1
|
Huang X, Li Y, Zheng H, Xu Y. Sudden Cardiac Death Risk Stratification in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction. Cardiol Rev 2024:00045415-990000000-00279. [PMID: 38814094 DOI: 10.1097/crd.0000000000000728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) poses a significant clinical challenge, with sudden cardiac death (SCD) emerging as one of the leading causes of mortality. Despite advancements in cardiovascular medicine, predicting and preventing SCD in HFpEF remains complex due to multifactorial pathophysiological mechanisms and patient heterogeneity. Unlike heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, where impaired contractility and ventricular remodeling predominate, HFpEF pathophysiology involves heavy burden of comorbidities such as hypertension, obesity, and diabetes. Diverse mechanisms, including diastolic dysfunction, microvascular abnormalities, and inflammation, also contribute to distinct disease and SCD risk profiles. Various parameters such as clinical factors and electrocardiogram features have been proposed in SCD risk assessment. Advanced imaging modalities and biomarkers offer promise in risk prediction, yet comprehensive risk stratification models specific to HFpEF ar0e lacking. This review offers recent evidence on SCD risk factors and discusses current therapeutic strategies aimed at reducing SCD risk in HFpEF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xu Huang
- From the Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dattani A, Brady EM, Kanagala P, Stoma S, Parke KS, Marsh AM, Singh A, Arnold JR, Moss AJ, Zhao L, Cvijic ME, Fronheiser M, Du S, Costet P, Schafer P, Carayannopoulos L, Chang CP, Gordon D, Ramirez-Valle F, Jerosch-Herold M, Nelson CP, Squire IB, Ng LL, Gulsin GS, McCann GP. Is atrial fibrillation in HFpEF a distinct phenotype? Insights from multiparametric MRI and circulating biomarkers. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2024; 24:94. [PMID: 38326736 PMCID: PMC10848361 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-024-03734-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently co-exist. There is a limited understanding on whether this coexistence is associated with distinct alterations in myocardial remodelling and mechanics. We aimed to determine if patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) represent a distinct phenotype. METHODS In this secondary analysis of adults with HFpEF (NCT03050593), participants were comprehensively phenotyped with stress cardiac MRI, echocardiography and plasma fibroinflammatory biomarkers, and were followed for the composite endpoint (HF hospitalisation or death) at a median of 8.5 years. Those with AF were compared to sinus rhythm (SR) and unsupervised cluster analysis was performed to explore possible phenotypes. RESULTS 136 subjects were included (SR = 75, AF = 61). The AF group was older (76 ± 8 vs. 70 ± 10 years) with less diabetes (36% vs. 61%) compared to the SR group and had higher left atrial (LA) volumes (61 ± 30 vs. 39 ± 15 mL/m2, p < 0.001), lower LA ejection fraction (EF) (31 ± 15 vs. 51 ± 12%, p < 0.001), worse left ventricular (LV) systolic function (LVEF 63 ± 8 vs. 68 ± 8%, p = 0.002; global longitudinal strain 13.6 ± 2.9 vs. 14.7 ± 2.4%, p = 0.003) but higher LV peak early diastolic strain rates (0.73 ± 0.28 vs. 0.53 ± 0.17 1/s, p < 0.001). The AF group had higher levels of syndecan-1, matrix metalloproteinase-2, proBNP, angiopoietin-2 and pentraxin-3, but lower level of interleukin-8. No difference in clinical outcomes was observed between the groups. Three distinct clusters were identified with the poorest outcomes (Log-rank p = 0.029) in cluster 2 (hypertensive and fibroinflammatory) which had equal representation of SR and AF. CONCLUSIONS Presence of AF in HFpEF is associated with cardiac structural and functional changes together with altered expression of several fibro-inflammatory biomarkers. Distinct phenotypes exist in HFpEF which may have differing clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhishek Dattani
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
| | - Emer M Brady
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | | | - Svetlana Stoma
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - Kelly S Parke
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - Anna-Marie Marsh
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - Anvesha Singh
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - Jayanth R Arnold
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - Alastair J Moss
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - Lei Zhao
- Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | | | | | - Shuyan Du
- Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Christopher P Nelson
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - Iain B Squire
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - Leong L Ng
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - Gaurav S Gulsin
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - Gerry P McCann
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schönbauer R, Hana F, Duca F, Koschutnik M, Donà C, Nitsche C, Sponder M, Lenz M, Lee J, Loewe C, Hengstenberg C, Mascherbauer J, Kammerlander A. Right Atrial Phasic Function in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking and Outcomes. J Clin Med 2023; 12:5179. [PMID: 37629221 PMCID: PMC10455785 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12165179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study sought to investigate the prognostic impact of right atrial (RA) size and function in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in sinus rhythm (SR) and atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS Consecutive HFpEF patients were enrolled and indexed RA volumes and emptying fractions (RA-EF) were assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). For patients in SR, feature tracking of the RA wall was performed during CMR. In addition, all patients underwent right and left heart catheterization and 6 min walk distance (6MWD) and N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) evaluations. We prospectively followed patients and used Cox regression models to determine the association of RA size and function with a composite endpoint of heart failure hospitalization and cardiovascular death. RESULTS A total of 188 patients (71% female patients, 70 ± 8 years old) were included. Ninety-two patients (49%) were in persistent AF. Eighty-five patients reached the combined endpoint during a follow-up of 69 (42-97) months. After a multivariate cox regression analysis, the impaired RA reservoir strain (HR 0.949; 95% CI [0.909-0.990], p = 0.016), the RA reservoir strain rate (HR 0.991; 95% CI [0.983-0.999], p = 0.028), the RA conduit strain (HR 0.932; 95% CI [0.879-0.988], p = 0.019), and the RA conduit strain rate (HR 0.989; 95% CI [0.881-0.997], p = 0.011) were significantly associated with a worse outcome for patients in SR. In persistent AF, no RA imaging parameter was related to outcome after a multivariate regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS In HFpEF patients in SR, CMR parameters of impaired RA conduit and reservoir function are associated with dismal cardiovascular outcomes. In persistent AF, RA parameters lose their prognostic ability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Schönbauer
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (R.S.); (F.H.); (F.D.); (M.K.); (C.D.); (C.N.); (M.S.); (M.L.); (J.L.); (C.H.)
| | - Fiona Hana
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (R.S.); (F.H.); (F.D.); (M.K.); (C.D.); (C.N.); (M.S.); (M.L.); (J.L.); (C.H.)
| | - Franz Duca
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (R.S.); (F.H.); (F.D.); (M.K.); (C.D.); (C.N.); (M.S.); (M.L.); (J.L.); (C.H.)
| | - Matthias Koschutnik
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (R.S.); (F.H.); (F.D.); (M.K.); (C.D.); (C.N.); (M.S.); (M.L.); (J.L.); (C.H.)
| | - Carolina Donà
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (R.S.); (F.H.); (F.D.); (M.K.); (C.D.); (C.N.); (M.S.); (M.L.); (J.L.); (C.H.)
| | - Christian Nitsche
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (R.S.); (F.H.); (F.D.); (M.K.); (C.D.); (C.N.); (M.S.); (M.L.); (J.L.); (C.H.)
| | - Michael Sponder
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (R.S.); (F.H.); (F.D.); (M.K.); (C.D.); (C.N.); (M.S.); (M.L.); (J.L.); (C.H.)
| | - Max Lenz
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (R.S.); (F.H.); (F.D.); (M.K.); (C.D.); (C.N.); (M.S.); (M.L.); (J.L.); (C.H.)
| | - Jonghui Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (R.S.); (F.H.); (F.D.); (M.K.); (C.D.); (C.N.); (M.S.); (M.L.); (J.L.); (C.H.)
| | - Christian Loewe
- Department of Bioimiging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria;
| | - Christian Hengstenberg
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (R.S.); (F.H.); (F.D.); (M.K.); (C.D.); (C.N.); (M.S.); (M.L.); (J.L.); (C.H.)
| | - Julia Mascherbauer
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (R.S.); (F.H.); (F.D.); (M.K.); (C.D.); (C.N.); (M.S.); (M.L.); (J.L.); (C.H.)
| | - Andreas Kammerlander
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (R.S.); (F.H.); (F.D.); (M.K.); (C.D.); (C.N.); (M.S.); (M.L.); (J.L.); (C.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hashemi D, Doeblin P, Blum M, Weiss KJ, Schneider M, Beyer R, Pieske B, Duengen HD, Edelmann F, Kelle S. Reduced functional capacity is associated with the proportion of impaired myocardial deformation assessed in heart failure patients by CMR. Front Cardiovasc Med 2023; 10:1038337. [PMID: 36844739 PMCID: PMC9947709 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1038337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims Heart failure (HF) does not only reduce the life expectancy in patients, but their life is also often limited by HF symptoms leading to a reduced quality of life (QoL) and a diminished exercise capacity. Novel parameters in cardiac imaging, including both global and regional myocardial strain imaging, promise to contribute to better patient characterization and ultimately to better patient management. However, many of these methods are not part of clinical routine yet, their associations with clinical parameters have been poorly studied. An imaging parameters that also indicate the clinical symptom burden of HF patients would make cardiac imaging more robust toward incomplete clinical information and support the clinical decision process. Methods and results This prospective study conducted at two centers in Germany between 2017 and 2018 enrolled stable outpatient subjects with HF [n = 56, including HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), HF with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF), and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)] and a control cohort (n = 19). Parameters assessed included measures for external myocardial function, for example, cardiac index and myocardial deformation measurements by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging, left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS), the global circumferential strain (GCS), and the regional distribution of segment deformation within the LV myocardium, as well as basic phenotypical characteristics including the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) and the 6-minute walk test (6MWT). If less than 80% of the LV segments are preserved in their deformation capacity the functional capacity by 6MWT (6 minutes walking distance: MyoHealth ≥ 80%: 579.8 ± 177.6 m; MyoHealth 60-<80%: 401.3 ± 121.7 m; MyoHealth 40-<60%: 456.4 ± 68.9 m; MyoHealth < 40%: 397.6 ± 125.9 m, overall p-value: 0.03) as well as the symptom burden are significantly impaired (NYHA class: MyoHealth ≥ 80%: 0.6 ± 1.1 m; MyoHealth 60-<80%: 1.7 ± 1.2 m; MyoHealth 40-<60%: 1.8 ± 0.7 m; MyoHealth < 40%: 2.4 ± 0.5 m; overall p-value < 0.01). Differences were also observed in the perceived exertion assessed by on the Borg scale (MyoHealth ≥ 80%: 8.2 ± 2.3 m; MyoHealth 60-<80%: 10.4 ± 3.2 m; MyoHealth 40-<60%: 9.8 ± 2.1 m; MyoHealth < 40%: 11.0 ± 2.9 m; overall p-value: 0.20) as well as quality of life measures (MLHFQ; MyoHealth ≥ 80%: 7.5 ± 12.4 m; MyoHealth 60-<80%: 23.4 ± 23.4 m; MyoHealth 40-<60%: 20.5 ± 21.2 m; MyoHealth < 40%: 27.4 ± 24.4 m; overall p-value: 0.15)-while these differences were not significant. Conclusion The share of LV segments with preserved myocardial contraction promises to discriminate between symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects based on the imaging findings, even when the LV ejection fraction is preserved. This finding is promising to make imaging studies more robust toward incomplete clinical information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Djawid Hashemi
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany,Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, German Heart Institute Berlin, Berlin, Germany,German Centre for Cardiovascular Research, Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany,*Correspondence: Djawid Hashemi,
| | - Patrick Doeblin
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, German Heart Institute Berlin, Berlin, Germany,German Centre for Cardiovascular Research, Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Moritz Blum
- Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Karl Jakob Weiss
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, German Heart Institute Berlin, Berlin, Germany,German Centre for Cardiovascular Research, Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthias Schneider
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany,Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, German Heart Institute Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rebecca Beyer
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, German Heart Institute Berlin, Berlin, Germany,German Centre for Cardiovascular Research, Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Burkert Pieske
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany,Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, German Heart Institute Berlin, Berlin, Germany,German Centre for Cardiovascular Research, Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hans-Dirk Duengen
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany,Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, German Heart Institute Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frank Edelmann
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany,Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, German Heart Institute Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Kelle
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany,Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, German Heart Institute Berlin, Berlin, Germany,German Centre for Cardiovascular Research, Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|