Diagnostic utility of ThinPrep Imaging System® for detecting atypical glandular cells in cervical smear samples

INTRODUCTION

The ThinPrep Imaging System® (TIS) is an automated system that has now been used for over 20 years in the primary screening of ThinPrep liquid-based cervical samples. Although there are a lot of publications about the diagnostic utility of this method in squamous cell lesions, which has advantages such as time-saving and standardization, there are only a few publications on this issue in glandular cell lesions in the literature. We aimed in this study to investigate the diagnostic utility of the system in the detection of premalignant and malignant glandular lesions in cervical smears.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Our study was conducted retrospectively, and a total of 126 cervical smear samples between 2010 and 2022 that have histological confirmation of endometrial adenocarcinoma (EAC), endocervical adenocarcinoma (ECAC), or adenocarcinoma in situ (AİS), were included. These samples were re-evaluated by manual and TIS by two experienced pathologists, and the results were compared in terms of sensitivity.

RESULTS

We found out that 70 of the 126 smear samples have atypical glandular cells. We detect 48 cases (48/70) (sensitivity 68.5%) in manual examination, however TIS successfully determined 66 cases (66/70) (sensitivity 94.3%). In 4 cases (5.7%) TIS could not detect the atypical cells within the 22 areas.

CONCLUSION

TIS is quite an effective method with a high sensitivity for detecting atypical glandular cells in cervical smears, like detecting squamous cell anomalies. Imposing this system in our laboratory and using them appropriately, save us time and help to ensure standardization. Additionally, it may be a good way to adopt artificial intelligence and digital pathology in today's world.

ThinPrep® imaging system-assisted vs manual screening of urinary cytology slides in the detection of the "suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma" category

BACKGROUND

The ThinPrep® Imaging System (TIS) is a Food and Drug Administration-approved review system for cervical cytopathology, where it has been shown to increase performance over manually reviewed slides. Application of the TIS to urinary cytology has only been reported in a single study, in 2013.

METHODS

We aimed to compare the agreement of two cytotechnologists' and a pathologist's manual screening (dots) with the fields of view (FOVs) selected by the TIS. We also aimed to track cases in which the TIS could identify missed abnormals and reduce the false-negative fraction. Electronically marked TIS fields (EMTFs) suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (SHGUC) were controlled by follow-up cystoscopy and histology, where available.

RESULTS

A total of 826 consecutive specimens were studied. Of those, 94 (11.4%) were unreadable by the TIS. There were 710 possible comparisons, of which 380 (53.5%) received no dot after manual screening. Of the 330 remaining slides, 149 (45.1%) had at least one dot matching with the TIS FOVs. After TIS reading, EMTFs were noted in 13 of 636 (2.0%) negative cytology cases. Surveillance showed that 3/13 (23.1%, 0.4% of the 710 possible comparisons) of those cases matched with high grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC), whereas 6/13 (46.1%, 0.8% of the 710 possible comparisons) had negative follow-up at 24 months, and 4/13 (30.8%) were lost for follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The TIS increases the detection rate of SHGUC cells, potentially leading to a slight decrease in the false-negative fraction, but at the expense of a slight but larger increase in the number of false-positive cases. These findings stress the importance of a careful approach to the evaluation of the FOVs.

False-negative Papanicolaou tests in women with biopsy-proven invasive endocervical adenocarcinoma/adenocarcinoma in situ: a retrospective analysis with assessment of interobserver agreement

INTRODUCTION

The objectives of our study were to identify factors contributing to false-negative Papanicolaou (Pap) tests in patients with endocervical adenocarcinoma (EA) or adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), and to analyze the impact of educational instruction on interobserver agreement in these cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

False-negative Pap tests from patients with EA/AIS were reviewed by a consensus group and by 12 individual reviewers in 2 rounds, with an educational session on glandular neoplasia in Pap tests conducted between the 2 rounds.

RESULTS

Of 79 Pap tests from patients with EA/AIS, 57 (72.2%) were diagnosed as abnormal and 22 (27.8%) as negative. Of the 22 false-negative cases, 10 remained negative on consensus review, with false-negative diagnoses attributed to sampling variance. The other 12 cases were upgraded to epithelial abnormalities (including 8 to glandular lesions). The false-negative diagnoses were attributed to screening variance in 2 cases and interpretive variance in 10 cases. On individual review, abnormal cells were misinterpreted as reactive glandular cells or endometrial cells in 7 of 8 and 5 of 8 cases upgraded to glandular abnormalities, respectively. With education, the proportion of individual reviewers demonstrating at least moderate agreement with the consensus diagnosis (Cohen's kappa >0.4) increased from 33% (4 of 12) to 75% (9 of 12).

CONCLUSIONS

Sampling and interpretive variance each accounted for nearly one-half of the false-negative Pap tests, with underclassification as reactive glandular or endometrial cells the main source of the interpretive variances. Educational instruction significantly decreased the interpretive variance and interobserver variability in the diagnosis of glandular abnormalities.

Cytologic parameters predicting neoplasia in Papanicolaou smears with atypical glandular cells and histologic follow-up: a single-institution experience

INTRODUCTION

Studies investigating histologic follow-up of The 2001 Bethesda System diagnosis of atypical glandular cells (AGC) have focused on various screening methods, patient populations, and Papanicolaou preparations. Our aim was to report the histologic follow-up of AGC diagnoses from ThinPrep slides and evaluate specific cytologic features predicting benign or malignant follow-up results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective search identified liquid-based cervical cytology results interpreted as AGC. AGC diagnoses were stratified into four groups: atypical endometrial cells (AGC-EM); atypical endocervical cells (AGC-EC); AGC, favor neoplastic (AGC-FN); and AGC not otherwise specified (AGC-NOS). Evidence of disease was based on histologic follow-up (biopsy or resection specimen) with a diagnosis of cancer, complex endometrial hyperplasia, or high-grade squamous dysplasia. Available slides were blindly reviewed for specific cytologic features. Statistical analysis compared cytologic factors that would predict benign or malignant follow-up.

RESULTS

We interpreted 264 samples as AGC from 2005 through 2009. Of the 246 (93.2%) with follow-up histologic material, 60 (24.4%) were AGC-EM; 36 (14.6%) were AGC-EC; 28 (11.4%) were AGC-FN; and 122 (49.6%) were AGC-NOS. Neoplasia was diagnosed in 80 (32.5%). Neoplastic cases showed significantly increased numbers of single cells, cells in 3-dimensional clusters, engulfed neutrophils, nuclear enlargement, increased nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio, irregular nuclear borders, reniform nuclei, loss of polarity, and macronucleoli.

CONCLUSIONS

Cytologic parameters can be used to predict benign from neoplastic glandular lesions. Biopsy follow-up is necessary to correlate cytologic findings when AGC is diagnosed on a Papanicolaou smear.

A comparison of ThinPrep Imager-assisted with manual screening, and its place in the New Zealand cervical cancer screening program

AIMS

Overseas studies have shown equivalent sensitivity and specificity between computer-assisted screening and manual screening, with increased screener productivity. This study was undertaken to test these in a New Zealand laboratory setting.

METHODS

A total of 9232 slides were read manually alone, and following ThinPrep Imager-assisted screening, and the results compared. Two senior screeners and a cytopathologist reviewed the slides with discordant results.

RESULTS

The detection rate for abnormalities was 7.30% for Imager-assisted screening and 7.83% for manual screening. The concordance in diagnosis of abnormalities ranged from 72.7% to 100% with the lowest concordance for high-grade abnormalities diagnosed by Imager-assisted screening. The rate of unsatisfactory smears with Imager-assisted screening is half that of manual screening. There was a screener productivity increase of 140%. In all but one case, abnormal cells were identified by the Imager but screeners varied in their interpretations.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, Imager-assisted screening was as sensitive as manual screening, and more sensitive for high-grade lesions, with a halving of the rate of unsatisfactory smears. In the setting of the New Zealand cervical screening program, the initial screen by the Imager removes the need for a second, rapid rescreen required by the program for manual screening.

Gynecologic cytology on conventional and liquid-based preparations: a comprehensive review of similarities and differences

Liquid-based preparations (LBPs) have largely replaced conventional Papanicolaou smears (CPS) for cervical samples in the United States and in many other industrialized countries. The two FDA-approved LBP currently in use include ThinPrep (TP), (Hologic Inc., Bedford, MA) and SurePath (SP), (BD Diagnostic, Burlington, NC). Split-sample and direct-to-vial studies have shown that LBPs show an overall improvement in sample collection and processing, reduce artifacts that interfere in diagnosis, are more sensitive, can be utilized for ancillary tests and are a cost-effective replacement for CPS. Comparative analyses of diagnostic accuracy indicate that LBPs perform at least as well as CPS. However, the added advantages of standardized, automated preparations and screening, reduced unsatisfactory rate, improved specimen adequacy and ability to perform human papillomavirus (HPV) test, are enough to continue use of LBP. The cytologic features in LBP are similar to CPS with subtle differences, particularly in background information. There are also subtle differences between the two LBPs, SP and TP, which are reflective of different sampling devices, collection media, and processing techniques. Architecturally, LBP shows smaller cell clusters and sheets and more dyscohesion. Cytologically, enhanced nuclear features and smaller cell size are more prominent. Advances in liquid-based Papanicolaou's (Pap) test have lead to well-defined patient management guidelines by the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology. Herein, we review these aspects of Pap test including, morphology, automation, ancillary tests (HPV and immunochemistry), pertinent QA/QC monitors, patient management guidelines, and review of pertinent literature.

Atypical glandular cells (AGC): ThinPrep Imaging System (TIS), manual screening (MS), and correlation with Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) HPV DNA testing

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to determine if the ThinPrep Imaging System (T1S) improves the positive predictive value (PPV) of atypical glandular cell (AGC) diagnosis for identifying HPV-related squamous and/or glandular lesions over manual screening (MS), and if human papilloma virus (HPV)-DNA testing improves the diagnostic yield.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

85 ThinPrep cervical cytology specimens with a diagnosis of AGC by TIS (n = 51) and MS (n = 34) were retrieved. The diagnoses were correlated with corresponding histologic follow-up and high risk (HR)-HPV testing results.

RESULTS

The PPV of AGC by TIS and MS for HPV-related squamous lesions were similar. In the MS group, more cases of glandular pathology were identified, however only three represented adenocarcinoma in-situ (AIS), and the remaining ten were endometrial carcinomas (EMCA).

CONCLUSIONS

TIS and MS are comparable in the detection of AGC representing squamous histology and the addition of HPV DNA testing does not differentially improve performance. Although the MS group harbored more glandular pathology, the differences in the detection of AIS were not statistically significant.