Plant–soil feedbacks help explain plant community productivity

Quantifying soil microbial effects on plant species coexistence: A conceptual synthesis

Soil microorganisms play a critical role in shaping the biodiversity dynamics of plant communities. These microbial effects can arise through direct mediation of plant fitness by pathogens and mutualists, and over the past two decades, numerous studies have shined a spotlight on the role of dynamic feedbacks between plants and soil microorganisms as key determinants of plant species coexistence. Such feedbacks occur when plants modify the composition of the soil community, which in turn affects plant performance. Stimulated by a theoretical model developed in the 1990s, a bulk of the empirical evidence for microbial controls over plant coexistence comes from experiments that quantify plant growth in soil communities that were previously conditioned by conspecific or heterospecific plants. These studies have revealed that soil microbes can generate strong negative to positive frequency-dependent dynamics among plants. Even as soil microbes have become recognized as a key player in determining plant coexistence outcomes, the past few years have seen a renewed interest in expanding the conceptual foundations of this field. New results include re-interpretations of key metrics from classic two-species models, extensions of plant-soil feedback theory to multispecies communities, and frameworks to integrate plant-soil feedbacks with processes like intra- and interspecific competition. Here, I review the implications of theoretical developments for interpreting existing empirical results and highlight proposed analyses and designs for future experiments that can enable a more complete understanding of microbial regulation of plant community dynamics.

Effects of scale and contrast of spatial heterogeneity in plant-soil feedbacks on plant growth

Spatial heterogeneity in plant-soil feedbacks (PSFs) has been evidenced to influence plant growth. However, it is unclear whether patch size and contrast of PSF heterogeneity influence plant growth. We first conditioned a background soil by seven species separately and then grew each of them in a homogeneous soil and three heterogeneous soils. The first heterogeneous soil (large patch and high contrast; LP-HC) consisted of two large patches, of which one was filled with the sterilized background soil and the other with the conditioned soil. The second heterogeneous soil (small patch and high contrast; SP-HC) consisted of four small patches, of which two were filled the sterilized background soil and the other two with the conditioned soil. The third heterogeneous soil (small patch and low contrast; SP-LC) also consisted of four patches, of which two were filled with a 1:3 (w:w) mixture and the other two with a 3:1 mixture of the sterilized background soil and the conditioned soil. In the homogeneous soil, all patches were filled with a 1:1 mixture of the two soils. Both shoot biomass and root biomass were equal in the homogeneous and heterogeneous soils. No significant growth difference was observed between the SP-HC and LP-HC heterogeneous soil. However, shoot biomass and root biomass of the legume Medicago sativa, and root biomass of the grass Lymus dahuricus were greater in the SP-HC heterogeneous soil than in the SP-LC heterogeneous soil, probably due to enhanced root growth in the conditioned soil. Moreover, plant growth in the heterogeneous soils was associated with plant growth but not soil nutrient availability at the end of the conditioning phase. Our results show for the first time that patch contrast of PSF heterogeneity can influence plant growth via changing root placement and highlight the importance of fundamentally different facets of PSF variability.

Plant-soil feedback from eastern redcedar (Juniperus virginiana) inhibits the growth of grasses in encroaching range

The encroachment of woody plants into grasslands is an ongoing global problem that is largely attributed to anthropogenic factors such as climate change and land management practices. Determining the mechanisms that drive successful encroachment is a critical step towards planning restoration and long‐term management strategies. Feedbacks between soil and aboveground communities can have a large influence on the fitness of plants and must be considered as potentially important drivers for woody encroachment. We conducted a plant–soil feedback experiment in a greenhouse between eastern redcedar Juniperus virginiana and four common North American prairie grass species. We assessed how soils that had been occupied by redcedar, a pervasive woody encroacher in the Great Plains of North America, affected the growth of Andropogon gerardi, Schizachyrium scoparium, Bromus inermis, and Pascopyrum smithii over time. We evaluated the effect of redcedar on grass performance by comparing the height and biomass of individuals that were grown in live or sterilized conspecific or redcedar soil. We found redcedar created a negative plant–soil feedback that limited the growth of the cool season grasses B. inermis and P. smithii, reducing their overall biomass by >60%. These effects were found in both live and sterilized redcedar soils. In live soils, some growth suppression can be attributed to the negative effects of soil microbes. The limitation of grass growth in sterile soils indicates redcedar may exude an allelochemical into the soil that limits grass growth. Our results demonstrate that plant–soil feedback created by redcedar inhibits the growth of certain grass species. By creating a plant–plant interaction that negatively affects competitors, redcedars increase the probability of seedling survival until they can grow to overtop their neighbors. These results indicate plant–soil feedback is a mechanism of native woody plant encroachment which could be important in many systems yet is understudied.