Hyperkalaemia and hypokalaemia outpatient management: a survey of 500 French general practitioners

Stopping renin-angiotensin system inhibitors after hyperkalemia and risk of adverse outcomes

BACKGROUND

Stopping renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) after an episode of hyperkalemia is common but may involve therapeutic compromises, in that the cessation of RASi deprives patients of their beneficial cardiovascular effects.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Observational study from the Stockholm Creatinine Measurements (SCREAM) project including patients initiating RASi in routine care and surviving a first-detected episode of hyperkalemia (potassium >5.0 mmol/L). We used target trial emulation techniques based on cloning, censoring and weighting to compare stopping vs. continuing RASi within 6 months after hyperkalemia. Outcomes were 3-year risks of mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke hospitalization) and recurrent hyperkalemia. Of 5669 new users of RASi who developed hyperkalemia (median age 72 years, 44% women), 1425 (25%) stopped RASi therapy within 6 months. Compared with continuing RASi, stopping therapy was associated with a higher 3-year risk of death (absolute risk difference 10.8%; HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.34-1.64) and MACE (risk difference 4.7%; HR 1.29, 1.14-1.45), but a lower risk of recurrent hyperkalemia (risk difference -9.5%; HR 0.76, 0.69-0.84). Results were consistent for events following potassium of >5.0 or >5.5 mmol/L, after censoring when the treatment decision was changed, across prespecified subgroups, and after adjusting for albuminuria.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that stopping RASi after hyperkalemia may be associated with a lower risk of recurrence of hyperkalemia, but higher risk of death and cardiovascular events.

[Recurrent hyperkalaemia management and use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors: Analysis of French data from the PROKALE multinational European study]

INTRODUCTION

Recurrent hyperkalaemia may result in underutilisation of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors. We report an analysis of French data from the PROKALE retrospective study, which assessed the management of recurrent hyperkalaemia in five European countries.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review including patients not on dialysis with two or more hyperkalaemia episodes≥5.5 mEq/L documented within a 12-month observation period was performed.

RESULTS

In France, 115 physicians (57 nephrologists et 58 cardiologists) participated in the study and 295 patients were studied in this analysis. Mean age was 68 years; 212 patients (71.9%) had chronic kidney disease, 108 (36.6%) had chronic heart failure and 102 (34.6%) had diabetes mellitus. The mean number of documented hyperkalaemic episodes was 2.3. A total of 90 hospitalizations occurred during the observation period, of which 24 (26.7%) were directly related to a hyperkalaemic episode. At the time of the first documented hyperkalaemic episode, measures used for the management of hyperkalaemia included loop diuretics (144 patients [48.8%]), sodium/calcium polystyrene sulphonate (135 patients [45.8%]), a low-potassium diet (31 patients [10.5%]) and sodium bicarbonate (31 patients [10.5%]). Between the two consecutive hyperkalaemic episodes documented, the proportion of patients on renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors treatment decreased from 42.4% to 34.6%.

CONCLUSION

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors treatment interruptions were observed in the setting of recurrent hyperkalaemic episodes. Recurrent hyperkalaemia is a major cause of hospitalizations. More effective strategies for the prevention of recurrent hyperkalaemia are needed.

Hyperkalaemia and hypokalaemia outpatient management: a survey of 500 French general practitioners

AIMS

How general practitioners (GPs) manage dyskalaemia is currently unknown. This study aimed at describing GP practices regarding hypokalaemia or hyperkalaemia diagnosis and management in their outpatients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A telephone survey was conducted among French GPs with a 20-item questionnaire (16 closed-ended questions and 12 open-ended questions) regarding their usual management of hypokalaemia or hyperkalaemia patients, both broadly and more specifically in patients with heart failure and/or chronic kidney disease and/or in patients treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme/angiotensin receptor blockers or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. We aimed to interview 500 GPs spread geographically throughout France. This descriptive survey results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (if normally distributed or as median and inter-quartile range if the distribution was skewed). Categorical variables are expressed as frequencies and proportions (%). A total of 500 GPs participated in the study. Dyskalaemia thresholds (for diagnosis and intervention) and management patterns were highly heterogeneous. The mean ± SD (range) potassium level leading to 'intervene' was 5.32 ± 0.34 mmol/L (4.5-6.5) for hyperkalaemia and 3.23 ± 0.34 mmol/L (2.0-6.5) for hypokalaemia. Potassium levels leading to refer the patient to the emergency department (ED) were 6.14 ± 0.55 (4.5-10) and 2.69 ± 0.42 mmol/L (1-4), respectively. Potassium binders (51-65%) or potassium supplements (67-74%) were frequently used to manage hyperkalaemia or hypokalaemia. GPs uncommonly referred their dyskalaemic patients to cardiologists or nephrologists (or to the emergency department, if the latter was deemed necessary owing to the severity of the dyskalaemia). We identified an association between the close vicinity of GP office from an ED and 'referring a heart failure patient' (19.2% with ED vs. 8.6% without ED) and referring a heart failure and chronic kidney disease patient on mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (16.7% with ED vs. 9.3% without ED). Although the majority (67%) of GPs had an electrocardiogram on hand, it was rarely used (14%) in dyskalaemic patients. Subgroup analyses considering gender, age of the participating GPs, and high-income/low-income regions did not identify specific patterns regarding the multidimensional aspect of dyskalaemia management.

CONCLUSIONS

Owing to the considerable heterogeneity of French GP practices toward dyskalaemia diagnosis and management approaches, there is a likely need to standardize (potentially enabled by therapeutic algorithms) practices.