Pap smear collection devices: technical, clinical, diagnostic, and legal considerations associated with their use

Detection of Trichomonas vaginalis in endocervical and ectocervical smears

The objective of this study was to determine the relative sensitivity of detecting Trichomonas vaginalis in endocervical as compared to ectocervical Papanicolaou-stained smears. The average number of organisms in 10 (200x) high-power fields (hpf) per smear was used for comparing the presence of trichomonads in the two smear types. In every pair of ectocervical-endocervical smears, there were always more trichomonads in the ectocervical smear. Fifty percent of cases showed at least 25 more trichomonads per 200x hpf in the ectocervical smear than in the endocervical smear. In 20 of 50 cases (40%), trichomonads were present only in the ectocervical smear. The organisms were found only in the endocervical smears of women with a heavier ectocervical trichomonad burden. In conclusion, trichomonads are detected in the Papanicolaou-stained ectocervical smear more often than in the endocervical smear; therefore, examination of an adequate ectocervical smear has greater utility than the endocervical smear for the diagnosis of trichomoniasis.

Endocervical glandular atypia: a "new" problem for the cytologist

New patterns of cellular presentation on cervical smears have become more frequent since the introduction of new sampling devices which provide increased material from the upper portions of the endocervical canal. The normal histologic variability of the endocervical canal, as well as the presence of tubal metaplasia, infectious and inflammatory reactions, squamous lesions involving endocervical glands, and true endocervical neoplastic lesions in these areas, have presented the cytologist with a variety of cellular appearances which may cause difficulties in differential diagnosis. Recognition of these entities, their cytologic manifestations, and the effects of increased high endocervical sampling, will allow the cytologist to begin the process of gaining the experience necessary to assess these new cellular patterns. A potential management protocol for patient follow-up is presented which will allow the user to investigate such cases in an efficient and cost effective manner.

Cytomorphologic appearances of normal endometrial cells during different phases of the menstrual cycle: a cytologic approach to endometrial dating

From 1988 to 1992, 156 endometrial cytologic preparations were procured by directly brushing hysterectomy specimens from premenopausal women with normal endometrium and regular menstruation. These brushing smears were obtained by using the cytobrush and/or the endometrial brush. The cytologic findings were correlated with histologic endometrial dating. Of these, 56 cases were classified as proliferative phase endometrium; 89, secretory phase; and 11, menstrual phase. The cytomorphologic features of endometrial glandular and stromal cells at different stages of the menstrual cycle are summarized and compared. On the basis of the different cytomorphologic features of glandular and stromal cells seen during various phases of the cycle, cytologic differentiation between proliferative phase and secretory phase endometria can be readily established. It appears possible to date the endometrium by direct endometrial brushing technique. It is also possible to determine if the glandular and/or stromal cells seen in the endocervical smears procured by the cytobrush are normal endometrial cells from cytobrush extraction, and are consistent with the date of the menstrual cycle, which should be made clear in the cytology report.

Artifactual endocervical atypia induced by endocervical brush collection

The cytologic distinctions between artifactual atypia induced by endocervical brush collection, endocervical glandular repair, and endocervical glandular dysplasia or neoplasia are often difficult. This difficulty is amplified by the lack of accepted cytologic criteria for endocervical glandular dysplasia, and the fact that earlier studies defining the significant cytologic features of endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ and endocervical adenocarcinoma (endocervical neoplasia) utilized a swab for endocervical cell retrieval. With the almost universal adoption of the endocervical brush, it is important to redefine those cytologic characteristics that differentiate true endocervical glandular dysplasia or neoplasia from reactive or reparative processes and instrument artifact. From our data, it appears that the classically described cytologic discriminators between a negative smear and smears of endocervical dysplasia or neoplasia are basically unchanged with some minor modifications for endocervical brush-collected samples.

Specimen adequacy evaluation in gynecologic cytopathology: current laboratory practice in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program and tentative guidelines for future practice

Routine specimen adequacy evaluation, as advocated by The Bethesda System (TBS), can play an important role in improving the sensitivity and accuracy of cervical cytopathology screening. The effectiveness of this measure, however, has been limited by the lack of uniform criteria for adequacy. Practice parameters are now emerging, through TBS development of tentative criteria and interlaboratory comparison of adequacy practices. This study reviews 1) nationwide responses to surveys of laboratory practices in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology (CAP PAP); 2) the definitions of adequacy based on TBS; and 3) the results of implementation of these criteria in a private independent laboratory, university hospital laboratory, and private nonprofit hospital laboratory. In the initial CAP PAP survey in 1990, 35% of responding laboratories routinely reported specimen adequacy, increasing to 66% in 1991 and 85% in 1992. Interlaboratory variations in adequacy practices were observed, however, underscoring the need for consensus criteria. The experience in the authors' laboratories indicates that TBS criteria can serve as a sound guideline. Effective implementation of adequacy assessment in the individual laboratory requires careful attention to ensuring the quality of adequacy ratings, correlating clinical and prior laboratory information, issuing clear and concise reports, and giving recommendations judiciously. Through interlaboratory comparison and consistent intralaboratory emphasis on specimen adequacy, greater uniformity of adequacy assessment can be achieved, and adequacy evaluation can achieve its promise of improving the quality of cervical cytopathology.

Tubal metaplasia: a cytologic study with comparison to other neoplastic and non-neoplastic conditions of the endocervix

Tubal metaplasia of the endocervix (TME), a condition that may be confused morphologically with glandular neoplasia, is frequently found in cone or hysterectomy specimens. To determine the frequency of detecting TME in cytologic smears, we retrospectively reviewed 28 Papanicolaou (Pap) smears from 22 women (mean age 39.1 yr; range 25-60 yr) with histologically proven TME. Our criteria for TME were the presence of two cell types in addition to endocervical secretory cells, i.e., peg cells (cells with dark and granular cytoplasm and elongate nuclei) and ciliated cells. All women had cervical cytology specimens obtained with an endocervical brush shortly before the procedures in which TME was diagnosed, and five also had at least one post-procedure smear. Of 20 smears with an adequate, non-neoplastic endocervical component, TME was found in 2 (10%). In these two, TME cells constituted 10% and < 5% of all the glandular cells, respectively, and the percentage of ciliated cells in the TME was approximately 25% and 75%. In conclusion, TME was noted infrequently (10%) on the cervical cytosmears of women with histologically-proven TME. This result corresponds to the histologic finding that TME typically involves the upper endocervix and glandular epithelium, with only 13% of the women having TME on the surface of the lower endocervix. Atypical glandular cells on cervical cytology are a problem for clinicians and pathologists alike. The differential diagnosis of such atypia, including TME, cells of the lower uterine segment, squamous intraepithelial lesion in glands and glandular neoplasia, is discussed.