Relative impact of bleedings over ischaemic events in patients with heart failure: insights from the CARDIONOR registry

Left atrial cardiomyopathy: Pathophysiological insights, assessment methods and clinical implications

Atrial cardiomyopathy is defined as any complex of structural, architectural, contractile or electrophysiological changes affecting atria, with the potential to produce clinically relevant manifestations. Most of our knowledge about the mechanistic aspects of atrial cardiomyopathy is derived from studies investigating animal models of atrial fibrillation and atrial tissue samples obtained from individuals who have a history of atrial fibrillation. Several noninvasive tools have been reported to characterize atrial cardiomyopathy in patients, which may be relevant for predicting the risk of incident atrial fibrillation and its related outcomes, such as stroke. Here, we provide an overview of the pathophysiological mechanisms involved in atrial cardiomyopathy, and discuss the complex interplay of these mechanisms, including aging, left atrial pressure overload, metabolic disorders and genetic factors. We discuss clinical tools currently available to characterize atrial cardiomyopathy, including electrocardiograms, cardiac imaging and serum biomarkers. Finally, we discuss the clinical impact of atrial cardiomyopathy, and its potential role for predicting atrial fibrillation, stroke, heart failure and dementia. Overall, this review aims to highlight the critical need for a clinically relevant definition of atrial cardiomyopathy to improve treatment strategies.

Incidence, source, and prognostic impact of major bleeding across the spectrum of aortic stenosis

BACKGROUND

Severe aortic stenosis (AS) has been associated with bleeding. However, there is a lack of prospective assessment of bleeding events and their clinical significance in a large population of outpatients with variable degree of AS severity.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the incidence, source, determinants, and prognostic impact of major bleeding in patients with variable degree of AS severity.

METHODS

Between May 2016 and December 2017, consecutive outpatients were included. Major bleeding was defined as type ≥3 bleed using the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium definition. Cumulative incidence was calculated with death as the competing event. Data was censored at time of aortic valve replacement.

RESULTS

Among 2,830 patients, 46 major bleeding events occurred (0.7%/year) during a median follow-up of 2.1 years (interquartile range: 1.4-2.7). Most frequent sites of bleeding were gastrointestinal (50%) and intracranial (30.4%). Major bleeding was significantly associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 5.93 (95% confidence interval 3.64-9.65); P < .001). AS severity was associated with major bleedings (P = .041). By multivariable analysis, severe AS was an independent determinant of major bleeding (hazard ratio vs mild AS: 3.59 [95% confidence interval 1.56-8.29]; P = .003). The increased risk of bleeding associated with severe AS was significantly exacerbated in patients using oral anticoagulation.

CONCLUSION

In AS patients, major bleeding is rare but a strong independent predictor of death. AS severity is a determinant of bleeding events. Severe AS and oral anticoagulation should be identified as an association at very high risk of major bleeding.

Protective Effect of Irsogladine against Aspirin-Induced Mucosal Injury in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Small Intestine

Background and Objectives: Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) is widely used for preventing cerebrovascular and cardiovascular diseases. Gastrointestinal (GI) tract injury is one of the major complications of aspirin use, potentially leading to severe GI bleeding. However, no drugs for preventing aspirin-induced small intestinal injury have been developed. The aim of this study was to establish a human experimental model for investigating aspirin-induced small intestinal mucosal injury. In addition, we evaluated the protective effect of Irsogladine against aspirin-induced small intestinal mucosal injury using human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived 2D monolayer crypt-villus structural small intestine (2D-hiPSC-SI). Materials and Methods: Human iPS cell-derived intestinal organoids were seeded and cultured in Air-liquid interface. The permeability of 2D-hiPSC-SI was evaluated using Lucifer yellow. Changes in structure and mucosal permeability of 2D-hiPSC-SI after addition of aspirin were confirmed over time, and changes in intestinal epithelium-related markers were evaluated by real-time qPCR and Immunofluorescence staining. The effect of Irsogladine on prevention of aspirin mucosal injury was examined by adding Irsogladine to the culture medium. Results: Cultured 2D-hiPSC-SI showed multi-lineage differentiation into small intestinal epithelium comprised of absorptive cells, goblet cells, enteroendocrine cells, and Paneth cells, which express CD10, MUC2, chromogranin A, and lysozyme, respectively. RNA in situ hybridization revealed intestinal stem cells that express Lgr5. ASA administration induced an increase in the mucosal permeability of 2D-hiPSC-SI. ASA-injured 2D-hiPSC-SI showed decreased mRNA expression of multi-lineage small intestinal cell markers as well as intestinal stem cell marker Lgr5. Administration of Irsogladine on the basal side of the 2D-hiPSC-SI resulted in significant increases in Mki67 and Muc2 mRNA expression by 2D-hiPSCs at 48 h compared with the control group. Administration of 400 µg/mL Irsogladine to the ASA-induced small intestinal injury model resulting in significantly decreased mucosal permeability of 2D-hiPSC-SI. In immunofluorescence staining, Irsogladine significantly increased the fluorescence intensity of MUC2 under normal conditions and administration of 400 µg/mL ASA. Conclusions: we established a novel ASA-induced small intestinal injury model using human iPSC-derived small intestine. Irsogladine maintains mucosal permeability and goblet cell differentiation against ASA-induced small intestinal injury.

Relative impact of bleedings over ischaemic events in patients with heart failure: insights from the CARDIONOR registry

AIMS

Major bleeding events in heart failure (HF) patients are poorly described. We sought to investigate the importance of major bleeding and its impact on outcomes in HF patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analysed incident bleeding and ischaemic events during a 3 year follow-up in 2910 HF outpatients included in a prospective multicentre registry. Major bleeding was defined as a Type ≥3 bleed using the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium definition. Ischaemic event was a composite of ischaemic stroke and myocardial infarction. Events were adjudicated by a blinded committee. At inclusion, most patients (89%) received at least one antithrombotic: anticoagulation (53.9%) and/or antiplatelet therapy (46.2%). Bleeding occurred in 111 patients {3 year cumulative incidence: 3.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.0-4.3]} and ischaemic events in 102 patients [3 year cumulative incidence: 3.3% (95% CI 2.7-4.0)]. Most bleedings were Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3a (32.5%) or 3b (31.5%). Most frequent sites of bleeding were gastrointestinal (40.6%) and intracranial (27.9%). Variables associated with bleeding were atrial fibrillation [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.63 (95% CI 1.66-4.19), P < 0.0001], diabetes [HR = 1.62 (95% CI 1.11-2.38), P = 0.012], and older age [HR = 1.19 per 10 year increase (95% CI 1.00-1.41), P = 0.049]. Anticoagulation use was associated with a two-fold increase in the bleeding risk. Bleeding events as well as ischaemic events were strongly associated with subsequent mortality [adjusted HRs: 5.67 (4.41-7.29), P < 0.0001 and 4.29 (3.18-5.78), P < 0.0001, respectively].

CONCLUSIONS

In HF outpatients, antithrombotics are widely used. Bleeding occurs at a stable rate of 1.2% annually (as frequent as ischaemic events) and is associated with a dramatic increase in mortality (at least as severe as ischaemic events). Most events occurred in patients receiving anticoagulation. Knowledge of these findings may help physicians to manage antithrombotics in HF patients.