Effect of the selective estrogen receptor modulator raloxifene on explanted uterine growth in rats

Estrogen Receptor Function: Impact on the Human Endometrium

The physiological role of estrogen in the female endometrium is well established. On the basis of responses to steroid hormones (progesterone, androgen, and estrogen), the endometrium is considered to have proliferative and secretory phases. Estrogen can act in the endometrium by interacting with estrogen receptors (ERs) to induce mucosal proliferation during the proliferative phase and progesterone receptor (PR) synthesis, which prepare the endometrium for the secretory phase. Mouse knockout studies have shown that ER expression, including ERα, ERβ, and G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) in the endometrium is critical for normal menstrual cycles and subsequent pregnancy. Incorrect expression of ERs can produce many diseases that can cause endometriosis, endometrial hyperplasia (EH), and endometrial cancer (EC), which affect numerous women of reproductive age. ERα promotes uterine cell proliferation and is strongly associated with an increased risk of EC, while ERβ has the opposite effects on ERα function. GPER is highly expressed in abnormal EH, but its expression in EC patients is paradoxical. Effective treatments for endometrium-related diseases depend on understanding the physiological function of ERs; however, much less is known about the signaling pathways through which ERs functions in the normal endometrium or in endometrial diseases. Given the important roles of ERs in the endometrium, we reviewed the published literature to elaborate the regulatory role of estrogen and its nuclear and membrane-associated receptors in maintaining the function of endometrium and to provide references for protecting female reproduction. Additionally, the role of drugs such as tamoxifen, raloxifene, fulvestrant and G-15 in the endometrium are also described. Future studies should focus on evaluating new therapeutic strategies that precisely target specific ERs and their related growth factor signaling pathways.

Medical treatments for endometriosis-associated pelvic pain

The main sequelae of endometriosis are represented by infertility and chronic pelvic pain. Chronic pelvic pain causes disability and distress with a very high economic impact. In the last decades, an impressive amount of pharmacological agents have been tested for the treatment of endometriosis-associated pelvic pain. However, only a few of these have been introduced into clinical practice. Following the results of the controlled studies available, to date, the first-line treatment for endometriosis associated pain is still represented by oral contraceptives used continuously. Progestins represent an acceptable alternative. In women with rectovaginal lesions or colorectal endometriosis, norethisterone acetate at low dosage should be preferred. GnRH analogues may be used as second-line treatment, but significant side effects should be taken into account. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are widely used, but there is inconclusive evidence for their efficacy in relieving endometriosis-associated pelvic pain. Other agents such as GnRH antagonist, aromatase inhibitors, immunomodulators, selective progesterone receptor modulators, and histone deacetylase inhibitors seem to be very promising, but there is not enough evidence to support their introduction into routine clinical practice. Some other agents, such as peroxisome proliferator activated receptors-γ ligands, antiangiogenic agents, and melatonin have been proven to be efficacious in animal studies, but they have not yet been tested in clinical studies.

Comparison of the effects of raloxifene and anastrozole on experimental endometriosis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacies of anastrozole and raloxifene on endometriosis.

STUDY DESIGN

A randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blind, experimental study was performed on 45 adult Wistar female rats in the Experimental Surgery Laboratory at Ondokuz Mayis University in Turkey. Endometrial tissues were implanted on the abdominal peritoneum in 45 rats. Six weeks later, the implant volumes were measured (volume-1) by performing a second laparotomy. Rats were randomized to one of three equal study groups. Saline solution (0.1 cc/rat/week, subcutaneously) was administered to group 1 (control group), anastrozole (0.004 mg/rat/day, orally) to group 2 (anastrozole group), and raloxifene (0.24 mg/rat/day, orally) to group 3 (raloxifene group) for 8 weeks. At the end of administration, a third laparotomy was performed to remeasure implant volumes (volume-2), and implants were totally excised for histopathologic examination. Volume-1 and volume-2 within the groups, as well as stromal and glandular tissues between the groups, were compared.

RESULT(S)

In the anastrozole and raloxifene groups, volume-2 values were significantly lower than those of volume-1. When compared to the control group, in both anastrozole and raloxifene groups, while glandular tissue scores were found significantly lower, stromal tissue scores were not different than that of the control group. There was no significant difference between both the GT and ST scores of the anastrozole and raloxifene groups.

CONCLUSION(S)

Anastrozole and raloxifene were seen to have caused equally the regression of the experimental endometriosis statistically significantly.

A pilot study on the off-label use of valproic acid to treat adenomyosis

Following on the heels of the discovery that endometriosis is an epigenetic disease, we conducted a pilot study on the off-label use of valproic acid to treat adenomyosis. We found that by the end of the 3-month treatment, all three recruited patients reported complete disappearance of dysmenorrhea, with an average of one-third reduction in uterus size.

Genistein causes regression of endometriotic implants in the rat model

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of raloxifene and genistein on experimentally induced endometriosis in a rat model.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized animal study.

SETTING

Animal surgery laboratory in a university hospital.

ANIMAL(S)

Thirty-three adult, mature female Wistar-Albino rats in which endometriotic implants were induced by transplanting autologous uterine tissue to ectopic sites on the peritoneum.

INTERVENTION(S)

After the endometriotic implants were formed surgically, the 33 rats were randomly divided into three groups. Group 1 (genistein group, 10 rats) were given 500 mg/kg per day of oral genistein. Group 2 (raloxifene group, 10 rats) were given 10 mg/kg per day of oral raloxifene. Group 3 were given no medication and served as controls (13 rats). All the rats continued to receive treatment for 21 days, and then were killed to assess the implants' size and for histologic examination.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The surface area of the endometriotic implants and the score of histologic analysis.

RESULT(S)

At the beginning of the medical treatment, the mean surface areas of the endometriotic implants were comparable in all three groups. At the end of the medical treatment, the mean surface area of implants in groups 1 and 2 was smaller than that of implants in the control group. The decrease in the surface area of the endometriotic implants was greater in group 1 and group 2 than found in the control group. The histologic assessment revealed that the mean of the histopathologic score of the implants at the end of the treatment was lower in groups 1 and 2 when compared with the control group.

CONCLUSION(S)

Genistein caused a statistically significant regression of endometriotic implants.

Two Unsuccessful Clinical Trials on Endometriosis and a Few Lessons Learned

In 1999, a phase II clinical trial on the use of fulvestrant to treat endometriosis was launched; yet after 7 years there is still no report on its outcome. In 2005, another trial on the use of raloxifene to treat endometriosis was terminated early due to unfavorable outcome. The two apparently unsuccessful clinical trials on endometriosis have taught us a few important lessons. First, we need to understand endometriosis through more basic research. We have also been reminded that human endometriosis trials differ from animal studies; anatomy and physiology are often divergent, and outcome measures are certainly different. Ectopic endometrium can differ significantly from eutopic tissue, and this issue needs to be more thoroughly explored. We believe human cell lines will prove to be an inexpensive and valuable tool for future preliminary evaluation of medical therapies as well as discerning pathophysiologic processes of the disease. Based on our current understanding of endometriosis, some concrete benchmarks can be established for testing or screening potential compounds in vitro. Finally, estrogen receptor modulators are often tissue-, cell-, and context-specific in their actions; they should not be simplistically grouped together nor should extrapolations from one compound to another be undertaken in a cavalier manner.

Endometriosis: the way forward

Endometriosis, a common cause of morbidity, affects 10% of women of reproductive age. In this review we focus on the new developments in pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment options, reviewing the literature published about this enigmatic disorder over the past three years. More specifically, new theories of the pathogenesis of the syndrome of Sampson and Cullen are discussed. The new era of genomics may characterize endometriosis and transform clinical management of the disease. Literature suggesting that endometriosis may have an environmental origin is reviewed. New approaches to medical therapy of endometriosis have been developed, including the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device, aromatase inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, angiogenesis inhibitors, selective estrogen and progesterone receptor modulators, and statins. Subfertility is another well-known result of endometriosis and often complex decisions must be made regarding management of the endometriosis patient who wishes to conceive. Laparoscopic surgery and assisted reproduction--with or without gonadotropin-releasing hormone-agonist treatment--are reviewed. Finally we speculate about new developments in the field of endometriosis in the coming three years.

Emerging drugs in endometriosis

Endometriosis is a common, estrogen-dependent, gynaecological disease, defined as the presence of endometrial-like tissue outside the uterus. Although several medications are used for treatment of the disease, they are associated with high recurrence rates, considerable side effects and limited duration of application. Due to these limitations and to the impact of endometriosis on the quality of life of affected women, their environment and the society, there is a great need for new drugs able to abolish endometriosis and its symptoms. Studies in recent years investigating the (patho)physiological mechanisms involved in disease aetiology have fostered the development of novel therapeutic concepts for endometriosis, by targeting the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, by selective modulation of estrogenic and progestogenic pathways, by inhibiting angiogenesis or by interfering with inflammatory and immunological factors. This article presents a brief summary of the currently available medications and an overview regarding the development of some of the most interesting and/or most promising novel drug candidates for endometriosis.

Inhibition of proliferation of endometrial stromal cells by trichostatin A, RU486, CDB-2914, N-acetylcysteine, and ICI 182780

BACKGROUND

All current major medications in treating endometriosis are effective in treating pain, most likely through suppression of proliferation of the implants, yet their effectiveness is relatively short term and they all have many undesirable, and sometimes severe, side effects. There is pressing need for novel, more effective medications in treating endometriosis with less and/or milder side effects.

METHODS

Using a recently established immortalized endometrial stromal cell line, we carried out cell proliferation assays for cells treated with trichostatin A (TSA), RU486, CDB-2914, and N-acetylcysteine, and ICI 182780. Gene expression levels for PR-A, PR-B, AR, Fas and FasL were measured. Protein expression levels for ERalpha, ERbeta, and AR were also measured.

RESULTS

Cell proliferation assay results for NAC, H2O2, CDB, and RU486 were nearly identical or similar to what have been reported based on primary cell cultures or in vivo studies. TSA, CDB, RU486 and NAC all had various antiproliferative effects. TSA had a more potent and longer lasting antiproliferative effect than CDB and NAC, even in the presence of an oxidant, H2O2. Its antiproliferative effect was concentration-dependent. ICI did not have a significant antiproliferative effect. PR-A, PR-B, AR, and FasL expression were all increased as compared with untreated cells.

CONCLUSIONS

The cell line appears to be an adequate model for stromal components of endometriotic implants. That ICI has no inhibitory effect on endometrial proliferation may explain why a phase II clinical trial on its use to treat endometriosis did not advance to later stages. The upregulation of PR-B and AR may be responsible for antiproliferative effects induced by TSA, a histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACI). HDACIs may be promising therapeutics in treating endometriosis due to their antiproliferative effects as well as the potential to restore gene dysregulation through chromatin remodeling.

Future Perspectives in the Medical Treatment of Endometriosis

In the last few years, our understanding of the pathogenesis of endometriosis at the cellular and molecular levels has improved significantly. This may give us the opportunity to use new, specific agents for the treatment of this disorder. Despite the effectiveness of the available treatments, novel therapeutic strategies may improve our ability to eliminate endometriotic lesions when present and to prevent the recurrence of endometriosis after surgical treatment. This review focuses on the new, experimental approaches to the medical treatment of endometriosis and its symptoms. The blockage of aromatase activity in endometriotic lesions with an aromatase inhibitor may represent a new step in the medical treatment of endometriosis. Preliminary clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy of third-generation nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors (ie, anastrozole and letrozole) in reducing the intensity of pain symptoms associated with the presence of endometriosis. The new selective progesterone receptor modulators may represent a valid hormonal treatment option. Therapeutic manipulation of the immune system through TNFalpha inhibitors may be beneficial in women with endometriosis. New pharmaceutical agents affecting inflammation, angiogenesis, and matrix metalloproteinase activity may prevent or inhibit the development of endometriosis. Further clinical trials may determine if these new therapies are superior to current medical treatment strategies for endometriosis.

TARGET AUDIENCE

Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians Learning.

OBJECTIVES

After completion of this article, the reader should be able to describe the new experimental medical treatments of endometriosis, state that the clinical use of nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors for endometriosis appears to be efficacious but is based on preliminary clinical data, and recall that the drugs used for endometriosis in the future may include manipulation of the immune system.

Validation of rat endometriosis model by using raloxifene as a positive control for the evaluation of novel SERM compounds

Approximately 10% of women of reproductive age suffer from endometriosis, a potentially painful disease process and important cause of female infertility. Raloxifene, a commercially available SERM (selective estrogen receptor modulator) compound, used for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, has preclinically demonstrated its estrogen antagonist effect on uterine tissue in rats. There is potential that SERM compounds may become a viable treatment option for human endometriosis, although more investigation is needed. In this study, raloxifene was administered at various doses to determine the efficacy and an appropriate dose level for use as a positive control in a rat model of endometriosis. Prior to dose administration, all rats underwent a bilateral ovariectomy, autologous transplantation of uterine tissue onto the peritoneal surface of the abdominal wall, and implantation of a subcutaneous estrogen pellet (E2). Two separate postsurgical experiments were performed. In experiment 1, following a 4-wk recovery, the rats bearing implants were assigned to three groups: (1) removal of the E2 pellet and dosing vehicle only (n = 7); (2) E2 and vehicle (n = 6); and (3) E2 and raloxifene at 10.0 mg/kg (n = 6). In experiment 2, also following a 4-week recovery, the rats bearing implants were assigned to five groups (n = 8/group): (1) E2 and vehicle only; (2) E2 and raloxifene, 0.3 mg/kg/d; (3) E2 and raloxifene, 1.0 mg/kg/d; (4) E2 and raloxifene, 3.0 mg/kg/d; (5) E2 and raloxifene, 10.0 mg/kg/d. All rats were dosed orally BID for 14 d. At the end of the study, the implanted endometrium was remeasured and compared to the pretreatment measurement. The results from both studies demonstrated that Raloxifene at only one dose (10.0 mg/kg) displayed significant implant regression (p < .05). Subsequently, our rat endometriosis experimental model consistently uses the exogenous E2 pellet and raloxifene at 10 mg/kg, BID, as a positive control to help screen and compare novel SERM compounds.

Endometriosis: novel etiopathogenetic concepts and clinical perspectives

OBJECTIVE

To discuss current ideas about therapy for endometriosis derived from new observations generated by using molecular biology techniques and in vivo animal models of disease.

METHOD(S)

The MEDLINE database was reviewed for English-language articles on new drugs that affect the endocrine or immunologic system, the possibility that endometriosis has multiple forms, and the association of endometriosis with cancer. Specific attention was given to in vivo studies in animals or humans.

CONCLUSION(S)

Among the novel potential candidate drugs, aromatase inhibitors and raloxifene should be considered for treatment of postmenopausal women with endometriosis. Notable observations have emerged from studies of immunomodulators and antiinflammatory agents in animal models of disease. These findings must be confirmed in women. The histogenesis of ovarian endometriomas is still unclear, thus limiting new experimental approaches to this form of disease. Given the low but established risk for malignant transformation of endometriosis, efforts should be directed toward identification of susceptibility loci for the disease and its potential transformation into cancer.

Selective estrogen receptor modulators: tissue selectivity and differential uterine effects

Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are compounds that bind to estrogen receptors and produce estrogen-like (agonist) effects in some tissues and estrogen-blocking (antagonist) effects in other tissues. One of the goals of SERM research has been to develop compounds that provide the potential benefits of estrogen in the skeleton and cardiovascular system, but avoid the negative effects of estrogen in other tissues. Estrogen therapy has been consistently associated with endometrial stimulation, including glandular proliferation, hyperplasia and cancer. In contrast, the presence or degree of endometrial stimulation observed with SERMs varies by compound. The purpose of this review is to differentiate the endometrial effects of compounds that display a SERM-like profile. Molecular mechanisms involving SERM binding to estrogen receptors, preclinical uterine effects in both tissue culture and animal models, and endometrial findings in clinical experience are discussed. There are several SERMs commercially available or in development. The favorable safety profile of raloxifene in the uterus differentiates it from the others. Future SERM development will continue to focus on finding compounds that exhibit minimal endometrial stimulation.

The selective estrogen receptor modulator, raloxifene: an overview of nonclinical pharmacology and reproductive and developmental testing

Raloxifene is a nonsteroidal, selective estrogen receptor modulator being developed by Eli Lilly and Company as a therapeutic agent for postmenopausal osteoporosis. In the ovariectomized (OVX) rat, raloxifene prevents the loss of bone at the distal metaphysis of the femur, proximal tibia, and vertebrae; reduces cancellous bone resorption; and reduces serum cholesterol, but does not cause any significant changes in stromal eosinophilia or uterine epithelium. In estrogen-stimulated OVX rats, raloxifene prevents the morning lowering of serum luteinizing hormone levels, produces a reduction in afternoon serum prolactin levels, antagonizes pituitary weight increase, and antagonizes stimulation of mammary gland development. Raloxifene also has been shown to exhibit antiestrogenic activity in several in vivo and in vitro mammary tumor models. Raloxifene treatment results in regression of endometriosis in both a surgically prepared, rat uterine explant model and in Rhesus macaques diagnosed with spontaneous endometriosis before exposure. Also, uterine leiomyomas in estrogen-stimulated OVX guinea pigs regress after the onset of raloxifene treatment. Raloxifene antagonizes testosterone-induced increases in prostate weight of castrated rats, but does not bind to androgen receptors or affect prostatic 5-alpha-reductase or testicular steroid 17-alpha-hydroxylase activity. A series of preclinical toxicology studies was designed to characterize reproductive and developmental outcomes following various schedules of raloxifene treatment in rats or rabbits. Studies of female reproduction and developmental outcome were conducted primarily at pharmacologic doses (0.1, 1, or 10 mg/kg/d); male reproductive studies used higher doses (10, 30, or 100 mg/kg/d). In this series of studies, male reproductive end points were not affected, whereas embryo implantation, fetal rabbit morphology, and several aspects of offspring development were disrupted by the lowest dose of maternal raloxifene treatment, a profile consistent with estrogen antagonist activity.