Cytological differences between invasive and noninvasive or minimally invasive lung adenocarcinomas diagnosed in Japanese patients using needle biopsy specimens of pulmonary lesions ≤3 cm in diameter

Detection of early (T1) lung cancers and lepidic adenocarcinomas in sputum and bronchial cytology

BACKGROUND

The lung is an extensively epithelialized organ, producing ample exfoliated material for sputum and bronchial cytology. In view of the updates in the World Health Organization classification of early (T1/≤ 3 cm) lung cancer with respect to adenocarcinomas with lepidic pattern, this study retrospectively reviews sputum and bronchial cytology paired with resection-confirmed lung cancers.

METHODS

A computerized search for all lung resection specimens of carcinomas over a 20-year period was performed. Cytologic diagnoses of corresponding sputum and bronchial cytology were classified into five-tiered categories (C1-insufficient/inadequate, C2-benign, C3-atypia, C4-suspicious and C5-malignant). Reports and slides of the resection specimen were reviewed for reclassification of T1 cancers.

RESULTS

Totally 472 and 383 sputum and bronchial cytology specimens respectively were included. Sensitivity for T1 lesions on sputum cytology were 10.6 %, 2.1 % and 0.5 % at cutoffs of atypia/C3, suspicious/C4 and malignant/C5 categories, lower than bronchial cytology (35.1 %, 15.5 %, 8.1 %; p < 0.001). T1 lesions correlated with lower detection rates, whereas squamous cell carcinoma histology, larger size and bronchial invasion were associated with increased detection rates in sputum and bronchial cytology (p < 0.050). Detection rates for abrasive bronchial cytology (brushing) were overall higher (p = 0.018- < 0.001), but on subgroup comparison, non-abrasive (aspiration, lavage and washing) cytology demonstrated favorable trends (p = 0.063-0.088) in detecting T1 lesions. Adenocarcinomas with lepidic pattern had lower suspicious/C4 (p = 0.040) or above and malignant/C5 (p = 0.019), but not atypia/C3 or above (p = 0.517) rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Most adenocarcinomas with lepidic pattern are only diagnosed as atypia/C3 on cytology. With its modest sensitivity, interpretation of negative and indeterminate cytology results mandates caution.

Cytological differences between invasive and noninvasive or minimally invasive lung adenocarcinomas diagnosed in Japanese patients using needle biopsy specimens of pulmonary lesions ≤3 cm in diameter

BACKGROUND

According to the WHO classification for lung cancer, adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) have a better prognosis than invasive adenocarcinoma (IAD). However, detecting the foci of invasion in lung adenocarcinomas radiologically remains difficult. The present study examined whether or not differences in the cytological characteristics between IAD and AIS or MIA (noninvasive or minimally invasive adenocarcinomas [NMIAD]) plays a role in the differential diagnosis.

METHODS

Seventy surgical resection specimens of primary lung adenocarcinoma with preoperative cytology, in which several parameters were evaluated and assessed.

RESULTS

The histopathological diagnoses of surgical resection specimens were AIS in 8, MIA in 31, IAD in 31 including lepidic adenocarcinoma in 9, and papillary adenocarcinoma in 22. NMIAD had a 100% 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), while IAD had an 82.8% 5-year RFS. The numbers of tumor cells (at ×10 magnification in 10 fields) were 60.3 ± 40.5 in IAD and 39.8 ± 28.7 in NMIAD (P = 0.0017). A univariate analysis of cytological parameters revealed significant differences in large tumor cell clusters, three-dimensional (3D) tumor cell clusters, and irregular nuclear contours between the two groups. The frequency of irregular nuclear contours continued to be significantly different according to a multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Large or 3D tumor cell clusters and irregular nuclear contours may be important cytological factors for distinguishing IAD from NMIAD, with the latter being potentially more important for distinguishing between the two groups.