Efficacy of early initiation of ivabradine treatment in patients with acute heart failure: rationale and design of SHIFT-AHF trial

Successful treatment with ivabradine in a β-blocker-refractory patient with acute decompensated heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Ivabradine is an established treatment for chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF); however, it is not used for acute heart failure treatment. Negative inotropic effects (NIE) often limit the up-titration of β-blockers. Contrarily, ivabradine has no NIE, and enables β-blockers usage for treating patients with acute decompensated HFrEF.

Acute Heart Failure in an Almost-Centenarian Patient With Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis Treated With Ivabradine

We report the case of a 99-year-old woman with acute chest pain caused by myocardial ischemia due to severe aortic stenosis (AS) and severe anemia. Red blood cells were transfused; however, this increased the preload and worsened pulmonary congestion. Treatment with drugs and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation could not sufficiently improve the pulmonary congestion. Ivabradine was administered to control the resting heart rate, following which the pulmonary congestion significantly improved. Ivabradine is a promising drug for acute heart failure of patients with AS by improving cardiac output by prolonging the left ventricular diastolic filling time without a negative inotropic effect.

The role of ivabradine in doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity: exploring of underlying argument

This study investigated the potential role of ivabradine (IVN) in the attenuation of doxorubicin (DXR)-induced cardiotoxicity in rats. A total of 28 Swiss-Albino male mice were used, divided into four equal groups: the negative control did not receive any agents (n = 7), the DXR group received a single dose of DXR 20 mg/kg (n = 7), the treated group A was pretreated with IVN 5 mg/kg plus DXR (n = 7), and the treated group B was pretreated with IVN 10 mg/kg plus DXR (n = 7). The duration of this study was 10 days. Inflammatory biomarkers, including tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), malondialdehyde (MDA), and cardiac troponin (cTn-I) serum levels were measured. TNF-α, LDH, MDA, and cTn-I serum levels were higher in the DXR-treated mice compared with the control (P˂0.01). IVN produced a dose-dependent effect in the reduction of MDA and cTn-I compared to DXR-treated mice (P˂0.05). Our findings suggest that IVN is an effective agent in mitigating DXR-induced cardiotoxicity due to its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects. IVN illustrated a dose-dependent effect in the attenuation of DXR-induced cardiotoxicity through inhibition of lipid peroxidation and cardiomyocyte injury.

The association between ivabradine and adverse cardiovascular events in acute decompensated HFrEF patients

Aims

Ivabradine has been used in patients who have chronic heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and concomitant sinus heart rate ≥70 bpm. This administration for acute HFrEF remains a concern. This study used a real‐world multicentre database to investigate the effects of ivabradine among patients with acute decompensated HFrEF before discharge.

Methods and results

This study retrospectively identified patients with acute decompensated HFrEF who were administered ivabradine at discharge from two multicentre HF databases. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for confounders. Cardiovascular mortality, all‐cause mortality, and recurrent HF rehospitalization risks were then compared between those with and without ivabradine treatment. After 1:2 propensity score matching, 876 patients (age, 60.7 ± 14.6 years; female, 23.2%; left ventricular ejection fraction, 28.2% ± 7.8%; and heart rate at discharge, 84.3 ± 13.8 bpm) were included in the final analysis, including 292 and 584 patients with and without ivabradine treatment at discharge, respectively. No significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics between the two groups. At 1 year follow‐up, patients in the ivabradine group had significantly lower heart rates (77.6 ± 14.7 vs. 81.1 ± 16.3 bpm; P = 0.005) and lower HF severity symptoms (New York Heart Association Functional class, 2.1 ± 0.7 vs. 2.3 ± 0.9; P < 0.001) than those from the non‐ivabradine group. Ivabradine users had significantly lower risks of 1 year cardiovascular mortality (5.8 vs. 12.2 per 100‐person year; P = 0.003), all‐cause mortality (7.2 vs. 14.0 per 100‐person year; P = 0.003), and total HF rehospitalization (42.3 vs. 72.6 per 100‐person year; P < 0.001) than non‐ivabradine users. Following multivariate analysis, the predischarge prescription of ivabradine remained independently associated with lower 1 year all‐cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.28–0.74; P = 0.002) and cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.24–0.72; P = 0.002).

Conclusions

The current study findings suggest that ivabradine treatment is associated with reduced risks of cardiovascular mortality, all‐cause mortality, and HF rehospitalization within 1 year among patients with acute decompensated HFrEF in real‐world populations.

Optimal Heart Rate Modulation Using Ivabradine

Heart rate modulation therapy using ivabradine improves mortality and morbidity in patients with systolic dysfunction. However, a target heart rate remains uncertain. Echocardiography-guided ivabradine therapy, in which we attempt to approach zero overlap between two diastolic filling inflow waves, has recently been proposed to maximize cardiac output, facilitate reverse remodeling, and reduce mortality and morbidity, instead of using an absolute value for the target heart rate. Prospective studies are needed to validate the clinical implication of these therapeutic strategies. Also, this concept should be expanded to other clinical scenarios.

Efficacy of early initiation of ivabradine treatment in patients with acute heart failure: rationale and design of SHIFT-AHF trial

Aims

Elevated heart rate (HR) in heart failure (HF) is associated with worse outcomes, particularly in acute HF (AHF). HR reduction with ivabradine reduces cardiovascular events in HF patients with reduced ejection fraction. The present trial aimed to test the hypothesis that the early HR reduction using ivabradine improves clinical outcomes in patients with AHF.

Methods and results

SHIFT‐AHF is a prospective, multi‐centre, double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ivabradine when adding to standard therapy in AHF patients (SHIFT‐AHF). The trial will include 674 AHF patients with left ventricular ejection fraction < 45% and New York Heart Association functional classes III–IV. Participants were enrolled from March 2020 and will be followed up until December 2022. Patients are randomized to treatment with ivabradine or placebo (randomization 1:1). After allocation, the dose of ivabradine is titrated according to HR. Six months' follow‐up and three control visits (7, 90, and 180 days after enrolment) are required for every participant. Assessment involves clinical examination, laboratory tests, echocardiography, electrocardiography, heart rhythm, cardiac function, and quality of life. The primary endpoint is a composite of all‐cause mortality or re‐admission due to worsening HF. Secondary endpoints include the assessments of cardiac remodelling, cardiac functional capacity, and quality of life.

Conclusions

The SHIFT‐AHF trial will shed further light on the role of early HR reduction using ivabradine in patients with AHF.