Sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor was associated with an improvement in left ventricular systolic function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with impaired left ventricular systolic function

Dapagliflozin Effects on Cardiac Deformation in Heart Failure and Secondary Clinical Outcome

BACKGROUND

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors were shown to reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to assess potential effects of dapagliflozin in nondiabetic patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) on cardiac function assessed by speckle tracking echocardiography (STE).

METHODS

This randomized, prospective, single-center, open-label trial compared consecutive nondiabetic outpatients with HFrEF or HFmrEF receiving dapagliflozin with patients treated with optimal medical therapy (OMT) except sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors. Primary endpoint was the presence of a significant modification of left ventricular global longitudinal strain, diastolic function (as peak atrial longitudinal strain) and right ventricular function by STE from baseline to 6 months. Cardiovascular events and parameters of congestion were assessed as safety-exploratory endpoints.

RESULTS

Overall, 88 patients (38% HFmrEF) were enrolled and randomized to start dapagliflozin on top of OMT (n = 44) or to continue with OMT (n = 44). All STE values improved in the dapagliflozin group after 6 months, whereas there was a nonsignificant improvement in OMT group. Moreover, when comparing the modification of STE parameters at follow-up in patients with HFrEF and HFmrEF, only the main treatment effect resulted statistically significant in both groups (P < 0.0001), indicating a significant difference between dapagliflozin and OMT.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided randomized data on the beneficial effect of dapagliflozin in nondiabetic patients with HFrEF and HFmrEF in terms of myocardial performance measured by the most sensitive echocardiographic technique, ie, STE. This suggests its usefulness for left ventricular reverse remodeling and better quality of life in patients with HFrEF and HFmrEF. (Effects of Dapagliflozin on cardiac deformation and clinical outcomes in heart failure with reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction [DAPA ECHO trial]; EudraCT number: 2021-005394-66).

Switch to gliflozins and biventricular function improvement in patients with chronic heart failure and diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

SGLT2 inhibitors have been shown to reduce hospitalisation in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). The cardioprotective mechanisms of gliflozins however have not been fully elucidated. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on right and left ventricular function in patients with diabetes and HF.

METHODS

Seventy-eight patients with diabetes and CHF were enroled in the study and followed up; 38 started treatment with SGLT2i, while the remaining 40 continued their previous antidiabetic therapy. All patients underwent conventional, TDI and strain echocardiography in an ambulatory setting, at the beginning and after 3 months of therapy with SGLT2i.

RESULTS

After 3 months of therapy with SGLT2i, echocardiographic parameters assessing both left and right ventricular dimensions and function were found as significantly improved in patients switching to SGLT2i than control group: LVEF (45 ± 9% vs. 40 ± 8%, p < 0.001), LVEDD (54 ± 6.5 vs. 56 ± 6.5 mm, p < 0.01), GLS (-13 ± 4% vs. -10 ± 3%, p < 0.001), TAPSE (21 ± 3 vs. 19 ± 3 mm, p < 0.001), RV S' (12.9 ± 2.5 vs 11.0 ± 1.9 cm/sec, p < 0.001) and PAsP (24 ± 8 vs. 31 ± 9 mmHg, p < 0.001). Also mitral (1.0 ± 0.5 vs. 1.3 ± 0.5, p < 0.01) and tricuspid regurgitation (1.0 ± 0.5 vs. 1.3 ± 0.5, p < 0.01) improved after SGLT2i therapy. Changes were not statistically significant in patients not treated with SGLT2i (p n.s. in all cases).

CONCLUSIONS

In a real-world scenario, treatment with SGLT2i in patients with CHF and diabetes is associated with an improvement in both left and right ventricular function assessed at echocardiography. These data may explain potential anti-remodelling effects of gliflozins.

Pathophysiological basis of the cardiological benefits of SGLT-2 inhibitors: a narrative review

In recent years, GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), and SGLT-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) have become available, which have become valuable additions to therapy for type 2 diabetes as they are associated with low risk for hypoglycemia and cardiovascular benefits. Indeed, SGLT-2i have emerged as a promising class of agents to treat heart failure (HF). By inhibiting SGLT-2, these agents lead to excretion of glucose in urine with subsequent lowering of plasma glucose, although it is becoming clear that the observed benefits in HF cannot be explained by glucose-lowering alone. In fact, multiple mechanisms have been proposed to explain the cardiovascular and renal benefits of SGLT-2i, including hemodynamic, anti-inflammatory, anti-fibrotic, antioxidant, and metabolic effects. Herein, we review the available evidence on the pathophysiology of the cardiological benefits of SGLT-2i. In diabetic heart disease, in both clinical and animal models, the effect of SGLT-2i have been shown to improve diastolic function, which is even more evident in HF with preserved ejection fraction. The probable pathogenic mechanisms likely involve damage from free radicals, apoptosis, and inflammation, and therefore fibrosis, many of which have been shown to be improved by SGLT-2i. While the effects on systolic function in models of diabetic heart disease and HF with preserved ejection fraction is limited and contrasting, it is a key element in patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction both with and without diabetes. The significant improvement in systolic function appears to lead to subsequent structural remodeling of the heart with a reduction in left ventricle volume and a consequent reduction in pulmonary pressure. While the effects on cardiac metabolism and inflammation appear to be consolidated, greater efforts are still warranted to further define the entity to which these mechanisms contribute to the cardiovascular benefits of SGLT-2i.

The impact of SGLT2 inhibition on imaging markers of cardiac function: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2-Is) has resulted in significant benefits in patients with heart failure irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and the presence of diabetes mellitus. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the impact of SGLT2-Is on cardiac function indices.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search for studies assessing the changes in LVEF, global longitudinal strain (GLS), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), left ventricular mass index (LVMi), left atrial volume index (LAVi), and E/e' following the initiation of an SGLT2-I.

RESULTS

A total of 32 studies with 2351 patients were included. SGLT2 inhibition resulted in a significant improvement of LVEF [MD 1.97 (95%CI 0.92, 3.02), p < .01, I²:84%] in patients with heart failure, an increase in GLS [MD 1.17 (95% CI 0.25, 2.10), p < .01], a decrease in LVESV [MD: -3.60 (95% CI -7.02, -0.18), p = .04, I²:9%] while the effect was neutral concerning LVEDV [MD: -3.10 (95% CI -6.76, 0.56), p = .40, I²:4%]. LVMi [MD: -3.99 (95% CI -7.16 to -0.82), p = .01, I²:65%], LAVi [MD: -1.77 (95% CI -2.97, -0.57), p < .01, I²:0%], and E/e' [MD: -1.39 (95% CI -2.04, -0.73), p < .01, I²:55%] were significantly reduced.

CONCLUSIONS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the use of SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with an improvement in markers of cardiac function, confirming the importance of SGLT2 inhibition towards the reversal of cardiac remodeling.

Beneficial Effect of Sodium-Glucose Co-transporter 2 Inhibitors on Left Ventricular Function

BACKGROUND

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors lowered the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes or heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction, whether they directly promote cardiac function remains unclear. Therefore, we sought to determine whether SGLT2 inhibitors could improve left ventricular (LV) function in these patients.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases from their inception to July 9, 2021. Randomized clinical trials and cohort studies that reported LV function-related variables were included.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies comprising 1437 patients (830 SGLT2 inhibitor-treated and 607 non-SGLT2 inhibitor-treated patients) and representing 7 randomized controlled trials with 640 individuals and 6 cohort studies with 797 individuals were included in this meta-analysis. LV regression [LV mass (LVM)], LV ejection fractions (LVEF), LV volumes [LV end-diastolic volumes and systolic volumes (LVEDV and LVESV, respectively], and LV diastolic function [mitral inflow E velocity to tissue Doppler e' ratio, E/e' and left atrial volume index (LAVI)] were all significantly improved in patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors (weighted mean differences, 95% CI, LVM: -6.319 g, -10.850 to -1.789; LVEF: 2.458%, 0.693 to 4.224; LVEDV: -9.134 mL, -15.808 to -2.460; LVESV: -8.440 mL, -15.093 to -1.787; LAVI: -2.791 mL/m2, -.554 to -1.027; E/e': -1.567, -2.440 to -0.698). Subgroup analysis further confirmed the improvement of LV function mainly in patients with HF or those receiving empagliflozin treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors can significantly improve LV function in patients with or without diabetes (especially those with HF or undergoing empagliflozin treatment).

Effects and safety of SGLT2 inhibitors compared to placebo in patients with heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Heart failure (HF) prognosis without therapy is poor, however introduction of a range of drugs has improved it. We aimed to perform a systematic review on the effects and safety of sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in HF patients.

Methods

We carried out a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on SGLT2i compared to placebo for HF patients. We searched in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and EMBASE, with no language restriction, from inception to 31 August 2020. We included nine RCTs comprising three arms (empagliflozin, dapagliflozin and placebo). Effects sizes for continuous variables were expressed as mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Effects sizes for dichotomous variables were expresses as risk ratio (RR) and 95% CIs. We used random-effect models with the inverse variance method. We performed subgroup meta-analyses by intervention drug and follow-up period.

Results

SGLT2i significantly reduced all-cause mortality (RR: 0.88, 95%CI 0.79-0.98, I2 = 0%), cardiovascular mortality (RR: 0.87, 95%CI 0.77-0.99, I2 = 0%), HF hospitalization (RR: 0.73, 95%CI 0.66-0.81, I2 = 0%) and emergency room visits due to HF (RR: 0.40, 95%CI 0.21-0.76, I2 = 0%), as well as composite outcomes including the previous ones. Besides, it significantly improved the score of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ, MD: 1.70, 95%CI 1.67-1.73, I2 = 54%). SGLT2i reduced any serious adverse events, blood pressure and weight. However, it increased hematocrit and creatinine. The meta-analysis of RCTs of > 12 weeks of follow-up showed that SGTL2i significantly reduced NT-proBNP.

Conclusions

SGLT2i showed to improve critical outcomes in HF patients, and it is apparently safe.

Sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor was associated with an improvement in left ventricular systolic function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with impaired left ventricular systolic function

AIMS

Recent studies indicated that sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) reduced heart failure hospitalization in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, whether SGTL2i can improve left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic function remained unclear. This study aimed to compare the change in echocardiographic parameters in T2DM patients receiving SGLT2i with a different baseline LV ejection fraction (LVEF). The change in echocardiographic parameters was also compared between T2DM patients treated with SGLT2i and those treated with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4i).

METHODS AND RESULTS

This multicentre cohort study consecutively enrolled 665, 119, and 132 T2DM patients treated with SGLT2i with a preserved (≥50%), moderately reduced (40-50%), and reduced baseline LVEF (<40%), respectively, with paired baseline and post-treatment echocardiographic data available between 1 June 2016 and 31 May 2018. There were 212 patients treated with DPP4i with paired baseline and post-treatment echocardiographic data available at the same time. For those patients treated with DPP4i, 45 patients had impaired baseline LVEF of <50%. Echocardiographic parameters, including LVEF, LV end-diastolic volume, LV end-systolic volume (LVESV), and LV diastolic function, were analysed at baseline and after treatment. After a median SGLT2i treatment period of 230 days, patients with reduced LVEF were associated with an improvement in LVEF from 29.4 ± 7.4% to 42.2 ± 15.2% (P < 0.0001) and decrease in LVESV from 133.2 ± 49.2 to 117.4 ± 60.1 mL (P = 0.0002). Patients with moderately reduced LVEF were associated with an improvement in LVEF from 44.8 ± 2.9% to 49.7 ± 12.4% (P < 0.0001) and decrease in LVESV from 90.7 ± 31.1 to 80.0 ± 36.2 mL (P = 0.0017). Patients with preserved LVEF did not show an improvement in LVEF and LVESV after SGLT2i treatment. There were no significant changes of LV end-diastolic volume, LV diastolic function, and LV wall thickness in three study groups after SGLT2i treatment. In contrast, patients with impaired baseline LVEF (<50%) did not show any change in LVEF and LVESV after DPP4i treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor was associated with an improvement in LV systolic function in patients with T2DM with reduced and moderately reduced LVEF. In contrast, DPP4i treatment was not associated with any improvement in LVEF among patients with impaired LVEF.