Diagnostic problems of salivary gland tumors

Oncologic outcomes of the most prevalent major salivary gland cancers: retrospective cohort study from single center

BACKGROUND

The preoperative diagnosis of salivary gland cancer (SGC) is crucial for the application of appropriate treatment, particularly involving the extension of the resection.

METHODS

Retrospective search of medical database identified 116 patients treated surgically with malignant tumors of salivary gland between 2010 and 2020. Analysis included the demographical data, clinical course, type of surgical and adjuvant treatment, histology type and margin status, perivascular invasion (LVI), perineural invasion (PNI), metastatic lymph nodes (LN). Facial nerve function, recurrence-free and overall survival were evaluated. Adequate statistics were used for data analysis.

RESULTS

The final cohort included 63 SGC patients, with adenoid cystic carcinoma the most common pathological type (27%, n = 17), followed by adenocarcinoma (17.4% n = 11). T1 and T2 patients accounted for majority cases (n = 46). The lymph node metastases were confirmed with the histopathology in 31.7% (n = 20). Distant metastases were observed in 4.8% of cases (n = 3). 38% (n = 24) of SGC were treated selectively with surgery, 49.2% (n = 31) had postoperative radiotherapy and 15.9% (n = 10)-radio-chemotherapy. The final facial nerve function was impaired in 38% of patients. Mean overall survival (OS) for all patients was 108.7 (± 132.1) months, and was the most favorable for acinar cell carcinoma (118.9 ± 45.4) and the poorest for squamous cell carcinoma (44 ± 32). Cox regression analysis of disease-free survival and OS identified significant association only with patients' age over 65 years, the hazard ratio of 7.955 and 6.486, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of treatment modalities for SGC should be verified with regard to the histopathological type, but also the patients' age should be taken into account.

Implementation of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytology: A Two-Year Outcome Cytopathology Data of a Tertiary Care Center

OBJECTIVE

In 2015, the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) was implemented to eliminate overlapping and disparate morphologies in salivary gland lesions. This approach helps track diagnostic findings, describe the risk of malignancy for each group, and advance therapy based on the results. The research aimed to classify fine-needle aspiration (FNA) smears, analyze malignancy risk, correlate cytology with histological diagnosis, and reduce unnecessary surgeries.

METHODOLOGY

We evaluated 217 individuals using FNA, classified their conditions using the Milan System, and followed up on 149 cases through histopathology. Both the risk of malignancy in each cluster and the total risk of malignancy were noted.

RESULTS

The most recent studies, as reported by the MSRSGC, found almost universal agreement about this grouping. The FNA cytopathology test demonstrated a sensitivity of 75% for identifying salivary gland abnormalities and a specificity of 93.16%. The findings indicated that the test had an accuracy of 89.66%, with a positive predictive value of 72.41% and a negative predictive value of 93.97%.

CONCLUSION

The MSRSGC offers a standardized technique for examining the results and assists the physician in determining the treatment plan that will be most beneficial.

Second edition of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology: Refining the role of salivary gland FNA

The use of standardised reporting systems for non-gynaecologic cytopathology has made enormous gains in popularity during the past decade, including for thyroid fine-needle aspiration, urine cytology, serous effusions, pancreas, lymph nodes, lung and more. In February 2018, the first edition of the Atlas of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) was published. The MSRSGC defines six diagnostic fine-needle aspiration categories encompassing the spectrum of non-neoplastic, benign and malignant lesions of the salivary glands. The goal of the MSRSGC is to combine each diagnostic category with a defined risk of malignancy and a specific clinical and/or surgical management algorithm. Since its initial publication in 2018, more than 200 studies and commentaries have been published, confirming the role of the MSRSGC. The second edition of the MSRSGC, published in July 2023, includes refined risks of malignancy based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses, a new chapter summarising the use of salivary gland imaging, new advances in ancillary testing and updates in nomenclature.

Second edition of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology: Refining the role of salivary gland FNA

The use of standardized reporting systems for nongynecologic cytopathology has made enormous gains in popularity during the past decade, including for thyroid fine-needle aspiration, urine cytology, serous effusions, pancreas, lymph nodes, lung, and more. In February 2018, the first edition Atlas of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) was published. The MSRSGC defines six diagnostic fine-needle aspiration categories encompassing the spectrum of Non-Neoplastic, benign, and malignant lesions of the salivary glands. The goal of the MSRSGC is to combine each diagnostic category with a defined risk of malignancy and a specific clinical and/or surgical management algorithm. Since its initial publication in 2018, more than 200 studies and commentaries have been published confirming the role of the MSRSGC. The second edition of the MSRSGC, published in July 2023, includes refined risks of malignancy based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses, a new chapter summarizing the use of salivary gland imaging, new advances in ancillary testing, and updates in nomenclature. CONCISE SENTENCE: The second edition of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology, published in July 2023, includes refined risks of malignancy based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses, a new chapter summarizing the use of salivary gland imaging, new advances in ancillary testing, updates in nomenclature, and a guide to the practical application of the latest ancillary markers for the diagnosis of selected salivary gland fine-needle aspiration cases.

Second edition of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology: Refining the role of salivary gland FNA

The use of standardized reporting systems for non-gynecologic cytopathology has made enormous gains in popularity during the past decade, including for thyroid fine-needle aspiration, urine cytology, serous effusions, pancreas, lymph nodes, lung, and more. In February 2018, the first edition Atlas of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) was published. The MSRSGC defines six diagnostic fine-needle aspiration categories encompassing the spectrum of non-neoplastic, benign, and malignant lesions of the salivary glands. The goal of the MSRSGC is to combine each diagnostic category with a defined risk of malignancy and a specific clinical and/or surgical management algorithm. Since its initial publication in 2018, more than 200 studies and commentaries have been published confirming the role of the MSRSGC. The second edition of the MSRSGC, published in July 2023, includes refined risks of malignancy based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses, a new chapter summarizing the use of salivary gland imaging, new advances in ancillary testing, and updates in nomenclature.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) in Salivary Gland Lesions with Histopathological Examination (HPE) Correlation in a Tertiary Care Centre in Southern India

This study aimed to determine the diagnostic yield of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in salivary gland lesions compared to histopathological diagnosis. The present study was done on patients above 18 years of age, with a palpable swelling, who are clinically diagnosed as salivary gland lesions were evaluated. A total of 31 patients were evaluated in this study. The mean age of the patients was 41 years ± 16.08. The male to female ratio of patients evaluated in our study was 1: 1.066, with a marginal preponderance in the female population. There was a higher incidence of carcinoma in females than males. Parotid gland lesions comprised 83.9% of all the salivary gland lesions analyzed, while submandibular gland lesions comprised 16.1%. In our study, the distribution between non-neoplastic, neoplastic benign, and neoplastic malignant lesions was 9.6%, 83.8%, and 6.4%. The overall diagnostic accuracy for non-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions is 90.3%, with a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 100%. The segregation of the results into the positive and negative class of diagnostic outcomes shows 80.6% for true positive, 9.7% for true negative, 0% for false-positive, and 9.7% for false-negative reports. Diagnostic accuracy in differentiating non-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions is 90.3%, with a sensitivity and specificity of 89.0% and 100%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of FNAC in differentiating benign from malignant lesions in our study is 93.5% (29 out of 31), the sensitivity of FNAC in our study for diagnosing malignancy is poor, and the specificity is 100%. It can be concluded that FNAC is more accurate in diagnosing benign lesions and more specific than sensitive in diagnosing malignant lesions.

Salivary gland fine-needle aspiration biopsy: quality assurance results from a tertiary cancer center

INTRODUCTION

Fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) plays a critical role in the management of patients with salivary gland lesions. A specific diagnosis can be difficult due to the wide range of lesions with overlapping morphologic features, potentially leading to interpretation errors. We analyzed the cytologic-histologic discrepancies identified in the quality assurance program of a major cancer center in cases of salivary gland FNAB and performed a root cause analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Salivary gland FNAB specimens performed during a 12-year period at a major tertiary cancer center were reviewed. The inclusion criteria for this study included FNAB cases of salivary glands with subsequent histologic or flow cytometry follow up. The cytologic diagnoses for these cases were recategorized according to the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) based on the original reports. The risk of neoplasm and malignancy based on the cases with subsequent resection or flow cytometry and the most common causes of discrepancy were analyzed.

RESULTS

The risk of neoplasm ranged from 41% to 99% and the risk of malignancy ranged from 22% to 99% among the different MSRSGC categories. Lymphoid and myoepithelial rich lesions were the most common miscategorized lesions using the MSRSGC. Reactive changes due to inflammation were associated with overcalls. The most common malignancy in the atypical category was mucoepidermoid carcinomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Myoepithelial and lymphoid rich lesions arising in the salivary gland are associated with a higher risk of misclassification. The use of category IVB in the MSRSGC is appropriate for lesions with abundant myoepithelial cells. Reactive atypia seen in sialadenitis was the most common feature associated with overcall.

Assessment of Risk of Malignancy of Fine-needle Aspiration Cytology in Salivary Gland Lesions Using the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology Categorization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of the salivary gland is crucial in the identification of salivary gland lesions, but the variation in morphological pattern and the overlap of morphological traits can result in erroneous interpretation and affect treatment, making FNAC of the salivary gland problematic. The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) was created to address these problems.

OBJECTIVES

To ascertain whether the FNAC method using MSRSGC was reliable in predicting the risk of malignancy (ROM) in each category of salivary gland lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The databases PubMed-MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane, Scopus, and Google Scholar were all searched using pertinent keywords, reference searches, and citation searches. A fixed effect model was used to determine the pooled proportion with a 95% confidence interval (CI). All statistical analyses were performed using Meta Disc and R version 4.0.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing).

RESULTS

After reviewing the submissions' abstracts and titles, 58 documents that satisfied the necessary inclusion and exclusion criteria were ultimately selected. A total of 19,652 samples from 19,408 individuals was analyzed, out of which 9,958 samples were available for histopathological follow-up. The pooled ROM for category I was 10%, category II was 5%, category III was 28%, category IV A was 2%, Category IV B was 34%, category V was 91%, and category VI was 99%.

CONCLUSION

Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology is useful for risk stratification and quality control, confirming its validity and diagnostic utility. Widespread use of MSRSGC would improve the accuracy of salivary gland cytology and lead to better patient care and improved treatment strategies. The results of this study are in consonance with reported values as per MSRSGC except for category V.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The MSRSGC which was first reported in 2018 is a very useful tool for proper stratification of ROM in salivary gland FNAC. This study allowed us to validate the ROM values in different categories as reported in MSRSGC.

Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology for Parotid Tumors

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology is widely used in clinical practice as a simple and minimally invasive test for parotid tumors that allows for preoperative estimation of benignancy and malignancy, histological type, and malignancy grade and can be performed on an outpatient basis. In recent years, cell blocks prepared with core needle biopsy (CNB) and liquid-based cytology (LBC) have increased the reliability of immunostaining and molecular biological testing, leading to improved diagnostic accuracy. In 2018, the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytology was introduced, but it does not include malignancy grade or histological type, so we proposed the Osaka Medical College classification as a more clinically based cell classification that includes both types of information, and we have reported on its usefulness. This review gives an overview of the history and use of FNA and describes CNB and LBC and the two classification systems.

The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology

OBJECTIVES

Our study assesses whether the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) offers any benefit over the original cytology classification, and measures interobserver agreement.

METHODS

Four cytopathologists retrospectively blindly classified preoperative cytology by MSRSGC from 101 resected salivary tumors. Consensus MSRSGC diagnoses were correlated with surgical pathology diagnoses and compared with the original cytology classification. Diagnostic parameters were calculated for both systems. Interobserver variability was assessed.

RESULTS

The original cytology classification vs MSRSGC had sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 75.0% vs 78.3%, 97.1% vs 98.0%, 91.2% vs 94.7%, and 90.1% vs 90.0%, respectively. The original cytology classification risk of neoplasm (RON) was 91.7% for "negative for malignancy" and 100.0% for other categories. The MSRSGC RON was 71.4% in category II (nonneoplastic) and 100.0% in all other categories. The original cytology classification risk of malignancy (ROM) ranged from 0.0% for "atypical" to 100.0% for "positive for malignancy." The MSRSGC ROM ranged from 0.0% in categories I (nondiagnostic) and III (nonneoplastic) to 100.0% in category VI (malignant). Weighted agreement using the MSRSGC was 92% (Gwet AC1, 0.84); unweighted agreement was 69% (Gwet AC1, 0.64). MSRSGC category IVA (benign neoplasm) was most likely to show interobserver agreement, with complete agreement in 67% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The MSRSGC performs similarly to the original cytology classification and shows relatively high interobserver agreement.

Application of the Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology using cell blocks

The Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology (MSRSGC) is a novel standardized classification tool for salivary gland cytology specimens based on the use of direct smears. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) cell blocks facilitate the use of ancillary studies, leading to improved diagnostic accuracy. However, the application of the MSRSGC with only cell blocks has not been well established. Consecutive cohort of all parotid gland cytology specimens between 01/01/2018 and 30/06/2021 was performed. All cytology specimens were processed into cell blocks only. Cytologic diagnoses were classified prospectively according to the MSRSGC categories. The risk of malignancy (ROM) for each diagnostic category and the diagnostic performance were calculated. A total of 230 FNA samples from 221 patients were identified, including 47% and 78.4% with surgical or clinical follow-up, respectively. The ROMs based on surgical follow-up for the non-diagnostic, non-neoplastic, AUS, neoplasm: benign, SUMP, SFM and malignant categories were 21.4%,0%,50%,0%,30%,100% and 100%, respectively. The ROMs based on the clinical follow-up for these categories were 7.3%,0%,37.3%,0%,27.3%,100% and 100%, respectively. Following surgical excision, all Milan IVa category samples were confirmed as benign, and all Milan V and VI category samples were confirmed as malignant. This study validates the application of the MSRSGC with the sole use of FFPE cell blocks. The diagnostic accuracy of MSRSGC is high and compares favorably to other institutions using traditional cytology assessment methods. Furthermore, FNA results using this technique enabled to provide optimal patient management based on the ROM of the different Milan system categories.

Evaluation of Accuracy of Salivary Gland Fine Needle Aspirates using the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology

CONTEXT

The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) is a standardized six tier-reporting format aimed at ensuring better communication and improved patient management.

AIMS

The main objectives of our study were to classify salivary gland fine needle aspirates into 6 categories of the MSRSGC and assess Risk of malignancy (ROM), specificity, sensitivity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive Value.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

It was a retrospective study done over a period of three years from January 2017 to December 2020.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All salivary gland FNAs performed in the above period were retrieved and classified into six categories based on the Milan system. Histopathological diagnosis was also retrieved wherever available.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Using histopathological diagnosis as gold standard, ROM was calculated. Specificity, sensitivity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy were also assessed.

RESULTS

Out of the 202 salivary gland FNAs, histopathological diagnosis was available in 102 cases. ROM for Non Diagnostic, Non Neoplastic, Atypia of Undetermined Significance (AUS), Benign, Salivary Gland Neoplasm of Uncertain Malignant Potential (SUMP), Suspicious for Malignancy (SM) and Malignant categories was 30%, 8.3%, 25%, 3.9%, 33.3%, 71.4% and 93.3% respectively. Highest specificity and diagnostic accuracy were achieved when only malignant and SM were considered as positive results. Maximum sensitivity was observed when AUS, SUMP, SM and malignant were included in positive test results.

CONCLUSION

The MSRSGC is an excellent system for accurately classifying salivary gland FNAs with better reproducibility of reports and enhanced communication between pathologist and surgeon.

Reclassification of salivary gland aspirates based on “The Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytology”: A five-year retrospective study

Introduction:

The Milan System for reporting salivary gland cytopathology helps standardize reporting systems across institutions, improve communication between clinicians and pathologists and guide the clinical management of patients.

Aims:

This study was undertaken to evaluate the utility of the Milan system classification in cytology reporting.

Settings and Design:

The present study is a retrospective study conducted over a period of five years in tertiary care centre.

Methods and Materials:

All the cases of salivary gland aspirates were reviewed and reclassified into six diagnostic categories according to the Milan system of reporting salivary gland cytology (MSRSGC). Cytological diagnosis was correlated with the histopathological diagnosis wherever available.

Results:

A total of 258 cases were classified using the Milan system as non-diagnostic (20.9%), non-neoplastic (26.3%), atypia of undetermined significance (4.7%), neoplasm benign (37.5%), neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (3.5%), suspicious for malignancy (0.4%), and malignancy (6.6%). Cytohistological discordance was noted among 8/76 cases (10.5%). The sensitivity and specificity of FNAC were 75% and 98.5%, respectively. The risk of malignancy was 14.2% for Category I, 9% for II, 50% for III, zero for IVA and IVB, and 83.3% for category VI.

Conclusions:

The new classification system helps pathologists to standardize reporting leading to better clinical and surgical management.

The Contributory Role of Cell Blocks in Salivary Gland Neoplasms Fine Needle Aspirations Classified by the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytology

(1) Background: The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) was introduced in 2018, bringing an organ-specific classification system for salivary gland cytopathology. The aim of present study is to evaluate the MSRSGC prospectively, based on a two-year experience in the tertiary care center pathology department, and evaluate the role of routine cell block (CB) preparation in salivary gland cytopathological diagnostics. (2) Methods: In our institution, the Department of Pathology, Fimlab Laboratories, Tampere, Finland, the MSRSGC has been implemented in salivary gland cytopathology since January 2018 and, over a two-year period (January 2018–December 2019), there were 365 fine-needle aspirations, of which 164 had a surgical follow-up. The CB methods used were Plasma-thrombin, the collection of visible fragments, and the Shandon and in-house methods. (3) Results: The MSRSGC diagnostic figures were as follows: accuracy 87.5%, sensitivity 45.8% and specificity 98.9%. For diagnostic categories of MSRSGC (non-neoplastic, benign neoplasm and malignant neoplasm) (n = 63) diagnostic accuracy was 98.4%, and for undetermined categories (atypia of undetermined significance, salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential and suspicious for malignancy) (n = 49) diagnostic accuracy was 73.5%. Non-contributory cell blocks resulted more often in a false negative diagnosis (25%, 3/12) than a true negative diagnosis (10%, 7/73, p < 0.001), and is, most likely, an insufficient cytological diagnosis (86%, 18/21, p < 0.001). (4) Conclusion: The application of MSRSGC and CBs are beneficial in salivary gland cytological diagnosis, increasing diagnostic accuracy and, thus, patients’ management and treatment.

Accuracy, predictability and prognostic implications of fine-needle aspiration biopsy for parotid gland tumours: A retrospective case series

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the precision and utility of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) in differentiating between benign and malignant parotid tumours, and the implications of FNA results on management and outcomes.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SETTING

Tertiary medical centre.

PARTICIPANTS

All adults who underwent preoperative FNA, followed by postoperative histological examination, between 1986 and 2014.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Differences in clinical management and outcomes of patients with parotid masses in light of FNA results.

RESULTS

We analysed 505 samples from 485 patients. According to histopathological results, preoperative FNA successfully identified benign tumours in 89% of the cases (362/405) and only 59% of malignant tumours (59/100). Overall sensitivity and specificity of FNA in distinguishing between different subtypes of benign lesions were 80% and 99%, respectively, whereas positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 85% and 98%. Moreover, malignant lesions subtyping had high false-positive and false-negative rates with sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 44%, 100%, 75% and 99%, respectively. Additionally, when FNA falsely classified malignant tumours as benign, surgeries were inappropriately delayed and the durations of surgeries and hospitalisations were shorter, compared to true malignant FNA results. Interestingly, survival was not affected in falsely benign lesions that were mostly low-grade, conversely non-diagnostic FNA for malignant tumours resulted in decreased survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlight the limitations of FNA as a decision-making tool in preoperative evaluation of parotid masses. Clinicians should take into account that FNA is inaccurate for identifying specific subtypes of malignant lesions, which may eventually delay treatment and influence outcome.

The effectiveness of the Milan system for risk stratification of salivary gland lesions: The 10-year cytohistopathological correlation results of salivary gland FNA cytology at a tertiary center

BACKGROUND

The Milan system reporting salivary gland cytopathology (MSRSGC) is a tiered classification scheme that is based on risk stratification. The aim of the current study was to assess the risk of malignancy (ROM) and risk of neoplasia (RON) in each of the diagnostic categories proposed by the MSRSGC.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis and categorization according to the MSRSGC was made of salivary gland fine needle aspirations (FNA) performed from January 2007 to December 2017. The FNA cytology results were correlated with subsequent histological follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 578 FNAs were evaluated and histopathology was available for 198 cases (34.2%). The RON and ROM for individual diagnostic categories were: Non-diagnostic: 52.2% to 13%, non-neoplastic: 21.4% to 10.7%, atypia of undetermined significance: 74% to 22.2%, benign neoplasm: 100% to 1.1%, salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential: 93.3% to 53.3%, suspicious for malignancy (SFM): 100% to 100%, and malignant: 100% to 100%. A diagnosis of 'SFM' or 'malignant' with FNA cytology carried a 100% risk for malignancy, while a diagnosis of "non-neoplastic," "benign neoplasm" reduced the probability of malignancy to 3.4%.

CONCLUSION

The MSRSGC is useful for the management of salivary gland lesions as it can successfully differentiate between benign and malignant cases. It will bring uniformity in salivary gland FNA cytology reporting across various institutions globally.

The Milan System, from Its Introduction to Its Current Adoption in the Diagnosis of Salivary Gland Cytology

Salivary gland masses are often encountered in the everyday practice of cytopathology. It is commonly known that the cytologic interpretation of these lesions can pose diagnostic problems due to overlapping cytomorphologic features. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) of salivary lesions shows good to excellent sensitivity and specificity in differentiating a neoplastic from a non-neoplastic process and in diagnosing common tumors such as pleomorphic adenoma. However, its value is limited in diagnosing specific neoplastic entities especially those with well-differentiated morphology. In light of this gap, an international group of pathologists has proposed a management-oriented, tiered classification for reporting salivary gland FNA specimens, “The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC)”. Similar to other classification systems, the MSRSGC scheme comprises six diagnostic categories, which were linked with a specific risk of malignancy (ROM) and management. In this review article, the author evaluated the published literature on FNA in diagnosing salivary gland lesions with the adoption of the Milan system since its introduction in the daily practice of salivary cytopathology.

Assessing the diagnostic accuracy for pleomorphic adenoma and Warthin tumor by employing the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology: An international, multi-institutional study

BACKGROUND

The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) has established distinct diagnostic categories for reporting cytopathological findings, and each is associated with a defined risk of malignancy (ROM). However, the ROM is applied at the overall category level and is not specific for particular morphological entities within a category. Here, the diagnostic performance of the MSRSGC for pleomorphic adenoma (PA) and Warthin tumor (WT) is reported.

METHODS

The pathology archives of 11 institutions from 4 countries were retrospectively searched to identify all salivary gland fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsies with a differential or definitive diagnosis of PA or WT and all resection specimens with a diagnosis of PA or WT; only paired cases were included. All FNA diagnoses were retrospectively classified according to the MSRSGC.

RESULTS

A total of 1250 cases met the inclusion criteria, and they included 898 PA cases and 352 WT cases. The ROM in the benign neoplasm category was 3.0% and 1.3% for cases with a differential or definitive diagnosis of PA and WT, respectively. The ROM in the salivary gland neoplasm with uncertain malignant potential (SUMP) category was 2.7% and 18.8% for PA and WT, respectively (P = .0277). The diagnostic accuracy for PA and WT was 95.1% and 96.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic accuracy for PA and WT on FNA is high. Furthermore, these findings highlight the difference in the ROMs associated with 2 specific differential diagnoses in the SUMP category: basaloid neoplasms and oncocytoid neoplasms.

Current classification systems and standardized terminology in cytopathology

The history of classification systems and the search for a unified nomenclature in cytopathology spans several decades and expresses the preoccupation of all those involved to make cytopathology a reliable diagnostic tool and a trusted screening method. Early classification schemes, applicable to exfoliative and aspiration cytology, attempted to set some basic standards for how non-gynecological cytopathology findings should be reported. While useful in establishing some basic guidelines, these were not specific to the various fields of non-gynecologic cytopathology, often burdened with specific problems. Cytopathology has evolved tremendously in the last couple of decades, undoubtedly boosted by the emergence of various classification schemes that, more than ever, are based on evidence gathered by professionals across the globe. The benefit of classification systems and standardized nomenclature in cytopathology is to provide useful, clear, and clinically relevant information for clinicians and ultimately to provide the best patient care. Standardized reporting systems make cytopathology reports more meaningful and robust. It now became standard that these include by default elements, such as adequacy criteria, diagnostic groups, risk of malignancy (ROM), and recommendations for patient management. In this brief review, we attempted to summarize how these classification schemes emerged and how they are reshaping the landscape of diagnostic cytopathology.

Retrospective application of the Milan System for reporting salivary gland cytopathology: A Cancer Center experience

BACKGROUND

The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) was recently proposed. Herein, we retrospectively applied this nomenclature system to salivary gland lesions sampled by ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA).

METHODS

All cases of salivary gland FNA with available surgical follow-up, in the period from 2014 to 2017 at our institution were reviewed and reclassified according to one of the six categories of the MSRSGC, blind to the surgical outcome. Overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated, as well as risks of neoplasm (RON) and risk of malignancy (ROM) for each of the proposed categories.

RESULTS

There were 104 salivary gland lesions, with a female predominance (57.7%), most cases from the parotid gland (89.4%). Mean age was 53.2 years. Distribution of the specimens according to the Milan System was as follows: 19.2% nondiagnostic (ND), 8.7% non-neoplastic (NN), 9.6% atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), 40.4% benign neoplasm (BN), 14.4% salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (SUMP), 1.9% suspicious for malignancy (SFM), and 5.8% malignant. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV using MSRSGC were calculated as 75%, 98.4%, 88.9%, and 95.3%, respectively. RON/ROM for each category were 60%/15% for ND, 44.4%/0% for NN, 90%/40% for AUS, 100%/9.5% for BN, 100%/13.3% for SUMP, 50%/50% for SFM and 100%/100% for malignant.

CONCLUSION

The use of the Milan System proved to be a useful method to predict the risk of neoplasm and malignancy in the sample studied, with high sensitivity and specificity.

Cytologic grading of primary malignant salivary gland tumors: A blinded review by an international panel

BACKGROUND

Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is commonly used for the preoperative evaluation of salivary gland tumors. Tumor grade is a key factor influencing clinical management of salivary gland carcinomas (SGCs). To assess the ability to grade nonbasaloid SGCs in FNA specimens, an international panel of cytopathologists convened to review and score SGC cases.

METHODS

The study cohort included 61 cases of primary SGC from the pathology archives of 3 tertiary medical centers. Cases from 2005 to 2016 were selected, scanned, and digitized. Nineteen cytopathologists blinded to the histologic diagnosis reviewed the digitized cytology slides and graded them as low, high, or indeterminate. The panelists' results were then compared to the tumor grades based on histopathologic examination of the corresponding resection specimens.

RESULTS

All but 2 of the 19 (89.5%) expert panelists review more than 20 salivary gland FNAs per year; 16 (84.2%) of the panelists work at academic medical centers, and 13 (68.4%) have more than 10 years' experience. Participants had an overall accuracy of 89.4% in the grading of SGC cases, with 90.2% and 88.3% for low- and high-grade SGC, respectively. Acinic cell carcinoma and mucoepidermoid carcinoma had the highest degree of accuracy, while epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma and salivary duct carcinoma had the lowest degree of accuracy. As expected, the intermediate-grade SGC cases showed the greatest variability (high-grade, 42.1%; low-grade, 37.5%, indeterminate, 20.4%).

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the high accuracy of cytomorphologic grading of primary SGC by FNA as low- or high-grade. However, caution should be exercised when a grade cannot be confidently assigned.

Evaluation of Accuracy of Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytology: Review of Morphology and Diagnostic Challenges in Each Category

Background:

Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in salivary gland lesions is challenging for the cytopathologists due to diverse morphological pattern and overlapping morphologic features which are responsible for the pitfalls. The present study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of the Milan system in the diagnosis of salivary gland lesions and to discuss and review the morphology and diagnostic challenges in individual Milan categories.

Materials and Methods:

The study was a retrospective diagnostic analytical study in the department of pathology at a tertiary care hospital attached to medical college over a duration of 2 years. All the salivary gland FNAC cases were reviewed and divided into six categories as per the proposed Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology. Histopathology correlation was performed wherever possible.

Results:

A total of 131 cases formed the study group. The number of cases in each category were: nondiagnostic 4.5%, nonneoplastic 51.9%, atypical lesions 0.76%, neoplastic category benign neoplasm 21.37%, salivary lesion of uncertain malignant potential 1.52%, suspicious category 2.29%, and malignant category 17.5%. The risk of malignancy for each categories were 6.25% (nonneoplastic), 100% (atypical), 3.3% (neoplastic), 0% (benign), 25% (salivary neoplasm of uncertain neoplastic potential), 100% (suspicious for malignancy), and 100% (malignant) categories. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of FNAC with application of Milan system was 89.4%, 100%, 100%, and 95.74%, respectively.

Conclusion:

The high efficacy of FNAC obtained in the present study, when Milan system was applied, confirms the usefulness of this scheme in reporting salivary gland lesions.

Moving toward a systematic approach for reporting salivary gland cytopathology: cytohistological correlation with the application of the Milan system for risk stratification at a tertiary care center

INTRODUCTION

Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of salivary glands is a well-established technique that plays a critical role in the preoperative diagnosis of lesions. Despite its clinical utility, it remains one of the most challenging areas in cytopathology. This is because there is no consensus on how to report salivary gland cytopathology, which has resulted in inconsistent terminology and confusion in communication among cytopathologists and clinicians. A risk stratification of FNA diagnostic categories has been recently proposed to be useful in reporting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study of FNAC of salivary gland lesions reported from 2014 to 2017 was performed. The performance of the cytology reporting system was evaluated with histological diagnosis serving as the gold standard. The aspirates were then categorized according to the Milan system. Furthermore, the risk of malignancy was calculated for all diagnostic categories.

RESULTS

A total of 899 salivary gland aspirates were evaluated: 2.2% were nondiagnostic, 55.8% indicated nonneoplastic lesions, and 40.4% indicated neoplastic lesions. Histopathology was available for 172 cases. FNA had a sensitivity of 72.3% and a specificity of 92.6% with an overall diagnostic accuracy of 91.4% for differentiating malignant from benign tumors.

CONCLUSION

A tiered classification scheme as proposed by the Milan system may prove helpful in effectively guiding clinical management of patients with salivary gland lesions. Our experience with this system helps to pave the way for the adoption of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology.

The risk of malignancy according to Milan reporting system of salivary gland fine-needle aspiration with Becton Dickinson SurePath liquid-based processing

BACKGROUND

Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a noninvasive, safe, cost-effective, diagnostic procedure for the evaluation of salivary gland lesions and the selection of patients for surgery. The aim of this study was to analyze the risk of malignancy (ROM) according to the Milan reporting system of salivary gland FNA specimens using a liquid-based cytology (LBC) technique.

METHODS

The cytological diagnosis of 459 cases between 2014 and 2017 was revised according to the Milan reporting system. The FNAC results of 129 cases with a histological diagnosis were compared with respect to the final diagnosis. The ROM for each category calculated.

RESULTS

The ROM was high in the indeterminate and malignant categories, while the ROM in the benign neoplasm category was low. Sensitivity and specificity analyzed in two different ways were 95.1% and 88.8%, 81%, and 77.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

When salivary gland lesions are evaluated together with clinical and radiological data, the LBC technique can be applied to salivary gland specimens based on the high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity in liquid-based samples reported according to the Milan system.

A Call for Universal Acceptance of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology

OBJECTIVES

The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) established a standardized, tiered reporting system for salivary gland fine-needle aspiration (FNA) that has gained international acceptance among cytologists. Our goal was to review the key features of the MSRSGC to familiarize the surgical community with this system and its application to the FNA evaluation of salivary gland masses.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the MSRSGC and its application in clinical practice.

RESULTS

The MSRSGC consists of six major diagnostic categories: 1) nondiagnostic, 2) non-neoplastic, 3) atypia of undetermined significance, 4) neoplasm (benign or salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential), 5) suspicious for malignancy, and 6) malignant. Each diagnostic category is associated with an implied risk of malignancy with implications for clinical management.

CONCLUSIONS

The MSRSGC is similar to the system used for reporting thyroid FNA, which is familiar to most otolaryngologists and head and neck surgeons. As this reporting system continues to gain popularity among pathologists, widespread understanding by surgeons will be important to standardize communication and classification of salivary gland cytopathology to improve clinical care. Laryngoscope, 130:80-85, 2020.

Salivary Gland Fine Needle Aspiration and Introduction of the Milan Reporting System

Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is a well-established procedure for the diagnosis and management of salivary gland lesions despite challenges imposed by their diversity, complexity, and cytomorphologic overlap. Until recently, the reporting of salivary gland FNA specimens was inconsistent among different institutions throughout the world, leading to diagnostic confusion among pathologists and clinicians. In 2015, an international group of pathologists initiated the development of an evidence-based tiered classification system for reporting salivary gland FNA specimens designated the "Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology" (MSRSGC) that culminated with the publication of the MSRSGC Atlas in February 2018. The MSRSGC consists of 6 diagnostic categories, which incorporate the morphologic heterogeneity and overlap among various non-neoplastic, benign, and malignant lesions of the salivary glands. In addition, each diagnostic category is associated with a risk of malignancy and management recommendations. The main goal of the MSRSGC is to improve communication between cytopathologists and treating clinicians, while also facilitating cytologic-histologic correlation, sharing of data from different laboratories for quality control, and research. Herein, we review the current status of salivary gland cytology and the role of MSRSGC in providing a framework for reporting salivary gland lesions.

Risk of high-grade malignancy in parotid gland tumors as classified by the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology

BACKGROUND

The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (Milan System) has previously shown its diagnostic utility by categorizing the seven cytology findings in salivary gland lesions. However, there has been lack of study about the risk of high-grade malignancy in the cytology diagnosis based on the Milan System. Thus, we tried to identify the diagnostic ability of the Milan System for high-grade malignancy and to suggest an improved diagnostic approach for preoperative estimation of high-grade malignancy using the Milan System.

METHODS

A total of 413 patients with parotid gland tumors, who had undergone surgical resection from 2011 to 2015 were included in the present study retrospectively. Cytopathology was reclassified according to the Milan System by two independent reviewers. The outcomes were risk of malignancy and risk of high-grade malignancy. The diagnostic performance of the Milan System category [Malignant] for detecting high-grade malignancy was calculated.

RESULTS

The risk of malignancy was 83.3% and 100% in the Milan System categories [Suspicious for Malignancy] and [Malignant], respectively. Meanwhile, the risk of high-grade malignancy was 16.7% and 55.9% in these two categories. Disease-free survival of patients with high-grade malignancy was significantly worse than those with low- and intermediate-grade malignancy. Union combining the Milan System category [Malignant] with the presence of nodal metastasis suggested high-grade malignancy with an acceptable diagnostic sensitivity (0.889-0.963) and negative predictive value (0.900-0.966).

CONCLUSIONS

The Milan System category [Malignant] with the presence of nodal metastasis suggested parotid gland tumors as high-grade malignancy in a pretreatment setting.

Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology: An Experience with the Implication for Risk of Malignancy

Introduction:

Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a well-established technique for evaluation of salivary gland lesions, but because of the heterogenicity and morphological overlap between spectrum of lesion, there are a few challenges in its wide use. Recently, “The Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology” (MSRSGC) was introduced, providing guide for diagnosis and management according to the risk of malignancy (ROM) in different categories. The current study was conducted retrospectively to reclassify the salivary gland lesions from previous diagnosis and to evaluate the ROM in different categories.

Material and Methods:

Clinical data, FNAC specimen, histological, and clinical follow-up of cases were retrieved, cytological features were re-evaluated, and cases were reclassified as follows: Category 1: Non-diagnostic (ND); Category 2: Non-neoplastic (NN); Category 3: Atypia of undetermined significance (AUS); Category 4a: Neoplasm: benign (NB), Category 4b: Neoplasm: salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (SUMP); Category 5: suspicious of malignancy (SM); and Category 6: Malignant (M).

Result:

Total 293 cases were evaluated cytologically, and histological follow-up was available in 172 cases. The distribution of cases into different categories was as follows ND (6.1%), NN (38.2%), AUS (2.7%), NB (33.4%), SUMP (2.0%), SM (2.4%), and M (15%). Overall, ROM reported were 25%, 5%, 20%, 4.4%, 33.3%, 85.7%, and 97.5%, respectively for each category. Overall, sensitivity was 83.33%, specificity was 98.31%, positive predictive value was 95.74%, and negative predictive value was 92.80%.

Conclusion:

MSRSGC is a recently proposed six category scheme, which places salivary gland FNAC into well-defined categories that limit the possibilities of false negative and false positive cases.

Risk stratification of salivary gland cytology utilizing the Milan system of classification

BACKGROUND

The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) is based on risk stratification. Our study is a retrospective review of salivary gland fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) with the goal of determining the risk of malignancy (ROM) in each of the categories proposed by the MSRSGC.

METHODS

FNAC of salivary gland lesions with corresponding surgical resection specimens were retrieved over a 5-year period. Metastatic tumors were excluded. BothFNAC and corresponding surgical resections were reviewed blindly and classified as per criteria published by the MSRSGC. The ROM for each of the diagnostic categories was determined and compared with the ROM published by the MSRSGC.

RESULTS

The total number of entities and ROM in 199 reviewed cases were as follows: Nondiagnostic 18 (9.2%) (ROM 0%), non-neoplastic 4(2%) (ROM 0%), atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) 12(6%) (ROM 33%), benign neoplasm 118(59.2%) (ROM 0.8%), salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (SUMP) 22(11%) (ROM 40.9%), suspicious for malignancy 3(1.5%) (ROM 100%), malignant 22(11%) (ROM 100%).

CONCLUSION

The ROM reported in our study was mostly concordant with ROM published by the MSRSGC. This classification is helpful for the management of categories; nondiagnostic, non-neoplastic, benign neoplasm, suspicious for malignancy and malignant. The management is not standardized for the category, salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential, as clinical information plays an important role in planning surgical procedures at an individual basis. Further studies will need to be performed using this new classification to help define appropriate management and predict ROM more accurately.

The utility of the Milan System as a risk stratification tool for salivary gland fine needle aspiration cytology specimens

OBJECTIVE

To perform a retrospective investigation of our institutional experience with salivary gland fine needle aspirations (FNA) through the framework of The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) and assess the risks of neoplasm and malignancy for each diagnostic category.

METHODS

All salivary gland FNAs performed from January 2009 to December 2016 were retrospectively categorised according to the MSRSGC. When available, pre-operative cytological results were correlated with subsequent histological follow-up.

RESULTS

In total, 893 FNAs were reviewed. The specimens were retrospectively classified as nondiagnostic (ND: 13.5%), non-neoplastic (NN: 16.1%), atypia of undetermined significance (AUS: 10.8%), benign neoplasm (BN: 34.9%), salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (SUMP: 8.2%), suspicious for malignancy (SM: 2.7%) and malignant (M: 13.8%). Histological follow-up was available for 429 cases (48%); the majority (68.1%) were benign. The risks of neoplasm and malignancy for each category were as follows: ND: 64.5%, 16.1%; NN: 42.9%, 17.9%; AUS: 79.6%, 30.6%; BN: 100%, 2.2%; SUMP: 100%, 46.6%; SM: 94.7%, 78.9%; and M: 100%, 98.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

The MSRSGC is a useful classification scheme for stratifying salivary gland lesions according to their associated risk of malignancy and guiding clinicians toward appropriate management. Diagnostic pitfalls are seen in a small proportion of cases and a multidisciplinary approach for assessing salivary gland pathology is essential in their evaluation.

Parotid tumours: clinical and oncologic outcomes after microscope-assisted parotidectomy with intraoperative nerve monitoring

Temporary and permanent facial nerve dysfunctions can be observed after parotidectomy for benign and malignant lesions. Intraoperative nerve monitoring is a recognised tool for the preservation of the nerve, while the efficacy of the operative microscope has been rarely stated. The authors report their experience on 198 consecutive parotidectomies performed on 196 patients with the aid of the operative microscope and intraoperative nerve monitoring. 145 parotidectomies were performed for benign lesions and 53 for malignancies. Thirteen patients treated for benign tumours experienced temporary (11 cases) or permanent facial palsy (2 cases, both of House-Brackmann grade II). Ten patients with malignant tumour presented with preoperative facial nerve weakness that did not improve after treatment. Five and 6 patients with malignant lesion without preoperative facial nerve deficit experienced postoperative temporary and permanent weakness respectively (the sacrifice of a branch of the nerve was decided intraoperatively in 2 cases). Long-term facial nerve weakness after parotidectomy for lesions not directly involving or originating from the facial nerve (n = 185) was 2.7%. Patients treated for benign tumours of the extra facial portion of the gland without inflammatory behaviour (n = 91) had 4.4% facial nerve temporary weakness rate and no permanent palsy. The combined use of the operative microscope and intraoperative nerve monitoring seems to guarantee facial nerve preservation during parotidectomy.

Synchronous Parotid (Mammary Analog) Secretory Carcinoma and Acinic Cell Carcinoma: Report of a Case

Mammary analogue secretory carcinoma (MASC) is a recently described low-grade salivary gland malignancy with histologic, immunohistochemical and molecular similarities to secretory carcinoma of the breast, including a specific t(12;15)(p13;q25) resulting in an ETV6-NTRK3 gene fusion. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging frequently document a macrocystic structure. The main differential diagnosis of secretory carcinoma is with low grade acinic cell carcinoma (AciCC). The two can be differentiated with immunohistochemical stains for S100, mammaglobin, carbonic anhydrase VI and DOG-1; the identification of the specific translocation can help to characterize non-typical cases. We report a unique case of synchronous MASC and AciCC presenting in a parotid gland and discuss the implications of the correct identification of the two tumors.

The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC): An ASC-IAC-Sponsored System for Reporting Salivary Gland Fine-Needle Aspiration

The diagnostic role of salivary gland fine-needle aspiration (SG-FNA) is well established in the preoperative evaluation of patients with salivary gland lesions. At present, most salivary SG-FNA specimens are diagnosed based on conventional diagnostic criteria. However, there exists a lack of uniform reporting for these specimens to guide the clinical management of patients. This void motivated a group of experienced cytopathologists to spearhead the development of a uniform reporting system. This international panel, under the sponsorship of the American Society of Cytopathology (ASC) and the International Academy of Cytology (IAC), gathered in September 2015 at the European Congress of Cytology, held in Milan, Italy, to propose the “Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology” (MSRSGC). This effort sparked the interest of many and brought forth an agreement to develop an evidence-based tiered classification consisting of 6 diagnostic categories. It is hoped that this standard reporting system will enhance the overall effectiveness of SG-FNA reporting across institutions, with the ultimate result being better communication and improved patient care.

The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC): an ASC-IAC-sponsored system for reporting salivary gland fine-needle aspiration

The diagnostic role of salivary gland fine-needle aspiration (SG-FNA) is well established in the preoperative evaluation of patients with salivary gland lesions. At present, most salivary SG-FNA specimens are diagnosed based on conventional diagnostic criteria. Nevertheless, there exists a lack of uniform reporting for these specimens to guide the clinical management of patients. This void motivated a group of experienced cytopathologists to spearhead the development of a uniform reporting system. This international panel, under the sponsorship of the American Society of Cytopathology (ASC) and the International Academy of Cytology (IAC), gathered in September 2015 at the European Congress of Cytology, held in Milan, Italy, to propose "The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology. This effort sparked the interest of many and brought forth an agreement to develop an evidence-based tiered classification consisting of 6 diagnostic categories. We hope that this standard reporting system will enhance the overall effectiveness of SG-FNA reporting across institutions, with the ultimate result being better communication and improved patient care.

Cross-sectional Imaging of Parotid Gland Nodules: A Brief Practical Guide

Clinical evaluation and ultrasound examination are the first steps in the evaluation of a patient with a swelling of the parotid region. After the detection of a nodular lesion, cytological or histological confirmation is usually performed to achieve the diagnosis, while the choice of cross-sectional imaging (computed tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging) may significantly vary from one physician to another, on the basis of the degree of confidence that both radiologist and surgeon have with this kind of imaging. This work focuses on some essential “reporting points” in cross-sectional imaging evaluation of parotid nodules, chiefly helpful to the radiologist when the ultrasonography assessment is considered incomplete and requires a further evaluation.

The value of fine needle aspiration cytology in the clinical management of rare salivary gland tumors

Salivary gland tumors are relatively rare neoplasms, mostly located in the parotid gland, and few are malignant. Preoperative evaluation of salivary gland tumors includes fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC).

Three-year cytohistological correlation of salivary gland FNA cytology at a tertiary center with the application of the Milan system for risk stratification

BACKGROUND

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology of salivary glands is a well-established technique that plays a critical role in the preoperative diagnosis of lesions. A risk stratification of FNA diagnostic categories has been recently proposed to be useful in reporting. The aims of this study were to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of salivary gland FNA and to apply the proposed Milan system for reporting salivary gland lesions.

METHODS

A retrospective audit of FNA specimens of salivary gland lesions reported from 2014 to 2016 was performed. A correlation with the follow-up histopathology, wherever it was available, was performed. The aspirates were then categorized according to the Milan system as follows: nondiagnostic, nonneoplastic, atypical, benign neoplasm, neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (NUMP), suspicious for malignancy, or positive for malignancy. Furthermore, the risk of malignancy and the risk of high-grade malignancy were calculated for all diagnostic categories.

RESULTS

A total of 631 salivary gland aspirates were evaluated: 2.2% were nondiagnostic, 55.8% indicated nonneoplastic lesions, and 40.4% indicated neoplastic lesions. Histopathology was available for 94 cases (14.9%). FNA had a sensitivity of 79.4% and a specificity of 98.3% with an overall diagnostic accuracy of 91.4% for differentiating malignant tumors from benign tumors. The overall risk of malignancy was 17.4% for the nonneoplastic category, 100% for the atypical category, 7.3% for the benign neoplasm category, 50% for the NUMP category, and 96% for the positive-for-malignancy category.

CONCLUSIONS

Salivary gland FNA continues to have high diagnostic accuracy and is thus helpful for guiding management. Neoplasms with classic cytomorphology are easily diagnosed; however, in difficult cases showing overlapping features, the use of the Milan system could be beneficial. Cancer Cytopathol 2017;125:767-75. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Expression of SOX10 in Salivary Gland Oncocytic Neoplasms: A Review and a Comparative Analysis with Other Immunohistochemical Markers

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated SOX10 (SRY-related HMG-box 10) in differentiating acinic cell carcinoma (AciCC) from other salivary gland neoplasms with oncocytic features on fine-needle aspiration cell blocks (FNA CB) and compared its performance to DOG1 (discovered on gastrointestinal stromal tumor 1).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

35 FNA CB of oncocytic salivary gland neoplasms, i.e. 13 cases of AciCC, 16 of Warthin tumor (WT), 3 of mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) and 3 of oncocytoma (ONC), and 75 salivary gland resections, i.e. 26 AciCC, 7 WT, 36 MEC, 3 ONC, 2 mammary analog secretory carcinomas (MASC) and 1 papillary cystadenoma were stained for SOX10 and DOG1.

RESULTS

None of the benign oncocytic neoplasms were immunoreactive for SOX10 on CB or resection, similar to DOG1. On CB, 61.5 and 77% of AciCC were positive for SOX10 and DOG1, respectively. All surgically resected AciCC cases were positive for SOX10 and DOG1; other malignant oncocytic lesions such as MEC and MASC demonstrated variable SOX10 and DOG1 staining.

CONCLUSION

The use of SOX10 may increase the diagnostic accuracy of oncocytic lesions on FNA. In this context, SOX10 is equivalent to DOG1 in ruling out benign lesions such as WT and ONC; however, negative results for SOX10 as well as DOG1 do not favor a benign diagnosis since MEC is often negative for both markers.