Lmo4 and Other LIM domain only factors are necessary and sufficient for multiple retinal cell type development

Pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 regulates LMO4 expression in psoriatic keratinocytes via AKT/STAT3 pathway

The transcription factor LIM-only protein 4 (LMO4) is overexpressed in the psoriatic epidermis and regulates keratinocyte proliferation and differentiation. High LMO4 expression levels are induced by interleukin-23 (IL-23) to activate the AKT/STAT3 signaling pathway. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is mainly involved in regulating T cell functions and development in patients with psoriasis. However, whether LMO4 expression is regulated by IL-6 remains unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to explore the role and molecular mechanisms of IL-6 in regulating LMO4 expression. The interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels in human plasma were determined using a chemiluminescence immunoassay system. A psoriasis-like mouse model was established using imiquimod induction. Epidermal keratinocytes (HaCaT) were cultured in defined keratinocyte-serum-free medium and stimulated by IL-6 alone or with inhibitors. The proteins of interest were detected using western blot analysis, immunofluorescence, and immunohistochemistry. The 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine assay was used to detect cell proliferation. The results revealed that IL-6 levels were markedly increased in the plasma of patients with psoriasis, compared to healthy control. The high expression of LMO4 was consistent with high levels of IL-6, p-AKT, and p-STAT3 in the lesions of both psoriasis patients and imiquimod-induced psoriasis-like mice. IL-6 activates the AKT/STAT3 signaling pathway, followed by LMO4 high-expression in HaCaT cells. IL-6 induces HaCaT proliferation and differentiation via AKT/STAT3 signaling pathway activation. We think that the high expression of LMO4 in psoriatic keratinocytes requires IL-6 to activate the AKT/STAT3 signaling pathway and leads to epidermal keratinocytes abnormal proliferation and differentiation.

Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals the landscape of early female germ cell development

Meiosis initiation is a crucial step for the production of haploid gametes, which occurs from anterior to posterior in fetal ovaries. The asynchrony of the transition from mitosis to meiosis results in heterogeneity in the female germ cell populations, which limits the studies of meiosis initiation and progression at a higher resolution level. To dissect the process of meiosis initiation, we investigated the transcriptional profiles of 19 363 single germ cells collected from E12.5, E14.5, and E16.5 mouse fetal ovaries. Clustering analysis identified seven groups and defined dozens of corresponding transcription factors, providing a global view of cellular differentiation from primordial germ cells toward meiocytes. Furthermore, we explored the dynamics of gene expression within the developmental trajectory with special focus on the critical state of meiosis. We found that meiosis initiation occurs as early as E12.5 and the cluster of oogonia_4 is the critical state between mitosis and meiosis. Our data provide key insights into the transcriptome features of peri-meiotic female germ cells, which offers new information not only on meiosis initiation and progression but also on screening pathogenic mutations in meiosis-associated diseases.

Necessity and Sufficiency of Ldb1 in the Generation, Differentiation and Maintenance of Non-photoreceptor Cell Types During Retinal Development

During mammalian retinal development, the multipotent progenitors differentiate into all classes of retinal cells under the delicate control of transcriptional factors. The deficiency of a transcription cofactor, the LIM-domain binding protein Ldb1, has been shown to cause proliferation and developmental defects in multiple tissues including cardiovascular, hematopoietic, and nervous systems; however, it remains unclear whether and how it regulates retinal development. By expression profiling, RNA in situ hybridization and immunostaining, here we show that Ldb1 is expressed in the progenitors during early retinal development, but later its expression gradually shifts to non-photoreceptor cell types including bipolar, amacrine, horizontal, ganglion, and Müller glial cells. Retina-specific ablation of Ldb1 in mice resulted in microphthalmia, optic nerve hypoplasia, retinal thinning and detachment, and profound vision impairment as determined by electroretinography. In the mutant retina, there was precocious differentiation of amacrine and horizontal cells, indicating a requirement of Ldb1 in maintaining the retinal progenitor pool. Additionally, all non-photoreceptor cell types were greatly reduced which appeared to be caused by a generation defect and/or retinal degeneration via excessive cell apoptosis. Furthermore, we showed that misexpressed Ldb1 was sufficient to promote the generation of bipolar, amacrine, horizontal, ganglion, and Müller glial cells at the expense of photoreceptors. Together, these results demonstrate that Ldb1 is not only necessary but also sufficient for the development and/or maintenance of non-photoreceptor cell types, and implicate that the pleiotropic functions of Ldb1 during retinal development are context-dependent and determined by its interaction with diverse LIM-HD (LIM-homeodomain) and LMO (LIM domain-only) binding protein partners.

Reconnecting Eye to Brain

Although much is known about the regenerative capacity of retinal ganglion cells, very significant barriers remain in our ability to restore visual function following traumatic injury or disease-induced degeneration. Here we summarize our current understanding of the factors regulating axon guidance and target engagement in regenerating axons, and review the state of the field of neural regeneration, focusing on the visual system and highlighting studies using other model systems that can inform analysis of visual system regeneration. This overview is motivated by a Society for Neuroscience Satellite meeting, "Reconnecting Neurons in the Visual System," held in October 2015 sponsored by the National Eye Institute as part of their "Audacious Goals Initiative" and co-organized by Carol Mason (Columbia University) and Michael Crair (Yale University). The collective wisdom of the conference participants pointed to important gaps in our knowledge and barriers to progress in promoting the restoration of visual system function. This article is thus a summary of our existing understanding of visual system regeneration and provides a blueprint for future progress in the field.

Ipsilateral and Contralateral Retinal Ganglion Cells Express Distinct Genes during Decussation at the Optic Chiasm

The increasing availability of transcriptomic technologies within the last decade has facilitated high-throughput identification of gene expression differences that define distinct cell types as well as the molecular pathways that drive their specification. The retinal projection neurons, retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), can be categorized into distinct morphological and functional subtypes and by the laterality of their projections. Here, we present a method for purifying the sparse population of ipsilaterally projecting RGCs in mouse retina from their contralaterally projecting counterparts during embryonic development through rapid retrograde labeling followed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Through microarray analysis, we uncovered the distinct molecular signatures that define and distinguish ipsilateral and contralateral RGCs during the critical period of axonal outgrowth and decussation, with more than 300 genes differentially expressed within these two cell populations. Among the differentially expressed genes confirmed through in vivo expression validation, several genes that mark “immaturity” are expressed within postmitotic ipsilateral RGCs. Moreover, at least one complementary pair, Igf1 and Igfbp5, is upregulated in contralateral or ipsilateral RGCs, respectively, and may represent signaling pathways that determine ipsilateral versus contralateral RGC identity. Importantly, the cell cycle regulator cyclin D2 is highly expressed in peripheral ventral retina with a dynamic expression pattern that peaks during the period of ipsilateral RGC production. Thus, the molecular signatures of ipsilateral and contralateral RGCs and the mechanisms that regulate their differentiation are more diverse than previously expected.