Metastatic small cell osteosarcoma to the liver: A diagnostic pitfall for fine-needle aspiration cytology

The Small Round Cell Sarcomas Complexities and Desmoplastic Presentation

Background

Small round cell sarcomas (SRCSs) account for most solid malignancies in the pediatric age group and are a part of group of malignant tumors characterized by heterogenous clinical presentation and overlapping microscopic features of small, round, primitive cells. In addition to the recently established certain genetically defined subset of undifferentiated round cell sarcomas of soft tissue and bone, this group of sarcomas include desmoplastic small round cell tumor, poorly differentiated synovial sarcoma, alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma, mesenchymal chondrosarcoma, and small cell osteosarcoma. Although, those entities share clinical and cytomorphologic features and cannot be unequivocally classified based on clinical presentation and morphology alone. Most of SRCSs characterizes of particular patterns of protein expression or genetic changes and ancillary tests remain necessary to confirm or rule out a specific diagnosis. Subtle but occasionally distinctive cytologic features narrows the number of differential diagnoses and helps to select appropriate ancillary tests necessary for the final diagnosis. Thus, when adequate fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy specimen is combined with ancillary tests, a specific histologic diagnosis can be made in almost all cases. However, due to complex cytologic features of SRCS as well as various quality and diversity of FNA smears, there are cases in that cytologic features which do not entirely match the known diagnostic criteria.

Summary

The aim of this review was to summarize cytomorphologic criteria and to present rare and divergent cytological features of SRCSs. Careful assessment of clinical presentation, cytological features, immunohistochemical patterns, and molecular alternations is necessary for an accurate diagnosis. Knowing of rare and divergent microscopic findings that does not fit with the known cytological criteria will help to avoid misdiagnosis.

Key Messages

The role of FNA biopsies diagnosing soft tissue and bone tumors has been increasing because of the ability of ancillary tests to assist in the diagnosis of specific tumors. SRCSs may be diagnosed accurately in cytology specimens. Access to clinical and radiographic presentation, utility of ancillary tests, understanding complexity of cytological features, and awareness of the rare cytologic findings that differ from that of the established diagnostic criteria are essential to make correct diagnosis.

Osteosarcoma pleural effusion: A diagnostic challenge with some cytologic hints

Pleural effusions can be the first manifestation, recurrence, or metastasis of small round cell sarcomas in children. The most common are Ewing sarcoma, neuroblastoma, and rhabdomyosarcoma. The cytomorphology is variable, the cells can be cohesive, single cells, small or large, morphologically mimicking lymphomas, carcinomas, melanomas, and mesothelioma depending on the sarcoma involved. Osteosarcomas are rare. Their rarity, variable histomorphologic features, immunophenotypic heterogeneity, being of osseous or extraosseous origin and focality of malignant osteoid matrix make their cytologic recognition a diagnostic challenge. They can be confused with small round cell sarcomas, may be misinterpreted as degenerative inflammatory cells, or masked by florid reactive mesothelial hyperplasia particularly in pleural effusions. However, attention to certain cytomorphologic features in smears and cellblock sections should raise suspicion. We report a case of a 9-year-old child who presented with cough, chest pain and breathing difficulty, left pleural effusion, a collapsed consolidated lower lung lobe, and a clinical impression of pneumonia. Pleural fluid cytology was initially reported as inflammatory effusion with florid reactive mesothelial hyperplasia. Tissue biopsy of the lung mass showed histomorphologic features consistent with osteosarcoma. A careful look at the cytology materials and cellblock sections showed helpful cytomorphologic features that were masked by florid reactive mesothelial cells and misinterpreted as degenerative inflammatory lymphocytes. An extracellular matrix was a helpful hint. Malignant pleural effusion secondary to osteosarcoma is rare. Cytologic examination may help reach the correct diagnosis if the smears and cellblock sections are carefully evaluated for certain helpful cytomorphologic features, particularly osteoid matrix.

Clarifying prognostic factors of small cell osteosarcoma: A pooled analysis of 20 cases and the literature

Introduction

Small cell osteosarcoma (SCOS) is a rare subtype of osteosarcoma, with limited studies mainly focusing on histological features. Our study aims to analyze our own patients and those reported in the literature to increase the recognition of this rare disease, to evaluate patient survival and to further determine potential prognostic factors.

Material and methods

Twenty patients with SCOS were treated in our hospital between 2010 and 2019. Their follow-up data were collected retrospectively. A total of 336 literature cases from 58 manuscripts were retrieved by means of a PubMed search with the key word “small cell osteosarcoma”. Data pertaining to treatment and follow-up were extracted. We performed a pooled analysis for the survival of patients and the risk factors for local recurrence (LR), as well as metastatic disease (MD), in a total of 160 patients using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression method.

Results

We reported our experience in diagnosing and treating SCOS. In our cases, elevated alkaline phosphatase (P = 0.013) and lactate dehydrogenase (P = 0.001) significantly impaired overall survival. In the pooled analysis, SCOS was diagnosed at the median age of 17 years and affected both sexes almost equally. The median follow-up duration was 19.5 months. In the pooled analysis cases, the 5-year overall survival rate was 38.6%, and 36.4% of patients survived 10 years. However, an increasing trend was detected, indicating recent improvements in management. The surgical margin status (P = 0.024) and metastases (P = 0.008) significantly impaired overall survival, and the response to chemotherapy was related to disease-free survival (P = 0.012). LR and MD were significantly correlated (P = 0.002) and could be observed after 5 years of follow-up. LR was significantly dependent on response to chemotherapy (P = 0.020). The development of MD seemed to be affected by response to chemotherapy (P = 0.060). Correlations between imaging features and prognosis were not detected.

Conclusions

This study suggested that positive margins, poor response to chemotherapy and MD are negative prognostic factors for SCOS, implied the potential role of laboratory examinations in the survival prediction and supported the need for prolonged or more intensive surveillance in patients with MD or LR. More well-documented literatures are encouraged to allow further confirmations.