Utility of Sry-Related HMG-Box Gene 10 (SOX10) as a marker of melanoma in effusion cytology

Diagnostic performance of melanocytic markers for immunocytochemical evaluation of lymph-node melanoma metastases on cytological samples

AIMS

The diagnosis of metastatic cutaneous melanoma (CM) on lymph node fine needle aspiration samples may be challenging and usually requires confirmation by immunocytochemistry. However, the cytological material could be too scant to order a broad panel of markers. In this case, the pathologist is forced to choose the most advantageous antibodies. The most commonly used melanocytic markers include S100, Melan-A, HMB45 and SOX10 but their diagnostic yield on cytological samples has been poorly studied. The current work aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of melanocytic markers when applied to cell blocks obtained from fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of lymph node metastases from CM.

METHODS

S100, Melan-A, HMB45 and SOX10 were tested on cell block sections of 38 lymphnode metastases from CM diagnosed by cytology. A combined score was built to evaluate each immunostaining, considering the intensity of the staining and the percentage of stained neoplastic cells.

RESULTS

S100 and SOX10 revealed a higher sensitivity (100%) than Melan-A and HMB45 for the diagnosis of metastatic CM. Furthermore, SOX10 emerged as the melanocytic marker with the best staining performance.

CONCLUSION

SOX10 has a 100% detection rate and the most easily interpretable staining pattern compared with other melanocytic markers. Therefore, it is strongly recommended that SOX10 is included in the minimal immunocytochemical panel for the diagnostic evaluation of lymph node FNAC in patients with suspected CM metastasis.

Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy of Intraocular Mass-Like Lesions

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy for intraocular mass-like lesions and its contributing factors.

METHODS

Intraocular FNA cases were retrieved and reviewed along with histopathologic follow-ups, if available. The effects of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE), repeated biopsy, and adjunct immunocytochemical studies on cytologic diagnoses were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 72 FNA biopsies from 63 patients, nondiagnostic biopsy was seen in 17 cases (24%), whereas a definitive diagnosis was rendered in 39 cases (54%). The cytologic diagnoses correlated well with histopathologic follow-ups with a concordance rate of 61%. Almost all nondiagnostic biopsies (16/17, 94%) were seen in cases in which ROSE was not performed. Of the 7 patients in whom biopsy was repeated, a definitive diagnosis was rendered in 4 cases (57%). Immunocytochemistry was performed in the majority of cases with a malignant diagnosis, especially in metastatic tumors (75%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrates that FNA is an effective tool for the diagnosis of intraocular tumors. ROSE, repeated biopsy, and adjunct immunocytochemistry can help reduce the nondiagnostic rate and/or enhance diagnosis of malignancy, further improving FNA diagnostic performance.

Immunocytochemistry for diagnostic cytopathology-A practical guide

Cytological specimens, which are obtained by minimally invasive methods, are an excellent source of diagnostic material. Sometimes they are the only material available for diagnosis as well as for prognostic/predictive markers. When cytomorphology is not straightforward, ancillary tests may be required for a definitive diagnosis to guide clinical management. Immunocytochemistry (ICC) is the most common and practical ancillary tool used to reach a diagnosis when cytomorphology is equivocal, to differentiate entities with overlapping morphological features, and to determine the cell lineage and the site of origin of a metastatic neoplasm. Numerous immunomarkers are available, and some are expressed in multiple neoplasms. To rule out entities within a differential diagnosis, the use of more than one marker, sometimes panels, is necessary. ICC panels for diagnostic purposes should be customised based on the clinical context and cytomorphology, and the markers should be used judiciously to preserve material for additional tests for targeted therapies in the appropriate setting. This review offers a practical guide for the use of ICC for diagnostic cytopathology, covering the most commonly encountered non-hematolymphoid diagnostic scenarios in various body sites.

Sex-Determining Region Y Chromosome-Related High-Mobility-Group Box 10 in Cancer: A Potential Therapeutic Target

Sex-determining region Y-related high mobility group-box 10 (SOX10), a member of the SOX family, has recently been highlighted as an essential transcriptional factor involved in developmental biology. Recently, the functionality of SOX 10 has been increasingly revealed by researchers worldwide. It has been reported that SOX10 significantly regulates the proliferation, migration, and apoptosis of tumors and is closely associated with the progression of cancer. In this review, we first introduce the basic background of the SOX family and SOX10 and then discuss the pathophysiological roles of SOX10 in cancer. Besides, we enumerate the application of SOX10 in the pathological diagnosis and therapeutic potential of cancer. Eventually, we summarize the potential directions and perspectives of SOX10 in neoplastic theranostics. The information compiled herein may assist in additional studies and increase the potential of SOX10 as a therapeutic target for cancer.

Cytologic features and immunohistochemical findings of epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) in effusion: A case series

BACKGROUND

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is a rare malignant vascular tumor characterized by WWTR1-CAMTA1, t (1:3) (p36;q25) translocation in 90% of cases. Without prior EHE history, it can mimic other malignant effusions. Recently, CAMTA1 was published as an excellent immunohistochemical surrogate marker for molecular testing for WWTR1-CAMTA1 fusion in surgical specimens.

METHODS

A 6-year retrospective search using our computer system was performed for cases diagnosed as EHE on effusion cytology and surgical specimens. The clinical presentation, cytologic findings and immunohistochemical stain results, including CAMTA1 were reviewed.

RESULTS

Four pleural and one peritoneal effusions were identified. The median age was 52 years with a female to male ratio of 3:2. Most patients presented with pulmonary symptoms. The cytologic features were non-specific easily mimicking other malignancies; especially in the absence of known prior malignancy. This was exemplified by one of our cases which was initially misdiagnosed as adenocarcinoma. Intracytoplasmic erythrocytes were present only on the cell blocks but not on cytology. The cytology cell blocks from patients with prior EHE confirmed on surgical biopsies stained positive for vascular markers (CD31, ERG) and CAMTA1.

CONCLUSION

The features of EHE in effusion are non-specific and a diagnostic pitfall in cytology. In the absence of prior EHE diagnosis, inclusion of this entity in the differential diagnoses and application of immunohistochemical stain panels will be prudent in avoiding a misdiagnosis. However, in cases with prior EHE diagnosis, CAMTA1 could serve as diagnostic marker; especially on limited cytology material. Additional studies will be helpful in supporting our results.

Combined use of SOX10 and GATA3 in mammary carcinoma

The complementary coverage of different subsets of breast cancer by GATA3 and SOX10 makes their use in combination appealing for routine clinical use, but study of these markers has been largely limited to cases with high or absent ER expression. Here we report SOX10 and GATA3 immunostaining in parallel using a tissue microarray containing 246 invasive breast carcinoma cases with a range of ER expression. GATA3 and SOX10 were positive in 93 % (229/246) and 15 % (38/246) of cases overall and in 63 % (24/38) and 74 % (28/38) of triple negative breast carcinomas (TNBC), respectively; SOX10 was positive in 15 of the 17 cases that lacked GATA3 expression (88 %). SOX10 was also positive in 3 % (6/196) of ER + cases, including 50 % of cases with low ER (3/6), 20 % with intermediate ER (3/15), and 0 % with high ER (n = 175), so that ER-low cases more strongly resembled TNBC than those with high ER expression. GATA3 expression was lower in cases that co-expressed SOX10 in comparison to those that were positive for GATA3 alone. Less than 1 % (2/246) of cases were negative for both GATA3 and SOX10. Therefore, SOX10 is a useful adjunct to GATA3 in the detection of TNBC and cases with low ER expression and/or reduced GATA3 intensity relative to that typical of breast cancers with higher ER expression. Moreover, given such high sensitivity, metastatic tumors lacking either GATA3 or SOX10 are unlikely to be of breast origin. Additional study is necessary to determine the extent to which SOX10 may also improve specificity and to characterize its biologic significance in breast cancers with low ER expression.