hepatocellular nodular lesions; (iii) distinguishing poorly differentiated HCC from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and metastatic carcinomas; (iv) determining the histogenesis of a malignant tumour; and (v) determining the site of origin of a malignant tumour. An overview of the biological evolution and histopathological aspects of dysplastic nodules, small HCCs and 'nodule-in-nodule' lesions is presented in tandem with clinically relevant nomenclature. An algorithmic approach to FNA diagnosis of HCC and hepatocellular nodular lesions is outlined. Optimal results depend on (i) a dedicated radiologist-cytopathologist team; (ii) an on-site cytology service, (iii) a combined cytohistological approach, (iv) immunohistochemistry, and (v) clinicopathological correlation. As we move towards personalized medicine, it is envisaged that hepatic FNA is likely to become a point of care in the management protocol as it takes on the additional role of procurement of tumour and peritumoural tissues for genomic and proteomic profiling to enable targeted molecular therapy.

Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of hepatocellular carcinoma and related hepatocellular nodular lesions in cirrhosis: controversies, challenges, and expectations

The role of hepatic fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy has evolved. Advances in imaging modalities have obviated the need for tissue confirmation in most hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). There is risk of needle-tract seeding. Increasingly, small nodules are being detected on ultrasound surveillance of high-risk patients. Diagnostic challenges associated with cirrhosis include distinction of benign hepatocellular nodules, namely, large regenerative nodules and dysplastic nodules, from reactive hepatocytes; and distinction of well-differentiated HCCs from benign hepatocellular nodules. This paper will discuss (i) controversies regarding preoperative/pretransplantation FNA diagnosis of HCC, (ii) update of biological evolution, nomenclature, and histopathologic criteria for diagnosis of precancerous nodules and small HCCs, and (iii) algorithmic approach to FNA diagnosis of hepatocellular nodules. Optimal results depend on dedicated radiologist-cytopathologist team, on-site cytology service; combined cytohistologic approach, immunohistochemistry, and clinicopathologic correlation. Hepatic FNA is likely to be incorporated as a point of care as we move towards personalized medicine.

DOG1 antibody is a highly sensitive and specific marker for gastrointestinal stromal tumors in cytology cell blocks

Initial diagnosis of submucosal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is often made from material obtained by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). Although 95% of GISTs are positive for KIT by immunohistochemical analysis on surgical specimens, we have observed several cases of GIST that were negative for KIT on the cell block but subsequently positive on the surgical resection. DOG1 has been found to be a specific and sensitive marker for GISTs on surgical material. We compared KIT and DOG1 staining in 52 GIST cell blocks and in 44 cell blocks of other intra-abdominal spindle cell neoplasms. We found that DOG1 was the more sensitive marker, with positivity in all 52 GIST cell blocks. KIT was positive in 46 (88%) of the GIST cases, with sensitivity dependent on the FNA method. Both markers were highly specific: KIT was negative in all 44 non-GIST cases, whereas DOG1 showed weak positivity in only 1 leiomyosarcoma.

A guide for the diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal stromal cell tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal cell tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract and are frequently detected on routine endoscopy. Although only approximately 10-30% of GISTs are clinically malignant, all may have some degree of malignant potential. Preoperative determination of malignancy risk can be estimated from tumor size and location, but reliable histopathologic criteria are not currently available. Given such biological uncertainty, accurate diagnosis is essential to differentiate these lesions from other truly benign, subepithelial tumors. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration has emerged as an important procedure to secure a tissue diagnosis of a GIST. When encountering GISTs, gastroenterologists are faced with challenging management decisions, especially in the face of small, incidentally discovered lesions. The majority of localized GISTs are managed via surgical resection, although a select few may be observed using serial endoscopic ultrasound examinations. This Review provides a general overview of GISTs, with an emphasis on their endoscopic diagnosis, the management of localized disease, and the management of incidentally discovered GISTs.

Review of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology

This review, based on the Hennepin County Medical Center experience and review of the literature, vastly covers the up-to-date role of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) in evaluating tumorous lesions of the gastrointestinal tract and adjacent organs. Emphasis is given to the tumoral and nodal staging of esophageal, pulmonary, and pancreatic cancer. This review also discusses technical, pathological, and gastroenterologic aspects and the role of the pathologist and endosonographer in the evaluation of these lesions, as well as the corresponding FNA cytology and differential diagnosis.

The utility of fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a cytomorphologic and immunohistochemical analysis with emphasis on malignant tumors

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms of the tubular gut and mesentery. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) currently is a useful tool in the diagnosis of GIST because of various mutations of the KIT protooncogene that are recognized as characteristic of these tumors. Despite such advances, the malignant potential of GIST remains variable, and few studies have reported their findings in patients with malignant GIST. Therefore, in the current study, the authors have reported their experience with FNAB as a diagnostic tool in one of the largest series of malignant GISTs and have analyzed the cytomorphologic features of the tumors relative to their clinical behavior to determine which, if any, cytologic features are indicators of malignancy.

METHODS

All patients with histologically confirmed GIST who were diagnosed by image-guided FNAB and confirmed with positive CD117 staining from 1998 to 2003 were included in the study. All tumors were reviewed for various cytomorphologic features. For study purposes, the patients were divided into two groups: Group A included all patients with malignant tumors, defined as those with metastatic disease or recurrent disease after adequate surgery with or without chemotherapy; Group B included all other patients.

RESULTS

In total, 26 tumors from 23 patients (8 males and 15 females) with a mean age of 60.9 years were available for review. There were 14 primary tumors, 7 metastases (to the liver), and 5 recurrences. Twenty-one tumors were unequivocally malignant and were placed into Group A; the remaining 5 tumors were placed into Group B. The tumors in both groups were characterized by spindled or epithelioid cells with minimal nuclear atypia or pleomorphism and a moderate amount of cytoplasm. None of the cytologic features that were evaluated could distinguish reliably between benign tumors and malignant tumors, as expected. However, on cytologic examination, all tumors that demonstrated mitoses (n = 7 tumors) and/or pretreatment necrosis (n = 3 tumors) were identified as malignant.

CONCLUSIONS

FNAB remains a reliable method for the diagnosis of GIST. Immunohistochemical staining of cytologic material with CD117 has been reliable in establishing this diagnosis by FNAB, provided adequate tissue is procured. In the current study, the presence of necrosis or mitoses in cytologic specimens was correlated with a diagnosis of malignant GIST.

c-KIT mutation analysis for diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in fine needle aspiration specimens

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are a specific clinicopathologic entity characterized by activating mutations in the c-KIT gene. These mutations are associated with increased immunohistochemical staining for the c-KIT protein. Because many GISTs display a definitive response to the KIT inhibitor imatinib, accurate diagnosis of these neoplasms is of great clinical importance. GISTs are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms of the digestive tract and show lineage differentiation along the lines of the interstitial cells of Cajal. The cytomorphology of GISTs has been well described, but the cytologic features are not entirely specific and immunohistochemical staining is frequently used to confirm the diagnosis. However, KIT protein positivity established by immunohistochemistry (IHC) may be unreliable in some instances because of a small number of KIT-negative GISTs and immunohistochemical KIT positivity in some non-GIST spindle cell neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract. Antigen retrieval may be the cause of this spurious positivity. Recently, the demonstration of KIT and PDGFRA mutations has been shown to be more reliable in establishing the diagnosis of GIST than IHC.

METHODS

High resolution amplicon melting analysis was performed in a series of eight gastrointestinal stromal tumors sampled by fine needle aspiration (FNA).

RESULTS

In five of eight cases, adequate material was obtained for mutational analysis. In four of these, mutations in the c-KIT gene were detected, and in the fifth case a mutation in the PDGFRA gene was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

It appears that high resolution amplicon melting analysis can be successfully performed on material obtained by FNA and will show either KIT for PDGFR mutations in the majority of GIST FNA specimens.