Effect of GLP-1 and GIP on C-peptide secretion after glucagon or mixed meal tests: Significance in assessing B-cell function in diabetes

Effects of dulaglutide and trelagliptin on beta-cell function in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled study: DUET-beta study

Aims

This randomized, open-label, parallel-group, controlled trial compared the effects of dulaglutide and trelagliptin on beta-cell function in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Materials and methods

For 24 weeks, participants received dulaglutide (0.75 mg/week) or trelagliptin (100 mg/week), after which beta-cell function was evaluated using a glucagon stimulation test-based disposition index. The primary endpoint was the change in disposition index over the 24-week treatment period.

Results

Fifty patients with type 2 diabetes who received metformin with or without basal insulin were randomized to receive dulaglutide or trelagliptin. Forty-eight patients completed the 24-week dulaglutide (n = 23) or trelagliptin (n = 25) treatment. The dulaglutide group reduced HbA1c levels more than the trelagliptin group (dulaglutide: - 0.77% ± 0.07% vs. trelagliptin: - 0.57% ± 0.07%; p = 0.04). Change in disposition index during the 24 weeks did not differ between the groups (dulaglutide: - 0.07 ± 1.08 vs. trelagliptin: + 0.59 ± 1.04; p = 0.66), but the dulaglutide group increased HOMA2-%β levels more than the trelagliptin group (dulaglutide: + 26.2 ± 4.3% vs. trelagliptin: + 5.4 ± 4.1%; p = 0.001). The dulaglutide group showed greater body fat mass reduction than the trelagliptin group (dulaglutide: - 1.2 ± 0.3 kg vs. trelagliptin: - 0.3 ± 0.2 kg; p = 0.02) without skeletal muscle mass loss.

Conclusion

Dulaglutide and trelagliptin had similar effects on beta-cell function according to the glucagon stimulation test-based disposition index. However, dulaglutide promoted improved HOMA2-%β levels compared to trelagliptin and body fat mass was reduced without loss of skeletal muscle mass (UMIN-CTR 000024164).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13340-024-00717-6.

Evaluation of type 1 diabetes' partial clinical remission after three years of heterologous adipose tissue derived stromal/stem cells transplantation associated with vitamin D supplementation

BACKGROUND

Mesenchymal stem cell infusion and vitamin D supplementation may have immunomodulatory actions that could prolong the preservation of residual insulin secretion in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Intervention with these agents after onset of T1D could favor the development of a remission phase, with potential clinical impact. We aimed to compare the presence of clinical remission (CR), glycemic control and daily insulin requirement at 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months after the diagnosis of T1D using IDAA1c in patients who received therapy with adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cell (ASC) infusion and vitamin D supplementation and a control group.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from the medical records of patients with T1D diagnosed between 15 and 40 years. Partial CR was defined as an IDAA1c index < 9. Patients in the intervention group received an infusion of adipose tissued-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs) within 3 months after diagnosis and supplementation with 2000 IU of cholecalciferol for 1 year, started on the day following the infusion. Partial CR was also determined using the ISPAD criteria, to assess its agreement with IDAA1c.

RESULTS

A total of 28 patients were evaluated: 7 in the intervention group (group 1) and 21 in the control group (group 2). All patients in group 1 evolved with partial CR while only 46.7% of patients in group 2 had this outcome. Group 1 had a higher frequency of CR when evaluated with IDAA1c and ISPAD criteria. The mean duration of CR varied between the two criteria. Although HbA1c was similar between groups during follow-up, group 1 had a lower total daily insulin requirement (p < 0.005) at all time points. At 36 months, group 1 used 49% of the total daily insulin dose used by group 2 with similar glycemic control.

CONCLUSION

The intervention with infusion of ASC + vitamin D supplementation was associated with partial CR at 6 months. Although there were no differences in CR established by the IDAA1c and ISPAD criteria after three years of follow-up, patients who underwent intervention had nearly the half insulin requirement of controls with conventional treatment, with similar glycemic control.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

37001514.0.0000.5257.

Pancreatic beta-cell function dynamics in youth with GCK, HNF1A, and KCNJ11 genes mutations during mixed meal tolerance test

OBJECTIVE

The aims were (1) to assess beta-cell function in GCK diabetes patients over 2-year period; (2) to evaluate the dynamics of beta-cell function in HNF1A and KCNJ11 patients after treatment optimization; using mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT) as a gold standard for non-invasive beta-cell function assessment.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Twenty-two GCK diabetes patients, 22 healthy subjects, 4 patients with HNF1A and 2 with KCNJ11 were recruited. Firstly, beta-cell function was compared between GCK patients versus controls; the dynamics of beta-cell function were assessed in GCK patients with two MMTTs in 2-year period. Secondly, the change of beta-cell function was evaluated in HNF1A and KCNJ11 patients after successful treatment optimization in 2-year period.

RESULTS

GCK diabetes patients had lower area under the curve (AUC) of C-peptide (CP), average CP and peak CP compared to controls. Also, higher levels of fasting, average, peak and AUC of glycemia during MMTT were found in GCK patients compared to healthy controls. No significant changes in either CP or glycemia dynamics were observed in GCK diabetes group comparing 1st and 2nd MMTTs. Patients with HNF1A and KCNJ11 diabetes had significantly improved diabetes control 2 years after the treatment was optimized (HbA1c 7.1% vs. 5.9% [54 mmol/mol vs. 41 mmol/mol], respectively, p = 0.028). Higher peak CP and lower HbA1c were found during 2nd MMTT in patients with targeted treatment compared to the 1st MMTT before the treatment change.

CONCLUSION

In short-term perspective, GCK diabetes group revealed no deterioration of beta-cell function. Individualized treatment in monogenic diabetes showed improved beta-cell function.

C-peptide determination in the diagnosis of type of diabetes and its management: A clinical perspective

Impaired beta-cell function is a recognized cornerstone of diabetes pathophysiology. Estimates of insulin secretory capacity are useful to inform clinical practice, helping to classify types of diabetes, complication risk stratification and to guide treatment decisions. Because C-peptide secretion mirrors beta-cell function, it has emerged as a valuable clinical biomarker, mainly in autoimmune diabetes and especially in adult-onset diabetes. Nonetheless, the lack of robust evidence about the clinical utility of C-peptide measurement in type 2 diabetes, where insulin resistance is a major confounder, limits its use in such cases. Furthermore, problems remain in the standardization of the assay for C-peptide, raising concerns about comparability of measurements between different laboratories. To approach the heterogeneity and complexity of diabetes, reliable, simple and inexpensive clinical markers are required that can inform clinicians about probable pathophysiology and disease progression, and so enable personalization of management and therapy. This review summarizes the current evidence base about the potential value of C-peptide in the management of the two most prevalent forms of diabetes (type 2 diabetes and autoimmune diabetes) to address how its measurement may assist daily clinical practice and to highlight current limitations and areas of uncertainties to be covered by future research.

Partial Clinical Remission of Type 1 Diabetes: The Need for an Integrated Functional Definition Based on Insulin-Dose Adjusted A1c and Insulin Sensitivity Score

Despite advances in the characterization of partial clinical remission (PR) of type 1 diabetes, an accurate definition of PR remains problematic. Two recent studies in children with new-onset T1D demonstrated serious limitations of the present gold standard definition of PR, a stimulated C-peptide (SCP) concentration of >300 pmol/L. The first study employed the concept of insulin sensitivity score (ISS) to show that 55% of subjects with new-onset T1D and a detectable SCP level of >300 pmol/L had low insulin sensitivity (IS) and thus might not be in remission when assessed by insulin-dose adjusted A1c (IDAA1c), an acceptable clinical marker of PR. The second study, a randomized controlled trial of vitamin D (ergocalciferol) administration in children and adolescents with new-onset T1D, demonstrated no significant difference in SCP between the ergocalciferol and placebo groups, but showed a significant blunting of the temporal trend in both A1c and IDAA1c in the ergocalciferol group. These two recent studies indicate the poor specificity and sensitivity of SCP to adequately characterize PR and thus call for a re-examination of current approaches to the definition of PR. They demonstrate the limited sensitivity of SCP, a static biochemical test, to detect the complex physiological changes that occur during PR such as changes in insulin sensitivity, insulin requirements, body weight, and physical activity. These shortcomings call for a broader definition of PR using a combination of functional markers such as IDAA1c and ISS to provide a valid assessment of PR that reaches beyond the static changes in SCP alone.

Kinetics of C-peptide during mixed meal test and its value for treatment optimization in monogenic diabetes patients

AIM

The mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT) is a gold standard for evaluating beta-cell function. There is limited data on MMTT in monogenic diabetes (MD). Therefore, we aimed to analyze plasma C-peptide (CP) kinetics during MMTT in young MODY and neonatal diabetes patients as a biomarker for beta-cell function.

METHODS

We included 41 patients with MD diagnosis (22 GCK, 8 HNF1A, 3 HNF4A, 4 KCNJ11, 2 ABCC8, 1 INS, 1 KLF11). Standardized 3-hour MMTT with glycemia and plasma CP measurements were performed for all individuals. Pancreatic beta-cell response was assessed by the area under the curve CP (AUC_CP), the baseline CP (CP_Base) and the peak CP (CP_max). Threshold points of CP_Base, CP₉₀, CP_max and CP_AUC were determined from analysis of ROC curves.

RESULTS

GCK diabetes patients had significantly higher AUC_CP, CP_Base and CP_max compared to HNF4A and KCNJ11 patients. In HNF4A, KCNJ11 and ABCC8 patients with all CP levels < 200 pmol/L, the treatment change attempt to sulfonylurea agent was unsuccessful. The ROC analysis showed that CP baseline threshold equal or higher to 133.5 pmol/L could be used to predict successful switch to oral agents.

CONCLUSION

A pretreatment challenge with MMTT might be used to guide the optimal treatment after molecular diagnosis of MD.

Impact of mixed meal tolerance test composition on measures of beta-cell function in type 2 diabetes

Background

Application of mixed meal tolerance tests (MMTT) to measure beta-cell function in long-term studies is limited by modification of the commercial products occurring over time. This study assessed the intra-individual reliability of MMTTs and compared the effects of liquid meals differing in macronutrient composition on the estimation of beta-cell function in type 2 diabetes (T2DM).

Methods

To test the reliability of MMTTs, 10 people with T2DM (age 58 ± 11 years, body mass index 30.0 ± 4.9 kg/m²) received Boost®high Protein 20 g protein three times. For comparing different meals, another 10 persons with T2DM (58 ± 5 years, 31.9 ± 5.3 kg/m²) ingested either Boost®high Protein 20 g protein or the isocaloric Boost®high Protein 15 g protein containing 35% less protein and 18% more carbohydrates. C-peptide, insulin and glucose release were assessed from the incremental area under the concentration time curve (iAUC) and the intra- and inter-individual variation of these parameters from the coefficients of variations (CV).

Results

Repetitive ingestion of one meal revealed intra-individual CVs for the iAUCs of C-peptide, insulin and glucose, which were at least 3-times lower than the inter-individual variation of these parameters (18.2%, 19.7% and 18.9% vs. 74.2%, 70.5% and 207.7%) indicating a good reliability. Ingestion of two different meals resulted in comparable intra-individual CVs of the iAUCs of C-peptide and insulin (16.9%, 20.5%).

Conclusion

MMTTs provide reliable estimation of beta-cell function in people with T2DM. Furthermore, moderate differences in the protein and carbohydrate contents in a standardized liquid meal do not result in relevant changes of C-peptide and insulin responses.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, Identifier number: NCT01055093. Registered 22 January 2010 – Retrospectively registered, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT01055093