Crush preparations of meningiomas: Can grading be accomplished?

Cytologic features of meningioma: An analysis of common and uncommon subtypes and diagnostic difficulties during intraoperative procedures

Despite common histogenesis meningiomas have a wide morphologic spectrum, and the World Health Organization (WHO) recognizes 15 subtypes. They are the most common brain tumour in adults and typically have an extra-axial location. Although there have been important advances in the molecular biology of meningiomas its diagnosis is based on histopathologic features. The great majority are benign WHO grade 1 tumours. There are specific criteria for assigning WHO grade 2 and 3 that can be applied to all meningioma subtypes. Regardless of these criteria, chordoid and clear cell morphologic subtypes are considered grade 2. WHO grade 3 tumours exhibit a very high mitotic index, frank anaplasia or specific molecular abnormalities. The impressive morphologic diversity shown by meningiomas makes them a diagnostic challenge, which can be even greater in intraoperative studies. The focus of this article is to describe and illustrate their main cytologic features, with emphasis on the most infrequent subtypes.

Intraoperative Diagnosis of Central Nervous System Tumors: Challenges, Errors, Lessons Learned, and the Surgeon's Perspective

Background: Intraoperative crush smear is an adjuvant in diagnosing central nervous system (CNS) lesions on tissue sent for frozen section. Besides rapid decision-making, it also ensures that minimum injury is caused to the normal brain structures surrounding the intracranial neoplasm. A rapid intraoperative diagnosis helps the surgeon in planning the appropriate surgery.

Objective: Our objective is to review all the discordant cases between intraoperative and histopathological diagnosis and also to study the crush smear slides for morphological clues that could have been helpful in minimizing such errors, especially for an inexperienced neuropathologist/general pathologist. The surgeon’s perspective on the impact of these errors on management is also discussed.

Method: A prospective study of six years from 2013 to 2019 was conducted. Crush smears were made and stained with rapid hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). The rest of the tissue was processed for permanent tissue sections. Slides in which there was discordance between the intraoperative and permanent paraffin sections were reviewed to ascertain the reasons thereof.

Results: A total of 81 specimens of CNS tumors were sent for intraoperative consultation. Out of these, discordance was seen in 13 (16%) cases.

Conclusion: To minimize diagnostic errors, it is important to do regular analyses of the misinterpreted cases. Knowledge of the pre-operative radiological differential diagnosis is mandatory. Discussion with the surgeon regarding the clinical impact of the errors made will give a clearer picture to the pathologists regarding clinically relevant reporting during intraoperative consultation.

Role of gamma knife radiosurgery for recurrent or residual World Health Organization grade II and III intracranial meningiomas

Background: To analysis the role of gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) in treatment of the recurrent or residual World Health Organization (WHO) grade II and III meningiomas.Methods: Between 1995 and 2015, a total of 1163 meningioma patients were treated with GKRS at our single institute; 26 atypical and 6 anaplastic meningiomas were enrolled. The group consisted of 16 men and 16 women with a median age of 59.5 years (range 30-78 years). The median follow-up was 106.5 months (range 40-216 months). All were cases of tumour recurrence except 7 cases of residual lesions. Six patients were given fractionated radiotherapy before the initial course of GKRS (median dose, 56 Gy).Results: The median tumour volume was 3035 mm³ (range 247-11400 mm³). The median prescribed dose to high grade meningioma margin was 14 Gy (range 12-20 Gy,). The median prescribed dose to WHO II and III meningioma were 14 Gy (range 12-18 Gy) and 15 Gy (range 14-20 Gy), respectively. After radiosurgery, local tumour control rate was 50%. Tumour progression was observed in 28 patients; 16 recurrences were local (12 atypical and 4 anaplastic), 8 were marginal (7 atypical and 1 anaplastic), and 4 were distal (3 atypical and 1 anaplastic). Seven patients (21.88%) developed adverse radiation effects after GKRS. WHO grade was strongly associated with survival, with grade II showing a much longer survival (p = 0.01), and a prior history of radiation was associated with decreased survival (p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis showed that WHO grade (hazard ratio, HR: 5.051, p = 0.01) and prior radiation (HR: 5.763, p = 0.004) were independently associated with survival.Conclusions: WHO grade and a prior history of radiation therapy are reliable long-term predictors of overall outcome when treated with GKRS.

Analysis of the results of recurrent intracranial meningiomas treated with re-radiosurgery

OBJECTS

Meningioma is the most common intracranial neoplasm, comprising approximately 30% of all primary intracranial tumors (Claus et al., 2005) [1]. Treatment options include observation, microsurgical resection, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is a very effective treatment for intracranial meningiomas; previous studies showed the tumor control rate at 5-10 years of follow-up as 84.3%-100% in all cases (Feigl et al., 2005; Linskey et al., 2005; Malik et al., 2005; Aichholzer et al., 2000; Hakim et al., 1998; Chang and Adler 1997; Lunsford, 1994; Ganz et al., 1993) [2-9]. Many studies have discussed issues like optimal dose, conformal configurations, and adverse effects to improve the treatment result with GKRS (Malik et al., 2005; Kenai et al., 2005; Rowe et al., 2004; Shrieve et al., 2004) [4,10-12]. There are some cases in which the radiosurgery result is unfavorable and perhaps further treatment is needed. In these cases, re-radiosurgery can be an option. However, there have not been comprehensive studies discussing the issues of re-radiosurgery. Therefore, we analyzed the result of re-radiosurgery for recurrent meningiomas and their impact on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

From 1995 to 2015, we retrospectively reviewed 1163 patients who underwent GKRS for intracranial meningioma at the Asan Medical Center. Patients with multiple meningiomas or a follow-up with a period of less than a year were excluded from this study. Finally, 865 patients were enrolled in this study. Clinical symptoms and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were assessed by neurosurgeons. When tumor size increased together with newly developed neurologic symptoms, further management, such as microsurgical resection or SRS, was considered. Histologic analysis of the resected tumors was performed by neuropathologists. Clinical data, including patient's sex, age, and tumor locations were recorded. Treatment data included tumor volume, tumor grade, radiation dose, and presence of edema. Final outcome data including follow-up period, time to progression, interval between first and second radiosurgery courses and interval between microsurgery and radiosurgery were obtained.

RESULTS

Among 865 patients, tumor recurrence was found in 63 patients (7.28%). Seven patients showed transient tumor growth after GKRS. These patients have been under close observation without any further treatments. Fifty-six patients (6.47%) showed permanent tumor growth on follow-up MRI. Thirty-three patients from this group underwent repeated radiosurgery owing to tumor growth, resulting in a re-irradiation rate of 3.82% at our radiosurgery center. The other 23 patients were treated using methods other than re-radiosurgery. Among the 33 patients, 25 underwent microsurgical resection prior to their initial course of GKRS, and the other 8 were treated with re-radiosurgery only. An analysis was performed to determine factors that may have a role in treatment results. Of the many variables, tumor grade (p=0.004, Fisher's exact test) was the only significant factor for progression-free survival (PFS). Thirteen patients with unbiopsied or benign meningioma showed stable tumor size, while there was tumor growth in 8 patients. Among high-grade meningioma patients, 3 and 9 showed stable disease and tumor growth, respectively. As a result of re-radiosurgery, 11 out of 17 patients showed tumor growth and needed further treatments; this involved a third GKRS for 4 patients, microsurgical resection for 6 patients, and cyber knife radiosurgery (CKRS) for 1 patient. Four patients from this group were also treated with WBRT.

CONCLUSION

We analyzed the results of re-radiosurgery for recurrent meningiomas and observed that World Health Organization (WHO) grade II and III was significantly associated with a lower PFS rate compared with low-grade meningiomas (p=0.004). Conversely, patients with benign meningioma or unbiopsied tumors had much better results. Hence, re-radiosurgery is recommended for patients with unknown or benign meningiomas if their first GKRS result is unsatisfactory. However, re-radiosurgery should be considered carefully for recurrent high-grade tumors. Owing to the small number of recurrent meningioma patients treated with re-radiosurgery, further studies are required to delineate the role of this treatment.

Intraoperative diagnosis of central nervous system lesions: Comparison of squash smear, touch imprint, and frozen section

Background:

Intraoperative diagnosis of central nervous system (CNS) lesions is of utmost importance for neurosurgeons to modify the approach at the time of surgery and to decide on further plan of management. The intraoperative diagnosis is challenging for neuropathologists.

Aims:

The study was undertaken to determine the accuracy of cytological techniques (crush smears and touch imprints), frozen sections of space occupying lesions of the CNS and compare it with histopathological diagnosis.

Materials and Methods:

A total of 75 specimens received intraoperatively were subjected to cytology and frozen section study.

Results:

Neoplastic lesions formed the major group with 62 (82.7%) cases while 13 (17.3%) were nonneoplastic. The diagnostic accuracy of “squash smears” was found to be 89.2%. “Touch imprints” showed diagnostic accuracy of 78.4%. The low accuracy of touch imprints was attributed to poor cellular yield. The diagnostic accuracy of “frozen section” was 75.7%. However, the overall diagnostic accuracy was 96%.

Conclusion:

We believe that the cytololgical methods and frozen sections are complimentary to each other and both should be used to improve the intraoperative diagnostic accuracy in the CNS lesion.

Atypical Meningiomas: Recurrence, Reoperation, and Radiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Atypical meningiomas (World Health Organization [WHO] grade II) represent a therapeutic challenge given their high recurrence rate and greater mortality compared with WHO grade I meningiomas. Traditionally, treatment has entailed attempts at gross total resection with radiation therapy reserved for residual disease or recurrences.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our patient database of atypical meningioma (AM) patients over the past 10 years to assess surgical and radiotherapeutic treatments administered, treatment-related complications, radiographic-clinical progression after treatment, and mortality. We identified 45 patients with AMs and excluded 2 patients with incomplete hospital records.

RESULTS

The average age of our patients was 59.7 years. Forty-three AM patients underwent a total of 62 surgeries. Thirty patients underwent one initial surgical resection; 8 patients underwent a second resection for recurrence; 4 patients underwent 3 resections; and 1 patient underwent 4 resections for recurrences. The rate of postoperative complication was 12.9% (8/62). Five patients had postoperative wound infections requiring treatment, and 1 patient had a postoperative hematoma requiring surgical evacuation. There was 1 case of wound breakdown in a patient with a previously irradiated scalp and 1 case of lower-extremity venous thrombosis. Clinical follow-up ranged from 11-120 months with average follow-up of 43 months and median follow-up of 65 months. Nineteen patients (44%) developed clinical-radiographic evidence of recurrence at an average of 32.4 months after surgical resection. Of the recurrences, 12 were treated with repeat surgery and radiation therapy, 3 were treated with radiation therapy alone, and 2 with surgery alone. Radiation therapy included Gamma Knife (GK), CyberKnife (CK), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), or some combination of these. There was one case of symptomatic radiation necrosis (1/15 or 6.6%). The survival rate at last follow-up of our patient cohort was 95.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Given their high rates of recurrence, AMs require close clinical follow-up and an individualized treatment strategy. Reoperation, radiotherapy, or combination therapy can be effective strategies at managing disease progression while minimizing treatment-related morbidity. Treatment planning that attempts to anticipate future therapies in the form of further surgery or radiotherapy may improve clinical outcomes in these patients. Seventeen patients underwent adjuvant radiation therapy: 7 patients with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), 4 patients with Gamma Knife (GK), and 2 with CyberKnife (CK). Four patients underwent multiple treatments.

Cytological changes induced by embolization in meningiomas

OBJECTIVE

To describe cytological changes in meningiomas induced by embolization, which may be carried out a few days before surgery in order to soften the tumour and minimize intraoperative bleeding. Although histological changes have been described, we have found no description of such changes in the cytological literature.

METHODS

We reviewed 22 cases of meningiomas with prior embolization in which cytological material was obtained during intraoperative consultation. In 13 of them recognizable cytological changes induced by embolization were present. On histology, these 13 tumours were grade I and showed intravascular embolic material.

RESULTS

Cellular dissociation was prominent, with frequent single cells and small groups. Ischaemic cellular changes were a common finding and consisted of cell shrinkage, nuclear pyknosis and karyorrhexis. Confluent areas of necrosis were seen in one case. Additionally, numerous macrophages were present, many containing cellular debris, and neutrophils, giving a characteristic appearance of acute cellular ischaemia. Embolic material was seen cytologically in four cases as well-defined spherules surrounded by empty halos. Features of viable meningioma were recognized in all cases.

CONCLUSION

Embolization of meningiomas induces cytological changes that mirror those seen on histology, but cellular dissociation with changes of ischaemia may result in a worrisome image. When faced with such changes the pathologist should consider the possibility of embolization, avoiding misdiagnosis of higher grade meningioma or metastatic carcinoma.