Application of a non-target variable data independent workflow (vDIA) for the screening of prohibited substances in doping control testing

Recent advances in mass spectrometry for the detection of doping

INTRODUCTION

The analysis of doping control samples is preferably performed by mass spectrometry, because obtained results meet the highest analytical standards and ensure an impressive degree of reliability. The advancement in mass spectrometry and all its associated technologies thus allow for continuous improvements in doping control analysis.

AREAS COVERED

Modern mass spectrometric systems have reached a status of increased sensitivity, robustness, and specificity within the last decade. The improved sensitivity in particular has, on the other hand, also led to the detection of drug residues that were attributable to scenarios where the prohibited substances were not administered consciously but rather by the unconscious ingestion of or exposure to contaminated products. These scenarios and their doubtless clarification represent a great challenge. Here, too, modern MS systems and their applications can provide good insights in the interpretation of dose-related metabolism of prohibited substances. In addition to the development of new instruments itself, software-assisted analysis of the sometimes highly complex data is playing an increasingly important role and facilitating the work of doping control laboratories.

EXPERT OPINION

The sensitive analysis and evaluation of a higher number of samples in a shorter time is made possible by the ongoing developments in mass spectrometry.

Factors affecting untargeted detection of doping agents in biological samples

Doping control is essential for sports, and untargeted detection of doping agents (UDDA) is the holy grail for anti-doping strategies. The present study examined major factors impacting UDDA with metabolomic data processing, including the use of blank samples, signal-to-noise ratio thresholds, and the minimum chromatographic peak intensity. Contrary to data processing in metabolomics studies, both blank sample use (either blank solvent or plasma) and marking of background compounds were found to be unnecessary for UDDA in biological samples, the first such report to the authors' knowledge. The minimum peak intensity required to detect chromatographic peaks affected the limit of detection (LOD) and data processing time for untargeted detection of 57 drugs spiked into equine plasma. The ratio of the mean (ROM) of the extracted ion chromatographic peak area of a compound in the sample group (SG) to that in the control group (CG) impacted its LOD, and a small ROM value such as 2 is recommended for UDDA. Mathematical modeling of the required signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) for UDDA provided insights into the effect of the number of samples in the SG, the number of positive samples, and the ROM on the required S/N, highlighting the power of mathematics in addressing issues in analytical chemistry. The UDDA method was validated by its successful identification of untargeted doping agents in real-world post-competition equine plasma samples. This advancement in UDDA methodology will be a useful addition to the arsenal of approaches used to combat doping in sports.