Peripartum cardiomyopathy in Iraq: initial registry-based data and 6 month outcomes

Thromboembolism in peripartum cardiomyopathy: a systematic review

Background

Women with peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) are at an increased risk of arterial and venous thromboembolic events. The review summarizes the evidence on the incidence of thromboembolic complications in women with PPCM, diagnostic approaches, related outcomes, and effects of therapies that have been used.

Methods

English articles were retrieved from Web of Science and PubMed using search terms to capture studies related to PPCM (or postpartum cardiomyopathy) and all combinations of thrombosis- and embolism-related keywords. A total of 347 articles from PubMed and 85 from Web of Science were obtained, and after removing duplicates, 327 articles were screened for original data and classified into four domains: epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, and therapy of thromboembolism in PPCM. Ultimately, 30 articles were included. Data were synthesized in summary tables for each domain.

Results

Studies in the United States and Europe reported varying incidence for thromboembolism in PPCM, up to 14% in 6 months. Risk factors include elevated levels of coagulation factors, decreased protein C and S activity, decreased fibrinolysis, and a low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Cesarean delivery and post-operative status were correlated with a higher incidence of thromboembolic complications. Diagnosis relied mostly on ultrasonography and magnetic resonance and depended on the suspected location of thrombus. Anticoagulation has been used mostly for PPCM patients with a reduced LVEF, with the duration varying across guidelines and healthcare systems. Unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) were considered safe choices during pregnancy, while warfarin and novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were used postpartum. The association of bromocriptine with risk of thromboembolic complications remains debated.

Conclusions

There are important gaps in our understanding of the epidemiology, risk stratification, and optimal secondary prevention of thromboembolism in PPCM. Larger prospective studies with detailed phenotyping are required.

The year in cardiovascular medicine 2021: heart failure and cardiomyopathies

In the year 2021, the universal definition and classification of heart failure (HF) was published that defines HF as a clinical syndrome with symptoms and/or signs caused by a cardiac abnormality and corroborated by elevated natriuretic peptide levels or objective evidence of cardiogenic congestion. This definition and the classification of HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), mildly reduced, and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is consistent with the 2021 ESC Guidelines on HF. Among several other new recommendations, these guidelines give a Class I indication for the use of the sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors dapagliflozin and empagliflozin in HFrEF patients. As the first evidence-based treatment for HFpEF, in the EMPEROR-Preserved trial, empagliflozin reduced the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death and HF hospitalizations. Several reports in 2021 have provided novel and detailed analyses of device and medical therapy in HF, especially regarding sacubitril/valsartan, SGLT2 inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, ferric carboxymaltose, soluble guanylate cyclase activators, and cardiac myosin activators. In patients hospitalized with COVID-19, acute HF and myocardial injury is quite frequent, whereas myocarditis and long-term damage to the heart are rather uncommon.