The Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology: Single center experience with cell blocks

Molecular analysis using SalvGlandDx improves risk of malignancy estimation and diagnosis of salivary gland cytopathology: An exploratory multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of salivary gland neoplasms is challenging, especially on cytological specimens acquired by fine-needle aspiration. The recently implemented standardized Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology provides an estimated risk of malignancy (ROM); yet, for two of the categories, the diagnosis of the lesion remains unclear. However, a precise diagnosis is desirable for optimal patient management, including planning of surgery and imaging procedures.

METHODS

Cytological specimens (n = 106) were subjected to molecular analysis using the SalvGlandDx panel. The risk of malignancy was calculated for each detected alteration based on the diagnosis of the resection specimen. By taking into account the molecular alterations, their associated ROM, the clinical and cytological features, and the current literature, the Milan category was evaluated.

RESULTS

Of n = 63 technically valid cases, 76% revealed a molecular alteration. A total of 94% of these molecularly altered cases could be assigned to a different Milan category when additionally taking molecular results into account. In only 2% of the salivary gland neoplasms of uncertain malignant potential, in which a molecular alteration was detected, the classification remained salivary gland neoplasms of uncertain malignant potential.

CONCLUSION

Molecular analysis of cytological specimens provides a benefit in classifying salivary gland neoplasms on fine-needle aspiration. It can improve the ROM estimation and thus help to assign cases of formerly unknown malignant potential to clearly benign or malignant categories.

Second edition of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology: Refining the role of salivary gland FNA

The use of standardised reporting systems for non-gynaecologic cytopathology has made enormous gains in popularity during the past decade, including for thyroid fine-needle aspiration, urine cytology, serous effusions, pancreas, lymph nodes, lung and more. In February 2018, the first edition of the Atlas of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) was published. The MSRSGC defines six diagnostic fine-needle aspiration categories encompassing the spectrum of non-neoplastic, benign and malignant lesions of the salivary glands. The goal of the MSRSGC is to combine each diagnostic category with a defined risk of malignancy and a specific clinical and/or surgical management algorithm. Since its initial publication in 2018, more than 200 studies and commentaries have been published, confirming the role of the MSRSGC. The second edition of the MSRSGC, published in July 2023, includes refined risks of malignancy based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses, a new chapter summarising the use of salivary gland imaging, new advances in ancillary testing and updates in nomenclature.

Second edition of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology: Refining the role of salivary gland FNA

The use of standardized reporting systems for nongynecologic cytopathology has made enormous gains in popularity during the past decade, including for thyroid fine-needle aspiration, urine cytology, serous effusions, pancreas, lymph nodes, lung, and more. In February 2018, the first edition Atlas of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) was published. The MSRSGC defines six diagnostic fine-needle aspiration categories encompassing the spectrum of Non-Neoplastic, benign, and malignant lesions of the salivary glands. The goal of the MSRSGC is to combine each diagnostic category with a defined risk of malignancy and a specific clinical and/or surgical management algorithm. Since its initial publication in 2018, more than 200 studies and commentaries have been published confirming the role of the MSRSGC. The second edition of the MSRSGC, published in July 2023, includes refined risks of malignancy based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses, a new chapter summarizing the use of salivary gland imaging, new advances in ancillary testing, and updates in nomenclature. CONCISE SENTENCE: The second edition of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology, published in July 2023, includes refined risks of malignancy based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses, a new chapter summarizing the use of salivary gland imaging, new advances in ancillary testing, updates in nomenclature, and a guide to the practical application of the latest ancillary markers for the diagnosis of selected salivary gland fine-needle aspiration cases.

Second edition of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology: Refining the role of salivary gland FNA

The use of standardized reporting systems for non-gynecologic cytopathology has made enormous gains in popularity during the past decade, including for thyroid fine-needle aspiration, urine cytology, serous effusions, pancreas, lymph nodes, lung, and more. In February 2018, the first edition Atlas of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) was published. The MSRSGC defines six diagnostic fine-needle aspiration categories encompassing the spectrum of non-neoplastic, benign, and malignant lesions of the salivary glands. The goal of the MSRSGC is to combine each diagnostic category with a defined risk of malignancy and a specific clinical and/or surgical management algorithm. Since its initial publication in 2018, more than 200 studies and commentaries have been published confirming the role of the MSRSGC. The second edition of the MSRSGC, published in July 2023, includes refined risks of malignancy based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses, a new chapter summarizing the use of salivary gland imaging, new advances in ancillary testing, and updates in nomenclature.

Comparison Study of FNAC Using the Milan System Cytopathology versus Definitive Histology for the Diagnosis of Salivary Gland Tumors

INTRODUCTION

Salivary gland tumors (SGT) represent 6 to 8 percent of head and neck tumors. The cytologic diagnosis of SGT is performed by fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) with variable sensitivity and specificity. The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) categorizes the cytological results and provides the risk of malignancy (ROM). The aim of our study was to evaluate the cytological findings with the definitive pathological findings to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of FNAC in SGT according to MSRSGC classification.

METHOD

An observational, retrospective, single-center study was carried out at a tertiary referral hospital over a period of 10 years. Patients that underwent FNAC for major SGT and that have undergone surgery to remove the tumor were included. A histopathological follow-up was performed on the surgically excised lesions. Results from the FNAC were categorized into one of the six MSRSGC categories. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and diagnostic accuracy of FNAC for determining benign and malignant cases were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 417 cases were analyzed. The cytological prediction of ROM was 10% in nondiagnostic, 12.12% in non-neoplastic, 3.58% in neoplasm benign group, 60% in AUS and SUMP groups, and 100% in suspicious and malignant group. The statistical analysis of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy for determining benign cases was 99%, 55%, 94%, 93%, and 94%, respectively, and for determining malignant neoplasm was 54%, 99%, 93%, 94%, and 94%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In our hands, MSRSGC is highly sensitive for benign tumors and highly specific for malignant tumors. The low sensitivity to differentiate malignant from benign cases makes it necessary to apply an adequate anamnesis, physical examination, and imaging tests to consider surgical treatment in most cases.

Does Milan affect management? A retrospective analysis of resection rate and time to surgery among Milan categories

INTRODUCTION

The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) is an established system with reproducible risk of malignancies (ROM) for salivary gland fine needle aspiration (SGFNA). No studies have reviewed the relationship between Milan categories and the resection rate (RR) and time to resection (TTR).

METHODS

We searched our database (January 1, 2011 to January 4, 2021) for non-lymphoma SGFNAs and assigned appropriate MSRSGC categories. RR and TTR were calculated and compared for each category. A literature search was performed; RRs and TTRs were compared.

RESULTS

Seven hundred and eighty SGFNAs were identified, 333 with follow-up. RR was highest in suspicious for malignancy (SUS, V; 70.6%, n = 12/17), followed by the salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (SUMP, IVb; 69.6%, n = 80/115) and malignant (M, VI; 55.6%, n = 75/135). Among M, primary tumors had a higher RR (65.1%, n = 41/63) than metastases (47.2%, n = 34/72, p = .36). In literature review, SUS had the highest RR (69.3%, n = 233/336) followed by M (61.6%, n = 821/1332) and SUMP (60.2%, n = 632/1050). TTR was shorter in SUS (mean = 32.3 days, median = 25 days). Within the benign neoplasms (BN, IVa), Pleomorphic adenomas (PAs) had a higher RR than Warthin tumors (WTs) (66.3% vs. 37.2%, p < .00001), and a shorter TTR (median = 63 days vs. 90 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Tumors classified as SUS had higher RR and at shorter intervals than those classified as SUMP. PAs have higher RRs and more expedient surgery than WTs. Cases classified as M are less likely to undergo follow-up than SUS, perhaps due to a lower RR for metastases.

Assessment of Risk of Malignancy of Fine-needle Aspiration Cytology in Salivary Gland Lesions Using the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology Categorization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of the salivary gland is crucial in the identification of salivary gland lesions, but the variation in morphological pattern and the overlap of morphological traits can result in erroneous interpretation and affect treatment, making FNAC of the salivary gland problematic. The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) was created to address these problems.

OBJECTIVES

To ascertain whether the FNAC method using MSRSGC was reliable in predicting the risk of malignancy (ROM) in each category of salivary gland lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The databases PubMed-MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane, Scopus, and Google Scholar were all searched using pertinent keywords, reference searches, and citation searches. A fixed effect model was used to determine the pooled proportion with a 95% confidence interval (CI). All statistical analyses were performed using Meta Disc and R version 4.0.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing).

RESULTS

After reviewing the submissions' abstracts and titles, 58 documents that satisfied the necessary inclusion and exclusion criteria were ultimately selected. A total of 19,652 samples from 19,408 individuals was analyzed, out of which 9,958 samples were available for histopathological follow-up. The pooled ROM for category I was 10%, category II was 5%, category III was 28%, category IV A was 2%, Category IV B was 34%, category V was 91%, and category VI was 99%.

CONCLUSION

Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology is useful for risk stratification and quality control, confirming its validity and diagnostic utility. Widespread use of MSRSGC would improve the accuracy of salivary gland cytology and lead to better patient care and improved treatment strategies. The results of this study are in consonance with reported values as per MSRSGC except for category V.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The MSRSGC which was first reported in 2018 is a very useful tool for proper stratification of ROM in salivary gland FNAC. This study allowed us to validate the ROM values in different categories as reported in MSRSGC.

Application of the Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology using cell blocks

The Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology (MSRSGC) is a novel standardized classification tool for salivary gland cytology specimens based on the use of direct smears. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) cell blocks facilitate the use of ancillary studies, leading to improved diagnostic accuracy. However, the application of the MSRSGC with only cell blocks has not been well established. Consecutive cohort of all parotid gland cytology specimens between 01/01/2018 and 30/06/2021 was performed. All cytology specimens were processed into cell blocks only. Cytologic diagnoses were classified prospectively according to the MSRSGC categories. The risk of malignancy (ROM) for each diagnostic category and the diagnostic performance were calculated. A total of 230 FNA samples from 221 patients were identified, including 47% and 78.4% with surgical or clinical follow-up, respectively. The ROMs based on surgical follow-up for the non-diagnostic, non-neoplastic, AUS, neoplasm: benign, SUMP, SFM and malignant categories were 21.4%,0%,50%,0%,30%,100% and 100%, respectively. The ROMs based on the clinical follow-up for these categories were 7.3%,0%,37.3%,0%,27.3%,100% and 100%, respectively. Following surgical excision, all Milan IVa category samples were confirmed as benign, and all Milan V and VI category samples were confirmed as malignant. This study validates the application of the MSRSGC with the sole use of FFPE cell blocks. The diagnostic accuracy of MSRSGC is high and compares favorably to other institutions using traditional cytology assessment methods. Furthermore, FNA results using this technique enabled to provide optimal patient management based on the ROM of the different Milan system categories.

Nondiagnostic salivary gland FNAs are associated with decreased risk of malignancy compared with "all-comer" patients: Analysis of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology with a focus on Milan I: Nondiagnostic

BACKGROUND

The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) reports a 25% rate of malignancy (ROM) for the Milan I: Nondiagnostic (ND) category. We clarify the ROM of ND salivary gland fine-needle aspirations (SGFNAs) based on our institutional experience and review of the literature.

METHODS

Overall risk of malignancy (OROM) and that for those with surgical/flow cytometric follow-up (FROM) for each category and "all-comers" were calculated for Emory SGFNAs from January 2010 through March 2021. From a literature review of 50 articles using MSRSGC, distribution of diagnoses, rates of follow-up, FROM, and OROM by category were calculated. FROMs and OROMs between ND FNAs and all-comers were compared. Milan I rate was compared with the ratio of Milan I OROM to all-comer OROM.

RESULTS

Of 819 SGFNAs at Emory, 12.8% (n = 105/819) were ND. Thirty-two had known follow-up, with 12 (37.5%) being malignant. Nonmucinous cyst contents accounted for 26.7% of ND SGFNAs (n = 28/105); all 7 with surgical follow-up were benign. Of 50 MSRSGC studies, 18.2% (n = 2384/13,129) of SGFNAs were classified as ND, 26.6% (n = 635/2384) with known follow-up. Total FROM and OROM for ND FNAs (15.7% and 4.1%, respectively) were significantly lower than those for all-comers (24.9% and 11.4%, respectively) (p < .001). There was no relationship between rate of ND SGFNA and ND ROM.

CONCLUSIONS

The ND category is associated with a lower ROM than that of all-comer SGFNA patients. The "true" ROM for ND SGFNAs is likely best estimated by the 4.1% OROM. SGFNAs showing nonmucinous cyst contents have a particularly low ROM. Rate of ND SGFNAs does not influence ND ROM.

Ancillary studies on cell blocks from fine needle aspiration specimens of salivary gland lesions: A multi‐institutional study

Background

Ancillary studies are commonly performed on cell blocks prepared from fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) specimens. There are limited studies in application of ancillary studies on cell blocks from salivary gland (SG) FNAs. This multi‐institutional study evaluates the role of ancillary studies performed on cell blocks in the diagnosis of SG lesions, and their impact on clinical management.

Method

The electronic pathology archives of three large academic institutions were searched for SG FNAs with ancillary studies performed on cell blocks. The patient demographics, FNA site, cytologic diagnosis, ancillary studies, and surgical follow‐up were recorded. If needed, the cytologic diagnoses were reclassified as per the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC).

Results

117 SG FNA cases were identified including 3, 10, 11, 6, 23, 4, and 60 cases in MSRSGC categories I, II, III, IVa, IVb, V, VI, respectively with surgical follow‐up available ranging from 27% to 100% within each category. Ancillary studies including histochemistry, immunocytochemistry (IHC), and in situ hybridization (ISH) were beneficial in 60%–100% of cases in each category. Risk of malignancy was 100% in both the suspicious for malignancy (V) and malignant (VI) categories. Ancillary studies improved diagnosis in 60% of non‐neoplastic cases (II, 6/10), 100% of benign neoplasm cases (IVa, 6/6), and 98.3% of malignant cases (VI, 59/60).

Conclusion

Judicious and case‐based ancillary studies performed on SG FNA cell blocks with sufficient material can improve the diagnostic yield by further characterization of the atypical/neoplastic cells, particularly in MSRSGC categories IVa‐VI.

The Contributory Role of Cell Blocks in Salivary Gland Neoplasms Fine Needle Aspirations Classified by the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytology

(1) Background: The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) was introduced in 2018, bringing an organ-specific classification system for salivary gland cytopathology. The aim of present study is to evaluate the MSRSGC prospectively, based on a two-year experience in the tertiary care center pathology department, and evaluate the role of routine cell block (CB) preparation in salivary gland cytopathological diagnostics. (2) Methods: In our institution, the Department of Pathology, Fimlab Laboratories, Tampere, Finland, the MSRSGC has been implemented in salivary gland cytopathology since January 2018 and, over a two-year period (January 2018–December 2019), there were 365 fine-needle aspirations, of which 164 had a surgical follow-up. The CB methods used were Plasma-thrombin, the collection of visible fragments, and the Shandon and in-house methods. (3) Results: The MSRSGC diagnostic figures were as follows: accuracy 87.5%, sensitivity 45.8% and specificity 98.9%. For diagnostic categories of MSRSGC (non-neoplastic, benign neoplasm and malignant neoplasm) (n = 63) diagnostic accuracy was 98.4%, and for undetermined categories (atypia of undetermined significance, salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential and suspicious for malignancy) (n = 49) diagnostic accuracy was 73.5%. Non-contributory cell blocks resulted more often in a false negative diagnosis (25%, 3/12) than a true negative diagnosis (10%, 7/73, p < 0.001), and is, most likely, an insufficient cytological diagnosis (86%, 18/21, p < 0.001). (4) Conclusion: The application of MSRSGC and CBs are beneficial in salivary gland cytological diagnosis, increasing diagnostic accuracy and, thus, patients’ management and treatment.

A multicenter validation of the revised version of the Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytology (MSRSGC)

INTRODUCTION

Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a basic step in the diagnosis of salivary gland tumors that have a wide variety of histological types. The recent Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology (MSRSGC) can correlate the risk of malignancy with precise cytological features. A revised version was recently proposed to improve the surgical relevance and facilitate uniform management.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A multicenter study retrospectively used the original and revised MSRSGC criteria to classify a series of patients who received surgery after FNAC.

RESULTS

We enrolled 503 patients from three tertiary centers. The risk of malignancy for the MSRSGC resulted 19.5% in cat. I, 14.3% in cat. II, 17.6% in cat. III, 3.6% in cat. IVa, 24.6% in cat. IVb, 66.7% in cat. V, and 96.8% in cat. VI. The results from the revised MSRSGC were consistent with the original values.

CONCLUSION

The MSRSGC is a promising classification system. In our opinion, the revised version of the MSRSGC supplements FNAC with some crucial clinical information and can better identify the appropriate treatment in each category.