Evaluating the carbon balance estimate from an automated ground-level flux chamber system in artificial grass mesocosms

Revisiting the choice of the driving temperature for eddy covariance CO2 flux partitioning

So-called CO₂ flux partitioning algorithms are widely used to partition the net ecosystem CO₂ exchange into the two component fluxes, gross primary productivity and ecosystem respiration. Common CO₂ flux partitioning algorithms conceptualize ecosystem respiration to originate from a single source, requiring the choice of a corresponding driving temperature. Using a conceptual dual-source respiration model, consisting of an above- and a below-ground respiration source each driven by a corresponding temperature, we demonstrate that the typical phase shift between air and soil temperature gives rise to a hysteresis relationship between ecosystem respiration and temperature. The hysteresis proceeds in a clockwise fashion if soil temperature is used to drive ecosystem respiration, while a counter-clockwise response is observed when ecosystem respiration is related to air temperature. As a consequence, nighttime ecosystem respiration is smaller than daytime ecosystem respiration when referenced to soil temperature, while the reverse is true for air temperature. We confirm these qualitative modelling results using measurements of day and night ecosystem respiration made with opaque chambers in a short-statured mountain grassland. Inferring daytime from nighttime ecosystem respiration or vice versa, as attempted by CO₂ flux partitioning algorithms, using a single-source respiration model is thus an oversimplification resulting in biased estimates of ecosystem respiration. We discuss the likely magnitude of the bias, options for minimizing it and conclude by emphasizing that the systematic uncertainty of gross primary productivity and ecosystem respiration inferred through CO₂ flux partitioning needs to be better quantified and reported.

Colonization of a Deglaciated Moraine: Contrasting Patterns of Carbon Uptake and Release from C3 and CAM Plants

INTRODUCTION

Current glacier retreat makes vast mountain ranges available for vegetation establishment and growth. As a result, carbon (C) is accumulated in the soil, in a negative feedback to climate change. Little is known about the effective C budget of these new ecosystems and how the presence of different vegetation communities influences CO2 fluxes.

METHODS

On the Matsch glacier forefield (Alps, Italy) we measured over two growing seasons the Net Ecosystem Exchange (NEE) of a typical grassland, dominated by the C3 Festuca halleri All., and a community dominated by the CAM rosettes Sempervivum montanum L. Using transparent and opaque chambers, with air temperature as the driver, we partitioned NEE to calculate Ecosystem Respiration (Reco) and Gross Ecosystem Exchange (GEE). In addition, soil and vegetation samples were collected from the same sites to estimate the Net Ecosystem Carbon Balance (NECB).

RESULTS

The two communities showed contrasting GEE but similar Reco patterns, and as a result they were significantly different in NEE during the period measured. The grassland acted as a C sink, with a total cumulated value of -46.4±35.5 g C m-2 NEE, while the plots dominated by the CAM rosettes acted as a source, with 31.9±22.4 g C m-2. In spite of the different NEE, soil analysis did not reveal significant differences in carbon accumulation of the two plant communities (1770±130 for F. halleri and 2080±230 g C m-2 for S. montanum), suggesting that processes often neglected, like lateral flows and winter respiration, can have a similar relevance as NEE in the determination of the Net Ecosystem Carbon Balance.