1
|
Hagmann RK, Hessburg PF, Prichard SJ, Povak NA, Brown PM, Fulé PZ, Keane RE, Knapp EE, Lydersen JM, Metlen KL, Reilly MJ, Sánchez Meador AJ, Stephens SL, Stevens JT, Taylor AH, Yocom LL, Battaglia MA, Churchill DJ, Daniels LD, Falk DA, Henson P, Johnston JD, Krawchuk MA, Levine CR, Meigs GW, Merschel AG, North MP, Safford HD, Swetnam TW, Waltz AEM. Evidence for widespread changes in the structure, composition, and fire regimes of western North American forests. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS : A PUBLICATION OF THE ECOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2021; 31:e02431. [PMID: 34339067 PMCID: PMC9285092 DOI: 10.1002/eap.2431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Revised: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Implementation of wildfire- and climate-adaptation strategies in seasonally dry forests of western North America is impeded by numerous constraints and uncertainties. After more than a century of resource and land use change, some question the need for proactive management, particularly given novel social, ecological, and climatic conditions. To address this question, we first provide a framework for assessing changes in landscape conditions and fire regimes. Using this framework, we then evaluate evidence of change in contemporary conditions relative to those maintained by active fire regimes, i.e., those uninterrupted by a century or more of human-induced fire exclusion. The cumulative results of more than a century of research document a persistent and substantial fire deficit and widespread alterations to ecological structures and functions. These changes are not necessarily apparent at all spatial scales or in all dimensions of fire regimes and forest and nonforest conditions. Nonetheless, loss of the once abundant influence of low- and moderate-severity fires suggests that even the least fire-prone ecosystems may be affected by alteration of the surrounding landscape and, consequently, ecosystem functions. Vegetation spatial patterns in fire-excluded forested landscapes no longer reflect the heterogeneity maintained by interacting fires of active fire regimes. Live and dead vegetation (surface and canopy fuels) is generally more abundant and continuous than before European colonization. As a result, current conditions are more vulnerable to the direct and indirect effects of seasonal and episodic increases in drought and fire, especially under a rapidly warming climate. Long-term fire exclusion and contemporaneous social-ecological influences continue to extensively modify seasonally dry forested landscapes. Management that realigns or adapts fire-excluded conditions to seasonal and episodic increases in drought and fire can moderate ecosystem transitions as forests and human communities adapt to changing climatic and disturbance regimes. As adaptation strategies are developed, evaluated, and implemented, objective scientific evaluation of ongoing research and monitoring can aid differentiation of warranted and unwarranted uncertainties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. K. Hagmann
- College of the Environment‐SEFSUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashington98195USA
- Applegate Forestry LLCCorvallisOregon97330USA
| | - P. F. Hessburg
- College of the Environment‐SEFSUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashington98195USA
- USDA‐FS, Forestry Sciences LaboratoryPacific Northwest Research StationWenatcheeWashington98801USA
| | - S. J. Prichard
- College of the Environment‐SEFSUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashington98195USA
| | - N. A. Povak
- USDA‐FS, Forestry Sciences LaboratoryPacific Northwest Research StationWenatcheeWashington98801USA
- USDA‐FS, Pacific Southwest Research StationPlacervilleCalifornia95667USA
| | - P. M. Brown
- Rocky Mountain Tree‐Ring ResearchFort CollinsColorado80526USA
| | - P. Z. Fulé
- School of ForestryNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffArizona86011USA
| | - R. E. Keane
- Missoula Fire Sciences LaboratoryUSDA‐FS, Rocky Mountain Research StationMissoulaMontana59808USA
| | - E. E. Knapp
- USDA‐FS, Pacific Southwest Research StationReddingCalifornia96002USA
| | - J. M. Lydersen
- Fire and Resource Assessment ProgramCalifornia Department of Forestry and Fire ProtectionSacramentoCalifornia94244USA
| | | | - M. J. Reilly
- USDA‐FS, Pacific Northwest Research StationCorvallisOregon97333USA
| | - A. J. Sánchez Meador
- Ecological Restoration InstituteNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffArizona86011USA
| | - S. L. Stephens
- Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and ManagementUniversity of California–BerkeleyBerkeleyCalifornia94720USA
| | - J. T. Stevens
- U.S. Geological SurveyFort Collins Science CenterNew Mexico Landscapes Field StationSanta FeNew Mexico87508USA
| | - A. H. Taylor
- Department of Geography, Earth and Environmental Systems InstituteThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkPennsylvania16802USA
| | - L. L. Yocom
- Department of Wildland Resources and the Ecology CenterUtah State UniversityLoganUtah84322USA
| | - M. A. Battaglia
- USDA‐FS, Rocky Mountain Research StationFort CollinsColorado80526USA
| | - D. J. Churchill
- Washington State Department of Natural ResourcesOlympiaWashington98504USA
| | - L. D. Daniels
- Department of Forest and Conservation SciencesUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaV6T 1Z4Canada
| | - D. A. Falk
- School of Natural Resources and the EnvironmentUniversity of ArizonaTucsonArizona85721USA
- Laboratory of Tree‐Ring ResearchUniversity of ArizonaTucsonArizona85721USA
| | - P. Henson
- Oregon Fish and Wildlife OfficeUSDI Fish & Wildlife ServicePortlandOregon97232USA
| | - J. D. Johnston
- College of ForestryOregon State UniversityCorvallisOregon97333USA
| | - M. A. Krawchuk
- College of ForestryOregon State UniversityCorvallisOregon97333USA
| | - C. R. Levine
- Spatial Informatics GroupPleasantonCalifornia94566USA
| | - G. W. Meigs
- Washington State Department of Natural ResourcesOlympiaWashington98504USA
| | - A. G. Merschel
- College of ForestryOregon State UniversityCorvallisOregon97333USA
| | - M. P. North
- USDA‐FS, Pacific Southwest Research StationMammoth LakesCalifornia93546USA
| | - H. D. Safford
- USDA‐FS, Pacific Southwest RegionVallejoCalifornia94592USA
| | - T. W. Swetnam
- Laboratory of Tree‐Ring ResearchUniversity of ArizonaTucsonArizona85721USA
| | - A. E. M. Waltz
- Ecological Restoration InstituteNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffArizona86011USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Duchac LS, Lesmeister DB, Dugger KM, Davis RJ. Differential landscape use by forest owls two years after a mixed‐severity wildfire. Ecosphere 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.3770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Leila S. Duchac
- USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Corvallis Oregon 97331 USA
- Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit Corvallis Oregon 97331 USA
- Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Oregon State University Corvallis Oregon 97331 USA
| | - Damon B. Lesmeister
- USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Corvallis Oregon 97331 USA
- Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Oregon State University Corvallis Oregon 97331 USA
| | - Katie M. Dugger
- U.S. Geological Survey Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Oregon State University Corvallis Oregon 97331 USA
| | - Raymond J. Davis
- USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region Corvallis Oregon 97331 USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Moriarty KM, Thompson J, Delheimer M, Barry BR, Linnell M, Levi T, Hamm K, Early D, Gamblin H, Szykman Gunther M, Ellison J, Prevéy JS, Hartman J, Davis R. Predicted distribution of a rare and understudied forest carnivore: Humboldt marten ( Martes caurina humboldtensis). PeerJ 2021; 9:e11670. [PMID: 34434640 PMCID: PMC8354145 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many mammalian species have experienced range contractions. Following a reduction in distribution that has resulted in apparently small and disjunct populations, the Humboldt marten (Martes caurina humboldtensis) was recently designated as federally Threatened and state Endangered. This subspecies of Pacific marten occurring in coastal Oregon and northern California, also known as coastal martens, appear unlike martens that occur in snow-associated regions in that vegetation associations appear to differ widely between Humboldt marten populations. We expected current distributions represent realized niches, but estimating factors associated with long-term occurrence was challenging for this rare and little-known species. Here, we assessed the predicted contemporary distribution of Humboldt martens and interpret our findings as hypotheses correlated with the subspecies' niche to inform strategic conservation actions. METHODS We modeled Humboldt marten distribution using a maximum entropy (Maxent) approach. We spatially-thinned 10,229 marten locations collected from 1996-2020 by applying a minimum distance of 500-m between locations, resulting in 384 locations used to assess correlations of marten occurrence with biotic and abiotic variables. We independently optimized the spatial scale of each variable and focused development of model variables on biotic associations (e.g., hypothesized relationships with forest conditions), given that abiotic factors such as precipitation are largely static and not alterable within a management context. RESULTS Humboldt marten locations were positively associated with increased shrub cover (salal (Gautheria shallon)), mast producing trees (e.g., tanoak, Notholithocarpus densiflorus), increased pine (Pinus sp.) proportion of total basal area, annual precipitation at home-range spatial scales, low and high amounts of canopy cover and slope, and cooler August temperatures. Unlike other recent literature, we found little evidence that Humboldt martens were associated with old-growth structural indices. This case study provides an example of how limited information on rare or lesser-known species can lead to differing interpretations, emphasizing the need for study-level replication in ecology. Humboldt marten conservation would benefit from continued survey effort to clarify range extent, population sizes, and fine-scale habitat use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie M. Moriarty
- Western Sustainable Forestry, National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc., Corvallis, OR, United States of America
| | - Joel Thompson
- Pacific Northwest Region Data Resources Management, USDA Forest Service, Joseph, OR, United States of America
| | - Matthew Delheimer
- Pacific Southwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Placerville, CA, United States of America
| | - Brent R. Barry
- Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde, Grand Ronde, OR, United States of America
| | - Mark Linnell
- Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Corvallis, OR, United States of America
| | - Taal Levi
- Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States of America
| | - Keith Hamm
- Green Diamond Resource Company, Korbel, CA, United States of America
| | - Desiree Early
- Green Diamond Resource Company, Korbel, CA, United States of America
| | - Holly Gamblin
- Department of Wildlife, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, United States of America
| | | | - Jordan Ellison
- Western Sustainable Forestry, National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc., Corvallis, OR, United States of America
| | - Janet S. Prevéy
- Fort Collins Science Center, US Geological Survey, Fort Collins, CO, United States of America
| | | | - Raymond Davis
- Pacific Northwest Region, USDA Forest Service, Corvallis, OR, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
The Spotted Owl is a rare and declining raptor inhabiting low/middle-elevation forests of the Pacific Northwest, California, and the Southwest in the USA. It is well established that Spotted Owls select dense, mature, or old forests for nesting and roosting. High-severity fire transforms such forests into a unique forest type known as “snag forest habitat”, which the owls select for foraging. This habitat is disproportionately targeted by post-fire logging projects. Numerous recent articles have explored the influence of high-severity fire and post-fire logging on this species. Studies have shown that post-fire logging significantly reduces Spotted Owl occupancy, but efforts have generally not been made to disentangle the effects of such logging from the influence of high-severity fire alone on Spotted Owls. We conducted an assessment of published, peer-reviewed articles reporting adverse impacts of high-severity fire on Spotted Owls, exploring the extent to which there may have been confounding factors, such as post-fire logging. We found that articles reporting adverse impacts of high-severity fire on Spotted Owls were pervasively confounded by post-fire logging, and in some cases by a methodological bias. Our results indicate a need to approach analyses of high-severity fire and Spotted Owls differently in future research.
Collapse
|