The role of rapid on site evaluation on touch imprint cytology and brushing during conventional bronchoscopy

Diagnostic performance of rapid on-site evaluation during bronchoscopy for lung cancer: A comprehensive meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Screening high-risk populations for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) reduces lung cancer mortality. Bronchoscopy is a diagnostic procedure used to monitor patients suspected of having lung cancer after LDCT. Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) can improve the diagnostic accuracy of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), although its diagnostic value remains unclear. In this meta-analysis, the authors evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of ROSE during bronchoscopy.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of ROSE for lung cancer during bronchoscopy. Studies evaluating the performance of ROSE and articles providing sufficient data for constructing a 2 × 2 table on a per-lesion basis were included. A meta-analysis was conducted using a bivariate random-effects model.

RESULTS

In total, 32 studies involving 8243 lung lesions were included with a pooled sensitivity of 91.8% and a pooled specificity of 94.9%. Subgroup analysis of 12 studies involving 2929 specimens from patients who underwent computed tomography revealed a pooled sensitivity of 93.8% and a pooled specificity of 96%. Further subgroup analysis of seven studies on the diagnostic outcomes of ROSE for intrathoracic or mediastinal lymph nodes through EBUS-TBNA for lung cancer staging revealed a pooled sensitivity of 90.1% and a pooled specificity of 96.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

ROSE exhibited high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing lung cancer during bronchoscopy. It also exhibited high sensitivity in detecting lung cancer in patients undergoing LDCT and higher specificity for nodal staging with EBUS-TBNA.

Optimizing Endoscopic Respiratory Diagnostics with Cytology: An Update on Touch Imprints with a Comparative Literature Review

Background: Major diagnostic and therapeutic changes led to the implementation of the 'lung cancer diagnosis in small biopsies and cytology specimens' concept in the WHO Classification of Tumours of the Lung, Pleura, Thymus and Heart in 2015. Touch imprints are an established technique in cytology that provides a rapid and minimally invasive method for morphological diagnoses of clinical specimens, accurate subtyping, and molecular characterizations of malignancies. The extended diagnostic requirements from the increasingly limited material provided by minimally invasive biopsy techniques pose major challenges for pathology. Recognizing the relevant features and potential pitfalls is essential for cytologists to avoid misinterpretation. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of endoscopic and surgical biopsy diagnostics was performed on 717 patients (303 women and 414 men; average age of 66.9 years) with clinically suspicious tumor findings at the LungenClinic Grosshansdorf in 2020. A total of 1363 cytological samples were obtained pre-therapeutically from 986 distinct biopsies covering 330 surgically and 656 endoscopically examined pulmonary, mediastinal, and bronchial regions. These samples were then compared with the histological diagnoses that were critical for determining the final therapy. Results: Out of a total of 656 endoscopically examined cases, 322 were classified as malignant, 308 as benign, and 26 as undetermined. While touch imprints and histological analysis separately achieved specificity values of 95.4% and 98.8%, both methods showed sensitivity values of 82.1% and 86.5%, respectively. In contrast, combining the two methods improved the sensitivity by 8 percentage points to 94.6%. Out of 330 cases of surgically examined samples, 137 were malignant, 190 were benign, and 3 were undetermined. The specificity of the morphological examinations for these samples was comparably high at 97.9% and 100%, respectively. In this surgical setting, touch imprints alone achieved a sensitivity of 75.9% (n = 104/137 cases), with a specificity of 97.9% (n = 186/190 cases). The outcome of the histological approach alone and in combination with touch imprints reached a sensitivity of 96.4% (n = 132/137 cases). Conclusions: Cytology and histology achieved comparably high sensitivity and specificity values on small biopsies. Under optimal conditions for morphological analysis in a surgical setting, the sensitivity of cytology for detecting malignant tumors was only 6 percentage points lower compared with the clinical endoscopic setting. A combined approach of cytologic-histologic evaluation for endoscopically examined specimens significantly increased the sensitivity by approximately 8% compared with the surgical setting (p < 0.003).

Rapid On-Site Evaluation Performed by an Interventional Pulmonologist: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Rapid On-Site Evaluation (ROSE) during bronchoscopy allows us to assess sample adequacy for diagnosis and molecular analyses in the context of precision oncology. While extemporaneous smears are typically evaluated by pathologists, their presence during bronchoscopy is not always possible. Our aim is to assess the concordance between ROSE performed by interventional pulmonologists and cytopathologists.

METHODS

We performed ROSE on 133 samples collected from 108 patients who underwent bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of suspect thoracic findings or for mediastinal lymph node staging (May 2023-October 2023). Randomly selected smears (one for each collection site) were independently evaluated for adequacy by a pulmonologist and a pathologist to assess the concordance of their evaluation.

RESULTS

Among 133 selected smears evaluated by a pulmonologist and pathologist, 100 were adequate for both, 10 were inadequate for both and 23 were discordant; hence, global concordance was 82.7%; Cohen's Kappa was 0.385, defining fair agreement. Concordance was similar irrespective of sample collection site (lymph nodes vs. pulmonary lesions; p = 0.999) and among samples which were considered adequate or inadequate by the pulmonologist (p = 0.608).

CONCLUSIONS

Trained pulmonologists can evaluate the appropriateness of sampling with good concordance with cytopathologists. Our work supports autonomous ROSE by pulmonologists where pathologists are not immediately available.

Cytomorphological Features as a Subtyping Tool of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Brushing Bronchoscopic Samples

Background and Objective

Nowadays, the separation of adenocarcinomas (ADCs) and squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) is crucial given that there are new specific targeted therapies. So, the aim of this study was to examine the differences in cytomorphological features between ADC and SCC in bronchoscopic brush samples.

Material and Methods

The retrospective study was conducted over a 3-year period at Western Balkan University Hospital. All brushing samples were analysed. According to the histopathological report, patients were classified into ADC and SCC groups. The cytomorphological features analysed in 95 samples were presence of necrosis, cell distribution, nuclear atypia, size of nuclei, and visibility of nucleoli. Statistical analysis was performed in JASP, and P values <0.05 were considered significant.

Results

The necrotic background was more frequent in SCC samples. Small clusters sized ≤200 µm were found in 17.95% of samples from the SCC group and 53.57% in the ADC group. Large clusters sized >400 µm were found in 43.59% in the SCC group, while in the ADC group, it was found in 5.36%. There were no differences in nuclear atypia between groups. Nuclei that were >5x lymphocyte size were found more often in samples from ADC than in the SCC group (37.50 vs 10.25%). In 89.75% of samples from the SCC group, nuclei were ≤5x lymphocyte sizes, while in the ADC group, the percentage was 63.5%. Nucleoli were more often visible in samples from the ADC group compared to the SCC group (92.86% vs 64.10%, P < 0,05).

Conclusions

Small clusters, large nuclei, and visible nucleoli were more frequent in the ADC group (P < 0.05), while large clusters, small nuclei, and invisible nucleoli were more frequent in the SCC group (P < 0.05).

A Combined Cyto- and Histopathological Diagnostic Approach Reduces Time to Diagnosis and Time to Therapy in First Manifestation of Metastatic Spinal Disease: A Cohort Study

Malignant spinal lesions (MSLs) are frequently the first manifestation of malignant disease. Spinal care, diagnostic evaluation, and the initiation of systemic therapy are crucial for outcomes in patients (pts) with advanced cancer. However, histopathology (HP) may be time consuming. The additional evaluation of spinal lesions using cytopathology (CP) has the potential to reduce the time to diagnosis (TTD) and time to therapy (TTT). CP and HP specimens from spinal lesions were evaluated in parallel in 61 pts (CP/HP group). Furthermore, 139 pts in whom only HP was performed were analyzed (HP group). We analyzed the TTD of CP and HP within the CP/HP group. Furthermore, we compared the TTD and TTT between the groups. The mean TTD in CP was 1.7 ± 1.7 days (d) and 8.4 ± 3.6 d in HP (p < 0.001). In 13 pts in the CP/HP group (24.1%), specific therapy was initiated based on the CP findings in combination with imaging and biomarker results before completion of HP. The mean TTT in the CP/HP group was 21.0 ± 15.8 d and was significantly shorter compared to the HP group (28.6 ± 23.3 d) (p = 0.034). Concurrent CP for MSLs significantly reduces the TTD and TTT. As a result, incorporating concurrent CP for analyzing spinal lesions suspected of malignancy might have the potential to enhance pts' quality of life and prognosis in advanced cancer. Therefore, we recommend implementing CP as a standard procedure for the evaluation of MSLs.

Quantitative evaluation of endobronchial ultrasound elastography in the diagnosis of benign and malignant mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes

OBJECTIVE

To compare the diagnostic value of different quantitative methods of endobronchial ultrasound elastography in benign and malignant mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients who underwent endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for mediastinal and hilar lymph node enlargement in our hospital between January 2019 and August 2022. We compared different quantitative elastography parameters [red area ratio (RAR, lymph node red area/lymph node area), green area ratio (GAR, lymph node green area/lymph node area), blue area ratio (SAR, lymph node blue area/lymph node area), mixed area ratio (MAR, lymph node green area/lymph node area), blue-green lymph node area/lymph node area), strain rate ratio (SR), strain rate in the target lymph node (LPA), ratio of blue area to total lymph node area outside the center of the target lymph node (PAR), and average grey value (MGV)], in order to find the best quantitative evaluation method.

RESULTS

A total of 244 patients (346 lymph nodes) were included in this study. All quantitative elastography parameters were statistically significant for the differentiation of benign and malignant lesions except the average grey value of the target lymph nodes. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of SAR was 0.872 (95% confidence interval: 0.83-0.91), the cutoff value was 0.409, and the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 85.4%, 78.0%, 80.4%, and 83.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Compared with other types of quantitative analysis, SAR has a higher predictive significance for benign and malignant lymph nodes.