Gsx transcription factors repress Iroquois gene expression

Conserved Gsx2/Ind homeodomain monomer versus homodimer DNA binding defines regulatory outcomes in flies and mice

How homeodomain proteins gain sufficient specificity to control different cell fates has been a long-standing problem in developmental biology. The conserved Gsx homeodomain proteins regulate specific aspects of neural development in animals from flies to mammals, and yet they belong to a large transcription factor family that bind nearly identical DNA sequences in vitro. Here, we show that the mouse and fly Gsx factors unexpectedly gain DNA binding specificity by forming cooperative homodimers on precisely spaced and oriented DNA sites. High-resolution genomic binding assays revealed that Gsx2 binds both monomer and homodimer sites in the developing mouse ventral telencephalon. Importantly, reporter assays showed that Gsx2 mediates opposing outcomes in a DNA binding site-dependent manner: Monomer Gsx2 binding represses transcription, whereas homodimer binding stimulates gene expression. In Drosophila, the Gsx homolog, Ind, similarly represses or stimulates transcription in a site-dependent manner via an autoregulatory enhancer containing a combination of monomer and homodimer sites. Integrating these findings, we test a model showing how the homodimer to monomer site ratio and the Gsx protein levels defines gene up-regulation versus down-regulation. Altogether, these data serve as a new paradigm for how cooperative homeodomain transcription factor binding can increase target specificity and alter regulatory outcomes.

Physical interactions between Gsx2 and Ascl1 balance progenitor expansion versus neurogenesis in the mouse lateral ganglionic eminence

The Gsx2 homeodomain transcription factor promotes neural progenitor identity in the lateral ganglionic eminence (LGE), despite upregulating the neurogenic factor Ascl1. How this balance in maturation is maintained is unclear. Here, we show that Gsx2 and Ascl1 are co-expressed in subapical progenitors that have unique transcriptional signatures in LGE ventricular zone (VZ) cells. Moreover, whereas Ascl1 misexpression promotes neurogenesis in dorsal telencephalic progenitors, the co-expression of Gsx2 with Ascl1 inhibits neurogenesis. Using luciferase assays, we found that Gsx2 reduces the ability of Ascl1 to activate gene expression in a dose-dependent and DNA binding-independent manner. Furthermore, Gsx2 physically interacts with the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) domain of Ascl1, and DNA-binding assays demonstrated that this interaction interferes with the ability of Ascl1 to bind DNA. Finally, we modified a proximity ligation assay for tissue sections and found that Ascl1-Gsx2 interactions are enriched within LGE VZ progenitors, whereas Ascl1-Tcf3 (E-protein) interactions predominate in the subventricular zone. Thus, Gsx2 contributes to the balance between progenitor maintenance and neurogenesis by physically interacting with Ascl1, interfering with its DNA binding and limiting neurogenesis within LGE progenitors.

Early transcriptional targets of MyoD link myogenesis and somitogenesis

In order to identify early transcriptional targets of MyoD prior to skeletal muscle differentiation, we have undertaken a transcriptomic analysis on gastrula stage Xenopus embryos in which MyoD has been knocked-down. Our validated list of genes transcriptionally regulated by MyoD includes Esr1 and Esr2, which are known targets of Notch signalling, and Tbx6, mesogenin, and FoxC1; these genes are all are known to be essential for normal somitogenesis but are expressed surprisingly early in the mesoderm. In addition we found that MyoD is required for the expression of myf5 in the early mesoderm, in contrast to the reverse relationship of these two regulators in amniote somites. These data highlight a role for MyoD in the early mesoderm in regulating a set of genes that are essential for both myogenesis and somitogenesis.