Prostate stromal sarcoma mimicking benign prostate hyperplasia: A case report

INTRODUCTION & OBJECTIVES

Prostate stromal sarcoma is extremely rare and aggressive malignancy accounting for less than 1 % of all type of prostate cancers. It is frequently misdiagnosed from other lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) problems.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present a case report of 45-year-old male complaining with LUTS problems. Patient also suffers anorexia and weight loss. He was first diagnosed with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). Patients had done transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) to alleviate the complaint, but the symptoms worsened and recurred. Histopathological examination findings confirmed prostate stromal sarcoma (T4N0M0). Patient was further examined using MRI and then radical prostatectomy procedure was performed.

DISCUSSION

Incidence of prostate stromal sarcoma is very low and most commonly presents with obstructive LUTS symptoms. This could mimic other disease such as BPH or other type of prostate cancer. Therefore, clinicians require a high suspicion in patient with recurrent LUTS.

CONCLUSION

Prostate stromal sarcoma diagnosis is a challenging disease entity that necessitates histopathology examination. Timely and accurate diagnosis of prostate stromal sarcoma is needed to achieve better outcome and prognosis for the patients.

Synovial sarcoma: cytopathology of 51 cases highlighting the application of ancillary molecular testing

INTRODUCTION

Among sarcomas, synovial sarcoma (SS) is defined by its unique SS18 cytogenetic translocation. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy is in a key position to exploit this uniqueness for diagnostic purposes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our cytopathology files were searched for examples of SS with histopathologic verification. FNA biopsy, imprint smears, and core needle biopsy (CNB) were performed using standard techniques.

RESULTS

Fifty-one cases from 49 patients (male/female ratio, 1:1; age range, 12-79 years; mean age, 40 years) met the inclusion criteria. Of the 51 cases, 44 (86%) were FNAs, 6 were cytology imprints, and 1 was pleural fluid. Eleven aspirates had concurrent CNB. All cases had tissue confirmation. The biopsy sites included extremities (n = 24; 47%), trunk (n = 12; 24%), lung (n = 8; 16%), head or neck (n = 6; 12%), and pleural fluid (n = 1; 2%). The aspirates were from primary (n = 36; 71%), metastatic (n = 12; 24%), and recurrent (n = 3; 5%) neoplasms. The cytologic diagnoses were SS (69%), suspicious for SS (12%), malignancy (10%), spindle cell neoplasm (4%), and malignancy other than SS (6%). In general, smears and imprints contained dense cell aggregates and single cells composed of a monotonous population having fusiform, rounded, or ovoid banal nuclei and scant cytoplasm. Poorly differentiated SS showed both large epithelioid cell and small cell cytomorphology. When performed, SS18 immunohistochemical and genetic testing was positive in all 19 FNA and 3 CNB cases.

CONCLUSIONS

When coupled with appropriate ancillary testing, FNA biopsy allows for a specific, accurate diagnosis of SS in most cases.

Unusual Cause of Acute Urinary Retention in Young Male Patient: Primary Synovial Sarcoma of Prostate—A Case Report

Introduction  Primary synovial sarcoma (SS) of the prostate is the rarest variety of prostate sarcoma. The first documented and confirmed case of SS of the prostate was published by Iwasaki et al in the year 1999; since then, only a few cases of primary SS of the prostate have been published in English literature.

Case Report  We report a unique case of primary SS in a young patient who presented with acute urinary retention and underwent emergency suprapubic catheterization, and on evaluation was diagnosed with primary SS of the prostate. Patient was managed with radical cystoprostatectomy and resection of the anterior wall of rectum infiltrated by the tumor with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection and adjuvant chemotherapy. Patient died after 2 months of surgery.

Conclusion  Primary SS of the prostate is a rare disease and important clinical entity to be included in differential diagnosis of acute urinary retention in young patients. It is associated with high local recurrence and poor prognosis, which warrants multidisciplinary approach of treatment.

Primary synovial sarcoma of the prostate: A case report and literature review

Synovial sarcoma arising from the prostate is extremely rare. Synovial sarcoma of the prostate is usually identified at a late stage and makes the treatment challenging. Here, we report a case of 30-year-old man with advanced metastatic synovial sarcoma of prostate gland at diagnosis and his poor prognosis.

Primary prostate synovial sarcoma: A case report and review of literature

Prostate synovial sarcoma (SS) is extremely rare. We report a case of prostate SS diagnosed using fine-needle biopsy. The following findings were found: The serum prostate specific antigen level was low, magnetic resonance imaging shows an irregular soft tissue mass in the right posterior part of the prostate, and computed tomography examinations did not reveal any tumor at other parts of the body. Microscopy showed that the tumor cell morphology was densely arranged by interwoven short strands of deep-stained nuclear spindle cells. Immunohistochemical tests were positive for SS18-SSX and SSX. Molecular testing showed that SS18 break-apart Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) results were positive, and a comprehensive analysis of this case was performed. Nine cases of prostate SS reported in the English literature were reviewed. In addition, the differential diagnosis, clinical treatment, and clinical prognosis of prostate SS are comprehensively described.

A Review of Effusion Cytomorphology of Small Round Cell Tumors

BACKGROUND

Small round cell tumors (SRCTs) are a broad category of diverse malignant tumors composed of monotonous undifferentiated cells. Involvement of serous fluids by SRCT is rare; however, the identification of exfoliated malignant cells is a crucial component of management and has significant implications for treatment and prognosis. The most common effusion tumors with SRCT morphology include Ewing sarcoma, synovial sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SCNC), and desmoplastic SRCT, and the cytomorphologic distinction between these tumors is challenging. The purpose of this article is to describe the morphologic features of the most common SRCT in fluids and propose helpful ancillary testing.

SUMMARY

Effusion SRCTs display similar primitive and undifferentiated morphologic features although each has subtle variations. Ewing sarcoma is a mesenchymal neoplasm and harbors characteristic translocations t(11;22) (EWSR1-FLI1) or t(21;22) (EWSR1-ERG). In fluids, Ewing sarcoma shows poorly differentiated cells of variable size with round to oval nuclei, prominent nucleoli, and scant cytoplasm. In contrast, synovial sarcoma typically involves extremities and expresses a fusion transcript in t(X;18) (SS18-SSX). This soft tissue neoplasm demonstrates uniform cells with irregular nuclear contours, characteristic nuclear folding, and scant cytoplasm. RMS is a neoplasm arising from skeletal muscle, and the alveolar subtype demonstrates a translocation in t(2;13) (PAX3-FOXO1). The malignant cells show a spectrum of small round cells and pleomorphic large cells with rhabdoid morphology. RMS cells characteristically express myogenin and MyoD1, markers of skeletal muscle differentiation. Although SCNC is not a classic SRCT, the morphology is similar. SCNC demonstrates tight clusters of malignant cells with nuclear molding and salt-and-pepper chromatin. This tumor classically has neuroendocrine differentiation and is positive for synaptophysin and chromogranin on immunohistochemistry. And last, desmoplastic SRCT typically presents as an intra-abdominal mass in young men and characteristically harbors the translocation t(11;22) (p13;q12) (EWSR1-WT1). Cytomorphologically, the tumor shows small monomorphic cells occasionally arranged as rosette-like structures.

KEY MESSAGE

The diagnosis of SRCT can be made in effusion samples and is best achieved with a combination of morphologic features, clinical history, and ancillary testing.

Imaging of non-epithelial neoplasms of the prostate

The purpose of this article is to review the spectrum of rare non-epithelial tumors of the prostate. This focused article will help the readers to understand the imaging findings of such rare entities attributed to their clinicopathological features. Radiologists must be familiar with the spectrum of non-epithelial tumors of the prostate, which helps to suggest alternate diagnosis other than adenocarcinoma, when imaging features are atypical. This is important because these tumors have different management approaches and prognoses when compared to adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Prostatic stromal proliferations: a review

Prostatic stromal proliferations account for the majority of benign tumour-like lesions in the prostate. The most common is nodular hyperplasia, seen in a majority of elderly men. Diagnostic difficulty is encountered with some variants, including stromal hyperplasia with atypia, characterised by degenerative changes of myofibroblasts. In contrast with benign stromal tumours, malignant stromal tumours of the prostate are rare, accounting for less than 0.1% of all prostatic malignancies. The most common are rhabdomyosarcoma (paediatric) and leiomyosarcoma (adults); others include phyllodes tumour and stromal sarcoma. Some authors lump malignant tumours with poor outcome (e.g., phyllodes tumour and stromal sarcoma) with benign stromal tumours (e.g., stromal hyperplasia with atypia, leiomyoma), considering them collectively to be of uncertain malignant potential, but this approach is discouraged. This review presents a contemporary approach to classification and diagnosis of prostatic stromal tumours.

Poorly differentiated pulmonary synovial sarcoma with SYT gene amplification: A case report

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis may be used for the diagnosis of synovial sarcoma (SS), particularly of the poorly differentiated type. While the majority of the studies report that the SYT FISH probe is considered to be break-apart in SS, with two orange and two green signals, the SYT probe in the present case of a 52-year-old male patient with pulmonary SS displayed orange and green signal separation, along with SYT orange signal amplification. RT-PCR was used to verify that the SYT gene amplification was another form of expression of SYT-SSX gene fusion t(X; 18)(p11; q11). In this case, the tumour sample obtained by biopsy was small; therefore, the definitive diagnosis of poorly differentiated SS originating from the lung with SYT gene amplification was confirmed by FISH and RT-PCR. Therefore, these mature biomarkers, which are available as immunohistochemical stains in the molecular pathology laboratory, may help pathologists to diagnose intractable soft tissue tumours based only on small cytological specimens.

Biphasic axillary synovial sarcoma diagnosed by preoperative fine-needle aspiration cytology

Synovial sarcoma (SS) is a soft-tissue sarcoma which usually occurs in lower extremities. Less than 20 cases of SS located in shoulder or axillary region have been reported, and these studies describe histopathological features. We report a case of axillary SS diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration cytology, immunocytochemistry, and molecular techniques performed on cytology smears. A 48-year-old woman presented with a palpable and well-defined axillary mass which measured 4 cm. On-site smears showed high cellularity with spindle cells, and a mesenchymal tumor was suspected. Definitive cytological analysis showed cells with ovoid- or comma-shaped nuclei arranged in loose sheets and fascicles, associated with naked nuclei and isolated cells. Mitotic count was 2 mitoses/HPF. Immunocytochemical studies showed vimentin and focal CK AE1-AE3 positivity. A PCR was performed and the specific translocation t(X;18) was detected. The lesion was excised and the diagnosis of biphasic SS was confirmed. The identification of SS on cytology specimens is difficult and differential diagnosis is broad. Complementary studies are necessary and they can be performed on FNA smears or cell blocks.