Clinical study on the treatment of chronic heart failure with a novel D-shant atrium shunt device

Interventional therapies for chronic heart failure: An overview of recent developments

Heart failure (HF), the final manifestation of most cardiovascular diseases, has become a major global health concern, affecting millions of individuals. Despite basic drug treatments, patients present with high morbidity and mortality rates. However, recent advancements in interventional therapy have shown promising results in improving the prognosis of patients with HF. These advancements include transcatheter aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis, transcatheter mitral valve repair for chronic mitral regurgitation, neuromodulation therapy for multiple targets and measures in the treatment of chronic HF and left ventricular assist device implantation for advanced HF (Figure 1). In this review, we aimed to provide an overview of the current progress in interventional therapies for chronic HF.

Left Atrial Hemodynamics and Clinical Utility in Heart Failure

Comprehensive knowledge of the left atrium (LA) and its pathophysiology has emerged as an important clinical and research focus in the heart failure (HF) arena. Although studies on HF focusing on investigating left ventricular remodeling are numerous, those on atrial structural and functional changes have received comparatively less attention. Studies on LA remodeling have recently received increasing attention, and LA pressure (LAP) has become a novel target for advanced monitoring and is a potential therapeutic approach for treating HF. Various devices specifically designed for the direct measurement of LAP have been developed to optimize HF treatment by reducing LAP. This review focuses on LA hemodynamic monitoring and effective LAP decompression.

Interatrial Shunt Devices

Elevated left atrial pressure during exercise is a hallmark of heart failure (HF) and is associated with adverse left atrial remodeling and poor outcomes. To decompress the pressure-overloaded left atrium in patients with HF, several device-based approaches have been developed to create a permanent, pressure-dependent, left-to-right interatrial shunt. Such approaches are currently in various stages of investigations in both HF with reduced ejection fraction (EF) and HF with preserved EF. This review discusses the evolution of the concept of left atrial decompression and summarizes the current landscape of device-based approaches used for left atrial decompression.

Short-term study of atrial shunt and improvement of functional mitral regurgitation

BACKGROUND

This study used an atrial septal shunt to compare the treatment progress and prognosis for patients with heart failure (HF) who have different ejection fractions.

METHODS

Twenty HF patients with pulmonary hypertension, who required atrial septal shunt therapy, were included in this study. The patients underwent surgery between December 2012 and December 2020. They were divided into two groups based on their ejection fraction: a group with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and a group with preserved ejection fraction(HFpEF) + mid-range ejection fraction (HfmrEF). Echocardiography was utilized to evaluate parameters such as left ventricular dimension (LVD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV). Hemodynamic parameters were measured using cardiac catheterization. The patient's cardiac function was assessed using the six-minute walking test (6MWT), KCCQ score, NYHA classification, and the degree of functional mitral regurgitation (FMR). Followed-up visits were conducted at 1, 3, and 6 months, and any adverse effects were recorded.

RESULTS

The LVEF values were consistently higher in the HFpEF+HFmrEF group than HFrEF group at all periods (P < 0.05). Differences in LVD were observed between the two groups before the surgery. Statistically, significant differences were found at the preoperative stage, 1 month, and 3 months (P < 0.05, respectively). However, the LVEDV showed a significant difference between the two groups only at 3 months (P = 0.049). Notably, there were notable variations in LAPm, LAPs, and the pressure gradient between the LA-RA gradient at baeline, after implantation, and during the 6 months follow-up (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Following treatment, the HFpEF+HFmrEF group exhibited more significant improvements in echocardiographic and cardiac catheterization indices than the HFrEF group. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the 6MWT and KCCQ scores. It is important to note that the findings of this study still require further investigation in a large sample size of patients.

Is combined use of radiofrequency ablation and balloon dilation the future of interatrial communications?

INTRODUCTION

Personalized and stable interatrial communication is an important palliative therapy for patients with heart failure. However, this remains a technically challenging task.

AREAS COVERED

In the past decades, substantial advancements in atrial septostomy for the creation of controllable and durable interatrial communication have been made, and numerous novel devices and techniques are in various stages of development. In this review, we discuss the evolving indications for atrial septostomy, current approaches with or without device implantation, and indicators for optimal interatrial communication. The combined use of radiofrequency ablation and balloon dilation (CURB) is an individualized management approach based on underlying hemodynamics, which demonstrates unique advantages in creating a sufficient interatrial communication with satisfactory stability. The advantages and disadvantages of this implant-free procedure are analyzed and its clinical prospects are assessed.

EXPERT OPINION

With ready availability, high safety, and efficacy, CURB is a promising procedure for creating personalized and stable interatrial communication without device implantation. Further research is required to simplify the procedure, screen optimal reference parameters for personalized therapy, and evaluate the long-term outcome in a large population of patients.

Development of Innovative Biomaterials and Devices for the Treatment of Cardiovascular Diseases

Cardiovascular diseases have become the leading cause of death worldwide. The increasing burden of cardiovascular diseases has become a major public health problem and how to carry out efficient and reliable treatment of cardiovascular diseases has become an urgent global problem to be solved. Recently, implantable biomaterials and devices, especially minimally invasive interventional ones, such as vascular stents, artificial heart valves, bioprosthetic cardiac occluders, artificial graft cardiac patches, atrial shunts, and injectable hydrogels against heart failure, have become the most effective means in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Herein, an overview of the challenges and research frontier of innovative biomaterials and devices for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases is provided, and their future development directions are discussed.