Cost-effectiveness of monolayers and human papillomavirus testing compared to that of conventional Papanicolaou smears for cervical cancer screening: protocol of the study of the French Society of Clinical Cytology

Practice guidelines for the early detection of cervical cancer in Korea: Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology and the Korean Society for Cytopathology 2012 edition

The consensus guideline development committee of Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology was reconvened in March 2012. The committee consisted of 36 experts representing 12 university hospitals and professional organizations. The objective of this committee was to develop standardized guidelines for cervical cancer screening tests for Korean women and to distribute these guidelines to every clinician, eventually improving the quality of medical care. Since the establishment of the consensus guideline development committee, evidence-based guidelines have either been developed de novo considering specific Korean situations or by adaptation of preexisting consensus guidelines from other countries. Recommendations for cervical cancer screening tests, management of atypical squamous and glandular cells, and management of low-grade and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions were developed. Additionally, recommendations for human papillomavirus DNA testing and recommendations for adolescent and pregnant women with abnormal cervical screening test results were also included.

Epidemiologic natural history and clinical management of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Disease: a critical and systematic review of the literature in the development of an HPV dynamic transmission model

BACKGROUND

Natural history models of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and disease have been used in a number of policy evaluations of technologies to prevent and screen for HPV disease (e.g., cervical cancer, anogenital warts), sometimes with wide variation in values for epidemiologic and clinical inputs. The objectives of this study are to: (1) Provide an updated critical and systematic review of the evidence base to support epidemiologic and clinical modeling of key HPV disease-related parameters in the context of an HPV multi-type disease transmission model which we have applied within a U.S. population context; (2) Identify areas where additional studies are particularly needed.

METHODS

Consistent with our and other prior HPV natural history models, the literature review was confined to cervical disease and genital warts. Between October 2005 and January 2006, data were gathered from the published English language medical literature through a search of the PubMed database and references were examined from prior HPV natural history models and review papers. Study design and data quality from individual studies were compared and analyses meeting pre-defined criteria were selected.

RESULTS

Published data meeting review eligibility criteria were most plentiful for natural history parameters relating to the progression and regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) without HPV typing, and data concerning the natural history of HPV disease due to specific HPV types were often lacking. Epidemiologic evidence to support age-dependency in the risk of progression and regression of HPV disease was found to be weak, and an alternative hypothesis concerning the time-dependence of transition rates is explored. No data were found on the duration of immunity following HPV infection. In the area of clinical management, data were observed to be lacking on the proportion of clinically manifest anogenital warts that are treated and the proportion of cervical cancer cases that become symptomatic by stage.

CONCLUSION

Knowledge of the natural history of HPV disease has been considerably enhanced over the past two decades, through the publication of an increasing number of relevant studies. However, considerable opportunity remains for advancing our understanding of HPV natural history and the quality of associated models, particularly with respect to examining HPV age- and type-specific outcomes, and acquired immunity following infection.

A methodological framework to distinguish spectrum effects from spectrum biases and to assess diagnostic and screening test accuracy for patient populations: application to the Papanicolaou cervical cancer smear test

BACKGROUND

A spectrum effect was defined as differences in the sensitivity or specificity of a diagnostic test according to the patient's characteristics or disease features. A spectrum effect can lead to a spectrum bias when subgroup variations in sensitivity or specificity also affect the likelihood ratios and thus post-test probabilities. We propose and illustrate a methodological framework to distinguish spectrum effects from spectrum biases.

METHODS

Data were collected for 1781 women having had a cervical smear test and colposcopy followed by biopsy if abnormalities were detected (the reference standard). Logistic models were constructed to evaluate both the sensitivity and specificity, and the likelihood ratios, of the test and to identify factors independently affecting the test's characteristics.

RESULTS

For both tests, human papillomavirus test, study setting and age affected sensitivity or specificity of the smear test (spectrum effect), but only human papillomavirus test and study setting modified the likelihood ratios (spectrum bias) for clinical reading, whereas only human papillomavirus test and age modified the likelihood ratios (spectrum bias) for "optimized" interpretation.

CONCLUSION

Fitting sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios simultaneously allows the identification of covariates that independently affect diagnostic or screening test results and distinguishes spectrum effect from spectrum bias. We recommend this approach for the development of new tests, and for reporting test accuracy for different patient populations.

[French pathologist' implication in cervical cancer screening]

The cytological test issue mostly from individual opportunistic or for some department from organized screening programme, must benefit of the same quality in all the procedures. Pathologists are very implicated in. The purpose of this document is to summarize cytopathologists' initiatives and to present their specific tools for that. The French association for quality assurance in pathology (AFAQAP) has been validated by HAS in March 2006 for EPP. Commission 1 of AFAQAP organized an annual voluntary test for diagnostic evaluation since 2000 with the adoption of new technologies (CD-rom, virtual digital slides), and in 2005 a test of Pap Smear reporting quality concerning TBS 2001 use. A referring evaluation on this theme is in press. Furthermore pathologists made tools are available to codify lesions they diagnose (ADICAP), to collect and to study data (FCRISAP), to standardize the histological and cytological reports (CRFS), to evaluate the procedures and structural requirements and techniques. Pathologists participate in the elaboration of national guidelines (ANAES 1998 et 2002, DGS 2006) and performance indicators with InVS. The cervix cancer screening programme must take in account and valorises the role of pathologists according to assessment of efficacy and evaluation of the screening.

Cytopathology in France

In France, organization of the cytopathology seems to be quite different from that specifically regulated in the USA and in some other European countries. The aim of this article is to underline these specificities and to describe the solutions we advocate concerning new technologies, teaching, quality assurance, national guidelines em leader, to make our current practice compatible with the international recommendations. Moreover, we highlight the peculiar status of French cytotechnologists' and comment on the recent dramatic decrease of the medical demography in France, the consequence of which may promote a controlled transfer of competence.

Cost-effectiveness of liquid-based cytology with or without hybrid-capture II HPV test compared with conventional Pap smears: A study by the French society of clinical cytology

Many articles concerning conventional Pap smears, ThinPrep liquid-based cytology (LBC) and Hybrid-Capture II HPV test (HC II) have been published. This study, carried out by the French Society of Clinical Cytology, may be conspicuous for several reasons: it was financially independent; it compared the efficiency of the conventional Pap smear and LBC, of the conventional Pap smear and HC II, and included an economic study based on real costs; for all the women, a "gold standard" reference method, colposcopy, was available and biopsies were performed whenever a lesion was detected; The conventional Pap smear, the LBC (split-sample technique), the colposcopy, and the biopsies were done at the same time. This study included 2,585 women shared into two groups: a group A of a high-risk population, a group B of a screening population. The statistical analysis of the results showed that conventional Pap smears consistently had superior or equivalent sensitivity and specificity than LBC for the lesions at threshold CIN-I (Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia) or CIN-II or higher. It underlined the low specificity of the HC II. Finally, the LBC mean cost was never covered by the Social Security tariff.

Cross sectional study of conventional cervical smear, monolayer cytology, and human papillomavirus DNA testing for cervical cancer screening

OBJECTIVES

To compare the sensitivity, specificity, and interobserver reliability of conventional cervical smear tests, monolayer cytology, and human papillomavirus testing for screening for cervical cancer.

DESIGN

Cross sectional study in which the three techniques were performed simultaneously with a reference standard (colposcopy and histology).

SETTING

Public university and private practices in France, with complete independence from the suppliers.

PARTICIPANTS

828 women referred for colposcopy because of previously detected cytological abnormalities and 1757 women attending for routine smears.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Clinical readings and optimised interpretation (two blind readings followed, if necessary, by consensus). Sensitivity, specificity, and weighted kappa computed for various thresholds of abnormalities.

RESULTS

Conventional cervical smear tests were more often satisfactory (91% v 87%) according to the Bethesda system, more reliable (weighted kappa 0.70 v 0.57), and had consistently better sensitivity and specificity than monolayer cytology. These findings applied to clinical readings and optimised interpretations, low and high grade lesions, and populations with low and high incidence of abnormalities. Human papillomavirus testing associated with monolayer cytology, whether systematic or for atypical cells of undetermined significance, performed no better than conventional smear tests.

CONCLUSIONS

Monolayer cytology is less reliable and more likely to give false positive and false negative results than conventional cervical smear tests for screening for cervical cancer.

Cost of screening for cancerous and precancerous lesions of the cervix

This paper is part of the cost-effectiveness study of cervical cancer screening conducted by the French Society of Clinical Cytology (SFCC). It describes the evaluation of costs of conventional smear tests, thin-layer smear tests (ThinPrep 2000 system), and viral typing by the HCS test. For 100,000 examinations per year, the average cost of a conventional smear test is 11.53 dollars in a private anatomo-pathology clinic. The cost of the thin-layer test for the same number of examinations and in the same type of clinic is 13.93 dollars. For 20,000 annual tests, the average cost of human papillomavirus (HPV) is 23.43 dollars in the public sector and 23.48 dollars in the private one. The higher price of the thin-layer method is only justifiable if this screening technique outperforms the conventional method. Furthermore, the high cost of the HPV test means that its integration into a population-based screening program must be carefully defined.

Present standards for cervical cancer screening

Survival rates for cancer of the uterine cervix have improved over the last 40 years largely because of the impact of screening measures such as the Pap smear. The ability to screen and treat women for preinvasive disease, cervical dysplasia, is the key factor leading to the reduction in the incidence of invasive cervical cancer. More recently, the ability to test women for the causative agent, the human papilloma virus, has emerged as a potential screening tool. New research has focused on new technologies for Pap smear screening such as thin layer technology, the appropriate intervals for screening, and the appropriate methods of incorporation of human papilloma virus testing into the screening protocols. Reviews of published studies evaluating the efficacy of new technologies suggest that there is still insufficient information to confirm improved outcome; however, results to date suggest that thin layer Pap smear technology may improve sensitivity in the detection of cervical dysplasia. Automated rescreening technologies in use may decrease the number of false-negative Pap smears and are an option for laboratories. Various professional groups and countries have differing recommendations on the interval for screening, primarily on the basis of cost-effectiveness. Some of the most important new information this year regarding cervical cancer screening includes the new Bethesda System for the reporting of Pap smears and the new guidelines for the management of the abnormal Pap smear by the American Society of Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology. These guidelines incorporate human papilloma virus testing based on a multicenter trial documenting its efficacy in the triage of women with atypical squamous cells on Pap smear. These recommendations are reviewed along with the current literature on cervical cancer screening.