The utility of cellient cell blocks in low-cellularity thyroid fine needle aspiration biopsies

Cell blocks in cytology: review of preparation methods, advantages, and limitations

Cell blocks are cytologic preparations that are processed as paraffin embedded blocks in a manner comparable to formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue in surgical pathology. In addition to serving as an adjunct to other cytologic preparations for morphologic diagnosis, cell blocks play an increasingly important role as they yield tissue sections that can be utilized for ancillary testing such as immunohistochemical stains and molecular studies. While essentially universally viewed as playing a pivotal role in cytopathology practice, there are various factors that limit their use in practice and contribute to dissatisfaction with cell block quality. Cell block preparation, as opposed to tissue processing in surgical pathology, is more variable with many different protocols in use today. This review explores the most commonly used cell block preparation techniques currently in use with review of the unique advantages and limitations each method presents. The goal of this work is to serve as a resource that can aid in making more informed decisions about which cell block protocol may work best for individual laboratories.

The diagnostic value of add-on thyroid cell block in the evaluation of thyroid lesions

Objectives

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology plays a pivotal role in diagnosing thyroid nodules. Imaging assessment, followed by thyroid lesion sampling, is a widely applied clinical practice. Tissue fragments remnants are retrieved in cell-block providing an adjunct diagnostic tool for histopathology visualization and use of ancillary testing. This study aimed to evaluate whether the auxiliary application of cell-block adds to the diagnostic accuracy of the thyroid FNA.

Material and Methods

A total of 252 thyroid FNA cases between (2020 and 2021) were reviewed from patients aged 18-76. Of those, 150 cell-blocks were recovered and examined to assess their utility. Following categories were plotted during cell-blocks revision: (A) Inadequate material retrieved; (B) cell-block shows similar features along with their accompanying smears; and (C) value added to cytology diagnosis when using cell-block.

Results

The distribution of cell-blocks according to the aforementioned classification are as follows: A - non-diagnostic 63%, B - similar observation seen in both preparations 35%, and C - value added to the rendered diagnosis 2%. Hence, the use of cell-block improved cytology diagnosis in only 2% of total cases. Mostly were of immunostains application for diagnosis confirmation.

Conclusion

The non-diagnostic and atypical cytology cases have not been upgraded to a more meaningful category by the incorporation of cell-block performed with the routine non-enhancement random method. On the other hand, cell-blocks contributed generously toward immunostaining application in malignant scenarios.

Utility of cell block as an adjunct to liquid-based cytology for diagnosing papillary thyroid carcinoma

Background

Although liquid-based cytology (LBC) has gained popularity among clinical laboratories, it is unclear whether it is equivalent to conventional smears for making a definite diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) suggests a definite diagnosis of PTC is preferred when there are at least one of three features (papillary architecture, psammomatous calcifications, and frequent pseudonuclear inclusions) plus other typical cytomorphological findings. This study evaluated whether an additional cell block (CB), prepared from the residual LBC material, could help improve the diagnosis of PTC.

Materials and Methods

A total of 62 cases with both ThinPrep LBC and CB preparations and histopathological follow-up of PTC were retrieved between November 2016 and March 2019. The ThinPrep LBC and CB slides were reviewed separately to identify any papillary architecture, psammomatous calcifications, or pseudonuclear inclusions for diagnosing PTC.

Results

Among the 51 cases with cytological diagnosis of PTC in the LBC+CB slides, the CB provided additional diagnostic information in 15 cases, which were initially diagnosed as suspicious for PTC based on the LBC slides alone. This information included papillary architecture (n=11), psammomatous calcification (n=1) and pseudonuclear inclusions (n=5). The number of specimens in the 51 cases containing at least one of the three features increased from 42 (LBC) to 51 (LBC+CB). The accuracy for diagnosing PTC increased from 58.1% for LBC alone to 82.3% for the LBC+CB examination.

Conclusion

An adjunctive CB preparation may improve the LBC technique for diagnosing PTC.

Architectural aspects of cell-blocks as small biopsies

Cell-block preparations have become an essential part of integrated cytology diagnosis. They are essentially microbiopsies that are formalin fixed and embedded in paraffin. This has become more prevalent with greater sample procurement due to the advent of newer biopsy techniques and needles. Cell-blocks allow retrieval of small tissue fragments from cytology specimens that sometimes cannot be processed by alternate cytologic techniques. They represent concentrated, cell-enriched preparations that provide cytologists with the opportunity to evaluate cellular architecture, as well as to perform ancillary testing. A cell-block compatible sample may thus obviate the need for a more invasive procedure such as a tissue biopsy. Microscopic examination of cell-blocks is quick, avoids obscuring material, permits cells to be evaluated in one focal plane, and allows the histologic architecture such as glandular differentiation, papillary formations, and sometimes invasion to be easily identified. This new era of “cytohistology” accordingly requires practicing cytologists to become more familiar with histopathology. This review article discusses the benefit of various architectural patterns identifiable in cell-blocks employed as an adjunct to Pap tests, exfoliative fluid specimens, and fine-needle aspirations.

Diagnostic utility of cell block in fine needle aspiration cytology of thyroid gland

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic utility of cell block material in fine needle aspiration (FNA) of thyroid nodules.

DESIGN

A total of 242 thyroid fine need aspirations (FNAs) were performed between January 2015 and December 2015. Of those, all consecutive thyroid FNA cases with cell blocks (n = 140) from 129 patients (age: 58.9 ± 12.8 years) are included in this study. Cytology slides and cell blocks are reviewed for adequacy assessment based on the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) and then categorizing them into TBSRTC diagnostic categories. These cases are divided into two groups, combined cytology and cell block (C + CB) and cytology without cell block (C).

RESULTS

In the first group (C + CB), a total 140 cases are categorized in TBSRTC as follows: I: 13 (9.3%) cases, II: 78 (55.7%) cases, III: 7 (5%), IV: 16 (11.4%), V: 3(2.2%) and VI: 23 (16.4%). In the second group (C), the cases are classified in TBSRTC as follows: I: 23 (16.4%) cases, II: 70 (50%), III: 7 (5%), IV: 16 (11.4%), V: 3 (2.2%) and VI: 21 (15%). Nondiagnostic rate was 7.1% lower in the first group (C + CB) as compared with second group (C) (First group: 9.3% vs second group: 16.4%, P = .0764).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined use of cytology slides and cell block decreases the nondiagnostic rate up to 7.1% as compared with cytology without cell block.

Comparison of plasma-thrombin, HistoGel, and CellGel cell block preparation methods with paired ThinPrep slides in the setting of mediastinal granulomatous disease

INTRODUCTION

Various cell block (CB) preparation methods are utilized by different laboratories, and not all laboratories perform CBs in tandem with ThinPreps (TPs). To compare the performance of different CB methods and their diagnostic value when used in conjunction with TP, we assessed the quantity and size of granulomas obtained from endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) of lymph nodes in the evaluation of granulomatous mediastinal disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of mediastinal lymph node EBUS-TBNA specimens that detected granulomas at our institution was performed. A total of 264 specimens from 124 patients had a TP followed by a CB (either plasma-thrombin, HistoGel, or CellGel) prepared from the residual material in the PreservCyt vial. The number and size of granulomas on each preparation was assessed using digital software.

RESULTS

Granulomas were detected only on the CB in 18.9% of cases and only on the TP in 5.3%. All 3 CB preparation methods showed significantly more and larger granulomas compared with the paired TP, with the plasma-thrombin and CellGel methods yielding more diagnostic material than the HistoGel method. In addition, the average number of granulomas (4.0 ± 0.4 versus 15.3 ± 1.1) and granuloma size (119.2 ± 3.2 μm versus 271.8 ± 7.3 μm) were significantly lower on TP compared with CB, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma-thrombin and CellGel CB preparation methods had a higher granuloma yield compared with the HistoGel method. Additionally, significantly more numerous and larger granulomas were present on CBs compared with TP slides. Therefore, solely relying on TP slide evaluation may unintentionally overlook larger tissue fragments obtained during needle aspirations.

Application of Immunocytochemistry on Cell Block Sections for the Investigation of Thyroid Lesions

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the potential of Classification and Regression Trees (CARTs) for the diagnosis of thyroid lesions based on cell block immunocytochemistry and cytological outcome.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 956 histologically confirmed cases (673 benign and 283 malignant) from patients with thyroid nodules were prepared via liquid-based cytology and evaluated; 4 additional slides were stained for cytokeratin 19 (CK-19), galectin 3 (Gal-3), Hector Battifora mesothelial cell 1 (HBME-1), and thyroglobulin. On the basis of immunocytochemistry and the cytological diagnosis, a CART algorithm was constructed and used for evaluation.

RESULTS

The major important factors contributing to the diagnostic CART model were: cytological outcome, CK-19, Gal-3, and HBME-1. The sensitivity and specificity of the cytological diagnosis were 96.27% and 88.26%, respectively (cut-off: category 3 of The Bethesda System [TBS-3]). The introduction of immunocytochemistry and the CART model increased the sensitivity and specificity to 98.88% and 99.11%, respectively. CK-19 presented the best performance for discriminating papillary thyroid carcinomas, followed by HBME-1 and Gal-3. In the TBS-2 cases, CK-19 and, subsequently, Gal-3 were important immunocytochemistry markers. Ultimately, CK-19 and HBME-1 on TBS-5 or TBS-6 cases demonstrated the best results.

CONCLUSIONS

The hierarchical structure of the CART model provides a diagnostic algorithm linked with the risk of malignancy at every step of the procedure. It also provides guidance on the use of ancillary examinations as it goes by simple, human understandable rules.