Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in pleural fluid: Diagnostic pitfall for atypical mesothelial cells

Comprehensive Review of Metastatic Breast Carcinoma in Cytology Specimens

Breast carcinomas are known to metastasize to various organs of the human body. Fine needle aspiration cytology or exfoliative cytology often are the standard method for diagnosis at these metastatic sites due to ease of procurement of diagnostic material, accessibility, less complications, high sensitivity, and specificity of diagnosis and evaluation of biomarker status needed to guide future management. This comprehensive review article discusses in detail metastatic patterns, cytomorphology of metastatic breast cancer at different body sites, immunohistochemistry needed for diagnosis of breast carcinoma, sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis and breast biomarker assays in the cytology material.

Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma of the breast: a comparison of cytopathological features with other lobular carcinoma variants

OBJECTIVE

Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma (PLC) is a subtype of breast cancer with unique morphological features, but it remains controversial whether PLC should be considered an independent disease entity. The aim of this study was to illustrate cytopathological characteristics of PLC in comparison with other lobular carcinoma variants.

METHODS

We investigated clinicopathological features of PLC (n = 11) compared with those of other variants of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC, non-PLC) (n = 32). Histological variants of the non-PLC group consisted of classic (n = 25), solid (n = 2), alveolar (n = 1) and a tubulolobular type (n = 4). A review of cytological reports and fine needle aspiration (FNA) smear samples was performed for the PLC (n = 9) and non-PLC (n = 27) groups.

RESULTS

Patients with PLC were older, and had a higher nuclear grade and a higher incidence of axillary lymph node metastasis and triple negative phenotype than non-PLC patients (P = 0.007, P < 0.001, P = 0.02 and P < 0.001, respectively). Cytological findings in PLC included medium- to large-sized nuclei, prominent nucleoli, a moderate-to-severe degree of pleomorphism, apocrine change and background necrosis, none of which were evident in the smears of the non-PLC group (P < 0.001, P = 0.002, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.03, respectively). Despite these differences, patients with PLC and non-PLC showed similar clinical outcomes in our follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our results, a cytological diagnosis of PLC should be proposed if there are moderate- to large-sized nuclei, prominent nucleoli, a moderate-to severe degree of nuclear pleomorphism, apocrine change and necrosis in the background in FNA biopsy samples.

Authors attain comparable or slightly higher rates of citation publishing in an open access journal (CytoJournal) compared to traditional cytopathology journals - A five year (2007-2011) experience

BACKGROUND

The era of Open Access (OA) publication, a platform which serves to better disseminate scientific knowledge, is upon us, as more OA journals are in existence than ever before. The idea that peer-reviewed OA publication leads to higher rates of citation has been put forth and shown to be true in several publications. This is a significant benefit to authors and is in addition to another relatively less obvious but highly critical component of the OA charter, i.e. retention of the copyright by the authors in the public domain. In this study, we analyzed the citation rates of OA and traditional non-OA publications specifically for authors in the field of cytopathology.

DESIGN

We compared the citation patterns for authors who had published in both OA and traditional non-OA peer-reviewed, scientific, cytopathology journals. Citations in an OA publication (CytoJournal) were analyzed comparatively with traditional non-OA cytopathology journals (Acta Cytologica, Cancer Cytopathology, Cytopathology, and Diagnostic Cytopathology) using the data from web of science citation analysis site (based on which the impact factors (IF) are calculated). After comparing citations per publication, as well as a time adjusted citation quotient (which takes into account the time since publication), we also analyzed the statistics after excluding the data for meeting abstracts.

RESULTS

Total 28 authors published 314 publications as articles and meeting abstracts (25 authors after excluding the abstracts). The rate of citation and time adjusted citation quotient were higher for OA in the group where abstracts were included (P < 0.05 for both). The rates were also slightly higher for OA than non-OA when the meeting abstracts were excluded, but the difference was statistically insignificant (P = 0.57 and P = 0.45).

CONCLUSION

We observed that for the same author, the publications in the OA journal attained a higher rate of citation than the publications in the traditional non-OA journals in the field of cytopathology over a 5 year period (2007-2011). However, this increase was statistically insignificant if the meeting abstracts were excluded from the analysis. Overall, the rates of citation for OA and non-OA were slightly higher to comparable.

Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma of the breast: a morphologically and clinically distinct variant of lobular carcinoma

Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma is an uncommon variant of lobular carcinoma, characterized by significant cytologic atypia that contrasts with the low pleomorphism of classical lobular carcinoma. It accounts for approximately 1% of all epithelial breast malignancies. In addition to its pleomorphism, it is characterized by aggressive behavior and shortened patient survival. Although the morphologic features of pleomorphic lobular carcinoma are well described, it often eludes accurate pathologic characterization. Some controversy surrounds the pathogenesis of pleomorphic lobular carcinoma; however, it is now considered a well-defined variant of invasive lobular carcinoma. Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma shares molecular alterations with classical lobular carcinoma, such as alterations in the gene CDH1 on chromosome band 16q22 that results in changes in E-cadherin protein function. The aggressive biology of pleomorphic lobular carcinoma relates to the acquisition of genetic alterations typical of high-grade ductal carcinoma, such as overexpression of HER2/neu and c-myc.

Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma of the breast: molecular pathology and clinical impact

Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma of the breast is a recently described morphological variant of classic invasive lobular carcinoma with an aggressive behavior. Morphologically, pleomorphic lobular carcinoma elicits a similar pattern of infiltrative growth as invasive lobular carcinoma, yet neoplastic cells have marked nuclear atypia and pleomorphism. Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma and the in situ counterpart, pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ, are frequently hormone receptor (estrogen-, progesterone- and androgen-receptor)-positive and E-cadherin and β-catenin-negative, attaining to their lobular nature. Tumors can also be positive for HER2, p53, ki67 and GCDFP-15 and harbor frequent chromosomal alterations involving gains on 1q and 16p, losses on 11q and 16q, and genomic amplifications in the region of 8q24, 11q13, 12q13, 17q12 and 20q13. Recent gene-expression profiling classified pleomorphic lobular carcinoma as ‘molecular apocrine’ tumors reflecting the frequent apocrine differentiation of the tumors. In support for the aggressive biological features described for pleomorphic lobular carcinoma, accumulating clinical data demonstrate that it has an aggressive clinical course. It is now important to define the most appropriate management strategy for patients diagnosed with pleomorphic lobular carcinoma.