Psychosocial factors, mental health, and coordination capacity in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction compared with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Association between growth differentiation factor-15 and adverse outcomes among patients with heart failure: A systematic literature review

Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) is an emerging biomarker in several conditions. This SLR, conducted following PRISMA guidelines, examined the association between GDF-15 concentration and range of adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). Publications were identified from Embase® and Medline® bibliographic databases between January 1, 2014, and August 23, 2022 (congress abstracts: January 1, 2020, to August 23, 2022). Sixty-three publications met the eligibility criteria (55 manuscripts and 8 abstracts; 45 observational studies and 18 post hoc analyses of randomized controlled trials [RCTs]). Of the 19 outcomes identified, the most frequently reported longitudinal outcomes were mortality (n = 32 studies; all-cause [n = 27] or cardiovascular-related [n = 6]), composite outcomes (n = 28; most commonly mortality ± hospitalization/rehospitalization [n = 19]), and hospitalization/re-hospitalization (n = 11). The most common cross-sectional outcome was renal function (n = 22). Among longitudinal studies assessing independent relationships with outcomes using multivariate analyses (MVA), a significant increase in risk associated with higher baseline GDF-15 concentration was found in 22/24 (92 %) studies assessing all-cause mortality, 4/5 (80 %) assessing cardiovascular-related mortality, 13/19 (68 %) assessing composite outcomes, and 4/8 (50 %) assessing hospitalization/rehospitalization. All (7/7; 100 %) of the cross-sectional studies assessing the relationship with renal function by MVA, and 3/4 (75 %) assessing exercise capacity, found poorer outcomes associated with higher baseline GDF-15 concentrations. This SLR suggests GDF-15 is an independent predictor of mortality and other adverse but nonfatal outcomes in patients with HF. A better understanding of the prognostic role of GDF-15 in HF could improve clinical risk prediction models and potentially help optimize treatment regimens.

Differences in Health-Related Quality of Life among Patients with Heart Failure

Heart failure (HF) is characterized by a progressive clinical course marked by frequent exacerbations and repeated hospitalizations, leading to considerably high morbidity and mortality rates. Patients with HF present with a constellation of bothersome symptoms, which range from physical to psychological and mental manifestations. With the transition to more advanced HF stages, symptoms become increasingly more debilitating, interfere with activities of daily living and disrupt multiple domains of life, including physical functioning, psychological status, emotional state, cognitive function, intimate relationships, lifestyle status, usual role activities, social contact and support. By inflicting profuse limitations in numerous aspects of life, HF exerts a profoundly negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). It is therefore not surprising that patients with HF display lower levels of HRQOL compared not only to the general healthy population but also to patients suffering from other chronic diseases. On top of this, poor HRQOL in patients with HF becomes an even greater concern considering that it has been associated with unfavorable long-term outcomes and poor prognosis. Nevertheless, HRQOL may differ significantly among patients with HF. Indeed, it has consistently been reported that women with HF display poorer HRQOL compared to men, while younger patients with HF tend to exhibit lower levels of HRQOL than their older counterparts. Moreover, patients presenting with higher New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class (III-IV) have significantly more impaired HRQOL than those in a better NYHA class (I-II). Furthermore, most studies report worse levels of HRQOL in patients suffering from HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) compared to patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) or HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF). Last, but not least, differences in HRQOL have been noted depending on geographic location, with lower HRQOL levels having been recorded in Africa and Eastern Europe and higher in Western Europe in a recent large global study. Based on the observed disparities that have been invariably reported in the literature, this review article aims to provide insight into the underlying differences in HRQOL among patients with HF. Through an overview of currently existing evidence, fundamental differences in HRQOL among patients with HF are analyzed based on sex, age, NYHA functional class, ejection fraction and geographic location or ethnicity.

Sex-specific differences in risk factors, comorbidities, diagnostic challenges, optimal management, and prognostic outcomes of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A comprehensive literature review

Due to hormonal variations, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains prevalent in women and affects almost half of the heart failure (HF) patients. Given the yearly death rate of 10-30% and the unavailability of medications targeting HFpEF, the need arises for a better understanding of the fundamental mechanisms of this syndrome. This comprehensive review explores sex-specific differences in traditional risk factors; female-specific factors that may impact HFpEF development and response to therapy, including variations in hormone levels that may occur pre- and post-menopausal or during pregnancy; and disparities in comorbidities, clinical presentation, and diagnostic challenges. Lastly, the review addresses prognostic outcomes, noting that women with HFpEF have a poor quality of life but a higher survival rate. It also discusses novel biomarkers and precision medicine, emphasizing their potential to improve early detection and personalized treatment.

Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure: A Cross-Sectional Study in Vietnam

Introduction Heart failure is currently a global health issue, imposing a burden on disease prevalence and mortality rates for patients, while simultaneously impacting the quality of life for affected individuals. Data on assessing the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with chronic heart failure in developing countries, including Vietnam, is still limited. This study was conducted with the aim of describing the quality of life of patients with chronic heart failure in Vietnam. Methods This cross-sectional investigation enrolled 140 chronic heart failure outpatients, utilizing a convenience sample at Hai Duong Province Hospital, Vietnam, spanning from December 2021 to April 2022. Essential patient variables encompassing age, gender, and heart failure duration were gathered. Surveying of patients took place at the outpatient clinic during chronic heart failure follow-up visits using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire. The SF-36 comprises eight dimensions: (1) Physical functioning, (2) Role limitations due to physical health, (3) Bodily pain, (4) General health perceptions, (5) Vitality, (6) Social role functioning, (7) Role limitations due to emotional health, and (8) Mental health. Component analysis of the SF-36 revealed two distinct concepts: a physical component summary (PCS) reflecting the physical aspect and a mental component summary (MCS) reflecting the mental aspect. Results The research involved 140 participants diagnosed with chronic heart failure, having a median age of 59 years (interquartile range (IQR): 52-63). Among them, 61.4% were male, and 50% exhibited reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (≤ 40%). The role limitations due to the physical health domain indicated the lowest score, registering a median value of 0 (IQR 0-25). Domains with median scores below the 25-point threshold encompassed role limitations due to physical health (0 points). Those with scores ranging from 25 to 49 points constituted general health perceptions (25 points), role limitations due to emotional health (33.3 points), vitality (45 points), and mental health (48 points). Bodily pain and social role functioning achieved median scores at a moderate level (50-74 points), scoring 62 and 62.5 points, respectively. The overall HRQoL score on the SF-36 scale was 45.2 (IQR: 32.1-58.7) points. Median scores for the PCS and MCS were 44.3 (IQR: 30.5-52) and 47.0 (IQR: 32.6-65.4), respectively. No statistically significant differences in PCS and MCS scores were observed when subgroup analysis was performed based on variables like age, gender, or LVEF. However, in the vitality domain, female patients exhibited a significantly lower median score than male patients (p-value = 0.046). In the physical functioning domain, individuals aged ≥ 60 had lower median scores than those aged < 60 years (p = 0.022). Additionally, the group with LVEF ≤ 40% had lower median scores compared to the group with LVEF > 40% (p = 0.038) in role limitations due to emotional health domain. Conclusion In Vietnam, the HRQoL in the outpatient population with chronic heart failure was notably low when assessed using the SF-36 questionnaire. Large-scale, multicenter studies are needed to provide stronger, more conclusive evidence.

Association of Depression and Anxiety with Cardiac Structural and Functional Characteristics in Heart Failure with Reduced and Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction

Heart failure and mental health conditions frequently coexist and have a negative impact on health-related quality of life and prognosis. We aimed to evaluate depression and anxiety symptoms and to determine the association between psychological distress and cardiac parameters in heart failure with reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction. A total of 43 patients (33 male, mean age 64 ± 10 years) with heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (29 with HFrEF, 14 with HFmrEF) underwent comprehensive echocardiographic evaluation. All study participants completed questionnaires for the assessment of depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), and health-related quality of life (MLHFQ). Ten (34%) patients with HFrEF and two (14%) participants with HFmrEF had moderate-to-severe depression symptoms. Significant anxiety symptoms were more frequent in HFrEF (10 vs. 2 patients; 34% vs. 14%). Poor quality of life was also more common among patients with HFrEF (17 vs. 5 patients; 59% vs. 36%), showing higher MLHFQ scores (p = 0.009). Moreover, PHQ-9, GAD-7, and MLHFQ scores showed significant correlations between NYHA class severity and the presence of peripheral edema. The symptoms of dyspnea correlated with both PHQ-9 and MLHFQ scores. Significant correlations were observed between MLHFQ scores and a large number of clinical features, such as exercise capacity, 6MWT distance, the need for furosemide, echocardiographic parameters (LVEDVI, LVESVI, LVEF, LVGLS, SVI), and laboratory variables (albumin, GFR, NT-proBNP). In the multiple linear regression analysis, dyspnea proved to be a significant predictor of higher PHQ-9 and MLHFQ scores, even after adjusting for potential confounders. High symptom burden due to psychological distress is common among patients with HFrEF and HFmrEF. More efficient control of congestion may improve depression, anxiety symptoms, and health-related quality of life.

Associations between cardiac structure and function and depressive disorder: A centenarian study in China

Background

Depressive disorder is a common comorbidity in patients with cardiovascular diseases and is associated with increased hospitalization and death rates. The relationships between cardiac structure and function and depressive disorder remains unclear in the older adults, especially in centenarians. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the possible associations between cardiac structure and function and depressive disorder among centenarians.

Methods

In the China Hainan Centenarian Cohort Study, the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale scores and echocardiography were used to evaluate depressive disorder and cardiac structure and function, respectively. All information, including epidemiological questionnaires, physical examinations, and blood tests, was obtained following standardized procedures.

Results

A total of 682 centenarians were enrolled in the study (mean age: 102.35 ± 2.72 years). The prevalence of depressive disorder in centenarians is 26.2% (179 older adults), of whom 81.2% (554 older adults) are women. Centenarians with depressive disorder have significantly higher left ventricular ejection fraction (60.02 ± 3.10) and interventricular septum thickness (9.79 ± 1.54). Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis detected positive associations of left ventricular ejection fraction (Bets: 0.093) and interventricular septum thickness (Bets: 0.440) with Geriatric Depression Scale scores. Both left ventricular ejection fraction (odds ratio: 1.081) and interventricular septum thickness (odds ratio: 1.274) were independently associated with depressive disorder in multiple logistic regression analysis (P < 0.05, all).

Conclusions

The prevalence of depressive disorder remains very high, and associations were found between left ventricular ejection fraction, interventricular septum thickness, and depressive disorder in Chinese centenarians. Future studies should focus on their temporal relationships to improve cardiac structure and function, prevent depressive disorder, and achieve healthy aging by coordinating their relationships.

Metabolomic Profiling in Patients with Heart Failure and Exercise Intolerance: Kynurenine as a Potential Biomarker

Aims: Metabolic and structural perturbations in skeletal muscle have been found in patients with heart failure (HF) both with preserved (HFpEF) and reduced (HFrEF) ejection fraction in association with reduced muscle endurance (RME). We aimed in the current study to create phenotypes for patients with RME and HFpEF compared to RME HFrEF according to their metabolomic profiles and to test the potential of Kynurenine (Kyn) as a marker for RME. Methods: Altogether, 18 HFrEF, 17 HFpEF, and 20 healthy controls (HC) were prospectively included in the current study. The following tests were performed on all participants: isokinetic muscle function tests, echocardiography, spiroergometry, and varied blood tests. Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry was used to quantify metabolites in serum. Results: Except for aromatic and branched amino acids (AA), patients with HF showed reduced AAs compared to HC. Further perturbations were elevated concentrations of Kyn and acylcarnitines (ACs) in HFpEF and HFrEF patients (p < 0.05). While patients with HFpEF and RME presented with reduced concentrations of ACs (long- and medium-chains), those with HFrEF and RME had distorted AAs metabolism (p < 0.05). With an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83, Kyn shows potential as a marker in HF and RME (specificity 70%, sensitivity 83%). In a multiple regression model consisting of short-chain-ACs, spermine, ornithine, glutamate, and Kyn, the latest was an independent predictor for RME (95% CI: −13.01, −3.30, B: −8.2 per 1 µM increase, p = 0.001). Conclusions: RME in patients with HFpEF vs. HFrEF proved to have different metabolomic profiles suggesting varied pathophysiology. Kyn might be a promising biomarker for patients with HF and RME.

Anxiety and Depression in Metabolic-Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease and Cardiovascular Risk

(1) Background: The relationship between anxiety and depression in metabolic-dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) and cardiovascular (CV) risk remains uncertain. Therefore, we aimed to assess whether anxiety and depression are associated with increased CV risk in MAFLD. (2) Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional observational study involving 77 subjects (39 MAFLD patients, 38 controls), between January and September 2020. Hepatic steatosis was assessed using a combination of hepatic ultrasonography and SteatoTestTM. CV parameters were evaluated using echocardiography and Doppler ultrasound. Self-reported questionnaires pertaining to symptoms of anxiety and depression were used. Anxiety was evaluated using Lehrer Woolfolk Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire (LWASQ), further divided into somatic, behavioral, and cognitive factors, as well as a global score, and depression using Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). (3) Results: MAFLD patients presented significantly higher BDI scores (p-value 0.009) and LWASQ global scores (p-value 0.045) than controls. LWASQ somatic factor was significantly associated with global longitudinal strain (GLS) in linear analysis (-0.0404, p-value = 0.002), while it lost significance following multivariate analysis (-0.0166, p-value = 0.124). Although group (MAFLD vs. controls) predicted BDI, LWASQ global score, and LWASQ somatic factor in linear regression, they lost significance in multivariate analysis. Moreover, the relationship between interventricular septal wall thickness (IVSWT) and BDI, LWASQ global score, and LWASQ somatic factor was significant in linear analysis, but statistical significance disappeared after multivariate analysis. (4) Conclusions: Although MAFLD patients presented increased anxiety and depression risk in univariate analysis, this association lost significance in multivariate analysis. A significant association between GLS levels and LWASQ somatic factor, in addition to IVSWT in anxiety and depression in univariate analysis, was observed, but was lost after multivariate analysis.

Influence of baseline parameters on one-year physical, mental, and health-related quality of life in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction

Aims

To identify baseline parameters longitudinally influencing overall health‐related quality of life (HRQoL), physical function and mental health 1 year later in patients with chronic heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).

Methods and results

We performed post hoc analyses of the randomized aldosterone in diastolic heart failure (Aldo‐DHF) trial, including 422 patients with HFpEF and NYHA class II or III. Overall HRQoL, measured by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ), physical functioning and mental health, both measured by the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF‐36), after 12 months were predicted in correlation analyses and multivariate regression analyses with continuous values and worst versus three better HRQoL quartiles as dependent variables. The mean age of the study population was 66.8 ± 7.6 years, 52.4% were female, and 86.0% had NYHA class II. All HRQoL variables at 1 year were predicted by their respective baseline values (all P < 0.001), which were also the best variables to predict lowest versus higher HRQoL quartiles (all P < 0.001). For overall HRQoL, six‐minute‐walking‐distance (P = 0.009), Borg‐score (P = 0.001), coronary heart disease (P = 0.036) and SF‐36 role‐emotional (P = 0.005) independently predicted one‐year‐outcome, while depression diagnosis (P = 0.044), self‐reported health status (P = 0.023) and PHQ depression (P = 0.001) were only significant predictors when excluding MLHFQ total score at baseline. In logistic regression analyses, only SF‐36 role‐emotional (P = 0.016) independently predicted overall HRQoL group status at follow up. For physical functioning, Borg‐score (P ≤ 0.001), 6 min walking distance (P = 0.005), coronary heart disease (P = 0.009), and SF‐36 vitality (P = 0.001) were significant independent predictors, also when excluding baseline physical functioning. Low SF‐36 vitality (P = 0.021) and presence of coronary heart disease (P = 0.027) independently predicted a patient's membership in the lowest quartile 1 year later. For mental health, SF‐36 physical functioning (P = 0.025) and HADS anxiety (P = 0.046) were independent predictors, while self‐rated fatigue and poor performance (P = 0.033) and SF‐36 vitality (P = 0.008) only served as significant predictors when excluding mental health at baseline. HADS anxiety (P = 0.009) also served as independent predictor of a patient's group status after 1 year.

Conclusion

Overall HRQoL, physical functioning, and mental health of HFpEF patients 1 year later are mainly influenced by their respective baseline values. Other self‐rated baseline parameters also showed independent effects while objective severity measures had limited predictive value.

Psychosocial factors, mental health, and coordination capacity in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction compared with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Aims

Patients with heart failure (HF) suffer from reduced quality‐of‐life (QoL). We aimed to compare QoL, depression, and anxiety scores among outpatients with preserved (HFpEF) and reduced (HFrEF) ejection fraction and non‐HF controls and its relationship to coordination capacity.

Methods and results

Fifty‐five participants were recruited prospectively at the University Hospital Jena, Germany (17 HFpEF, 18 HFrEF, and 20 non‐HF controls). All participants underwent echocardiography, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), 10 m walking test (10‐MWT), isokinetic muscle function and coordination tests, and QoL assessments using the short form of health survey (SF‐36), and hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS). Furthermore, inflammatory biomarkers such as growth differentiation factor‐15 (GDF‐15) were assessed. Patients with HFpEF showed compared with HFrEF and non‐HF controls reduced QoL [mental component score (MCS): 43.6 ± 7.1 vs. 50.2 ± 10.0 vs. 50.5 ± 5.0, P = 0.03), vitality (VT): 47.5 ± 8.4 vs. 53.6 ± 8.6 vs. 57.1 ± 5.2, P = 0.004), and elevated anxiety (6.5 ± 3.2 vs. 3.3 ± 2.8 vs. 3.8 ± 2. 8, P = 0.02) and depression scores (6.5 [3.5–10.0] vs. 3.0 [1.0–6.5] vs. 2.0 [0.75–3.0], P = 0.01)]. After adjusting to multiple comparisons, anxiety remained higher in HFpEF patients compared with HFrEF (p_post‐hoc = 0.009). HFpEF and HFrEF patients showed reduced coordination capacity compared with non‐HF controls (P < 0.05). In a logistic regression, the presence of depression score ≥8 remained an independent factor for predicting reduced coordination capacity after adjusting for peak VO₂, GDF‐15, 10‐MWT, physical component score (PCS), and peak torque of the leg [odds ratio (OR): 0.1, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.004–0.626, P = 0.02].

Conclusion

Outpatients with HFpEF had worse QoL and higher anxiety and depression scores compared with HFrEF and non‐HF controls. Depression is associated with reduced QoL and is an independent predictor for reduced coordination capacity.