Canalization by Selection of de Novo Induced Mutations

One of the most fascinating scientific problems, and a subject of intense debate, is that of the mechanisms of biological evolution. In this context, Waddington elaborated the concepts of "canalization and assimilation" to explain how an apparently somatic variant induced by stress could become heritable through the germline in Drosophila He resolved this seemingly Lamarckian phenomenon by positing the existence of cryptic mutations that can be expressed and selected under stress. To investigate the relevance of such mechanisms, we performed experiments following the Waddington procedure, then isolated and fixed three phenotypic variants along with another induced mutation that was not preceded by any phenocopy. All the fixed mutations we looked at were actually generated de novo by DNA deletions or transposon insertions, highlighting a novel mechanism for the assimilation process. Our study shows that heat-shock stress produces both phenotypic variants and germline mutations, and suggests an alternative explanation to that of Waddington for the apparent assimilation of an acquired character. The selection of the variants, under stress, for a number of generations allows for the coselection of newly induced corresponding germline mutations, making the phenotypic variants appear heritable.

Expression of the 53 kD forked protein rescues F-actin bundle formation and mutant bristle phenotypes in Drosophila

forked mutations affect bristle development in Drosophila pupae, resulting in short, thick, gnarled bristles in the adult. The forked proteins are components of 200-300-microm-long actin fiber bundles that are present transiently during pupal development [Petersen et al., 1994: Genetics 136:173-182]. These bundles are composed of segments of 3-10 microm long, and forked protein is localized along the actin fiber bundle segments and accumulates at the junctions connecting them longitudinally. In the forked mutants, f(36a) and f(hd), F-actin bundles are greatly reduced in number and size, and bundle segmentation is absent. The p-element, P[w(+), falter] contains a 5.3-kb fragment of the forked gene that encodes the 53-kD forked protein [Lankenau et al., 1996: Mol Cell Biol 16:3535-3544]. Expression of only the 53-kD forked protein is sufficient to rescue the actin bundle and bristle phenotypes of f(36a) and f(hd) mutant flies. The 5.3-kb forked sequence, although smaller than the 13-kb region previously shown to rescue forked mutants [Petersen et al., 1994: Genetics 136:173-182], does contain the core forked sequence that encodes actin binding and bundling domains in cultured mammalian cells [Grieshaber and Petersen, 1999: J Cell Sci 112:2203-2211]. These data show that the 53-kD forked protein is sufficient for normal bristle development and that the domains shown previously to be important for actin bundling in cell culture may be all that are required for normal actin bundle formation in developing Drosophila bristles.

Stress-induced phenocopy of C. elegans defines functional steps of sensory organ differentiation

The differentiation of male specific sensory rays in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans is a complex process regulated by multiple genetic components. A novel approach with heat shock treatment was employed to show that multistep regulation is involved in this process. Intervention in this stepwise regulation resulted in phenocopy of specific gene mutations. The results suggest that differential gene function acting at a precise time frame is necessary to guide the normal differentiation of sensory rays.

The basis for a heat-induced developmental defect: defining crucial lesions

Because lethal heat shocks perturb a multitude of cellular processes, the primary lesions responsible for death from heat stress remain to be defined. In Drosophila, sublethal heat treatments produce developmental anomalies that frequently mimic the effects of known mutations and are hence referred to as phenocopies. Mutations subject to phenocopy mimicry provide signposts to those biological processes most sensitive to heat and most important for the function and survival of the organism as a whole. We have analyzed a particular developmental defect inducible in early embryos of Drosophila melanogaster. By molecular, phenotypic, and genetic criteria, we have found extensive parallels between this phenocopy and certain dominant mutations in the segmentation gene fushi tarazu (ftz). Our analysis of this phenocopy indicates that the crucial lesion is interference with proper turnover of ftz protein, resulting in ftz overexpression. Our results provide a novel explanation for a heat-induced developmental defect. Perturbations in relative amounts of important regulatory proteins may be a common mechanism by which heat-shock phenocopies arise.

Effects of heat and chemical stress on development

Similarities in the means by which developmental defects are induced in vertebrates and Drosophila suggest that some kinds of defects may be induced by similar mechanisms. The similarities include the fact that heat and a group of chemicals that induce synthesis of heat-shock proteins induce defects in mammals, chickens, and flies. Different kinds of defects are even produced in one type of animal, depending on the precise timing of the environmental insult. The effectiveness of the environmental treatment in inducing defects depends on the genetic background of the animal as well as on past exposure to chemicals and heat. Developmental defects induced by heat in mice, rats, and flies can all be prevented by thermotolerance-inducing treatments. The basis for these effects has been studied at the molecular level in Drosophila, and the evidence indicates that these teratogens and the thermotolerance-inducing treatments affect the level or timing of expression of specific genes during critical periods in the developmental program.

Stages of cell hair construction in Drosophila

The construction of cell hairs (trichomes) on the wings of Drosophila occurs in synchrony on 30,000 cells over a period of about 20 hr. Changes in both morphology and patterns of protein synthesis occur rapidly during this time period. In this report we describe the use of stress-induced (heat shock) abnormalities in morphogenesis to provide further details on the stepwise processes of differentiation within single wing cells. A cartoon summary of the overall process and a discussion of some possible mechanisms is included.

Heat shock causes the collapse of the intermediate filament cytoskeleton in Drosophila embryos

Heat shock has a dramatic effect on the organization of the cytoplasm, causing the intermediate filament cytoskeleton to aggregate at the nucleus. This has previously been shown in cultured Drosophila and mammalian cells. In this paper we analyze the heat lability of the intermediate filament cytoskeleton in early Drosophila embryos by indirect immunofluorescence. At all stages of embryogenesis tested, the intermediate filament cytoskeleton, which is maternally provided, is severely disturbed by 30 min heat shock at 37 degrees C. After the nuclei have migrated to the subcortical cytoplasm, it collapses around them. Nuclei in all heat-shocked embryos are considerably enlarged and become displaced. Embryos before cellular blastoderm stage, in which heat shock protein synthesis is not inducible, are irreversibly arrested in development by heat shock. Embryos at or after cellular blastoderm, which do synthesize heat shock proteins in response to stress, are also immediately arrested in development but continue development when returned to 25 degrees C. We discuss the possibility that cytoplasmic events such as the intermediate filament cytoskeleton rearrangement may be involved in heat shock-mediated phenocopy induction.

Effects of heat shock on protein processing and turnover in developing Drosophila wings

Developmental defects called phenocopies can be induced by heating Drosophila melanogaster pupae at specific developmental stages. The induction of the defects is thought to be a result of interference with gene expression at some level (Petersen and Mitchell, Dev Biol 1987; 121:335-341, 1987). Here we look at protein turnover in developing 52-hour wings and at the effect of heat on the proteolytic processing of three proteins that normally turn over rapidly. The effect of the heat treatment itself on the turnover of each protein is different. However, all of the proteins appear to be stabilized at 25 degrees C during recovery from severe heat shocks.

Protein synthesis patterns following stage-specific heat shock in early Drosophila embryos

Very short heat shocks are administered to carefully staged early embryos of Drosophila melanogaster, and the effects on protein synthesis pattern investigated. A shock as short as 2 min will induce the heat shock response (reduction of normal protein synthesis, increased synthesis of the heat shock proteins) in syncytial blastoderm or later stages. Thus the initial events of the heat shock response must occur within 2 min, and not reverse upon rapid return to 22 degrees C. A low level of synthesis of the 70 kDA heat shock protein is sometimes visible in unshocked animals, but may be induced by the labeling procedure. Survival following a short shock is not strictly correlated with a high level of heat shock response. Pre-blastoderm embryos do not produce significant heat shock protein, but survive a 2 min 43 degrees C heat shock better than do heat shock response competent blastoderm embryos. The protein synthesis pattern prior to the blastoderm stage is very stable, possibly enhancing survival following a short shock. Shocks of 3 min or longer are more detrimental to pre-blastoderm embryos than to later stages, confirming the role of the heat shock response in survival following a longer shock. Stage-specific developmental defects (phenocopies) may be induced by heat shock at the blastoderm or later stages. Induction of these defects may require disruption of the normal protein synthesis pattern. Use of very short heat shocks to induce the heat shock response will be valuable in identifying the precise time at which a specific defect can be induced.

The induction of a multiple wing hair phenocopy by heat shock in mutant heterozygotes

Phenocopies are developmental defects induced by environmental treatments during differentiation. Because of their resemblance to mutant phenotypes it has been suggested that phenocopies are due to environmental effects on the expression of specific genes during development. In this paper we describe the heat shock (40.8 degrees C) induction of a multiple wing hair phenocopy in the mutant heterozygote (mwh/+). The mwh phenocopy is only induced in heterozygotes of the recessive mutant during a short sensitive period which appears to be the time of expression of the multiple wing hair gene. We suggest that this phenocopy is due to failure of mwh gene expression and that phenocopy sensitive periods may be useful in identifying expression periods for particular genes during development. Furthermore we have been able to demonstrate that a 35 degrees C pretreatment will prevent the induction of the multiple wing hair phenocopy. A similar 35 degrees C pretreatment prevents induction of several different phenocopies by heat in wild-type flies (N. S. Petersen and H. K. Mitchell (1985). In "Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Vol. X, Biochemistry." Pergamon, New York). This indicates a common molecular mechanism for both the induction and the prevention of heat-induced phenocopies.