Value of combined use of fine‐needle aspiration and core needle biopsy in palpable breast tumors performed by pathologist: Institut Curie experience

Breast fine-needle aspiration cytology in the era of core-needle biopsy: what is its role?

Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) has long been recognized as a minimally invasive, cost-effective, and reliable diagnostic tool for breast lesions. However, with the advent of core-needle biopsy (CNB), the role of FNAC has diminished in some clinical settings. This review aims to re-evaluate the diagnostic value of FNAC in the current era, focusing on its complementary use alongside CNB, the adoption of new approaches such as the International Academy of Cytology Yokohama System, and the implementation of rapid on-site evaluation to reduce inadequate sample rates. Advances in liquid-based cytology, receptor expression testing, molecular diagnostics, and artificial intelligence are discussed, highlighting their potential to enhance the diagnostic accuracy of FNAC. Despite challenges, FNAC remains a valuable diagnostic method, particularly in low-resource settings and specific clinical scenarios, and its role continues to evolve with technology.

Comparison of Fine-Needle Aspiration and Core Needle Biopsy for the Pre-Operative Diagnosis of Canine and Feline Mammary Gland Tumours

Mammary gland tumours are common neoplasms that affect female dogs and cats. We compared the accuracy of pre-surgical fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and core needle biopsy (CNB) diagnosing feline (n = 64) and canine (n = 83) mammary gland tumours with excisional histopathology as the gold standard for the definitive diagnosis. We also explored the impact of CNB needle sizes (18G and 16G). FNA, 18G CNB and 16G CNB demonstrated similar accuracy regarding the diagnosis of feline mammary tumours, ranging from 90% to 97.7% (p > 0.05). However, these techniques displayed lower diagnostic accuracy for canine mammary gland tumours: 46.7%-50.9% for FNA, 63.3% for 18G CNB and 73.6% for 16G CNB. In conclusion, FNA and CNB can be used optionally as pre-surgical diagnostic methods for feline and canine mammary gland tumours. However, factors that affect diagnostic accuracy, such as species and diagnostic techniques, should be considered.

Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Utility of Fine-Needle Aspiration in Breast Lesions: A Correlation with Surgical Pathology

INTRODUCTION

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is a valuable diagnostic tool for evaluating breast lesions, yet its use is less frequent compared to core needle biopsies in high-resource settings. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance and clinical utility of FNA in correlation with surgical pathology outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a 3-year retrospective search (2021-2023) using our institutional database to identify cases of breast mass FNAs performed by interventional radiologists under ultrasound guidance. We retrieved and re-evaluated all glass slides from the archive. Additionally, we reviewed the cytopathology reports and correlated the cytologic diagnoses with concurrent or subsequent surgical pathology results.

RESULTS

A total of 65 breast FNA cases from patients were reviewed. The diagnostic outcomes were 55% negative for malignancy, 23% insufficient for diagnosis, 11% atypical, 8% suspicious for malignancy, and 3% positive for malignancy. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value of FNA for detecting malignancy were 76%, 96%, 93%, and 85%, respectively. One false positive case, categorized as atypical due to degenerative changes, was later confirmed as benign apocrine metaplasia. Three false-negative cases, initially categorized as non-diagnostic, were later diagnosed as invasive ductal carcinoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, and papillary carcinoma. An additional false-negative case, categorized under negative for malignancy, was later diagnosed as invasive ductal carcinoma.

CONCLUSION

Breast FNAs, while less frequently performed than core needle biopsies, provide significant diagnostic insights, particularly for cystic lesions. The study demonstrates high specificity and PPV for FNA in detecting malignancy, underscoring its value as a diagnostic tool when integrated with imaging and clinical assessment. These findings support the continued use of FNA in the diagnostic evaluation of breast lesions.

Combined fine needle aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy in the same setting: A two-years' experience

INTRODUCTION

Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) combined with rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) and ancillary techniques is an accurate diagnostic tool for many pathologies. However, in some cases, it may not be sufficient for actionable diagnoses or molecular testing, especially for cases that require large immunohistochemical panels or cases in which histological features are mandatory for the diagnosis. Core needle biopsy (CNB), on the contrary, provides samples that are suitable for histological features and sufficient for all ancillary studies. However, CNB is often performed by radiologists or clinicians without the direct participation of cytopathologists, which can lead to missed or delayed diagnoses. This study reports on the experience of combining FNAC and CNB performed in one setting by cytopathologists. The aim was to evaluate the impact of CNB on FNAC and the diagnostic efficiency of the combined procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred forty-two FNAC and CNB procedures performed in the same setting over a period of 2 years were analysed. The FNAC diagnoses were compared and integrated with the subsequent CNB diagnoses. The impact of CNB was categorized as follows: non-contributory, in cases of inadequate samples; confirmed, when the CNB and FNAC diagnoses were the same; improved, when the CNB diagnosis was consistent with the FNAC diagnosis and further specified the corresponding entity; allowed, when CNB produced a diagnosis that could not be reached by FNAC; changed, when the CNB changed the previous FNAC diagnosis.

RESULTS

CNB confirmed the FNAC diagnosis in 40.1% of cases (n = 57/142). CNB improved the FNAC diagnosis in 47.2% of cases (n = 67/142). CNB allowed a diagnosis that could not be performed on FNAC in 2.1% of cases (n = 3/142). CNB changed a previous FNAC diagnosis in 2.1% of cases (n = 3/142). CNB was non-contributory in 8.4% of cases (n = 12/142). CNB produced a positive impact on the whole diagnostic procedure in 51.4% of total cases (n = 73/142). The combined FNAC and CNB resulted in actionable diagnoses in 91.5% of all cases (n = 130/142). A complete molecular assessment was successfully performed in 14.7% of cases (n = 21/142) utilizing either FNAC or CNB material.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined use of FNAC and CNB in one setting improves the diagnostic accuracy of both procedures. This approach exploits the advantages of each procedure, enhancing the accuracy of the final diagnosis.

Real-World Diagnostic Accuracy of the On-Site Cytopathology Advance Report (OSCAR) Procedure Performed in a Multidisciplinary One-Stop Breast Clinic

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology has been widely used for the diagnosis of breast cancer lesions with the objective of differentiating benign from malignant masses. However, the occurrence of unsatisfactory samples and false-negative rates remains a matter of concern. Major improvements have been made thanks to the implementation of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) in multidisciplinary and integrated medical settings such as one-stop clinics (OSCs). In these settings, clinical and radiological examinations are combined with a morphological study performed by interventional pathologists. The aim of our study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the on-site cytopathology advance report (OSCAR) procedure on breast FNA cytologic samples in our breast OSC during the first three years (April 2004 till March 2007) of its implementation. To this goal, we retrospectively analyzed a series of 1820 breast masses (1740 patients) radiologically classified according to the American College of Radiology (ACR) BI-RADS lexicon (67.6% being either BI-RADS 4 or 5), sampled by FNA and immediately diagnosed by cytomorphology. The clinicoradiological, cytomorphological, and histological characteristics of all consecutive patients were retrieved from the hospital computerized medical records prospectively registered in the central information system. Histopathological analysis and ultrasound (US) follow-up (FU) were the reference diagnostic tests of the study design. In brief, we carried out either a histopathological verification or an 18-month US evaluation when a benign cytology was concordant with the components of the triple test. Overall, histology was available for 1138 masses, whereas 491 masses were analyzed at the 18-month US-FU. FNA specimens were morphologically nondiagnostic in 3.1%, false negatives were observed in 1.5%, and there was only one false positive (0.06%). The breast cancer prevalence was 62%. Diagnostic accuracy measures of the OSCAR procedure with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were the following: sensitivity (Se) = 97.4% (96.19-98.31); specificity (Sp) = 94.98% (92.94-96.56); positive predictive value (PPV) = 96.80% (95.48-97.81); negative predictive value (NPV) = 95.91% (94.02-97.33); positive likelihood ratio (LR+) = 19.39 (13.75-27.32); negative predictive ratio (LR-) = 0.03 (0.02-0.04), and; accuracy = 96.45% (95.42-97.31). The respective positive likelihood ratio (LR+) for each of the four categories of cytopathological diagnoses (with their 95% CI) which are malignant, suspicious, benign, and nondiagnostic were 540 (76-3827); 2.69 (1.8-3.96); 0.03 (0.02-0.04); and 0.37 (0.2-0.66), respectively. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that the OSCAR procedure is a highly reliable diagnostic approach and a perfect test to select patients requiring core-needle biopsy (CNB) when performed by interventional cytopathologists in a multidisciplinary and integrated OSC setting. Besides drastically limiting the rate of nondiagnostic specimens and diagnostic turn-around time, OSCAR is an efficient and powerful first-line diagnostic approach for patient-centered care.

Validation of the Xpert Breast Cancer STRAT 4 Assay on the GeneXpert instrument to Assess Hormone Receptor, Ki67, and HER2 Gene Expression Status in Breast Cancer Tissue Samples

Breast cancer is the commonest cause of cancer-related mortality in African females where patients often present later and with advanced disease. Causes for delayed diagnosis include restricted diagnostic access and international controversy on interpretation of ancillary tests like immunohistochemistry (IHC). Fine needle aspirates (FNAC) are an attractive alternative although may have reduced sensitivity. The Xpert Breast Cancer STRAT4 (STRAT4) (CE-IVD*) assay (Cepheid, Sunnyvale) is a semi-quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction assay which detects messenger RNA (mRNA) expression in breast samples for estrogen receptor ( ESR1 ), progesterone receptor ( PGR1 ), human epidermal growth factor receptor/Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (HER2/ ERBB2 ) and the proliferation marker, MKi67 . We assessed the performance of this assay on both formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE, n=31) and matched FNAC (n=20) samples from patients presenting with breast cancer to the Johannesburg academic hospitals. IHC and Fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis (performed on HER2-indeterminate samples) was compared with the mRNA expression of the corresponding target genes in FFPE samples, and mRNA expression on FNAC samples was compared with the FFPE results for both mRNA expression and IHC. Concordance between IHC/FISH and Xpert Breast Cancer STRAT4 in FFPE and FNAC samples using the Quick lysis (Q) method (a research-use-only modification of the validated FFPE-lysis method), showed an overall percentage agreement for ESR1 expression of 90.3% and 81.3%, and for PGR1 expression at 86.7% and 81.3% respectively in FFPE and FNAC samples. Concordance was lowest for Ki67 expression, using a binary IHC cutoff for Ki67 positivity at ≥20% staining) at 83.9% and 62.5%, for FFPE and FNAC samples, respectively. This suggests that the STRAT4 assay may be a useful ancillary test in determining HR and Ki67 status in FFPE samples and that use on FNAC samples may be feasible. Future studies should expand the sample numbers and establish locally relevant cutoffs.

A Comparison of the Prognostic Effects of Fine Needle Aspiration and Core Needle Biopsy in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Nationwide Multicenter Prospective Registry

(1) Background: Breast core needle biopsy (CNB) is preferred over fine needle aspiration (FNA) as it has higher sensitivity and specificity and enables immunohistochemical evaluation. However, breast FNA remains widely used because of its low cost, minimally invasive nature, and quick results. Studies analyzing the effects of each test on the prognoses of patients with breast cancer are scarce and controversial, and the criteria for test selection remain unknown. (2) Methods: This study included adult female patients who underwent breast cancer surgery at 102 general hospitals. The trend of breast biopsies over time was analyzed, and the prognoses of patients with breast cancer who underwent CNB and FNA were compared. (3) Results: This study included 73,644 patients who underwent FNA (n = 8027) and CNB (n = 65,617). A multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that patients diagnosed using FNA had significantly worse overall survival (OS) and breast-cancer-specific survival (BCSS) than those diagnosed using CNB. In the subgroup analysis, patients with breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) 5 lesions, palpable tumors, or centrally located tumors had significantly worse OS and BCSS with FNA than with CNB. (4) Conclusions: CNB should be performed preferentially instead of FNA in patients with BI-RADS 5 lesions and nonpalpable or centrally located tumors.

The Use of the International Academy of Cytology Yokohama System for Reporting Breast Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy

OBJECTIVES

To perform the first meta-analysis regarding the pooled risk of malignancy (ROM) of each category of the Yokohama system for reporting breast fine-needle aspiration, as well as assess the latter's diagnostic accuracy using this new system.

METHODS

Two databases were searched, followed by data extraction, study quality assessment, and statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The "Insufficient," "Benign," "Atypical," "Suspicious," and "Malignant" Yokohama system categories were associated with a pooled ROM of 17% (95% CI, 10%-28%), 1% (95% CI, 1%-3%), 20% (95% CI, 17%-23%), 86% (95% CI, 79%-92%), and 100% (95% CI, 99%-100%), respectively. When both "Suspicious" and "Malignant" interpretations were regarded as cytologically positive, sensitivity (SN) was 91% (95% CI, 87.6%-93.5%) and false-positive rate (FPR) was 2.33% (95% CI, 1.30-4.14%). A summary receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed and the pooled area under the curve was 97.3%, while the pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 564 (95% CI, 264-1,206), indicating a high level of diagnostic accuracy. When only "Malignant" interpretations were regarded as cytologically positive, the pooled FPR was lower (0.75%; 95% CI, .39%-1.42%) but at the expense of SN (76.61%; 95% CI, 70.05%-82.10%).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite Yokohama's system early success, more data would be needed to unravel the system's value in clinical practice.

FNA 2.0: Value of cytopathologist-performed ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy

In the late 20^th century, pathologist-performed palpation-guided fine-needle aspiration (PG-FNA) of superficial masses was popularized in the United States. It brought pathologists out of the laboratory to see patients and the hope of decreasing the need for surgical biopsy for diagnostic purposes. This first iteration of minimally invasive tissue sampling could be informally called FNA 1.0. FNA 1.0 had shortcomings, such as detection of invasion in breast cancer, precise subtyping of lymphomas, aspiration of fibrous lesions, and diagnosis of sarcomas. The early 21^st century brought new hope. Ultrasound-guidance became commonly used to guide FNA of both palpable and non-palpable masses. Ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy was available to complement FNA in select cases. Flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, fluorescent in-situ hybridization, and genomic studies could be done on cell block and core biopsy specimens. These advances in minimally invasive tissue diagnosis could be informally called FNA 2.0. In particular, pathologist-performed ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy can overcome many of the criticisms and shortcomings of FNA. As pathologists were once leaders in palpation-guided fine-needle aspiration, they now have the opportunity to add pathologist-performed ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy to their skill set and emerge once again as leaders in minimally invasive tissue diagnosis. This will bring pathology to the next level.

The Accuracy of Electrical Impedance Tomography for Breast Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction

Incidence of breast cancer (BC) in 2020 is about 2.26 million new cases. It is the first common cancer accounting for 11.7% of all cancer worldwide. Disease complications and the mortality rate of breast cancer are highly dependent on the early diagnosis. Therefore, novel human breast-imaging techniques play an important role in minimizing the breast cancer morbidity and mortality rate. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a noninvasive technique to image the breast using the electrical impedance behavior of the body tissues.

Objectives

The aims of this manuscript are as follows: (1) a comprehensive investigation of the accuracy of EIT for breast cancer diagnosis through searching pieces of evidence in the valid databases and (2) meta-analyses of the results.

Methods

The systematic search was performed in the electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Science Direct, ProQuest, Scopus, and Google Scholar without time and language limitation until January 2021. Search terms were “EIT” and “Breast Cancer” with their synonyms. Relevant studies were included based on PRISMA and study objectives. Quality of studies and risk of bias were performed by QUADAS-2 tools. Then, relevant data were extracted in Excel form. The hierarchical/bivariate meta-analysis was performed with “metandi” package for the ROC plot of sensitivity and specificity. Forest plot of the Accuracy index and double arcsine transformations was applied to stabilize the variance. The heterogeneity of the studies was evaluated by the forest plots, χ2 test (assuming a significance at the a-level of 10%), and the I² statistic for the Accuracy index.

Results

A total of 4027 articles were found. Finally, 12 of which met our criteria. Overall, these articles included studies of 5487 breast cancer patients. EIT had an overall pooled sensitivity and specificity of 75.88% (95% CI, 61.92% to 85.89%) and 82.04% (95% CI, 69.72% to 90.06%), respectively. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 14.37 (95% CI, 6.22% to 33.20%), and the pooled effect of accuracy was 0.79 with 95% CI (0.73, 0.83).

Conclusions

This study showed that EIT can be used as a useful method alongside mammography. EIT sensitivity could not be compared with the sensitivity of MRI, but in terms of specificity, it can be considered as a new method that probably can get more attention. Furthermore, large-scale studies will be needed to support the evidence.

Statistical methods for evaluating the fine needle aspiration cytology procedure in breast cancer diagnosis

Background

Statistical issues present while evaluating a diagnostic procedure for breast cancer are non rare but often ignored, leading to biased results. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the fine needle aspiration cytology(FNAC), a minimally invasive and rapid technique potentially used as a rule-in or rule-out test, handling its statistical issues: suspect test results and verification bias.

Methods

We applied different statistical methods to handle suspect results by defining conditional estimates. When considering a partial verification bias, Begg and Greenes method and multivariate imputation by chained equations were applied, however, and a Bayesian approach with respect to each gold standard was used when considering a differential verification bias. At last, we extended the Begg and Greenes method to be applied conditionally on the suspect results.

Results

The specificity of the FNAC test above 94%, was always higher than its sensitivity regardless of the proposed method. All positive likelihood ratios were higher than 10, with variations among methods. The positive and negative yields were high, defining precise discriminating properties of the test.

Conclusion

The FNAC test is more likely to be used as a rule-in test for diagnosing breast cancer. Our results contributed in advancing our knowledge regarding the performance of FNAC test and the methods to be applied for its evaluation.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at (10.1186/s12874-022-01506-y).

Challenges in Pathology Specimen Processing in the New Era of Precision Medicine

CONTEXT.—

Precision therapies for patients with driver mutations can offer deep and durable responses that correlate with diagnosis, metastasis prognosis, and improvement in survival. Such targeted therapies will continue to increase, pushing us to change our traditional approaches. We needed to search for new tools to effectively integrate technological advancements into our practices because of their capability to improve the efficiency and accuracy of our diagnostic and treatment approaches. Perhaps nothing is as relevant as identifying and implementing new workflows for processing pathologic specimens and for improving communication of critical laboratory information to and from clinicians for appropriate care of patients in an efficient and timely manner.

OBJECTIVES.—

To define the gold standard in delivering the best care for patients, to identify gaps in the process, and to identify potential solutions that would improve our process, including gaps related to knowledge, skills, attitudes, and practices.

DESIGN.—

We assembled a team across disciplines to systematically perform a gap analysis study to clarify the discrepancy between the current reality in pathology specimen processing and the desired optimal situation to deliver the results intended for patient care.

RESULTS.—

A practical collaborative workflow for specimen management seeking the cooperation of the stakeholders in each medical discipline to provide guidelines in specimen collection, delivery, processing, and reporting of results with the ultimate goal of improving patients' outcomes is provided.

CONCLUSIONS.—

New tools are required to effectively integrate data-driven approaches in specimen processing to meet the new demands.

Prospective evaluation of accuracy of fine-needle aspiration biopsy for breast lesions using the International Academy of Cytology Yokohama System for reporting breast cytopathology

BACKGROUND

Classification of breast lesions into different cytological groups can accurately be done using the International Academy of Cytology (IAC) Yokohama System for reporting breast cytopathology. Fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of breast lesions has been considered to be the primary investigation in detecting breast cancers, especially in low-cost settings. The main objective of this study was to prospectively re-confirm the diagnostic accuracy of breast FNAB using the IAC Yokohama system. Additionally, separate secondary subgroup analysis was done to confirm the accuracy of breast FNAB excluding lymph-node positive and lymphadenopathy positive tumors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective study was done on patients undergoing biopsy of breast lesions between September 01, 2019 and November 30, 2020 (519 biopsies on 487 unique patients). Of these 519 histopathology biopsies, 505 had corresponding FNAB report of the same site. The FNAB was reported using the IAC Yokohama system and the most suitable category was allotted in every case. The rates of malignancy for each category and the accuracy of breast FNAB in diagnosing malignancy were calculated.

RESULTS

Of the total 487 patients, 120 cases were benign on histology, while 367 were malignant. The rates of malignancy in benign, atypical, suspicious and malignant categories were 5%, 25%, 71%, and 99.7%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of atypical, suspicious and malignant categories was calculated as 90.1%, 95.2%, and 93.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The high diagnostic accuracy for each BIRADS category suggest excellent accuracy for Breast FNAB using the IAC Yokohama system.