The reliability of visual ERP components in children across the first year of school

Model based fitting of pattern reversal visually evoked potentials provides a reliable characterization of waveform components

Objective

To introduce a novel approach to analyzing pattern reversal visual evoked potentials (prVEPs) using a difference-of-gammas model-based fitting method.

Methods

prVEP was recorded from uninjured youth ages 11-19 years during pre- or postseason sports evaluation. A difference-of-gammas model fit was used to extract the amplitude, peak time, and peak width of each of four gamma components. The within session reliability and stability of fits across a 6-month period were determined. To demonstrate an application of this analysis, changes in parameters across age were determined.

Results

A difference-of-gammas model consisting of four gamma functions was fit to the prVEP of 151 youth. Peak times and amplitudes of functions corresponded to standard measures of the N75, P100, and N135 components respectively, and a late gamma peak (mean peak time 219 ms). We extracted the peak width, which increased with each subsequent temporal peak. Parameter fits were reliable within sessions (correlation coefficient >0.92 for all measured parameters; good agreement on Bland-Altman calculation) and were stable between sessions separated by less than 6 months (correlation coefficient > 0.90). Standard peak analysis metrics extracted from the difference-of-gamma model fits were largely consistent with gold-standard peak analysis measurements.

Conclusions

The difference-of-gammas model provides a stable and reliable within-participant representation of the global temporal variability of prVEP waveforms across a large sample of youth.

Significance

Using difference-of-gammas model to characterize the global temporal variability of the prVEP waveform offers a promising direction to enhance analysis for identifying and following subtle changes in neurologic conditions.

Stability, change, and reliable individual differences in electroencephalography measures: a lifespan perspective on progress and opportunities

Electroencephalographic (EEG) methods have great potential to serve both basic and clinical science approaches to understand individual differences in human neural function. Importantly, the psychometric properties of EEG data, such as internal consistency and test-retest reliability, constrain their ability to differentiate individuals successfully. Rapid and recent technological and computational advancements in EEG research make it timely to revisit the topic of psychometric reliability in the context of individual difference analyses. Moreover, pediatric and clinical samples provide some of the most salient and urgent opportunities to apply individual difference approaches, but the changes these populations experience over time also provide unique challenges from a psychometric perspective. Here we take a developmental neuroscience perspective to consider progress and new opportunities for parsing the reliability and stability of individual differences in EEG measurements across the lifespan. We first conceptually map the different profiles of measurement reliability expected for different types of individual difference analyses over the lifespan. Next, we summarize and evaluate the state of the field's empirical knowledge and need for testing measurement reliability, both internal consistency and test-retest reliability, across EEG measures of power, event-related potentials, nonlinearity, and functional connectivity across ages. Finally, we highlight how standardized pre-processing software for EEG denoising and empirical metrics of individual data quality may be used to further improve EEG-based individual differences research moving forward. We also include recommendations and resources throughout that individual researchers can implement to improve the utility and reproducibility of individual differences analyses with EEG across the lifespan.