Bronchoscopic and transthoracic cytology and biopsy for pulmonary nonsmall cell carcinomas: Performance characteristics by procedure and tumor type

Rapid on-site evaluation of touch imprints of biopsies improves the diagnostic yield of transbronchial biopsy for endoscopically nonvisible malignancy: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

Rapid on-site evaluation has long been used for transbronchial needle aspiration or fine-needle aspiration to evaluate the adequacy of biopsy materials for the diagnosis of peripheral lung lesions. However, research on rapid on-site evaluation combined with transbronchial forceps biopsy in the diagnosis of lung carcinoma is rarely reported. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the value of rapid on-site evaluation during transbronchial forceps biopsy for endoscopically visible (tumor, infiltrative and necrotic) or nonvisible (compressive, nonspecific and normal) malignancy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed between January 2015 and January 2019 in Taihe Hospital with 1216 lung cancer patients who underwent bronchoscopy procedures, and these patients were allocated into the rapid on-site evaluation group and non-rapid on-site evaluation group, depending on the timing of the procedure. According to endoscopic features, bronchoscopic appearance was described as endoscopically visible malignancy (tumor, infiltrative and necrotic) and endoscopically nonvisible malignancy (compressive, nonspecific and normal). The diagnostic yield was compared, and the concordance between the rapid on-site evaluation results and the final histology was analyzed.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant difference in the diagnostic yield between the rapid on-site evaluation and non-rapid on-site evaluation groups for endoscopically nonvisible malignancy (74.3% vs. 51.7%, P < 0.05). However, we found no significant improvement in terms of diagnostic yield for endoscopically visible malignancy (95.2% vs. 91.2%, P > 0.05). The rapid on-site evaluation results showed high-level concordance with histology in the diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma and small cell carcinoma, with kappa values of 0.749 (P < 0.05), 0.728 (P < 0.05) and 0.940 (P < 0.05), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings demonstrated that the diagnostic yield of transbronchial biopsy for endoscopically nonvisible malignancy (compressive, nonspecific and normal) was significantly improved when rapid on-site evaluation was implemented. In addition, the rapid on-site evaluation results had high-level concordance with the final histological diagnosis.

Multivariate Analysis Of The Diagnostic Yield Of Conventional Bronchoscopy In Peripheral Lung Adenocarcinoma

Background

The new subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma reflect local invasive growth, pulmonary alveoli, and intraluminal spreading, while the effective improvement of the diagnostic yield of bronchoscopy still remains unclear. This study aims to explore whether the subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma and other factors affect the diagnostic yield of bronchoscopy.

Methods

All patients were performed 64-row CT examination and bronchoscopy.

Results

The bronchus cutoff sign in 48 cases and the endoscopic diagnostic yield was 60.4%. The lumen of the lobes and segments was invaded in 59 cases, and the endoscopic diagnostic yield was 54.2%.The lymph node metastasis was detected in 46 cases, and the endoscopic diagnostic yield was 60.9%. In addition, 42 cases showed acinar type-predominant, and the endoscopic diagnostic yield was 28.6%. Eighteen cases showed solid type-predominant, and the endoscopic diagnostic yield was 33.3%. The micropapillary type-predominant was noted in 17 cases, with the endoscopic diagnostic yield as 94.1%. The papillary type-predominant was in 14 cases, and the endoscopic diagnostic yield was 42.9%. The lepidic type-predominant was seen in 13 cases, and the endoscopic diagnostic yield was 7.7%. The mean diameter of tumors with a positive endoscopic diagnostic yield was 4.34±2.65cm, and the mean diameter of tumors with a negative diagnostic yield was 2.83±1.47cm. Multivariate analysis showed that micropapillary lung adenocarcinoma affected the endoscopic diagnostic yield (OR=37.594, 95% CI: 4.074-346.94) .Tumor diameter affects endoscopic diagnostic yield (OR=1.39, 95% CI: 1.073-1.802), bronchus cutoff sign is easy to obtain endoscopic diagnostic yield (OR=4.86, 95% CI: 1.606-14.704), and lymph node metastasis affects the endoscopic diagnostic yield (OR=3.696, 95% CI: 1.255-10.883).

Conclusion

The micropapillary subtype lung adenocarcinoma has a certain influence on the diagnostic yield of bronchoscopy. When the lung adenocarcinoma has a large tumor diameter, bronchus cutoff sign and lymph node metastasis, it is easy to obtain a diagnostic yield of bronchoscopy.

The Utility of Rapid On-Site Evaluation during Bronchoscopic Biopsy: A 2-Year Respiratory Endoscopy Central Experience

Background

Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) is commonly used to evaluate the adequacy of biopsy materials in fine-needle aspiration; however, the diagnostic performance of ROSE during fiber optic bronchoscopy (FOB) biopsy under direct vision is rarely reported. Here, we evaluated the role of ROSE during FOB biopsy of visible lesion in trachea or bronchi.

Methods

The role of ROSE was prospectively evaluated in consecutive bronchoscopy specimens obtained between January 2016 and January 2018. The agreement and accuracy between ROSE and final histopathological interpretation were assessed. The frequency and possible reasons for discrepancy between ROSE and definitive histopathology results were identified. Histological and cytological classification was performed according to the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, the American Thoracic Society, and the European Respiratory Society (IASLC/ATS/ERS) criteria of lung ADCs classification.

Results

The study enrolled 651 patients, of which 33 were excluded because of insufficient cells. Final diagnosis of malignancy was achieved in 462 cases (74.8%), whereas 156 cases (25.2%) were nonmalignant. ROSE and pathology were well correlated for the diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (Kappa = 0.718, p < 0.05), adenocarcinoma (AdC) (Kappa = 0.662; p < 0.05) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (Kappa = 0.955; p < 0.05). In 24 cases diagnosed as malignant by ROSE and nonmalignant by pathology, the lesion tissues were surgically excised and re-analyzed, and the 24 cases were finally confirmed as malignant by pathology.

Conclusions

ROSE technique allows bronchoscopists to obtain viable and adequate material for the diagnosis of histopathology, and provides them with an onsite preliminary diagnosis especially in cases with inconclusive macroscopic appearance. ROSE and pathology should be used in combination to increase the accuracy of diagnosis.

Histopathologic and molecular approach to staging of multiple lung nodules

Distinguishing multiple primary lung cancers from intrapulmonary metastases in patients with synchronous multifocal lung adenocarcinomas can be challenging. The most recent 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual (AJCC staging manual) distinguishes four disease patterns in patients with multiple lung nodules: (I) two or more distinct and histologically different masses (considered unrelated and staged as individual cancers); (II) multiple ground-glass or part-solid nodules, histologically of with lepidic growth pattern (considered separate tumors, T staged based on highest T stage lesion); (III) patchy areas of ground-glass and consolidations, histologically often invasive mucinous adenocarcinomas (considered single tumor with diffuse "pneumonic-type" involvement); and (IV) separate nodules with the same histologic features based on comprehensive histologic subtyping (considered intrapulmonary metastases). Histologic and molecular features, in conjunction with clinical and radiological information, can all be tools to assist with staging of multiple nodules. Histologic features of adenocarcinomas are best characterized using comprehensive histologic subtyping (percentage of lepidic, acinar, solid, papillary and micropapillary pattern). Genomic alterations are commonly assessed using fluorescence in-situ hybridization and next generation sequencing (NGS). The AJCC considers exactly matching breakpoints by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) as the only evidence for intrapulmonary metastases, and clearly different histologic types or subtypes as the only evidence for separate primary tumors. Similar histologic subtypes or the same biomarker pattern are considered merely relative arguments in favor of a single tumor source. When assessing multifocal lung cancer, pathologists should consider, and carefully weigh the importance of, molecular testing results in addition to the tumor's histologic features. For many cases encountered in routine clinical practice, absolute certainty cannot be reached as to whether they represent multiple primary cancers or intrapulmonary metastases. Classification of difficult cases often benefits from multidisciplinary discussion.

Imaging-guided thoracoscopic resection of a ground-glass opacity lesion in a hybrid operating room equipped with a robotic C-arm CT system

The intraoperative identification of small pulmonary nodules through video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery remains challenging. Although preoperative CT-guided nodule localization is commonly used to detect tumors during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), this approach carries inherent risks. We report the case of a patient with stage I lung cancer presenting as an area of ground-glass opacity (GGO) in the right upper pulmonary lobe. He successfully underwent a single-stage, CT-guided localization and removal of the pulmonary nodule within a hybrid operating room (OR) equipped with a robotic C-arm.