Papanicolaou society of cytopathology system for reporting pancreaticobiliary cytology: Risk stratification and cytology scope - 2.5-year study

Objectives:

Diagnosis of pancreatic lesions remains a clinical challenge. Early and accurate diagnosis is extremely important for improving the therapeutic usefulness of pancreatic cancers and Endoscopic ultrasonography - fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) cytology has come up with this advantage. For current study the authors evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNAC by applying PSC system for reporting pancreaticobiliary cytology and Calculated the malignancy risk associated with the diagnostic categories.

Material and Methods:

A retrospective study over the period of 2.5 years (April 2017 to Oct 2019) 60 patients in our cohort EUS-FNAC guided unstained fixed and unfixed slides received of pancreatic lesion and were stained with Papanicolau and Giemsa using standard technique and immunocytochemistry, where required Application of Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology system for reporting pancreaticobiliary cytology Histopathological and clinical follow-up were retrieved.

Results:

Our study has comparable results with sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 92.8%, 100%, 100%, and 92.59%, respectively. Fuurthermore, a diagnostic accuracy of 96.2%. Risk of malignancy is lower for benign and indeterminate category whereas it is higher for suspicious and malignant categories.

Conclusion:

The application of the new proposed terminology for pancreaticobiliary cytology brings standardization. Final diagnosis can be reached by the multidisciplinary approach of EUS-FNA cytology, cell block preparation, immunocytochemistry, and immunohistochemistry; if required, can be adopted as an alternative approach to biopsy. The present study showed high sensitivity and specificity for EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma, which may influence the treatment plans of both surgeons and oncologists.

Reclassification of lesions in biopsies by fine-needle aspiration of pancreas and biliary tree using Papanicolaou classification

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to evaluate the application of the classification of the Papanicolaou Cytopathology Society for the report of biopsies by fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of pancreas and bile duct.

METHODS

The FNAs obtained consecutively during 1 year were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were performed and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and cytohistological correlation were determined. The reference standard test was the histopathological study.

RESULTS

A total of 134 cases of FNA were reclassified with ultrasound guidance according to the classification of the Papanicolaou Society, the median age was 59 years (range, 25-80 years). A case interpreted as non-diagnostic was reclassified to category 4 and 3 cases with atypical cells were reclassified to category 5. All malignant cases remained unchanged. Surgical follow-up was performed in 35 patients (26.1%), with a cytohistological concordance in 21 cases (91.3%) and 2 discordant cases (8.7%), the reasons for the discrepancy were due to sampling error, one of them with scarce material to make a diagnosis of higher category, the other case with partial agreement, because cytology was observed atypical cylindrical epithelium, with histology of grade 2 neuroendocrine neoplasia and low grade mucinous intraepithelial neoplasia. In general, the sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 75% respectively, the positive predictive value 88% and the negative predictive value 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

The FNA guided with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and interpreted according to the Papanicolaou Cytopathology Society Classification is an accurate method to evaluate pancreatic and biliary tract lesions with a high positive predictive value of 88%.

Novel fork-tip needles versus standard needles for EUS-guided tissue acquisition from solid masses of the upper GI tract: a matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

There are very few available data on the novel SharkCore™ needles for EUS-FNB.

AIM

Comparison of the performance of the SharkCore™ needles with the standard EUS-FNA needles for the diagnosis of solid upper GI masses.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Single-center, retrospective cohort study in an academic tertiary referral hospital. Patients were matched 1:1 for the site of the lesion and the presence or absence of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE).

RESULTS

A total of 102 patients were included. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean number of passes (3.3 ± 1.3 versus 3.4 ± 1.5; p = .89). Similar results were observed at the subgroup with ROSE (4.3 ± 1.3 versus 3.7 ± 1.5; p = .26). More histological specimens were obtained with the SharkCore™ needles compared to standard needles (59 versus 5%; p < .001). Diagnostic test characteristics were not significantly different (sensitivity: 91.5 versus 85.7; specificity: 100 versus 100%; accuracy: 92.2 versus 85.4% for SharkCore™ versus standard needles, p > .05 in all cases). At multivariable analysis, there was no statistically significant difference in the mean number of passes in all patients (p = .23) and in the ROSE subgroup (p = .66). However, the SharkCore™ needle obtained significantly more histological material than the standard needle (odds ratio 66; 95% confidence interval: 11.8, 375.8, p < .001). There was no significant difference in complication rates (p = .5).

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective study, single-center.

CONCLUSION

The SharkCore needles were similar to standard FNA needles in terms of the number of passes to reach diagnosis, but obtained significantly more histological specimen.

Guidelines for pancreaticobiliary cytology from the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology: A review

The newest installment on state-of-the-art standards of practice in cytopathology from the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) focuses on the pancreaticobiliary system. Similar to the National Cancer Institute recommendations for aspiration cytology of the thyroid, the PSC guidelines for pancreaticobiliary cytology addresses indications, techniques, terminology and nomenclature, ancillary studies, and postprocedure management. Each committee was composed of a multidisciplinary group of experts in diagnosing, managing, and treating patients with pancreaticobiliary disease. Draft documents were posted on an interactive Web-based forum hosted by the PSC Web site (www.papsociety.org) and the topics of terminology, ancillary testing, and management were presented at national and international meetings over an 18-month period for discussion and feedback from practicing pathologists around the world. This review provides a synopsis of these guidelines.