1
|
Saqi A, Nishino M, Saieg M, Ly A, Lott Limbach A. Doing more with less: integrating small biopsies in cytology practice. J Am Soc Cytopathol 2024; 13:233-243. [PMID: 38677894 DOI: 10.1016/j.jasc.2024.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2024] [Revised: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024]
Abstract
Cytopathologists are at the forefront of specimen acquisition during many different procedures while providing rapid on site evaluation (ROSE). This has added pressure to cytopathologists as more and more ancillary testing is being requested on smaller amounts of tissue. By focusing on the most common organ sites: lung, head and neck, and pancreas, there is a discussion of what the cytopathologist needs to know to triage tissue successfully. Finally, there is a discussion of the logistical aspects of integrating small biopsies into everyday practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anjali Saqi
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Michiya Nishino
- Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mauro Saieg
- Department of Cytology, Fleury Group, Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Amy Ly
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Abberly Lott Limbach
- Department of Pathology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Luis R, Thirunavukkarasu B, Jain D, Canberk S. Welcoming the new, revisiting the old: a brief glance at cytopathology reporting systems for lung, pancreas, and thyroid. J Pathol Transl Med 2024; 58:165-173. [PMID: 39026441 PMCID: PMC11261173 DOI: 10.4132/jptm.2024.06.11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2024] [Revised: 06/07/2024] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024] Open
Abstract
This review addresses new reporting systems for lung and pancreatobiliary cytopathology as well as the most recent edition of The Bethesda Reporting System for Thyroid Cytopathology. The review spans past, present, and future aspects within the context of the intricate interplay between traditional morphological assessments and cutting-edge molecular diagnostics. For lung and pancreas, the authors discuss the evolution of reporting systems, emphasizing the bridge between past directives and more recent collaborative efforts of the International Academy of Cytology and the World Health Organization in shaping universal reporting systems. The review offers a brief overview of the structure of these novel systems, highlighting their strengths and pinpointing areas that require further refinement. For thyroid, the authors primarily focus on the third edition of The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology, also considering the two preceding editions. This review serves as an invaluable resource for cytopathologists, offering a panoramic view of the evolving landscape of cytopathology reporting and pointing out the integrative role of the cytopathologist in an era of rapid diagnostic and therapeutic advancements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rita Luis
- Department of Pathology, Unidade Local de Saúde São José, Lisbon, Portugal
- Pathology Institute, Lisbon School of Medicine, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Deepali Jain
- Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Sule Canberk
- Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (Ipatimup), Porto, Portugal
- Abel Salazar Institute of Biomedical Sciences (ICBAS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Selvaraj S, Dharmalingam P, Alashetty S, Patil A. Reproducibility assessment of WHO reporting system for pancreaticobiliary cytopathology: A single institution experience. Diagn Cytopathol 2024. [PMID: 38860686 DOI: 10.1002/dc.25367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Revised: 05/28/2024] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The World Health Organization (WHO) reporting system for pancreaticobiliary cytopathology was released to internationalize the reporting, assisting in correct diagnosis and patient treatment with significant revisions from the previous Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) system. The "neoplastic: benign" and "neoplastic: other" categories have mostly been superseded by two new ones: "pancreatic neoplasia-low-grade" (PaN-low) and "pancreatic neoplasia-high-grade" (PaN-high), which classify intermediate neoplastic lesions based on cytological atypia. We aim to assess the reproducibility and risk of malignancy (ROM) for reporting pancreaticobiliary cytopathology by the WHO system in comparison with the PSC system. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective study by reviewing archival slides sent for pancreaticobiliary cytological evaluation from June 2021 to June 2023, by two pathologists blinded to each other's findings. Absolute ROM was determined by histopathology/cell block study/clinical follow-up (minimum 6 months)/overtly malignant imaging/metastasis. RESULTS A total of 332 cases from 329 patients met the inclusion criteria, comprising pancreatic, gallbladder, and biliary lesions. The median patient age was 54 years (range, 14-86 years). The overall sensitivity of the test is 74.9% specificity is 93.2%, positive predictive value of 96.8%, negative predictive value of 57.6%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 81.8%. The absolute ROM for each site in all categories was comparable with that of the published data from the WHO system. CONCLUSION Our study highlights the reliability of the WHO system for guiding clinical decision-making and patient management in the context of pancreaticobiliary. However, continual efforts among pathologists are essential to maintain consistent accuracy in cytological interpretations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sivaranjani Selvaraj
- Department of Pathology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Priya Dharmalingam
- Department of Pathology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Soumya Alashetty
- Department of Pathology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Akkamahadevi Patil
- Department of Pathology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bueno A, Felipe-Silva A, Saieg M. Small biopsies for pancreatic lesions: Is there still room for fine needle aspiration? Cytopathology 2024; 35:70-77. [PMID: 37905686 DOI: 10.1111/cyt.13323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic carcinoma is an aggressive tumour with increasing incidence in both sexes worldwide. Early detection is, therefore, essential for patient management. A recent advancement involves the utilization of larger, thicker gauge needles, which enable the collection of core-type biopsies (FNB). Here, we investigated the role of fine needle aspiration and cytopathology in the diagnostic workflow of pancreatic lesions. A search query was designed to search for articles in the PubMed database comparing FNA and FNB for biopsy of pancreatic lesions, and detailed data were extracted from selected studies. Statistical analyses were performed using the R package meta version 6.2. Twenty-one studies made the final cut for data extraction. Overall, median age was 64.3 years (±6.1; 47.6-71.5), male: female proportion 53.9 (±11.3; 27.6-67.4), lesion size 3.1 cm (±0.5; 1.9-4.2 cm) and percentage of malignant cases 78.3% (±26.8; 2.1-100). FNA and FNB diagnostic yield was 85.8% (±10.3; 70.0-100.0) and 89.2% (±7.7; 70.0-98.6), respectively. Average accuracy was 89.5% (±11.7; 63.0-100.0) for FNA and 90.8% (±7.1; 77.0-100.0) for FNB. Adverse effects rate was 1.0% (±1.3; 0-4.3) for FNA and 2.2% (±4.4; 0-16.1) for FNB. None of the selected variables had a significant statistical difference between both methods. FNA and FNB perform similarly for diagnostic material acquisition in pancreatic lesions. The best outcome comes from the association of both techniques, emphasizing the value of combining cytological and histological morphology for the most accurate analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mauro Saieg
- Fleury Group, São Paulo, Brazil
- Santa Casa Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Diagnostic Performance of Pancreatic Cytology with the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System: A Systematic Review, before Shifting into the Upcoming WHO International System. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23031650. [PMID: 35163571 PMCID: PMC8835850 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23031650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2021] [Revised: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) reporting system classifies pancreatobiliary samples into six categories (I–VI), providing guidance for personalized management. As the World Health Organization (WHO) has been preparing an updated reporting system for pancreatobiliary cytopathology, this systematic review aimed to evaluate the risk of malignancy (ROM) of each PSC category, also the sensitivity and specificity of pancreatic FNA cytology using the current PSC system. Five databases were investigated with a predefined search algorithm. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to select the eligible studies for subsequent data extraction. A study quality assessment was also performed. Eight studies were included in the qualitative analysis. The ROM of the PSC categories I, II, III, IV, V, VI were in the ranges of 8–50%, 0–40%, 28–100%, 0–31%, 82–100%, and 97–100%, respectively. Notably, the ROM IVB (“neoplastic—benign”) subcategory showed a 0% ROM. Four of the included studies reported separately the ROMs for the IVO subcategory (“neoplastic—other”; its overall ROM ranged from 0 to 34%) with low (LGA) and high-grade atypia (HGA). ROM for LGA ranged from 4.3 to 19%, whereas ROM for HGA from 64 to 95.2%. When the subcategory IVO with HGA was considered as cytologically positive, together with the categories V and VI, there was a higher sensitivity of pancreatic cytology, at minimal expense of the specificity. Evidence suggests the proposed WHO international system changes—shifting the IVB entities into the “benign/negative for malignancy” category and establishing two new categories, the “pancreatic neoplasm, low-risk/grade” and “pancreatic neoplasm, high-risk/grade”—could stratify pancreatic neoplasms more effectively than the current PSC system.
Collapse
|
6
|
HooKim K, Reid MD. Atypical cells in fine needle aspiration biopsies of pancreas: Causes, work-up, and recommendations for management. Diagn Cytopathol 2021; 50:196-207. [PMID: 34378874 DOI: 10.1002/dc.24848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a sensitive and specific method for diagnosing cancer in solid pancreatic masses. However, some cases receive indeterminate atypical diagnoses, which creates management dilemmas. In the 2014 Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) standardized guidelines for pancreatobiliary cytology, specimens in the "Atypical" category show a spectrum of architectural and/or cellular changes beyond normal or reactive, but, quantitatively or qualitatively, insufficient for classification as neoplastic (benign/other), suspicious or positive for malignancy. Implementation of the PSC system decreased atypical diagnoses, particularly for cystic lesions, and redistributed many cases into benign and neoplastic categories. Because no set cytologic criteria exist for the "Atypical" category there is wide variability in its use, and its frequency ranges from 0%-16% (mean 6%). It consists of a heterogeneous mix of cases that occur because of preanalytic, lesion-specific (low cellularity, necrosis, cystic, reactive and premalignant changes), to pathologist-dependent factors (experience, expertise, training and institutional case volume). Outcomes of atypical diagnoses in solid pancreatic masses range from benign to premalignant and malignant and include reactive atypia in pancreatitis, well differentiated adenocarcinoma, and non-ductal malignancies. The associated risk of malignancy (ROM) ranges from 28%-100%, with an overall intermediate ROM in large-scale studies. Cytopathologists and institutions should monitor and keep their personal and/or laboratory's atypical rates low by judiciously using rapid onsite evaluation, ancillary studies, consensus or expert review, as well as correlation with clinical and radiologic findings. Early repeat EUS-FNA is indicated for unresolved cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim HooKim
- Department of Pathology, Anatomy and Cell Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Michelle D Reid
- Department of Pathology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ozretić L, Simonović AV, Rathbone ML, Young MPA, Perez-Machado MA. The benefits of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System for reporting pancreatobiliary cytology: A 2-year review from a single academic institution. Cytopathology 2021; 32:227-232. [PMID: 33415845 DOI: 10.1111/cyt.12949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Revised: 09/26/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is an essential tool in the diagnosis of pancreatic lesions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of cytology from EUS-FNA, to correlate the results with the corresponding histopathological diagnoses and to analyse the impact of retrospective assignment of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) reporting system categories. METHODS All pancreatic FNA specimens reported at the Royal Free Hospital during a 2-year period were retrospectively collected and assigned to the PSC system categories. Any available corresponding histological samples were assessed for concordance. RESULTS In total, 236 cytology specimens from 223 patients were identified, of which 108 (45.8%) had corresponding histology samples. The main reason for cyto-histological discrepancy was sampling error. Interpretive error was identified in one case. Overall, sensitivity was 92.5%, specificity was 100%, diagnostic accuracy of cytology was 95%, false-positive rate was 0% and false-negative rate was 7.5%. The implementation of the new reporting system reduced the number of cases in the atypical category. All cases previously categorised as suspicious or malignant remained in the same category. CONCLUSIONS EUS-FNA is an accurate method for evaluating pancreatobiliary lesions. The implementation of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology diagnostic system enhances standardisation of the reporting terminology and reduces the number of samples in the non-standardised and equivocal atypical category.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luka Ozretić
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | - Martin P A Young
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Layfield LJ, Baloch Z. Categorical systems for reporting of cytology specimens: Following the footsteps of Bethesda-like reporting systems. Diagn Cytopathol 2020; 48:859-861. [PMID: 32860658 DOI: 10.1002/dc.24598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zubair Baloch
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|