Evaluation of the HFA-PEFF Score: results from the prospective DIAST-CHF cohort

Transition from asymptomatic to symptomatic systolic chronic heart failure: rationale and design of TransitionCHF

AIMS

Chronic systolic heart failure (CHF) is a major health burden. A relevant number of patients shows asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction (ALVSD) before symptomatic CHF or becomes asymptomatic after initiating heart failure therapy. Clinical course, prognosis, and response to pharmacological and device-based treatment are largely unknown in these two distinct groups of patients. Current pharmacological and interventional therapies do neither properly address the underlying pathophysiology nor prevent malignant loss of function. New therapeutic paradigms are needed to stop the progression from asymptomatic to symptomatic heart failure. Key questions are what causes progression of clinically asymptomatic New York Heart Association (NYHA) I heart failure to overt heart failure (>NYHA I) in some but not all patients and the underlying reasons for this transition. This requires the identification of disease mechanisms and biomarkers that predict outcome in well-defined cohorts for innovative preclinical and clinical trials.

METHODS AND RESULTS

TransitionCHF is a prospective, multicentre, longitudinal pathophysiological evaluation cohort study in patients with asymptomatic systolic dysfunction NYHA I and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%. The cohort comprises both incidental findings and patients who had become asymptomatic after a previous symptomatic event. TransitionCHF has recruited 1000 patients with ALVSD caused by various aetiologies in 20 university heart failure clinics across Germany. Both patients with and without comorbidities at study entry will be recruited. Patients will be systematically investigated and followed up annually over the course of the study. The primary composite endpoint is time to hospitalization for heart failure and cardiovascular death. The secondary endpoints assess time to all-cause mortality, to cardiovascular mortality, to heart failure mortality, to all-cause hospitalization, to heart failure hospitalization, and to recurrent heart failure hospitalizations, as well as time to assist device implantation/transplantation. Additional investigations focusing on biomarkers, comorbidities, gender aspects, nutrition, and functional parameters including quality of life will be performed.

CONCLUSIONS

TransitionCHF will provide a more thorough pathophysiological understanding of the progression of asymptomatic systolic dysfunction into symptomatic heart failure that will help develop therapies tailored to prevent progressive heart failure.

Tricuspid Regurgitation in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Important risk factors for the development of HFpEF are similar to risk factors for the progression of tricuspid regurgitation (TR), and both conditions frequently coexist and thus is a distinct phenotype or a marker for advanced HF. Many patients with severe, symptomatic atrial secondary TR have been enrolled in current transcatheter device trials, and may represent patients at an advanced stage of HFpEF. Management of HFpEF thus may affect the pathophysiology of TR, and the physiologic changes that occur following transcatheter treatment of TR, may also impact symptoms and outcomes in patients with HFpEF. This review discusses these issues and suggests possible management strategies for these patients.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment

The aetiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is heterogenous and overlaps with that of several comorbidities like atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, valvular heart disease, iron deficiency, or sarcopenia. The diagnosis of HFpEF involves evaluating cardiac dysfunction through imaging techniques and assessing increased left ventricular filling pressure, which can be measured directly or estimated through various proxies including natriuretic peptides. To better narrow down the differential diagnosis of HFpEF, European and American heart failure guidelines advocate the use of different algorithms including comorbidities that require diagnosis and rigorous treatment during the evaluation process. Therapeutic recommendations differ between guidelines. Whilst sodium glucose transporter 2 inhibitors have a solid evidence base, the recommendations differ with regard to the use of inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis. Unless indicated for specific comorbidities, the use of beta-blockers should be discouraged in HFpEF. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the current state of the art in HFpEF diagnosis, clinical evaluation, and treatment.

Exploration of the Potential Biomarker FNDC5 for Discriminating Heart Failure in Patients with Coronary Atherosclerosis

Coronary atherosclerosis leading to ischemic artery disease is one of the etiological factors to develop heart failure (HF). This study aimed to investigate potential biomarkers for discriminating HF in atherosclerotic patients. This study included 40 consecutive atherosclerotic patients who underwent angiography. Concentrations of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), fibronectin type III domain containing 5 (FNDC5), and Phosphodiesterase 9A (PDE9A) were measured in 20 atherosclerotic patients with HF symptoms/signs and 20 without HF symptoms/signs. Circulating BNP levels were elevated, while FNDC5 levels were reduced in atherosclerotic patients with HF symptoms/signs compared to those without HF symptoms/signs. Pearson correlation analysis showed a significant correlation between FNDC5 and BNP. Receiver Operating Characteristics analysis indicated that both FNDC5 and BNP were able to discriminate HF in atherosclerotic patients. Our findings suggest that FNDC5, along with BNP, has independent value as a biomarker for discriminating HF in patients with coronary atherosclerosis.

[Diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction]

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) currently causes about half of the heart failure related hospitalizations. With the aging of the population and increasing prevalence of risk factors and comorbidities, such as arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus and obesity, HFpEF prevalence is expected to increase as well. With regards to quality of life, overall morbidity, and mortality, HFpEF patients have a similarly adverse prognosis as patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. The leading symptoms of exertional dyspnea and exercise intolerance with concomitant clinical signs of heart failure should, therefore, prompt diagnostic tests to exclude or confirm HFpEF. Considering the main pathophysiological mechanisms, echocardiography is crucial to non-invasively identify signs of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, impaired myocardial relaxation, and elevated filling pressures. Elevated NT-proBNP may furthermore indicate increased LV wall stress and volume overload. If the results of these investigations are inconclusive, parameters of elevated filling pressures can be measured invasively by right or left heart catheterization. High pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) or left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) may confirm a HFpEF diagnosis. Ongoing studies are investigating potential distinct phenotypes within the HFpEF patient group.

Association of HFA-PEFF score with clinical outcomes after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

The Heart Failure Association Pretest assessment, echocardiography and natriuretic peptide, functional testing and final aetiology (HFA-PEFF) score has been developed for diagnosing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), which is frequently associated with atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to investigate whether preprocedural HFA-PEFF score could be used to predict clinical outcomes in patients with AF who underwent catheter ablation (CA).

METHODS

Overall, 1679 patients with AF who underwent primary CA (71±10 years, 1218 males (72.5%), median follow-up duration 3.3 years) from July 2011 to December 2019 were included in this retrospective study. HFpEF was defined as an HFA-PEFF score ≥5. The primary study outcome was 5-year major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), which is a composite of all-cause death, hospitalisation for heart failure (HF) and hospitalisation for stroke.

RESULTS

The prevalence of HFpEF was 32.3%, but only 7.7% were diagnosed with HF at the time of CHADS2 scoring. Five-year MACCE occurred in 77 patients (4.6%). The cumulative 5-year incidence of MACCE was significantly higher in the HFpEF group than in the non-HFpEF group (11.2% vs 4.8% at 5 years, p<0.001). In the multivariable analysis, HFpEF by the HFA-PEFF score was associated with MACCE (adjusted HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.65, p=0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

Early detection of HFpEF using the HFA-PEFF score may have clinical applications in guiding therapeutic decision-making and improving prognosis by preventing HF and stroke in patients with AF undergoing CA.

Comprehensive diagnostic workup in patients with suspected heart failure and preserved ejection fraction

Diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) can be challenging and it could require different tests, some of which are affected by limited availability. Nowadays, considering that new therapies are available for HFpEF and related conditions, a prompt and correct diagnosis is relevant. However, the diagnostic role of biomarker level, imaging tools, score-based algorithms and invasive evaluation, should be based on the strengths and weaknesses of each test. The aim of this review is to help the clinician in diagnosing HFpEF, overcoming the diagnostic uncertainty and disentangling among the different underlying causes, in order to properly treat this kind of patient.

Noninvasive evaluation of pulmonary artery stiffness in heart failure patients via cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Heart failure (HF) presents manifestations in both cardiac and vascular abnormalities. Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is prevalent in up 50% of HF patients. While pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is closely associated with pulmonary artery (PA) stiffness, the association of HF caused, post-capillary PH and PA stiffness is unknown. We aimed to assess and compare PA stiffness and blood flow hemodynamics noninvasively across HF entities and control subjects without HF using CMR. We analyzed data of a prospectively conducted study with 74 adults, including 55 patients with HF across the spectrum (20 HF with preserved ejection fraction [HFpEF], 18 HF with mildly-reduced ejection fraction [HFmrEF] and 17 HF with reduced ejection fraction [HFrEF]) as well as 19 control subjects without HF. PA stiffness was defined as reduced vascular compliance, indicated primarily by the relative area change (RAC), altered flow hemodynamics were detected by increased flow velocities, mainly by pulse wave velocity (PWV). Correlations between the variables were explored using correlation and linear regression analysis. PA stiffness was significantly increased in HF patients compared to controls (RAC 30.92 ± 8.47 vs. 50.08 ± 9.08%, p < 0.001). PA blood flow parameters were significantly altered in HF patients (PWV 3.03 ± 0.53 vs. 2.11 ± 0.48, p < 0.001). These results were consistent in all three HF groups (HFrEF, HFmrEF and HFpEF) compared to the control group. Furthermore, PA stiffness was associated with higher NT-proBNP levels and a reduced functional status. PA stiffness can be assessed non-invasively by CMR. PA stiffness is increased in HFrEF, HFmrEF and HFpEF patients when compared to control subjects.Trial registration The study was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS, registration number: DRKS00015615).

Value of the HFA-PEFF diagnostic algorithms for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction to the inflammatory myopathy population

OBJECTIVES

The HFA-PEFF score has been validated to hold great diagnostic and prognostic utility for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) is recognized as one of the potential etiologies underlying HFpEF. Here, we intended to investigate the real prevalence of HFpEF in IIM via the HFA-PEFF score and explore the prognostic value of this score.

METHODS

Two hundred twenty IIM patients were enrolled for assessment. The cohort was divided into low, intermediate and high tertiles of the HFA-PEFF score. Spearman's correlation analysis was used to explore the association between the score and disease activity. Chi-square test was applied to investigate the distribution discrepancy of HFA-PEFF tertiles among patients with different myositis-specific antibodies (MSAs) or myositis-associated antibodies (MAAs). Univariate and multivariate ordinal regression analyses were performed to screen risk factors for high HFA-PEFF scores. Survival curves were obtained using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests.

RESULTS

In total, 79 (35.9%), 107 (48.6%) and 34 (15.5%) patients were rated low, intermediate and high probability of HFpEF, respectively. The HFA-PEFF score correlated well with disease activity. Patients with positive AMA-M2 scored higher in the HFA-PEFF score (p = 0.011). During follow-up, patients with positive AMA-M2 or anti-SRP antibody developed an inclination towards concentric hypertrophy on echocardiography. Additionally, palpitation symptom, AMA-M2 positivity and elevated serum levels of LDH, cTnI were independent risk factors for high HFA-PEFF scores. Finally, a high-tertile HFA-PEFF score was related to lower overall survival rate (p < 0.001). Patients with positive AMA-M2 had poorer outcomes (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

HFpEF was prevailing in IIM patients according to the HFA-PEFF score. The HFA-PEFF score correlated well with disease activity and held significant prognostic value. Patients with AMA-M2 antibody were prone to have poor outcomes.

CMR detects decreased myocardial deformation in asymptomatic patients at risk for heart failure

Aims

The main management strategy of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is prevention since HFpEF is associated with many cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, especially since HFpEF is linked to a high risk for both mortality and recurrent heart failure (HF) hospitalizations. Therefore, there is a need for new tools to identify patients with a high risk profile early. Regional strain assessment by CMR seems to be superior in describing deformation impairment in HF. The MyoHealth score is a promising tool to identify cardiac changes early.

Methods and results

Heart failure patients irrespective of LVEF and asymptomatic controls were recruited, and CMR based measures were obtained. For this analysis the asymptomatic control group (n = 19) was divided into asymptomatic subjects without CV co-morbidities or evidence of cardiac abnormalities and (n = 12) and asymptomatic subjects with CV co-morbidities or evidence of cardiac abnormalities (n = 7) as well as patients with HFpEF (n = 19). We performed CMR scans at rest and during a stress test using isometric handgrip exercise (HG). Assessing the MyoHealth score at rest revealed preserved regional strain in 85 ± 9% of LV segments in controls, 73 ± 11% in at Risk subjects and 73 ± 8% in HFpEF patients. During stress the MyoHealth score was 84 ± 7% in controls, 83 ± 7 in at risk subjects and 74 ± 11 in HFpEF patients.

Conclusion

In summary, we show for the first time that asymptomatic subjects with increased CV risk present with HFpEF like impaired myocardial deformation at rest, while they show results like controls under HG stress. The potential of preventive treatment in this group of patients merits further investigation in future.

Clinical trial registration

[https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00015615], identifier [DRKS00015615].