Axillary lymph node metastasis: Fine-needle aspiration biopsy sensitivity as a function of node size, percent replacement of lymph node by tumor and tumor deposit size

Uses and limitations of small-volume biopsies for the diagnosis of lymphoma

Although surgical biopsy remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of lymphoma, small-volume biopsies including fine-needle aspiration and core needle biopsy are increasingly being used as a first line diagnostic tool. Small-volume biopsies are safe, rapid and cost effective; however, diagnostic utility varies by lymphoma subtype. It is important for pathologists and clinicians to recognize both the strengths and limitations of such biopsies.

Surgical Lymph Node Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Lymphoma: A Case Report

We report the diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of a 52-year-old woman who originally presented to her primary care provider with adenopathy. Core needle biopsy (CNB) was inconclusive as it could not distinguish between follicular and diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCLs). A left axillary surgical lymph node biopsy was performed and demonstrated that the patient had a DLBCL arising from grade 3 follicular lymphoma. We discuss the limitations of CNB and the value of surgical lymph node biopsy in the diagnosis of lymphoma. The patient recovered from the biopsy without complications, and chemotherapy was initiated after the procedure. The patient has now remained in complete remission at 22 months.

Intraoperative Sentinel Node Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy as a Substitute for Whole Sentinel Node Excisional Biopsy in Breast Cancer Patients. Initial Report

INTRODUCTION

Sentinel Node Biopsy (SNB) is the choice procedure for axillary staging in Breast Cancer. Following the ACOSOG Z11 trial, axillary dissection is advised only in patients with more than 2 positive SNs. We aimed at exploring palpation-guided, intraoperative fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the SN as a replacement for whole SN excision in node-negative BC patients to minimize side-effects.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We included 80 patients with BC undergoing SNB between December 2020 and May 2022. After identification of the SN, the breast surgeon performed SN-FNAB. Results were compared with definitive pathological assessment. ResultsDiagnostic yield was 80%, including a "learning curve." 58 of 64 patients with suitable samples tested negative. In this group, the Negative Predictive Value was 77.6% (IC 64.7%-87.5 %). If micro metastasis is disregarded, the NPV would increase to 86.2% (IC 74.6%-93.9%). If we accept the Z11 criterion for axillary dissection, the NPV would rise to 100%. Six patients had a positive SN-FNAB. They were all confirmed as having macro metastatic-positive SNs at the final pathological assessment, and 3 of them also displayed extra nodal extension (ENE).

CONCLUSION

We believe that intraoperative SN-FNAB is highly accurate for swiftly depicting both low axillary tumor burden/negative cases, in whom axillary dissection is to be omitted, as well as high axillary tumor burden cases.

A roadmap for a comprehensive diagnostic approach to fine needle cytology of lymph node metastases

OBJECTIVE

Fine needle cytology (FNC) is widely used as a first-line procedure in the diagnostic algorithm of lymphadenopathies. In a metastatic setting, a first-line diagnostic approach identifies non-haematopoietic malignancy; however, cytopathologists could also provide a second diagnostic level, identifying the origin of the primary tumour. This paper outlines a comprehensive and practical approach to the cytological diagnosis of lymph node metastases.

METHODS

Cytological diagnoses of lymph node metastases performed over a 10-year period were selected and divided into two groups. The first group, labelled "oncological," comprised patients with a previous history of malignancy; the second group, labelled "naïve," included patients with no relevant history. Pathology records were retrieved to record microscopic findings, namely, background appearance, group architecture, and specific cell features; data from cell block (CB) preparations were also collected.

RESULTS

Overall, 982 cases were selected: 497 cases (50.61%) in the naïve group, and 485 (49.39%) in the oncological group. Overall, a second diagnostic level was achieved in 834/982 cases (84.92%); cases diagnosed as carcinoma not otherwise specified were more frequent in the naïve group than in the oncological group (17.51% vs. 8.04%, P < 0.01). Notably, although CB material was available in only 44.87% of the naïve cases, we were able to achieve a second diagnostic level thanks to the integration of clinical and cytomorphological findings, plus lymph node topography, in 82.49% of the cases.

CONCLUSION

Our results confirmed that in a metastatic setting, FNC can reliably lead to the identification of the origin of the primary tumour.